logo
Hong Kong home prices snap falling streak in April

Hong Kong home prices snap falling streak in April

Business Times28-05-2025

[HONG KONG] Hong Kong's home prices ended four months of decline and edged up in April, government figures showed on Wednesday (May 28), as falling mortgage rates helped lift buying sentiment.
Private home prices rose 0.4 per cent in April from the month before, following a revised 0.3 per cent fall in March, data from the Rating and Valuation Department showed.
The prices have dropped 1.2 per cent so far this year to their lowest level since 2016.
Home prices in Hong Kong, one of the world's most unaffordable cities, have tumbled nearly 30 per cent from a 2021 peak, hurt by higher mortgage rates, a weak economic outlook, and poor demand as many professionals have left the territory.
Authorities tried to prop up the sector last year, lifting all curbs on property purchases and relaxing down payment ratios, but housing demand has remained soft.
Realtors forecast home prices in 2025 could rise or fall by 5 per cent, depending on the pace of official rate cuts and the severity of trade tensions between China and the United States.
Eddie Kwok, executive director of real estate consultancy CBRE, said if the interbank rate continues to fall, the residential property market may see a recovery as it may cost less to repay mortgage as compared to rent.
One-month Hong Kong dollar interbank rate Hibor, which many of the mortgage plans are linked to, hit a fresh three-year low this week, making mortgage rates more affordable for home buyers. REUTERS

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield
China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

China's rare earth weapon changes contours of trade war battlefield

BEIJING - China has signalled for more than 15 years that it was looking to weaponise areas of the global supply chain, a strategy modelled on longstanding American export controls Beijing views as aimed at stalling its rise. The scramble in recent weeks to secure export licences for rare earths, capped by Thursday's telephone call between U.S. and Chinese leaders Donald Trump and Xi Jinping, shows China has devised a better, more precisely targeted weapon for trade war. Industry executives and analysts say while China is showing signs of approving more exports of the key elements, it will not dismantle its new system. Modelled on the United States' own, Beijing's export licence system gives it unprecedented insight into supplier chokepoints in areas ranging from motors for electric vehicles to flight-control systems for guided missiles. "China originally took inspiration for these export control methods from the comprehensive U.S. sanctions regime," said Zhu Junwei, a scholar at the Grandview Institution, a Beijing-based think tank focused on international relations. "China has been trying to build its own export control systems since then, to be used as a last resort." After Thursday's call, Trump said both leaders had been "straightening out some of the points, having to do mostly with rare earth magnets and some other things". He did not say whether China committed to speeding up licences for exports of rare earth magnets, after Washington curbed exports of chip design software and jet engines to Beijing in response to its perceived slow-rolling on licences. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in EV motors. In April it added some of the most sophisticated types to an export control list in its trade war with the United States, forcing all exporters to apply to Beijing for licences. That put a once-obscure department of China's commerce ministry, with a staff of about 60, in charge of a chokepoint for global manufacturing. The ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters' questions sent by fax. Several European auto suppliers shut down production lines this week after running out of supplies. While China's April curbs coincided with a broader package of retaliation against Washington's tariffs, the measures apply globally. "Beijing has a degree of plausible deniability – no one can prove China is doing this on purpose," said Noah Barkin, senior adviser at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. thinktank. "But the rate of approvals is a pretty clear signal that China is sending a message, exerting pressure to prevent trade negotiations with the U.S. leading to additional technology control." China mines about 70% of the world's rare earths but has a virtual monopoly on refining and processing. Even if the pace of export approvals quickens as Trump suggested, the new system gives Beijing unprecedented glimpses of how companies in a supply chain deploy the rare earths it processes, European and U.S. executives have warned. Other governments are denied that insight because of the complexity of supply chain operations. For example, hundreds of Japanese suppliers are believed to need China to approve export licences for rare earth magnets in coming weeks to avert production disruptions, said a person who has lobbied on their behalf with Beijing. "It's sharpening China's scalpel," said a U.S.-based executive at a company seeking to piece together an alternative supply chain who sought anonymity. "It's not a way to oversee the export of magnets, but a way to gain influence and advantage over America." DECADES IN THE MAKING Fears that China could weaponise its global supply chain strength first emerged after its temporary ban of rare earth exports to Japan in 2010, following a territorial dispute. As early as 1992, former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping was quoted as saying, "The Middle East has oil, China has rare earths." Beijing's landmark 2020 Export Control Law broadened curbs to cover any items affecting national security, from critical goods and materials to technology and data. China has since built its own sanctions power while pouring the equivalent of billions of dollars into developing workarounds in response to U.S. policies. In 2022, the United States put sweeping curbs on sales of advanced semiconductor chips and tools to China over concerns the technology could advance Beijing's military power. But the move failed to halt China's development of advanced chips and artificial intelligence, analysts have said. Beijing punched back a year later by introducing export licenses for gallium and germanium, and some graphite products. Exports to the United States of the two critical minerals, along with germanium, were banned last December. In February China restricted exports of five more metals key to the defence and clean energy industries. Analysts face a hard task in tracking the pace of China's approvals following the Trump-Xi call. "It's virtually impossible to know what percentage of requests for non-military end users get approved because the data is not public and companies don't want to publicly confirm either way," said Cory Combs, a critical minerals analyst with Trivium, a policy consultancy focused on China. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions
New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions

New EU-Ukraine agri trade quotas to be 'in between' current deal and wartime exemptions BRUSSELS - The European Union and Ukraine are negotiating a new deal that will set import quotas on agricultural goods from Ukraine somewhere "in between" current levels and the temporary exemptions granted after Russia's 2022 invasion, the EU's agriculture commissioner told Reuters. The EU temporarily waived duties and quotas on agricultural products in June 2022 after Russia's full-scale invasion to help Ukraine compensate for the higher costs of its exports, after Russia threatened its traditional Black Sea shipping lanes. Those tariff suspensions expired on Thursday. The EU and Ukraine reverted to the pre-war regime of trade quotas on Friday, while the two sides negotiate a new longer-term deal. "What will be negotiated will be something in between the quotas under the existing DCFTA and the autonomous trade measures, the volumes that have been exported there," EU agriculture commissioner Christophe Hansen said in an interview with Reuters on Thursday. The DCFTA refers to Ukraine and the EU's pre-war trade deal. The EU's "autonomous trade measures" temporarily suspended quotas on Ukrainian imports from 2022. Ukraine's farm minister Vitaliy Koval told Reuters this week that Kyiv was pushing for an agreement on higher quotas than it had before the war. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Musk signals he's open to cooling off period in Trump feud
Musk signals he's open to cooling off period in Trump feud

Straits Times

time3 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Musk signals he's open to cooling off period in Trump feud

Just May 30, US President Donald Trump staged an event for Mr Elon Musk in the Oval Office, celebrating his tenure and thanking him. PHOTO: REUTERS Mr Elon Musk signalled he would move to cool tensions with US President Donald Trump, after differences between the two exploded June 5 into an all-out public feud. Earlier in the day, Mr Musk called for Mr Trump's impeachment and insinuated he was withholding the release of files related to disgraced New York financier Jeffrey Epstein because of his own presence in them. Mr Trump, in turn, proposed cutting off the billionaire's government contracts, following his onetime adviser's repeated exhortations for Republicans to vote against the president's signature tax legislation. Mr Musk's olive branch came after Tesla Inc shares tanked 14 per cent and his personal wealth dropped by US$34 billion (S$43.7 billion). That might not encompass the full hit since it doesn't reflect any damage to the value of his private enterprises such as Space Exploration Technologies Corp, popularly known as SpaceX. On June 5, hours after saying he would end use of SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, Mr Musk reversed course and signalled there could be a cooling-off period between Mr Trump and the world's richest man. 'This is a shame this back and forth. You are both better than this. Cool off and take a step back for a couple days,' an X user who had just 200 followers on the platform wrote in reply to Mr Musk's post about Dragon. 'Good advice,' Mr Musk responded. 'Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' In a separate reply to billionaire Bill Ackman, an ally of both Mr Trump and Mr Musk who said they should 'make peace for the benefit of our great country', Mr Musk responded: 'You're not wrong.' The acrimonious back-and-forth between Mr Musk and Mr Trump represented a remarkable falling out among two men who spent months working together to reshape the federal government. It also left Republican lawmakers in the awkward position of choosing sides between Mr Musk, who has quickly become a key financial backer for the party's political efforts, and Mr Trump, the singular political force who has reshaped the party in his image. At the same time, several people in the party with ties to both Mr Trump and Mr Musk tried to find a quick off-ramp for hostilities and clear a pathway to peace. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that 'policy differences shouldn't be personal' and called Mr Musk a friend as he addressed reporters June 5. White House aides have scheduled a call with Mr Musk for June 6 in an effort to take down the temperature, Politico reported. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment late June 5 night on a potential cooling-off. 'Make My Day' The dispute over the GOP tax legislation devolved into personal bickering when Mr Musk called Mr Trump an ingrate and suggested the president would have never won the election without his help. Mr Trump responded by threatening a main source of the billionaire's wealth. Mr Musk's Tesla Inc and SpaceX have benefited from federal contracts and subsidies. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Mr Trump wrote to his social media site. Ending contracts with Mr Musk's companies could prove legally and practically unwieldy, given that they are deeply intertwined with US space and defense operations. The Dragon spacecraft carries crew and cargo to and from the International Space Station. Total revenue for SpaceX and Tesla from federal unclassified contracts since fiscal year 2000 is US$22.5 billion, according to Bloomberg Government data. 'Go ahead, make my day,' Mr Musk posted on X in response to Mr Trump's threat. Later, he responded 'yes' to a Twitter user's suggestion Mr Trump be impeached and replaced by Vice-President J.D. Vance and argued that the president's tariff regime would tip the country into a recession by the end of the year. Mr Musk also needled Mr Trump over his past relationship with Jeffery Epstein. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Mr Musk wrote. The White House declined to comment on the Epstein accusation. Mr Trump said Mr Musk's opposition to the Bill was rooted in a provision that would scale back electric vehicle tax credits that benefited Tesla. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!,' Mr Trump posted. Mr Musk responded that Mr Trump's claim he was asked to leave was 'such an obvious lie' and 'so sad'. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot,' Mr Trump said earlier during an Oval Office meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. 'He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next.' In a remarkable scene, Mr Musk rebuked Mr Trump in real time, firing off rebuttals on social media as the president spoke. 'Such ingratitude,' Mr Musk posted, citing his financial support for Republicans during the 2024 election. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Mr Musk even floated the idea of creating a new political party 'that actually represents the 80 per cent in the middle'. Mr Musk denied that motivation in a post on X, saying he was fine with reducing the EV credits if lawmakers 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill'. The public display unleashed a new torrent of criticism from long-time Trump supporters who had greeted Mr Musk's appearance with weary suspicion. Former Trump aide Steve Bannon told the New York Times that the US should launch an investigation into the immigration status of Mr Musk, a naturalised citizen. 'I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately,' Mr Bannon told the newspaper. Since leaving government, Mr Musk has criticised the Republican package – Mr Trump's 'one big, beautiful Bill,' as he calls it – because it is forecast to add to the US budget deficit. The legislation would eliminate a credit worth as much as US$7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of 2025, seven years ahead of schedule. That would cause a roughly US$1.2 billion hit to Tesla's full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts. 'I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this Bill better than almost anybody sitting here,' the president said. 'All of the sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed a problem when he found out we're going to have to the cut the EV mandate.' Mr Musk, in another retort, said he was not aware of the details. 'This Bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he said in a post on X. The pair have also clashed over Mr Trump's decision to withdraw the nomination of Mr Musk associate Jared Isaacman to lead the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Mr Trump said he pulled back the choice after learning of Mr Isaacman's past support for Democrats. 'I didn't think it was appropriate,' Mr Trump said. 'He wanted that person, a certain person, and we said no.' The exchange is the latest in what has been a relatively swift break with Mr Musk, who served as a Special Government Employee overseeing cost-cutting efforts before leaving. Just May 30, Mr Trump staged an event for Mr Musk in the Oval Office, celebrating his tenure and thanking him. Mr Trump recalled that in the June 5 meeting with Mr Merz, poinring out that Mr Musk was sporting a black eye at the time. 'I said do you want a little make-up? We'll get you a little make-up, but he said 'no, I don't think so,' which is interesting and very nice,' Mr Trump said June 5. 'He wants to be who he is.' BLOOMBERG More on this Topic Black eye? That's just from my son, says Elon Musk Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store