Fight over Saskatchewan school pronoun law to resume in court Monday
A judge ruled last year that the court challenge could continue, despite the government's use of the notwithstanding clause.
The law, which came into force in 2023, requires parental consent if children under 16 want to change their names or pronouns at school.
Lawyers for the LGBTQ+ group UR Pride brought forward the challenge, arguing the law causes irreparable harm to gender diverse youth and its case should move ahead.
The government has argued its use of the notwithstanding clause to bring the law into force should end the court challenge.
Nearly a dozen groups intervened in the appeal, including the government of Alberta, which argued in favour of Saskatchewan.
Story continues below advertisement
1:41
UR Pride fights Saskatchewan's pronoun law
Alberta passed a law last year requiring students 15 and younger have parental consent to change their names or pronouns. Students 16 and 17 don't need consent but their parents have to be notified.
Get weekly health news
Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
New Brunswick also had a pronoun policy but Premier Susan Holt revised it after she was elected in 2024.
UR Pride amended its challenge and argues Saskatchewan's law violates Section 12 of the Charter, which is the right to be free from cruel and unusual treatment. The province cited other sections when it invoked the notwithstanding clause.
Former Justice Minister Bronwyn Eyre said last year the Saskatchewan Party government wouldn't hesitate to use the notwithstanding clause again.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
8 minutes ago
- Global News
European leaders, Zelenskyy set to talk with Trump ahead of Putin summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday arrived in Berlin for talks with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and virtual meetings with other European and U.S. leaders ahead of a planned summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin later this week. Merz has convened a series of virtual meetings for Wednesday in an attempt to have the voice of European and Ukraine's leaders heard ahead of the summit in Alaska, where Trump and Putin are expected to discuss a path toward ending Moscow's war in Ukraine. Zelenskyy and the Europeans have been sidelined from that summit. German government spokesperson Steffen Meyer said the intention of Wednesday's meetings was to 'make clear the position of the Europeans.' Zelenskyy is due to meet with European leaders first, in preparation for a virtual call with Trump and Vice President JD Vance about an hour later. A call between leaders of countries involved in the 'coalition of the willing' — those who are prepared to help police any future peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv — will take place last. Story continues below advertisement The Ukrainian leader on Wednesday said his government has had over 30 conversations with partners ahead of the summit in Alaska, but reiterated his doubt that Putin would negotiate in good faith. Writing on his official Telegram channel, Zelenskyy said there was 'currently no sign that the Russians are preparing to end the war,' and urged Ukraine's partners in the United States and Europe to coordinate efforts and 'force Russia to peace.' 'Pressure must be applied on Russia for an honest peace. We must take the experience of Ukraine and our partners to prevent deception by Russia,' Zelenskyy said. The stakes for Europe Trump has said he wants to see whether Putin is serious about ending the war, now in its fourth year, describing Friday's summit as 'a feel-out meeting' where he can assess the Russian leader's intentions. Story continues below advertisement Yet Trump has disappointed allies in Europe by saying Ukraine will have to give up some Russian-held territory. He has also said Russia must accept land swaps, although it was unclear what Putin might be expected to surrender. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy European allies have pushed for Ukraine's involvement in any peace talks, fearful that discussions that exclude Kyiv could otherwise favor Moscow. 1:55 Trump keeps expectations low for Ukraine talks with Putin Trump on Monday ducked repeated chances to say that he would push for Zelenskyy to take part in his discussions with Putin, and was dismissive of Zelenskyy and his need to be part of an effort to seek peace. Trump said that following Friday's summit, a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders could be arranged, or that it could also be a meeting with 'Putin and Zelenskyy and me.' The Europeans and Ukraine are wary that Putin, who has waged the biggest land war in Europe since 1945 and used Russia's energy might to try to intimidate the European Union, might secure favorable concessions and set the outlines of a peace deal without them. Story continues below advertisement The overarching fear of many European countries is that Putin will set his sights on one of them next if he wins in Ukraine. Land concessions a non-starter for Kyiv Zelenskyy said Tuesday that Putin wants Ukraine to withdraw from the remaining 30 per cent of the Donetsk region that it still controls as part of a ceasefire deal, a proposal the leader categorically rejected. Zelenskyy reiterated that Ukraine would not give up any territory it controls, saying that would be unconstitutional and would serve only as a springboard for a future Russian invasion. He said diplomatic discussions led by the U.S. focusing on ending the war have not addressed key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations. 2:13 Trump says Putin 'very respectful' for coming to Alaska to talk Ukraine peace deal Three weeks after Trump returned to office, his administration took the leverage of Ukraine's NATO membership off the table — something that Putin has demanded — and signaled that the EU and Ukraine must handle security in Europe now while America focuses its attention elsewhere. Story continues below advertisement Senior EU officials believe that Trump may be satisfied with simply securing a ceasefire in Ukraine, and is probably more interested in broader U.S. geostrategic interests and great power politics, aiming to ramp up business with Russia and rehabilitate Putin. Russian advances in Donbas Russian forces on the ground in Ukraine have been closing in on a key territorial grab around the city of Pokrovsk, in the eastern Donbas region comprises Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland that Putin has long coveted. Military analysts using open-source information to monitor the battles have said Ukraine's ability to fend off those advances could be critical: Losing Pokrovsk would hand Russia an important victory ahead of the summit and could complicate Ukrainian supply lines to the Donetsk region, where the Kremlin has focused the bulk of military efforts. Meanwhile, Ukrainian forces struck an oil pumping station in Russia's Bryansk region overnight on Wednesday, according to a statement from Ukraine's General Staff. Story continues below advertisement Ukrainian drones struck the Unecha station which supplies the Russian army, the statement said, adding that damage and a large fire was reported in the area around the pumping station. Unecha transports oil to two pipelines with an annual capacity to pump 60 million tons. The operation was carried out by units of the Unmanned Systems Forces of Ukraine's army and the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Defense Ministry, the statement said. —Cook reported from Brussels. Associated Press writer Samya Kullab in Kyiv, Ukraine contributed.
Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Doug Ford teases new details of Ontario's $5B tariff response plan
Ontario Premier Doug Ford's government appears poised to announce details of how it will bail out tariff-hit businesses as opposition politicians demand a cohesive and urgent plan. On Wednesday morning, Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy is scheduled to hold a news conference alongside Vic Fedeli, the trade minister. At an unrelated event the day before, Ford appeared to tease details of what the pair would unveil. 'We're releasing another $5 billion. I think we're going to start a billion tomorrow and then just keep adding,' the premier said in Windsor, Ont. 'We're going to focus on helping small businesses, we're going to really focus on the auto sector and the steel sector, they're the ones that are really getting hit the hardest. So we're rolling out the money — and I won't hesitate to keep rolling it out.' Story continues below advertisement Ford appeared to be referencing the $5 billion Protecting Ontario Account, which was announced as part of his government's 2025 election platform and the budget that followed. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy When it was announced, the government's financial blueprint explained that the Protecting Ontario Account was designed to work together with tariff measures introduced by the federal government. It would include 'up to $1 billion in immediate liquidity relief aimed at protecting Ontario businesses and workers facing significant tariff-related business disruptions,' the budget said. Officials described it as 'an emergency backstop for Ontario businesses that have exhausted available funding.' Despite announcing the fund as part of its budget in May, the government has provided few details of how it will work and whether it has been used, even as tariffs bite. United States President Donald Trump has had levies in place for some time on Canadian steel and aluminum, also adding 35 per cent tariffs on all goods not covered by a trade deal between the two countries at the beginning of August. Opposition politicians said the Ford government was taking too long to stimulate the economy. 'Our economy is already taking a big hit with Trump's most recent tariff hike on all Canadian goods to 35 per cent,' NDP MPP Catherine Fife said in a statement. Story continues below advertisement 'Despite growing economic uncertainty and ongoing job losses, we still don't have a plan from the Premier to protect workers and create good jobs. In order to weather this 'Trump Storm,' we must strategically invest in our auto sector and fight to keep these good, stable jobs in Ontario.'
Global News
3 hours ago
- Global News
Developer's proposed route change for Hwy. 413 would have further delayed project
Long before the Ford government scrapped a 'developer-proposed' realignment of Highway 413, the premier was warned that rerouting the expressway would lead to significant delays and a cascading impact on other nearby projects. A confidential government briefing, obtained by Global News, outlines a major alteration to the highway's current route in Caledon to avoid two properties that are currently slated for housing development. To accommodate those properties, owned by developer Nick Cortellucci, the government considered realigning the highway up to 600 metres and moving or eliminating the Chinguacousy Road interchange altogether. 'As is standard practice in the development of major government infrastructure projects, this proposal — along with others submitted by municipal officials, landowners, utility companies, and the public — was brought forward for review by our engineering and technical teams,' a government spokesperson said in a statement. Story continues below advertisement A digital map of the proposed alteration was laid out in an official Government of Ontario slide deck — part of a briefing presentation for the premier — and included the new route drawn in red, along with a legend that called it a 'developer proposed realignment.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The same briefing document came with multiple warnings that changing the route, which has been studied since 2002, would require additional 'evaluation, fieldwork, consultation and preliminary design' work that would set the highway back by at least one year. Any late-stage decision to realign the highway, according to the document, would have triggered a review of the 'overall project phasing strategy' and would have required legislative changes to the Highway 413 act since the 'new route is outside of the defined study area.' Shifting the highway would have also impacted other road construction projects, housing developments, regional utility projects and even energy infrastructure planned for the area — triggering a divide within government over the long-term consequences and potential derailing of Ford's signature project. Among the items that would have been impacted: Highway 10: Early works construction contracts on the Highway 10 underpass and road resurfacing would be impacted Highway 410: Construction to extend Hwy. 410 to connect to the 413 would be 'delayed up to two years' Local roads: Advance construction on Kennedy, Dixie and Old School roads would be 'delayed up to two years' Peel Region: Three Peel utility projects would be delayed which, in turn, would 'delay housing starts' in the area Energy corridor: The North West GTA Transmission Corridor, which is slated to run parallel to the 413 in Caledon, would require 'review and possible redesign.' While it's unclear what changed and when, the premier's office told Global News the plan is no longer under consideration. Story continues below advertisement 'There are no anticipated changes to the previously approved highway alignment, of which 90 per cent of the construction design work is complete, with all major structures, interchanges and crossings determined,' a spokesperson said. Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said the process and consideration raised questions about who could influence the premier. 'Communities calling for real infrastructure investments are brushed aside. But when a well-connected friend asks, the Premier is ready to move mountains — or highways,' she said in a statement. 'This latest revelation raises serious questions about the motivations behind this government's multi-billion-dollar decisions. Ontarians deserve to know if the premier is wasting their hard-earned tax dollars on developer favours and pet projects.'
