logo
Subsurface Sea Mud Is The Unsung Hero In The Climate War

Subsurface Sea Mud Is The Unsung Hero In The Climate War

Forbes25-05-2025

Old growth forests usually get a lion's share of the credit for their role in sequestering Earth's atmospheric carbon. But subsurface sea mud is finally coming into its own as the potential unsung hero in the climate change wars.
Trouble is, oceanographers don't really have a full handle on when and how these important mud deposits formed, much less how they can be fully protected. To answer such questions, researchers from the U.K. are focusing on three subsurface sea mud sites that date back thousands of years. All lie on what is known as the Northwest European Shelf, a shallow continental shelf area in the Northeast Atlantic.
Continental shelf sediments are really important for storing organic carbon over an enormous area, Zoe Roseby, a sedimentologist at the U.K.'s University of Exeter in Penryn, tells me at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2025 in Vienna. We've produced a model that has the capacity to predict the location of muddy deposits and consider how they've evolved over time, she says. We can then can identify potential hotspots of carbon storage, says Roseby.
In fact, in a recent paper published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, the authors note that three mud centers in the northwest European shelf seas are all effectively sequestering carbon.
There are potentially hundreds of kilometers of such mud at depths of tens of meters, which is effectively helping sequester carbon, says Roseby, one of the paper's co-authors. They're a really important part of our global carbon cycle, she says.
The Celtic Deep is in what we call the Celtic Sea, and that is offshore southeast of Ireland and southwest of Cornwall in the U.K., Sophie Ward, the paper's lead author and an oceanographer at Bangor University in the U.K., tells me at the European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2025 in Vienna. The Western Irish Sea mud belt is in the northwestern Irish Sea, which is in a semi enclosed body of water between mainland of the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, and Great Britain, she says.
In the Celtic Deep, most mud accumulation has occurred in the past 10,000 years, with earlier tidal conditions too energetic for fine sediment deposition, the authors write. The Fladen Ground --- located some 160 km north of Aberdeen, Scotland, appears to have been tidally quiescent since the region was fully submerged some 17,000 years ago, they note.
Muds are important because they have a greater capacity to store organic carbon than sands and gravels, says Roseby.
But here's where there is an important distinction.
The formation of organic carbon in the marine environment has the potential to draw down carbon dioxide from Earth's atmosphere (a carbon sink), says Ward.
The same cannot be said for inorganic carbon.
Organic carbon on the seafloor is derived from both terrestrial and marine sources of living (or once living) matter, whereas the inorganic carbon in the sedimentary environment is largely made up of broken shells and skeletons. The latter (mostly calcium carbonate) can have a very negative impact on the ecosphere by releasing CO2 from the marine environment back into our atmosphere. This is why these precious sea muds are so important.
But what is subsurface sea mud?
Mud is any sediment that's less than 63 microns; the scientific cut off between mud and sand, says Roseby. Sand grains larger than 63 microns is what you're seeing on the beach, she says.
How does this mud build up over time?
Muds have this capacity to form very thick deposits which can then store quite large volumes of carbon, says Roseby. It's a combination of the surface area of the muds, but there's also a tendency to form thick deposits that makes them important for carbon storage, she says.
Thousands of years ago, when the shelf seas were a lot shallower because so much water was locked into ice sheets in some areas, the tidal dynamics were very different to what they are now, says Ward. Over time, the water depth has changed and the configuration of the land, the shapes of the shelf seas have changed massively, she says.
It's important that we know where these muddy deposits are, so that we can quantify carbon stocks, says Ward. But going out and sampling these muddy deposits can be a very expensive research campaign; expensive ships and large coring equipment is required, with lots of post-sampling analysis in the labs, she says.
As for the biggest threat to this subsurface mud?
That's probably trawling for shrimp on the sea bottom, says Ward. So, it's really important that we understand exactly what's going on when these muddy deposits are trawled and the potential effects for carbon that is stored and locked up in these muddy deposits, she says.
Like most mud deposits around the U.K., the Celtic Deep is intensively trawled for Nephrops prawns in a fishery that grew rapidly from the 1970s, the authors note.
The Fladen Ground, a heavily trawled and organic carbon‐rich area, was highlighted as experiencing relatively high losses of organic carbon, the authors write.
The shrimp burrow into the mud which they use as a habitat, but the act of trawling itself causes significant amounts of the sequestered carbon to be released.
In the future, we hope that sediments considered worthy of protection will go hand in hand with protecting subsurface habitat and living marine biology, says Roseby.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out
Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out

"It's a big deal for this government," says Simon Case. "It's the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto. "This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: 'This is what we're about'." As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021. On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government's priorities for the next three years. But it's unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it's really about. Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments. Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash - setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire. This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government's priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called "challenge panels" of independent experts. It's clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS - with a boost of up to £30bn expected - and to increase defence spending. On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding "£86bn boost" to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment. We're told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return. But the headline figure is misleading. . That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it's a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated. Read More: Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift - but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of , and the promised uplift in teachers' pay. In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners. We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions - but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze. We've heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government's crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils. The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she's sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects. That's why we've seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she's spending on regional transport projects. The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we'll hear more in the coming days. But there's a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out - and the promises which could slip as a result.

Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out
Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out

"It's a big deal for this government," says Simon Case. "It's the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto. "This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: 'This is what we're about'." As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021. On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government's priorities for the next three years. But it's unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it's really about. Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments. Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash - setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire. This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government's priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called "challenge panels" of independent experts. It's clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS - with a boost of up to £30bn expected - and to increase defence spending. On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding "£86bn boost" to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment. We're told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return. But the headline figure is misleading. . That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it's a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated. Read More: Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift - but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of , and the promised uplift in teachers' pay. In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners. We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions - but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze. We've heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government's crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils. The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she's sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects. That's why we've seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she's spending on regional transport projects. The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we'll hear more in the coming days. But there's a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out - and the promises which could slip as a result.

Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'
Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Researchers issue urgent warning over increasingly powerful threat to coastal communities: 'When it happens, it's going to be worse'

Coastal communities are experiencing excessive flooding — a form of extreme weather — at alarming new rates, and scientists are sounding the alarm about wildly insufficient infrastructure in low-lying urban areas. Researchers from UC Santa Cruz and the United States Geological Survey teamed up to identify novel flood mitigation strategies, citing an urgent need to shore up coastlines, and their joint findings were published in the journal Scientific Reports. "By 2050, the coastal flooding from extreme storms we currently consider once-in-a-lifetime events could occur every other year due to sea level rise," said in their coverage of the study. "Further, the flooding expected today from a once-in-a-lifetime event could occur daily by the end of the century." Coastal habitats like marshes and coral reefs "have been shown to effectively mitigate flood risk," but decades of development eroded those natural protections. "We've built cities and communities and our world under the assumption that these habitats will continue to protect us," explained lead author Rae Taylor-Burns, "and yet we degrade them." Researchers explored horizontal levees to mitigate flood risk in the San Francisco Bay area and found they were up to 30% more effective than traditional levees at mitigating flood risk. Coastal flooding has always occurred, but rising temperatures have made these extreme events more frequent and more deadly. Climate tech investor and journalist Molly Wood has said that "climate isn't weather, and weather isn't climate," likening human-influenced climate impacts to "steroids for weather." "Whatever was already going to happen, like droughts, floods, fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, heat waves, snowstorms, rain — all that is still going to happen," Wood explained. "But when it happens, it's going to be worse." Echoing the study's researchers, she continued. "Also, extreme versions of what used to be normal weather are going to happen more often." Do you think your city has good air quality? Definitely Somewhat Depends on the time of year Not at all Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. According to Climate Central, the "annual frequency of high tide flooding in the U.S. has more than doubled since 2000 — and is projected to more than triple again by 2050 as sea levels continue to rise." Around 30% of Americans live near a coastline, foregrounding an imminent need to identify accessible flood mitigation strategies and make coastal communities more resilient. Actions like installing solar panels are one way to ensure your home is more resilient in the face of natural disasters that could knock out infrastructure — and EnergySage not only offers quotes from trusted local installers, but can also save consumers up to $10,000 on new solar installations. Getting your power from the sun also helps to avoid contributing to the type of pollution that leads to increasing global temperatures. At the study's conclusion, researchers cited previously published findings that supported nature-based flood defenses for both efficacy and costs. They noted that structural properties like vegetation "could reduce levee investment cost by $320 billion on a global scale," adding that previous research "suggests that restoring marsh habitat in front of seawalls" could be far less costly than raising seawalls. "Horizontal levees could be a less expensive way to reduce the risk of levee failure with climate change, as opposed to increasing the height of the levees themselves," Taylor-Burns remarked. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store