logo
Washington Takes Aim at DeepSeek and Its American Chip Supplier, Nvidia

Washington Takes Aim at DeepSeek and Its American Chip Supplier, Nvidia

New York Times16-04-2025

Two months after DeepSeek, China's artificial intelligence star, rattled Washington and shook Wall Street, U.S. officials are taking steps to crack down on the Chinese start-up and its support from America's leading chip maker, Nvidia.
The Trump administration this week moved to restrict Nvidia's sale of A.I. chips to China. It also is weighing penalties that would block DeepSeek from buying U.S. technology and debating barring Americans' access to its services, said three people with knowledge of the actions who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Congressional leaders are also putting pressure on Nvidia. On Wednesday, the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party, which focuses on national security threats from China, opened an investigation into Nvidia's sale of chips across Asia. It is trying to assess whether the U.S. chipmaker knowingly provided DeepSeek with critical technology to develop A.I., potentially in violation of U.S. rules.
It is the first Congressional investigation into Nvidia's business. It comes as the Trump administration wrestles with how to implement a Biden-era rule that limits the number of A.I. chips that companies can send to different countries.
The attacks on DeepSeek and Nvidia are an outgrowth of fear in Washington that China could leapfrog the United States in A.I., which would have wide-ranging implications for national security and geopolitics. If China took the lead, it could more quickly use A.I. systems to design next-generation weapons like autonomous missiles and drones. It also could persuade other countries to use its technology for their network of A.I. systems and infrastructure, weakening U.S. influence across the world.
Klon Kitchen, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who focuses on national security and technology, said that the U.S. strategy with A.I. has been to use its current lead in making A.I. chips and systems to persuade countries to ally with the United States.
The competition between Washington and Beijing for technological supremacy has scrambled the semiconductor business. In the wake of the Trump administration cracking down on chip sales to China this week, Nvidia and another chip maker, Advanced Micro Devices, said they would lose billions of dollars in sales. ASML Holding, the Dutch company whose machines are essential for manufacturing the most advanced semiconductors, said on Wednesday that orders for its equipment had fallen short of expectations.
On Wednesday, shares of Nvidia and A.M.D. fell more than 7 percent. ASML shares were down 5.4 percent.
Nvidia didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Speaking in March at Nvidia's annual conference, Jensen Huang, the company's chief executive, said, 'We have a fundamental obligation to run our business, obeying laws and doing our best to compete and serve customers.'
In January, DeepSeek jolted the tech industry after the release of a new A.I. system called DeepSeek-V3 that it claimed to have trained for $6 million, roughly a tenth of what U.S. companies were spending.
The low-cost system challenged the industry's consensus that bigger and better A.I. systems would be built by companies that spent the most on chips and data centers. Shares of Nvidia, which controls the A.I. chip market, plummeted 17 percent in a single day, reducing its market valuation by $600 billion.
'DeepSeek's claims sent everyone through the roof because it showed we're one moment away from the centerpiece of American policy being undermined,' Mr. Kitchen said.
At a conference with industry executives in Washington in March, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who oversees U.S. technology controls, said the Trump administration would pursue 'a dramatic increase' in enforcement of U.S. tech restrictions on China, including imposing fines on companies.
'We have had enough of people trying to make a dollar supporting the people who seek to destroy our way of life,' Mr. Lutnick said, referring to China.
Last week, Mr. Lutnick made good on his promise. The Commerce Department notified Nvidia of new restrictions on its sale of A.I. chips to China. The limits mean Nvidia will need a license to sell a chip they specially made for China, the H20. The company had developed that chip by modifying the abilities of a leading A.I. chip, the H100, to comply with the Biden administration's performance thresholds for sales to China.
The crackdown on Nvidia came after White House and Commerce Department officials received briefings in recent weeks about the national security risk posed by DeepSeek. The briefings included details about the ties that some of its researchers have to the People's Liberation Army and other institutions in China sanctioned for aiding the Chinese military, a person familiar with the conversations said.
The findings, which were compiled by Exiger, a data analytics firm, and reviewed by The New York Times, showed that dozens of DeepSeek's researchers have or have previously had affiliations with P.L.A. laboratories or defense-research institutes in China. They had worked with groups that included an institute that develops and tests China's nuclear weapons, universities known as the 'seven sons of national defense' and organizations barred from buying American technology by the U.S. government.
It is common for private companies in China to have close ties to state-backed industries and create technology for state-funded projects. But the research indicates that DeepSeek, which claims to be a private company not linked with the state, has closer ties with the Chinese military and government than previously understood, said Kit Conklin, a senior vice president at Exiger, who wrote the report.
DeepSeek did not respond to a request for comment.
In February, the congressional committee on China began work on a separate report seeking to explain how DeepSeek made its technological leap. It cited estimates by SemiAnalysis, a semiconductor research firm, that DeepSeek had access to 60,000 Nvidia chips, including 20,000 that have been restricted from China.
The committee said that DeepSeek and other Chinese A.I. companies may have circumvented U.S. restrictions on buying Nvidia chips by purchasing them through intermediaries in Singapore. It cited a report by Reuters in February, that Singaporean authorities arrested three people for illegally exporting advanced Nvidia chips to DeepSeek in China.
In the letter opening its investigation into Nvidia, the committee asked the company to provide details about every customer from 11 Asian countries, including Malaysia and Singapore, who purchased 500 A.I. chips or more since 2020. It also asked for details about the companies who were expected to use those chips.
The committee has subpoena power and expects Nvidia to provide responses within two weeks, said a committee official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. It typically spends more than four months on an investigation before generating a report on an issue and calling a hearing, which it may do with Nvidia.
The investigation comes as the Trump administration evaluates a proposed government rule to provide more oversight over Nvidia's global chip sales. The Biden administration rule, which Mr. Lutnick and other Trump officials are reviewing, would dictate where A.I. chips could be shipped and require more disclosures about the customers using American technology.
Tech companies have protested the rules, saying they threaten sales and U.S. technology influence around the world.
In a statement, Representative John Moolenaar, a Michigan Republican and the committee's chair, said that DeepSeek's use of Nvidia's chips could be considered 'a national security failure.' 'U.S. companies should not enable a hostile regime's drive to dominate A.I. and challenge the free world,' he said.
Nvidia has previously said that its record of revenue from Singapore does not 'indicate diversion to China,' and it is a result of its practice of reporting the country where purchases are made, not necessarily where chips are shipped. 'We insist that our partners comply with all applicable laws, and if we receive any information to the contrary, act accordingly,' John Rizzo, a Nvidia spokesman, said in a January statement.
The congressional report also found that DeepSeek used data from OpenAI to accelerate the development of the Chinese company's A.I. system. In a memo from OpenAI to the committee, which was reviewed by The New York Times, OpenAI said DeepSeek employees had bypassed guardrails meant to prevent that kind of data harvesting.
Using data from one A.I. system to build another, a technique called distillation, is common. But if a company takes data from proprietary technology, the practice could be illegal.
(The New York Times has sued OpenAI, claiming copyright infringement of news content related to A.I. systems. OpenAI has denied the claims.)
OpenAI called on Congress to 'safeguard U.S. technological leadership.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss
Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss

The Trump administration is fighting to pause a second court ruling that blocked President Donald Trump's sweeping and so-called reciprocal tariffs, the signature economic policy of his second term. The administration's new appeal, filed Monday in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, comes less than a week after a very similar court challenge played out in the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) in New York, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington. At issue in both cases is Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to enact his sweeping "Liberation Day" tariff plan. The plan, which Trump announced on April 2, invokes IEEPA for both his 10% baseline tariff on most U.S. trading partners and a so-called "reciprocal tariff" against other countries. Trump Tariff Plan Faces Uncertain Future As Court Battles Intensify Trump's use of the emergency law to invoke widespread tariffs was struck down unanimously last week by the three-judge CIT panel, which said the statute does not give Trump "unbounded" power to implement tariffs. However, the decision was almost immediately stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, allowing Trump's tariffs to continue. But in a lesser-discussed ruling on the very same day, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras, an Obama appointee, determined that Trump's tariffs were unlawful under IEEPA. Read On The Fox News App Since the case before him had more limited reach than the case heard by the CIT – plaintiffs in the suit focused on harm to two small businesses, versus harm from the broader tariff plan – it went almost unnoticed in news headlines. But that changed on Monday. Trump Denounces Court's 'Political' Tariff Decision, Calls On Supreme Court To Act Quickly Lawyers for the Justice Department asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit – a Washington-based but still separate court than the Federal Court of Appeals – to immediately stay the judge's ruling. They argued in their appeal that the judge's ruling against Trump's use of IEEPA undercuts his ability to use tariffs as a "credible threat" in trade talks, at a time when such negotiations "currently stand at a delicate juncture." "By holding the tariffs invalid, the district court's ruling usurps the President's authority and threatens to disrupt sensitive, ongoing negotiations with virtually every trading partner by undercutting the premise of those negotiations – that the tariffs are a credible threat," Trump lawyers said in the filing. Economists also seemed to share this view that the steep tariffs were more a negotiating tactic than an espousal of actual policy, which they noted in a series of interviews last week with Fox News Digital. Trump Tariff Plan Faces Uncertain Future As Court Battles Intensify The bottom line for the Trump administration "is that they need to get back to a place [where] they are using these huge reciprocal tariffs and all of that as a negotiating tactic," William Cline, an economist and senior fellow emeritus at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, said in an interview. Cline noted that this was the framework previously laid out by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who had embraced the tariffs as more of an opening salvo for future trade talks, including between the U.S. and China. "I think the thing to keep in mind there is that Trump and Vance have this view that tariffs are beautiful because they will restore America's Rust Belt jobs and that they'll collect money while they're doing it, which will contribute to fiscal growth," said Cline, the former deputy managing director and chief economist of the Institute of International Finance. "Those are both fantasies." What comes next in the case remains to be seen. The White House said it will take its tariff fight to the Supreme Court if necessary. Counsel for the plaintiffs echoed that view in an interview with Fox News. But it's unclear if the Supreme Court would choose to take up the case, which comes at a time when Trump's relationship with the judiciary has come under increasing strain. In the 20 weeks since the start of his second White House term, lawyers for the Trump administration have filed 18 emergency appeals to the high court, indicating both the pace and breadth of the tense court article source: Tariff fight escalates as Trump appeals second court loss

Trump's Budget Axes Program That Keeps Poor People From Freezing To Death At Home
Trump's Budget Axes Program That Keeps Poor People From Freezing To Death At Home

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Budget Axes Program That Keeps Poor People From Freezing To Death At Home

WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump wants to make some pretty devastating cuts to the Department of Health and Human Services in his new 2026 budget request. But one of the cruelest is a line buried in HHS' Budget in Brief: 'The budget eliminates funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.' The federal block grant program, often referred to as LIHEAP, has been around for decades and helps millions of people in low-income households pay their energy bills. Critically, it helps seniors, families with children, and people with disabilities keep their heat on in the dead of winter and cool air blowing in the sweltering days of summer. More than 6 million households currently rely on LIHEAP for help with energy bills. The Trump administration appears to justify gutting LIHEAP by tying it to diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in government, all of which Trump wants to eradicate. 'Savings come from eliminating radical diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and critical race theory programs, which weaponized large swaths of the Federal Government against the American people and moving programs that are better suited for States and localities to provide,' reads the HHS budget brief, just before it calls for zeroing out LIHEAP funding. To be sure, the president's budget request isn't going to become law. It has to make its way through Congress, where lawmakers will make all kinds of changes to it. But it's going to fall on Republicans to fight to preserve LIHEAP. The Trump administration has already crippled the low-income energy program. On April 1, HHS announced it was putting 10,000 federal employees on administrative leave through June 2, at which they would be terminated. This included the entire staff running LIHEAP. Twenty state attorneys general intervened in May and sued HHS, claiming the mass firings were illegal and calling for everyone's jobs to be restored. The lawsuit is still underway. State administrators that provide LIHEAP assistance still have federal money to keep operating this year, but without federal staff, the program's future looks grim. Trump zeroing out its entire budget certainly feels like its death knell. While Republicans in Congress are overwhelmingly beholden to Trump, they don't have strong margins in either chamber. If even a handful of GOPers push back on a provision in a bill, their opposition could tank the whole thing. LIHEAP could draw such pushback. House and Senate Republicans have called on HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to restore the program's staff and vouched for its need. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), one of the most politically vulnerable in his party, told Kennedy in April the program is 'vital' to his community. 'The program supports our most vulnerable populations, including seniors, individuals with disabilities, and households with young children under the age of six,' Lawler wrote to Kennedy. 'In FY 2023, 24% of New Yorkers reported being unable to pay their energy bill at least once in a 12-month period. During FY 2023, LIHEAP also helped prevent over 100,000 utility disconnections in New York alone, highlighting this program's critical need.' Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) led a bipartisan letter to Kennedy in April urging him to reverse course on LIHEAP staff cuts. 'We write regarding reports that you have terminated staff responsible for administering the LowIncome Home Energy Program,' reads their letter, signed by 13 senators. 'If true, these terminations threaten to devastate a critical program dedicated to helping Americans afford their home energy bills. 'It is an indispensable lifeline, helping to ensure that recipients do not have to choose between paying their energy bills and affording other necessities like food and medicine,' said the senators. Separately, Murkowski directly told the HHS secretary in May how crucial LIHEAP assistance is for people in her state. 'For us it's not a budget line item,' she told Kennedy as he testified before a Senate committee. 'You've been to Alaska. You know that the temperatures there can get really, really tough. [LIHEAP] keeps people from freezing to death in their homes.' The fate of LIHEAP will almost certainly come up this week on Capitol Hill, with both the House and Senate back in session and Trump's budget request now awaiting their action. Aides to Murkowski, Collins and Lawler did not immediately respond to requests for comment relating to Trump's budget request zeroing out LIHEAP funding.

Putin didn't budge in Ukraine peace talks. Now Donald Trump may be forced to act
Putin didn't budge in Ukraine peace talks. Now Donald Trump may be forced to act

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Putin didn't budge in Ukraine peace talks. Now Donald Trump may be forced to act

So, Russia and Ukraine are still as far apart as ever, with the two warring countries unable to make a significant breakthrough in direct talks in Istanbul. While there was agreement to exchange more prisoners, Moscow and Kyiv remain deeply divided over how to bring the costly and bitter Ukraine war to an end. Russia has shown itself to be particularly uncompromising, handing Ukrainian negotiators a memorandum re-stating its maximalist, hardline terms which would essentially amount to a Ukrainian surrender. Expectations were always low for a Kremlin compromise. But Moscow appears to have eliminated any hint of a readiness to soften its demands. The Russian memorandum again calls on Ukraine to withdraw from four partially occupied regions that Russia has annexed but not captured: a territorial concession that Kyiv has repeatedly rejected. It says Ukraine must accept strict limits on its armed forces, never join a military alliance, host foreign troops or aquire nuclear weapons. It would be Ukrainian demilitarization in its most hardline form, unpalatable to Ukraine and much of Europe, which sees the country as a barrier against further Russian expansion. Other Russian demands include the restoration of full diplomatic and economic ties, specifically that no reparations will be demanded by either side and that all Western sanctions on Russia be lifted. It is a Kremlin wish-list that, while familiar, speaks volumes about how Moscow continues to imagine the future of Ukraine as a subjugated state in the thrall of Russia, with no significant military of its own nor real independence. This uncompromising position comes despite two important factors which may have given the Kremlin pause. Firstly, Ukraine has developed the technical capability to strike deep inside Russia, despite its staggering disparity of territory and resources. The stunning drone strikes recently targeting Russian strategic bombers at bases thousands of miles from Ukraine is a powerful illustration of that. Ukraine, it seems, has some cards after all, and is using them effectively. Secondly – and arguably more dangerously for Moscow – the Kremlin's latest hardline demands come despite US President Donald Trump's increasing frustrations with his own Ukraine peace efforts. Trump has already expressed annoyance with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, who he said had gone 'absolutely MAD' after massive Russian strikes on Ukraine last week. But now, Trump himself is under pressure as a cornerstone of his second term foreign policy – bringing a rapid end the Ukraine war – looks decidedly shaky. There are powerful levers to pull if Trump chooses, like increasing US military aid or imposing tough new sanctions, such as those overwhelmingly supported in the US Senate. One of the key backers of a cross-party senate bill that aims to impose 'crippling' new measures on Moscow, Senator Richard Blumenthal, accused Russia of 'mocking peace efforts' at the Istanbul talks and in a carefully worded post on X accused the Kremlin of 'playing Trump and America for fools.' It is unclear at the moment how the mercurial US president will react, or what – if anything – he will do. But the outcome of the Ukraine war, specifically the brokering of peace deal to end it, has become inextricably linked with the current administration in the White House. The fact that Putin has once again dug in his heels and presented an uncompromising response to calls for peace, may now force Trump to act.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store