Edinburgh Council 'must learn lessons' from probe into handling of Cammy Day complaints
The report found that Edinburgh council needed to improve its safeguarding measures, and that a 'prevalent' culture of hospitality needed to be looked at by the council.
But it found that council officers had acted appropriately in handling complaints made to them.
READ MORE: British couple try Chinese takeaway in America and spot one big difference
READ MORE: Edinburgh gang war continues in west as thugs torch taxi owned by dad of Mr Big's girlfriend
It also said that people who had complained about the behaviour of the former council leader experienced a 'significant perceived power imbalance' when making complaints about him.
Council leader Jane Meagher said the report was 'largely reassuring' – but that recommendations made in the report needed to be carried out 'swiftly and comprehensively'.
Kevin Dunion, former chair of the Standards Commission for Scotland, carried out the third party investigation that resulted in the report, which itself was commissioned by the council.
Mr Dunion's investigation came after recent and historic complaints about alleged sexual harassment by former Labour council leader Cammy Day came to light.
Councillor Day resigned in December 2024 soon after the first allegations were published in the press, and he was suspended from the Labour Party soon after.
Multiple Ukrainian refugees said Cllr Day had sent them unsolicited images and messages on social media, even after being asked to stop.
In one historic incident, which took place in 2010 and was reported in 2018, a then 15-year-old boy said he was sexually harassed online by Cllr Day.
Since his resignation, a police investigation into his behaviour has found no evidence of criminality, with the former leader claiming he is the target of a political witch hunt.
SNP group leader, Councillor Simita Kumar, said: 'It is imperative that lessons must be learned.
'A common thread throughout this report is that staff and complainants felt unable – or unwilling – to raise concerns due to the power and influence of the accused.
'We must establish better systems to support and protect those who come forward or the risk of abuse by those in positions of authority will persist.'
Mr Dunion's report found that leaks of information about alleged leaks by councillors had impeded the city's whistleblowing process.
Councillor Ed Thornley, leader of the Liberal Democrat group, said: 'I want to thank Kevin Dunion for his report and the work that's gone into it. He's highlighted several issues with the way the Council's processes aren't working correctly and the gaps in them.
'It's clear reading the report that where Council officers have been aware and informed, they acted appropriately and gave sound advice in line with the agreed processes. That is not the case for councillors.
'The two leaks of confidential information by councillors seriously undermine the integrity of the systems in place, and call into question the judgement of the individuals responsible.
'Such leaks represent a deliberate and blatant breach of the Councillors' Code of Conduct. The Lib Dem group will consider Mr Dunion's recommendations thoroughly over the coming days.'
Edinburgh Council's leader, Labour councillor Jane Meagher said: 'I want to thank Mr Dunion for leading this review, and for his report.
'While I'm largely reassured by Mr Dunion's findings about how recent complaints have been handled by officers, clearly, there are elements of this report which are of serious concern to us as elected members and we must act on his recommendations swiftly and comprehensively. I have already taken practical steps to begin to change the culture in the City Chambers.
'Our priority must be to nurture positive working relationships throughout the Council where colleagues feel able to speak up if something isn't right, they know and trust the channels open to them and they feel safe and supported in doing so.
'I'm fully committed to taking Mr Dunion's recommendations forward and, subject to approval by councillors next Thursday, look forward to agreeing concrete actions when officers bring a further report back in August outlining our proposed actions in response to Mr Dunion's recommendations.'
Independent councillor Ross McKenzie, who was part of the Labour group until 2023, said: 'It's now up to the Labour Party to decide whether they are comfortable with Cammy Day being a Labour councillor.
'The report contains details of an extraordinarily serious allegation made in 2018 and a pattern of sexual harassment allegations since.
'If Labour are serious about safeguarding then they will have conducted an exhaustive investigation into all of these allegations.'
Cllr Kayleigh Kinross-O'Neill, Edinburgh Green group co-convenor said: 'This report makes grim reading, and lays bare the council's completely inadequate response to multiple serious allegations of inappropriate behaviour against the former council leader.
"On behalf of the Green group, I want to apologise that the council has so badly let down alleged victims who have had the bravery to come forward. It is clear the council must address the recommendations in Mr Dunion's report and must make changes to council processes to ensure that alleged victims are never let down in this way again.'
'I want to thank Mr Dunion for the time and effort he has taken in preparing this detailed and comprehensive report.
"It is essential the council takes the time to address these recommendations and improves processes to ensure that all complaints against a councillor are properly investigated in future.
"The report makes clear there was a pattern of sexual harassment allegations which were not taken seriously or properly investigated.
"The council needs to both improve its processes, and also change its culture, to ensure this pattern of behaviour is never allowed to continue unchecked in future.'
The Dunion report will be considered by Edinburgh councillors at the next full council meeting on Thursday, 19 June, which can be viewed here.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sent straight to your messages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
China and Russia have the leverage to disrupt Trump's dealmaking
President Trump is planning to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin potentially this week in the Alaska. The topic is the war in Ukraine and Trump's intention to end the killing there. Obviously, despite what Trump promised during the election, 24 hours was not enough time to reach an agreement. Trump sending his ubiquitous envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow last week suggests this was the president's initiative and not Putin's. Perhaps Trump did not want his 10-day demand to Putin to end the war to expire without some measure of success. In any event, one can only speculate why Putin accepted the meeting — and it does not appear Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky will be part of that meeting, although Trump would be obliged to see him separately. Why Putin agreed has several possible explanations. He may need to end the sanctions for economic reasons. His offensive may have gained his objectives in Ukraine. Or Putin may conclude that as the 2014-2015 Minsk Agreements failed to provide security for Ukraine, a cease-fire will allow him to use what Lenin called 'other means' to gain control of his neighbor. So far, the administration has not claimed that Trump's submarine deployments to 'appropriate places' was a deciding factor in convincing or coercing Putin to meet. U.S. submarines have been operating in proximity to the former Soviet Union and now Russia since the Cold War began. On a few occasions, operations were inside Soviet territorial waters. Trump did threaten North Korea's Kim Jong Un with 'fire and fury,' claiming his button — meaning the nuclear trigger — was bigger than Kim's. After this clash of rhetoric, both met twice. But nothing occurred other than Trump's claim that he 'fell in love' with the ' Little Rocket Man.' Did U.S. submarines have the same effect on Putin? At Trump's disposal as commander in chief is the U.S. Navy's fleet of 68 nuclear submarines. Fourteen are Ohio class armed with 7,500 mile range Trident ballistic missiles. Four are able to carry up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles with a 1,000 mile range. Fifty are attack boats carrying torpedoes and cruise missiles. How two submarines could get Putin's attention is not clear. Russia has complained mightily when Tomahawk-armed U.S. warships sailed within 1,000 miles of Putin's physical location. But there is no obvious advantage in using Ohio class submarines as a signal, given the range of its Trident missiles. Missile and attack submarines could deploy in proximity to major Russian naval bases in the Kola peninsula in the Arctic or Petropavlovsk in the Pacific. But presumably, U.S. submarines are already there. The Baltic is too confined and shallow for nuclear submarine operations. The Mediterranean Sea is more suitable but gives no strategic advantage. The Black Sea is closed to all submarines not belonging to the littoral states; and the transit of surface warships is restricted by the Montreux Convention. So did the submarines make a difference? Who knows? Sanctions have not seemed to affect Putin's behavior. Russia has deftly shifted selling about half its oil exports to China and India. Trump has imposed sanctions on India but not China yet. Putin knows that Trump-imposed secondary sanctions on China is a double-edged sword. China has not been impressed by Trump's ' liberation day ' threat of tariffs and secondary sanctions. Why? The reason is due to which nation is more dependent on the other — China on the U.S. or the U.S. on China. China has withheld certain rare earth elements from the U.S. on which U.S. companies depend. China has additional assets to leverage. And why would China not seek to poach U.S. exports to other markets? India has less clout than China. A tariff war will drive India closer to China and away from the Quad, which comprises the U.S., Japan, Australia and India. None of this will be in American interests. And there is a worse case. Suppose China and India do cut off energy imports from Russia. Where will they turn? The U.S. cannot make up the difference yet. Increases in demand could drive the price of oil through the proverbial roof, causing a recession or worse. Does Trump understand these realities? Or does he not care? So what leverage does Trump have over Putin, and Putin over Trump? Putin knows Trump wants to end the war. Is Putin seeking a 2025 version of the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement in which United Kingdom Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sought 'peace for our time' or a real solution? Knowing Putin, you have the answer. Harlan Ullman, Ph.D., is UPI's Arnaud deBorchgrave Distinguished Columnist, a senior advisor at the Atlantic Council, the chairman of two private companies and the principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. He and former United Kingdom Defense Chief David Richards are the authors of a forthcoming book on preventing strategic catastrophe.
CNBC
22 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says he asked for 20% cut from Nvidia, calls H20 an 'obsolete' chip
President Donald Trump on Monday said that he initially asked Nvidia for a 20% cut of the chipmaker's sales to China, but the number came down to 15% after CEO Jensen Huang negotiated with him. The comments came after news broke over the weekend that Nvidia agreed to pay the federal government a 15% cut in return for receiving export control licenses that will allow it to once again sell the H20 chip to China and Chinese companies. Nvidia's Huang visited Trump in the White House on Friday. "I said, 'listen, I want 20% if I'm going to approve this for you, for the country,'" Trump said in a press conference in Washington. Trump said that Nvidia's H20 is an "old chip that China already has" and is "obsolete." He compared the H20 chip to Nvidia's current fastest artificial intelligence chip, which is called Blackwell, and said that he wouldn't allow those to be sold to China without significant downgrades, such as a 30% to 50% reduction in performance. "The Blackwell is super-duper advanced. I wouldn't make a deal with that," Trump said, adding that it was possible to make a deal for a "somewhat enhanced in a negative way" version of Blackwell. "That's the latest and the greatest in the world. Nobody has it. They won't have it for five years," Trump said. One reason for the U.S. export controls is fear that providing advanced chips to China could allow the foreign power to leapfrog the U.S. in AI capabilities. Many have said that could pose a threat to the national security of the U.S. Trump said that China already has chips with some similar capabilities to the H20. Huang has said that it is better for U.S. national security if Chinese AI developers use U.S. technology, and that denying them access to Nvidia chips would actually encourage the Chinese chip industry to develop and catch up. "He's selling a essentially old chip," Trump said. "Huawei has a similar chip." The H20 is a Chinese-specific chip that has had its performance slowed down. It is related to Nvidia's H100 and H200 chips that are used in the U.S. The H20 was introduced after the Biden administration implemented export controls on AI chips in 2023. In April, the Trump administration said it would require a license to export the H20 chip, and in May, Huang said that "effectively closed" the market off to Nvidia. Huang said that Nvidia was expecting to sell about $8 billion in H20 chips in the July quarter before sales were stopped. "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide," an Nvidia spokesperson told CNBC on Monday. Trump on Monday also said that Huang plans to visit him again to negotiate export licenses for the Blackwell chips. "I think he's coming to see me again about that," Trump said. A White House official confirmed to CNBC that AMD, the second-place AI chip maker, will also pay 15% to receive an export license for its China-focused AI chip, the Instinct MI308.
22 minutes ago
Trump describes upcoming summit with Russia's Putin as 'feel-out meeting'
President Donald Trump on Monday previewed his highly-anticipated meeting with Russia's Vladimir Putin, saying he's hopeful for "constructive conversations" but that it isn't up to him to make a peace deal. Trump confirmed last week he would sit down with Putin in Alaska as his imposed deadline for Moscow to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine came and went. No exact time or specific venue has been announced for Friday's summit. "This is really a feel-out meeting, a little bit," Trump told reporters in the White House briefing room, where he held a news conference on a federal takeover of Washington's police force and deployment of the National Guard to deal, he said, with the city's crime and homelessness. "I think if it weren't for me, he would not be even talking to anybody else right now," Trump said of Putin. At the same time, Trump downplayed the idea that Friday's talks will result in an end to the war in Ukraine. "We're going to see what the parameters are, and then I'm going to call up President [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy and the European leaders right after the meeting," Trump added. "And I'm going to tell them what kind of a deal -- I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal." Trump said Zelenskyy wasn't invited to be part of Friday's meeting, but that he'd call the Ukrainian leader first after to relay what was discussed. He said if there's a "fair deal" that he would reveal it to Zelenskyy and European leaders. "And I may say, 'Lots of luck, keep fighting' or I may say, 'We can make a deal,'" Trump said. When asked by Trump how he'll know whether a deal can be made, Trump responded: "Because that's what I do. I make deals." Trump declined to share specifics on what he would consider a fair agreement between Ukraine and Russia, but again suggested that there would be "some land swapping." Trump said his goal was to set up a next meeting between Zelenskyy and Putin or between himself, Zelenskyy and Putin. "I'll be there if they need, but I want to have a meeting set up between the two leaders," Trump said. Friday's meeting will mark the first time Putin will be in the U.S. since 2015. Trump on Monday mistakenly said he was "going to Russia" as he discussed the summit, though he also praised the fact that Putin is coming to the U.S. rather than the other way around. "I thought it was very respectful that the president of Russia is coming to our country as opposed to us going to his country or even a third party place," Trump said. "But I think we'll have constructive conversations." Trump on Monday continued to express frustration with Putin and Zelenskyy, and again claimed the war wouldn't have started if he were president. Trump had repeatedly claimed on the campaign trail that he would end the war within his first 24 hours in office, which he later said was an exaggeration. He described the yearslong conflict as "complex" with a "lot of bad blood" but that he would press Putin to pursue peace. "I am going in to speak to Vladimir Putin and I will be telling him, 'You have to end this war. You have to end it.' And he wasn't going to mess with me. This war would have never happened," Trump said.
