
Drone warfare came home during Op Sindoor. Where does India stand?
These words ring truer than ever in the context of two recent events.
On June 1, Ukraine bombed five airbases deep inside Russia using cheap First Person View (FPV) drones, underlining the need to fundamentally reimagine air defences in the age of asymmetric drone warfare.
Weeks earlier in May, during the hostilities in the wake of Operation Sindoor, Pakistan had attacked towns and military facilities across India's western front, from Baramulla to Barmer, with swarm after swarm of relatively low cost, low tech drones for four straight days. Apart from inflicting damage, these attacks were meant to overwhelm India's air defences, clutter radars, exhaust ammunition, gather intelligence, and probe for vulnerabilities.
Drones, a brief history
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) date back to World War II and the Korean War, where they were used for training anti-aircraft gunners and in specific offensive missions. Their modern military usage took off in the 1990s, after being successfully deployed in the Gulf War of 1991.
The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict of 2020 marked a turning point in drone warfare: Azerbaijan's use of Turkish Bayraktar TB2 and Israeli Harop drones devastated Armenian defences, decisively shifting the conflict's dynamics in favour of Baku.
🔴 Yemen, where Houthi rebels targeted Saudi oil infrastructure using drone swarms;
🔴 Gaza, where Israel has deployed high-tech drones for surveillance and strikes, and Hamas has used drones for grenades and observation; and
🔴 Ukraine, where both Moscow and Kyiv have deployed commercial quadcopters (DJI drones), military drones (Bayraktar TB2, Orlan-10, Shahed-136), and loitering munitions.
Ukraine has notably used 'first-person view' (FPV) racing drones to target tanks, chase individual soldiers and small units, and, most notably, bomb Russian air bases.
On June 1, Ukraine carried out Operation Spider's Web, one of the most sophisticated drone operations in history, using 100–150 FPV drones, transported clandestinely in trucks deep into Russia. The target: five key Russian airfields. Ukrainian officials claim to have hit more than 40 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers like the Tu-22 and Tu-95, and inflicted losses of around $7 billion.
Meanwhile, Russia throughout the war has used Iranian-made Shahed kamikaze drones in swarms to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses, and target critical infrastructure such as energy grids.
Not one, not two…
Swarm drones are autonomous or semi-autonomous UAVs that operate in coordinated groups, much like swarms of birds or fish. They communicate via wireless networks and adjust in real time to achieve shared objectives.
Swarms are more resilient than traditional drones due to in-built redundancy — even if one drone is intercepted, others can continue on the mission. Drone swarms are thus used to saturate air defences (a few payloads may sneak through even robust defences), gathering intelligence, and attacking high-value targets.
Countries are already developing even more lethal AI-driven swarm drones, capable of making real-time decisions, adapting tactics mid-mission, and coordinating more complex manoeuvres. These are expected to become integral to combined arms warfare, functioning alongside infantry, armour, and cyber units.
According to Fortune Business Insights, the global military drone market stood at $14.14 billion in 2023, and is projected to hit $47.16 billion by 2032.
Threat of swarms
Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan, in a lecture in Pune, flagged the rising drone threat: 'Now we have drones as small as water bottles — and in swarms,' he said, calling these 'undetectable' and 'untargetable'.
Air Marshal Anil Chopra (retd), former head of the Centre for Air Power Studies, said that while drone swarms deployed by Pakistan were not particularly effective, the Ukraine example offers some major learnings.
'When you use very cheap drones that carry warheads barely weighing a kilo — like Pakistan did — nothing much happens. They're jammed easily… Only a fool would fire expensive missiles at them,' Chopra told The Indian Express.
But swarm drone attacks can be carried out anywhere, and at any time. 'If someone moves a truck full of drones near an airbase and launches them [like in the case of Op Spider's Web], defending becomes very difficult. In countries like India, with porous borders and diverse populations, the threat is real,' he said.
Chopra emphasised upon the need for integration across the security establishment.
'Your intelligence setup, even the local police, matter. Even a traffic constable could make a difference,' he said, adding that the success of the Ukraine op was predicated on Kyiv being able to transport its drones thousands of kilometres inside Russia undetected.
'Strategic thinking, inventory management — everything must evolve. A $1,000 drone damaging a $200 million aircraft is our new reality,' Chopra said.
Countering drone threats
Defence against drones begins with detection. Modern systems employ a mix of AESA radars, electro-optical and infrared sensors, acoustic detectors, and AI-powered fusion systems.
Once detected, one option is for drones to be neutralised through kinetic means, that is, with missiles and anti-aircraft guns. But traditional kinetic air defences, especially surface-to-air missiles (SAMs), are costly, and less effective against swarms. Automated gun systems such as C-RAM and Phalanx, which track targets and fire autonomously, are preferred in this role.
Even more cost-effective alternatives include:
Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs): Lasers and microwave pulses that disable drones by damaging sensors or frying electronics;
Electronic Warfare (EW): Jamming GPS signals or communication links;
Spoofing: Misleading drones about their location or issuing false commands;
Cyber Attacks: Taking control of drones and crash them by exploiting software vulnerabilities; and
Interceptor drones & nets: For close-range neutralisation, protecting critical assets.
The asymmetry in cost remains the central challenge in anti-drone warfare. A drone swarm costing roughly $100,000 might take millions of dollars to neutralise with currently available technology. This is why nations, including India, are investing in more cost-effective solutions like EW and DEWs.
The ideal defence is a layered system, integrating multiple modes of interception for redundancy and cost-efficiency purposes. Examples include Israel's Iron Dome and the US's Directed Energy M-SHORAD.
India's capabilities
Since 2020, India has ramped up its counter-drone infrastructure, deploying a layered defence that blends indigenous technology, EW, and air defence systems. Key systems include:
Akashteer Air Defence Control System: Developed by Bharat Electronics Ltd, it integrates with the Indian Air Force's integrated command network for real-time tracking;
Bhargavastra: Solar Defence and Aerospace Ltd's weapon system fires 64 micro-rockets in salvos to eliminate drone swarms;
DRDO's Anti-Drone System: It offers 360-degree radar coverage, with both jamming (soft kill) and laser (hard kill) capabilities. Drones can be detected up to 4 km away, and neutralised within a 1 km radius; and
Indrajaal: An AI-powered grid from a Hyderabad startup that combines jammers, spoofers, and intelligence to protect areas up to 4,000 sq km. Already deployed at naval sites in Gujarat and Karnataka.
During the May 2025 swarm attacks, the IAF activated its Integrated Counter-UAS Grid, alongside conventional radars, guns, and missiles, neutralising attempted strikes on 15 military bases and several urban targets.
Looking ahead
There is currently a race to develop both drone and anti-drone capabilities. 'Even the Iranians are producing more than 20 Shahed drones per day. And these are powerful. India too has set up an ecosystem with 550 startups in the field. Some tech is acquired, but we're developing our own tech too,' Chopra said.
The future of warfare is here, and it's unmanned, AI-driven and asymmetric. India's response to the May 2025 drone swarms signals it is rapidly adapting to this future.
As CDS Chauhan put it: 'We are at a cusp where war may be between humans and machines — and tomorrow, between machines themselves. Machines that are autonomous, intelligent, and make decisions. We may need a layered and resilient defence system [to counter] this.'
With inputs from Amrita Nayak Dutta

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Zelenskyy captures Trump's attention with $90 billion arms deal in return for security guarantee
In a major rehaul from his last visit to the White House, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was able to entice US President Donald Trump to discuss the security guarantees for Kyiv in order to secure a peace deal with Russia, during the summit at the Oval Office on Monday which also saw several European leaders in Washington backing the Ukrainian president. Zelenskyy's last visit to Washington turned into an argument with Trump over the Russian war and became one of the worst public spat between two world leaders. However, on Monday, Zelenskyy left no stone unturned amid the high optics related to the meeting and said that security guarantees for Ukraine will likely be worked out within 10 days. 🚨 NEW — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 18, 2025 Zelenskyy briefed the media about the discussion with European leaders and Trump regarding the security guarantees for Ukraine and said the discussion included plans for Ukraine to purchase $90 billion in American weapons through European funding. The Ukrainian president added that another aspect of the guarantees would involve Kyiv manufacturing drones, some of which would be purchased by the United States. 'There indeed is a package with our proposals worth $90 billion. And we have agreements with the US president that when our export opens, they will buy Ukrainian drones. This is important for us,' Zelenskyy said, reported The Guardian. However, no formal agreement regarding the security guarantees have been reached but Zelenskyy said it is a necessary 'starting point for ending war'. After the meeting, Trump said talks with Ukrainian President Zelenskyy and other European leaders were 'good' and that the United States would oversee European security guarantees for Ukraine. 'During the meeting we discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, which guarantees would be provided by the various European countries, with a coordination with the United States of America,' Trump said in a post on Truth Social. Trump further said he has begun to arrange a bilateral meeting between Ukraine's Zelenskyy and Russia's Putin, with location yet to be determined and if the meeting goes well, then a trilateral summit would be held involving Trump.


Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Zelenskyy thanks Melania Trump for advocacy on ‘abduction of Ukrainian children'
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy expressed his heartfelt gratitude to US First Lady, Melania Trump, for her letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, which highlighted the issue of 'abduction of Ukrainian children' by Moscow. Outlining the humanitarian toll of the war, Zelenskyy emphasised the efforts being made to reunite the families separated in the conflict. 'I want to thank FLOTUS Melania Trump for her attention to one of the most painful and difficult issues of this war – the abduction of Ukrainian children by Russia. We deeply appreciate her compassion and her letter to Putin. This issue lies at the heart of the war's humanitarian tragedy – our children, broken families, the pain of separation. At least 20,000 children were taken. I asked President Trump to pass along a letter of gratitude from Ukraine's First Lady, Olena Zelenska, to Melania. Her voice matters, and her care gives strength to this cause,' The Ukrainian leader said in a post on X. I want to thank @FLOTUS Melania Trump for her attention to one of the most painful and difficult issues of this war – the abduction of Ukrainian children by Russia. We deeply appreciate her compassion and her letter to Putin. This issue lies at the heart of the war's… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 19, 2025 He further reaffirmed his commitment to freeing the prisoners of war and civilians held in Russia for years. 'We are working tirelessly to bring every child home. The same applies for our prisoners of war and civilians held in Russia for years, some since 2014, in very bad conditions. Thousands of people still need to be freed – and this is a part of making peace. We will work to negotiate all-for-all prisoners of war exchange, and we are grateful to have strong friends who help,' he added. Zelenskyy's remarks came in response to a post by US President Donald Trump where he said that he, along with President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, have been discussing the 'massive worldwide problem of missing children'. He asserted that the issue was a priority and the world would work together to reunite them with their families. 'Ursula von der Leyen, the distinguished and Highly Respected President of the European Commission, and I have been discussing the massive Worldwide problem of missing children. This is, likewise, a big subject with my wife, Melania. It is a subject at the top of all lists, and the World will work together to solve it, hopefully bringing them home to their families,' Trump said in a post on his Truth Social handle. Zelenskyy hands letter from the Ukrainian first lady to Trump Earlier in the day, Zelenskyy presented Trump with a letter from Ukrainian first lady Olena Zelenska and told the US president that the letter was for FLOTUS. 'My wife, the first lady of Ukraine, she gave the letter. It's not to you but to your wife,' he said. Happening now in the Oval Office. WATCH ⬇️ — The White House (@WhiteHouse) August 18, 2025 A highly anticipated meeting between Trump and Zelenskyy, along with other European leaders, concluded at the White House on Monday (Aug 18). Describing the discussions as 'very good', the leaders indicated a possibility of a peace deal between the warring countries, Russia and Ukraine. European leaders, including German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, flew to Washington to attend the meeting backing Zelenskyy, days after Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for a summit that failed to result in a ceasefire. (With inputs from agencies)


Mint
10 minutes ago
- Mint
Will Ukraine be allowed to join NATO under Security Guarantees? Explained
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte has suggested an Article 5–style arrangement for Ukraine as part of providing 'Security Guarantees' to Kyiv, which has faced relentless Russian bombardment since February 2022. But does this also amount to a promise of NATO membership for Ukraine as a guarantee of its future security in the face of the Russian war? Speaking with press after meeting with Zekensky and other European leaders at the White House, NATO secretary general Rutte said the team was discussing 'some Article 5 type arrangement' for Ukraine to protect it from future invasions by Russia. His comments were backed by Finland President Cai-Göran Alexander Stubb who said, 'We spoke of Article 5 type of Security Guarantees.' Article 5 provides that if a NATO ally is the victim of an armed attack, each and every other member of the Alliance will consider this act of violence as an armed attack against all members and will take the actions it deems necessary to assist the Ally attacked. It says, 'The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.' If Ukraine receives Article 5–style assurances, any future Russian attack would obligate all NATO allies to come to Kyiv's defense. But a NATO membership for Ukraine? Maybe not! Mark Rutte, speaking on NATO membership for Ukraine, said it was not under discussion but on what securities could be provided to the country. He also revealed that the United States and some other countries are against NATO membership for Ukraine. Also Read | Did Zelensky agree to a ceasefire? What do we know from Trump-Zelensky meeting? 'The situation is this - that the US and some other countries have said that they are against NATO membership for Ukraine. The official NATO position ... is that there is an irreversible path for Ukraine into NATO,' Mark Rutte said. 'But what we are discussing here is not NATO membership, what we are discussing here is Article 5 type of security guarantees for Ukraine and what exactly they will entail will now be more specifically discussed.' The 'Security Guarantees' would ensure that Russia does not invade Ukraine again. There was also no talks of sending troops on the ground in Ukraine but a NATO-style protection for Ukraine. NATO has 32 member countries called the NATO Allies. NATO was created by 12 countries on April 4, 1949 and over years, 20 more countries have joined the alliance. The member countries of NATO are: Belgium (1949), Canada (1949), Denmark (1949), France (1949), Iceland (1949), Italy (1949), Luxembourg (1949), Netherlands (1949), Norway (1949), Portugal (1949), United Kingdom (1949), United States (1949), Greece (1952), Türkiye (1952), Germany (1955), Spain (1982), Czechia (1999), Hungary (1999), Poland (1999), Bulgaria (2004), Estonia (2004), Latvia (2004), Lithuania (2004), Romania (2004), Slovakia (2004), Slovenia (2004), Albania (2009), Croatia (2009), Montenegro (2017), North Macedonia (2020), Finland (2023), and Sweden (2024).