Balancing Responsibility and Reality: Rethinking India's Recycling Cost Structure
New Delhi [India], April 19: India's push toward environmental responsibility took a bold step with the government's updated rules under the E-Waste (Management) Rules, 2022. The revised framework introduces significantly higher payments for recycling bulkier appliances like air conditioners, refrigerators, and televisions. While the objective–to boost formal recycling and reduce environmental harm–is both necessary and commendable, the method of implementation has sparked legitimate concerns among major OEMs such as Daikin, Hitachi, and Samsung.
As the founder of Foxx Compliance Services, an authorised e-waste recycler operating in the formal sector, I've witnessed firsthand both the urgent need for strong recycling mechanisms and the challenges posed by abrupt regulatory shifts.
The core issue manufacturers are flagging is the steep increase in mandated recycling costs–a shift that could disrupt their pricing models and strain operational budgets. It's important to recognize that recycling, especially for large household appliances, is resource-intensive. It requires trained manpower, specialized infrastructure, safe dismantling protocols, and environmentally sound disposal of components such as refrigerants and compressors. Yes, the cost is real–but so is the need for fairness and practicality in how those costs are allocated.
While recyclers like us welcome the emphasis on formalization and compliance, we must also acknowledge that transparency in cost determination is lacking. The current cost benchmarks appear disconnected from on-ground realities–set without adequate consultation with stakeholders who actually bear the operational load.
Let's be clear: increasing recycling cost obligations should not be seen as a punishment. It is a shared responsibility to clean up the mess created by rapid consumerism. However, the formula for calculating these costs must be realistic, data-driven, and regionally adaptive. The cost of collection, transportation, safe dismantling, and environmentally compliant disposal varies widely across the country. One-size-fits-all pricing risks alienating producers and deterring genuine efforts.
Moreover, the suddenness of the implementation has left many manufacturers scrambling to revise their compliance strategies, with little time for adjustment or planning. Compliance should not be a shock–it should be a journey guided by clear timelines, collaborative engagement, and shared objectives.
What India needs is a robust cost framework co-developed by authorities, producers, and authorised recyclers. Transparent cost models, based on actual field data, must reflect the nuances of each product category. For example, recycling an air conditioner is significantly more complex and expensive than recycling a television or a fan. Recognizing such differences in the pricing structure is not just fair–it's essential for a sustainable system.
At Foxx Compliance Services, we strongly support the government's vision for a cleaner, greener India. But we also urge policymakers to listen to the voices of the ecosystem they're trying to regulate. Let's build a recycling economy that is not just ambitious but also achievable.
In conclusion, as India takes firm steps toward environmental stewardship, the focus must shift from mere enforcement to enabling compliance. Let's ensure that recycling costs are not just imposed–but justified, understood, and accepted by all stakeholders. Only then can we achieve long-term, meaningful impact in our fight against e-waste.
By Shashi Shekhar, Founder, Foxx Compliance Services (Authorised E-waste Recycler)
For more information, please visit: https://foxxinternational.com/
(ADVERTORIAL DISCLAIMER: The above press release has been provided by SMPL. ANI will not be responsible in any way for the content of the same)
This story is auto-generated from a syndicated feed. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Explained: How new rule tweak frees up stock brokers to invest beyond securities
Government eases investment rules for stockbrokers. Amendment to Securities Contracts Regulation Rules gives clarity. Brokers can now invest surplus funds more freely. Earlier rules restricted investments in non-securities businesses. New rules allow investments unless client funds are involved. This empowers brokers to diversify revenue streams. However, exchange circulars need updating for full clarity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads In a welcome step for the broking industry, the government has amended Rule 8 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957 ( SCRR ), providing long-awaited clarity on what does not constitute 'business' for a stockbroker. The amendment addresses a long-standing industry concern around regulatory restrictions that limited brokers from investing their own surplus funds in non-securities 8 of the SCRR lays down the eligibility conditions for a person to act as a stockbroker or a member of a recognised stock exchange . Under sub-rules (1)(f) and (3)(f), brokers are prohibited from engaging in any business other than that of securities, unless such business is carried out without any personal financial liability. This essentially prevented brokers from exposing themselves to financial risks unrelated to their core broking time, the National Stock Exchange and the Bombay Stock Exchange issued circulars that significantly widened the interpretation of 'business' under Rule 8 of the SCRR. These circulars clarified that even passive investments in group companies (subsidiary or associate) engaged in non-securities businesses (such as NBFCs, real estate or insurance) would be treated as 'business' and would be in violation of Rule 8. This interpretation created a regulatory overhang that discouraged brokers from investing their own profits outside the securities practice, brokers were restricted from investing their retained earnings or surplus capital into group ventures operating outside the securities domain, even where such investments posed no financial risk to the broker or its clients. This created a significant operational constraint. If a broker wished to invest in a non-securities business, it first had to route profits to its parent, typically via dividends or buybacks, incurring additional tax liabilities before the funds could be redeployed by the parent. This structure was inefficient and deterred brokers from pursuing legitimate investment opportunities that could enhance their business offerings and these industry concerns, the Ministry of Finance released a consultation paper in September 2024 proposing a more nuanced interpretation of Rule 8. It clarified that the original intent of the restriction was to protect client interests and ensure the financial soundness of the brokers, not to place undue limitations on the use of their own capital. Since stockbrokers are already subject to stringent SEBI regulations aimed at safeguarding client funds, further restricting them from investing in group companies engaged in non-securities businesses under the guise of protecting client funds seemed excessive and position has now been codified through an amendment to Rule 8. It now clarifies that a broker's investment activity will not be treated as 'business', unless it involves client funds, client securities or creates a financial obligation for the broker. This empowers brokers to freely invest their retained earnings and surplus capital in group companies or unrelated ventures, so long as client interests remain unaffected. Brokers can now participate in broader financial services ecosystems such as lending or insurance through subsidiaries, allowing them to diversify revenue streams and build integrated financial this amendment to Rule 8 is now effective and offers much-needed regulatory clarity, it is worth noting that the circulars issued by NSE and BSE interpreting the earlier position have not yet been formally withdrawn. This could create some ambiguity for brokers on how the exchanges will align with the amended Rule 8, particularly given that the validity of the NSE circular had been challenged before the Bombay High Court. Until the exchanges formally update their stance, brokers may continue to face uncertainty in practice despite the regulatory intent to liberalise.(The authors Prashanth Ramdas is Partner and Shivaang Maheshwari is Associate at Khaitan & Co. The views expressed are personal.)
Fibre2Fashion
5 hours ago
- Fibre2Fashion
Tech & green values drive new online shopping trends: DHL
AI and social commerce are-redefining the online shopping experience, while fast and reliable delivery is proving crucial to converting carts into purchases. At the same time, sustainability is becoming a key driver of customer loyalty, as consumers increasingly align their buying habits with environmental values. These trends are collectively reshaping the future of e-commerce, as per the insights from DHL E-commerce's newly released E-Commerce Trends Report 2025. The report is based on responses from 24,000 online shoppers across 24 key global markets. It features eight chapters, profiling six shopper types and four generational segments, and explores how shifting consumer expectations are redefining the future of online retail. AI, social commerce, and sustainability are reshaping online retail, according to DHL's E-Commerce Trends Report 2025. It highlights growing demand for AI features, social platform purchases, and sustainable practices. Fast, flexible delivery and easy returns remain essential for cart conversion, while trust and environmental values increasingly drive consumer loyalty and purchasing decisions. "It's important to recognise that there isn't just one type of online shopper or one type of market. The reasons for cart abandonment can vary widely. Our E-commerce Trends Report analyses the trends and developments shaping online shopping worldwide to help our customers grow their businesses. Logistics plays a crucial role in this process, and we see ourselves as a vital partner, offering our customers relevant insights, expertise, and solutions to drive their success," said Pablo Ciano, CEO of DHL E-commerce . DHL's latest e-commerce trend report reveals that AI is one of the most highly anticipated and demanded innovations among consumers, with 7 in 10 shoppers globally wanting retailers to offer AI-powered shopping features. Virtual try-ons, AI-powered shopping assistants, and voice-enabled product search top the list of features consumers actively want to use. Shopping via voice commands is already on the rise, with 37 per cent of global shoppers — and nearly half of social commerce users — making purchases hands-free. As digital expectations rise, so does the demand for intuitive, tech-enabled shopping journeys that blend utility with delight. The traditional e-commerce website is increasingly being replaced — or bypassed — by social platforms. Consumers are turning to apps like TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook not just for discovery, but for purchase. Seven in ten shoppers say they have already made a purchase via social media, and that same proportion expects these platforms to become their primary shopping destination by 2030. The power of influence also plays a critical role: 82 per cent of shoppers say viral trends and social buzz influence their buying decisions. TikTok in particular is driving change in markets such as Thailand, where 86 per cent of online shoppers report buying through the app, and globally among Gen Z, where almost 50 per cent are already using the platform to purchase. This shift signals a major transformation in how and where brands need to engage with their audiences, and calls for seamless, mobile-native experiences built for in-app conversion. While new technologies continue to transform the digital shopping experience, it's the fundamentals of delivery and returns that remain the biggest drivers of cart abandonment. Shoppers aren't willing to compromise when it comes to convenience, flexibility, and control. In fact, 81 per cent of consumers say they will abandon their purchase if their preferred delivery option isn't available. Just as critically, 79 per cent will leave if the return process doesn't match their expectations. Trust also plays a major role, with three out of four shoppers reporting that they will not buy from a retailer if they don't trust the delivery and returns provider. These expectations emphasise the importance of transparent, customer-centric logistics strategies — not just as an operational concern, but as a core part of the conversion funnel. Sustainability has evolved from a brand differentiator into a core consumer demand. Globally, 72 per cent of shoppers now consider sustainability when making online purchases. For many, this goes beyond packaging or shipping — one in three shoppers have abandoned their carts due to sustainability concerns. Among Gen Z, this figure spikes to nearly one in two. Consumers are also embracing more circular models of consumption, with over half opting for pre owned or refurbished goods, motivated by both environmental values and cost efficiency. Additionally, 58 per cent of shoppers express willingness to participate in recycling or buy-back programmes offered by retailers. These behaviours point to a growing expectation that brands will not only reduce their footprint but actively empower consumers to shop more sustainably. Insights from DHL' E-Commerce Trends Report provides a clear roadmap for retailers aiming to capture the attention of today's diverse shopper demographics. By embracing technology, prioritising sustainability, and understanding the evolving preferences of consumers, businesses can transform challenges into opportunities.
New Indian Express
11 hours ago
- New Indian Express
India's EV policy: Can it deliver?
To encourage global brands to invest under the Scheme, they will be allowed to import Completely Built-in Units (CBUs) of e-4W with a minimum Cost, Insurance and Freight (CIF) value of $35,000 at reduced customs duty of 15% for five years from the application approval date. To avail this important benefit of the scheme, manufacturers would be required to make minimum investment of Rs4,150 crore. The maximum number of electric four-wheelers allowed to be imported at the reduced duty rate is capped at 8,000 units per year. The carryover of unutilised annual import limits would be permitted. The maximum benefits from this duty reduction are topped at Rs6,484 crore or the actual investment amount, whichever is lower. Manufacturers are also required to meet certain criteria including the need to achieve an annual turnover of at least Rs2,500 crore by the second year, Rs5,000 crore by the fourth year, and Rs7,500 crore by the fifth year. Additionally, they must reach local value-addition targets of 25% by the third year and 50% by the fifth year. They are also required to be of a certain size. The Global Group's Revenue (from automotive manufacturing) has to be at least Rs10,000 crore and if the applicant is an investment company, the revenue should not be less than Rs3,000 crore. The application widow under the scheme is likely to open soon, and will remain open for 120 days. However, the government can reopen the window as and when required till March 15, 2026. Union heavy industries minister H D Kumaraswamy has said that global players including Mercedes, Volkswagen-Skoda, Hyundai, and Kia have shown interest in applying under the EV policy.
