Lowering voting age could deepen class divide in schools due to lack of political literacy among teenagers
Academics have warned that the move to extend the vote to 16 and 17-year-olds risks only benefitting those from wealthier backgrounds, unless all students are given equal access to citizenship education.
Recent research from the University of Roehampton found specific classes on politics and democracy have been provided unevenly across the country, with more affluent schools likely to receive dedicated lessons.
It also found that pupils with university-educated parents are more likely to discuss politics at home, and feel more confident engaging in political debates.
This results in teenagers from low income households often being at a disadvantage in terms of understanding parties and voting systems, which the research concluded 'compounded class-based disparities'.
'Votes at 16 is an important milestone, but without proper political education in every school, we risk widening the democratic gap between privileged and disadvantaged teenagers', said Dr Bryony Hoskins, Professor of Political Comparative Social Science at the University of Roehampton.
'The students most likely to benefit are those already surrounded by political knowledge and encouragement, leaving disadvantaged young people behind again.
'The result is a political system that feels unrepresentative and irrelevant to many young people. If we ignore this, votes at 16 could actually entrench inequality.'
Labour's manifesto committed the party to lowering the voting age to 16 in line with Scottish and Welsh elections.
Sir Keir Starmer said it was 'important' to lower the voting age, as 16-year-olds were old enough to work and 'pay in' through tax, so should 'have the opportunity' to say how they wanted their money spent.
But a poll of 500 16 and 17-year-olds conducted for ITV News by Merlin Strategy found only half said they thought they should be allowed to vote, and only 18 per cent would definitely vote.
Labour stood to gain the most, with 33 per cent saying they would back the party, while 20 per cent said they would choose Reform UK and 18 per cent the Greens.
A EU and UK Research and Innovation project was trialled on 900 pupils earlier this ear, and found that a five-lesson political literacy programme improved students' belief in their own ability to engage with politics.
'We now have clear evidence that short, structured lessons that use inclusive education methods can make a real difference,' said Professor Hoskins. 'This should be part of every young person's education and not a postcode lottery.'
Ahead of the next general election, researchers are calling on the Department of Education to ensure political literacy becomes a compulsory part of the national curriculum.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
13 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pressure on Australia as allies to recognise state of Palestine; Thorpe condemns deaths in custody; and a big stick insect
Good afternoon. Pressure is growing for Australia to recognise a Palestinian state, after Canada announced it would join key allies France and the UK to formally recognise Palestine at the next UN general assembly meeting in September. The Canadian prime minister, Mark Carney, told reporters that the planned move was predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to reforms, including fundamentally reforming its governance and holding general elections in 2026 in which Hamas can play no part. Carney also said Hamas must release all hostages. The UK's announcement was also conditional, with Keir Starmer saying recognition would occur by September unless Israel held to a ceasefire, calling for the nation to commit to a two-state solution. Jim Chalmers, said he won't put a timeframe on Australian recognition of Palestine but said it's 'a matter of when, not if' it happens, while the Greens called for recognition as soon as possible. The Liberal senator James Paterson said Australia should not follow other countries based on an 'artificial measure of momentum'. Bruce Lehrmann claims police destroyed exonerating evidence and pending rape trial should be abandoned, court hears After-school carer charged with producing child abuse material at six facilities across northern Sydney Sam Groth's wife Brittany publicly defends couple's relationship as they threaten legal action against minister Helen Garner praises 'serious and sensitive' Dua Lipa after musician adds Australian author to her book club FBI opens first office in New Zealand 'to counter China and cybercrime' Fears for South Australia's annual cuttlefish gathering amid deadly algal bloom A newly discovered stick insect which weighs slightly less than a golf ball may be the heaviest insect in Australia, scientists say. The new species, named Acrophylla alta, was found in the high altitudes of the Atherton tablelands in north Queensland – and scientists said the habitat could be part of the reason for its large size. Watch the video here 'These are not just statistics. They are sons, daughters, mothers, fathers, cousins, siblings, grandchildren – lost to a system that continues to harm our people.' – Lidia Thorpe The Victorian independent senator condemned the 'shameful' number of Indigenous deaths in custody, including 17 this year, as the latest figures show just four of 19 Closing the Gap targets are on track to be met. Thorpe moved a condolence motion in the Senate, supported by Labor and the Greens, extending sympathies to the families of the 17 First Nations people who have died in custody this year and urging all parliamentarians to prevent further deaths in custody. Guardian Essential report: Albanese starts second term with solid approval, but Trump presidency looms – Australian Politics podcast As Anthony Albanese readies his second‑term reform agenda, Guardian Australia's Josh Butler speaks with Essential Media's Peter Lewis about the elephant in the room: Australia's dependence on the US and how its high‑stakes defence gambles could shape both his leadership and the nation's strategic future. Listen to the episode here Sign up to Afternoon Update Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Cloudbreak, near the island of Tavarua in western Fiji, is one of the best waves in the world. For decades, the long, hollow left-hand reef break has drawn surfers from around the globe; but until 2010, local surfers were forbidden from surfing the wave due to an exclusivity deal with a nearby surf resort. A decade and a half since Fiji's cabinet made all surfing areas open to the public, 16-year-old James Kusitino has just become Fiji's first professional surfer. Today's starter word is: IFF. You have five goes to get the longest word including the starter word. Play Wordiply. Enjoying the Afternoon Update? Then you'll love our Morning Mail newsletter. Sign up here to start the day with a curated breakdown of the key stories you need to know, and complete your daily news roundup. And follow the latest in US politics by signing up for This Week in Trumpland. If you have a story tip or technical issue viewing this newsletter, please reply to this email. If you are a Guardian supporter and need assistance with regards to contributions and/or digital subscriptions, please email
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Businesses set to be fined for late payments under new rules
Companies that consistently delay payments to their suppliers are set to face substantial fines, potentially running into millions of pounds, as the Prime Minister issued a stern warning that "it's time to pay up". In a significant move to bolster support for small businesses, the government is poised to unveil plans granting the small business commissioner enhanced powers to penalise large firms for persistent late payments. The commissioner will also gain new authority to enforce a crucial rule: suppliers must be paid within 30 days of a valid invoice, unless alternative terms have been agreed. This will be backed by spot checks designed to help identify breaches. Further legislation on the horizon will introduce maximum payment terms, initially set at 60 days, which will subsequently be reduced to 45 days. Sir Keir Starmer has highlighted the burden on businesses, stating that "too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments", a process he described as "exhausting". 'From builders and electricians to freelance designers and manufacturers — too many hardworking people are being forced to spend precious hours chasing payments instead of doing what they do best – growing their businesses,' Sir Keir said. 'It's unfair, it's exhausting and it's holding Britain back. 'So, our message is clear, it's time to pay up. 'Through our small business plan, we're not only tackling the scourge of late payments once and for all, but we're giving small business owners the backing and stability they need for their business to thrive, driving growth across the country through our plan for change.' The crackdown on late payments is part of a wider Government package and sits alongside a move to pump £4 billion of financial support into small business start-ups and growth. This is set to include £1 billion for new firms, with 69,000 start-up loans and mentoring support. 'This country is home to some of the brightest entrepreneurs and innovative businesses in the world, and we want to unleash their full potential by giving them back time and money to do what they do best – growing our local economies,' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said. 'Our small business plan – the first in over a decade – is slashing unnecessary admin costs, making it easier for businesses to set up shop and giving SMEs (small and medium-sized enterprises) the financial backing they need.' Andrew Griffith, the Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Cracking down on late payments will be welcome for small business but will mean nothing for the 218,000 businesses that have closed under Labour. 'The reality for businesses under Labour is a doubling of business rates, a £25 billion jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape. 'Only the Conservatives are on the side of the makers and will support businesses across Britain to create jobs and wealth.'
Spectator
an hour ago
- Spectator
Israel should make its own statehood claims
Britain intends to follow France, and now Canada, in recognising a Palestinian state in September. I've already set out the practical and theoretical problems inherent in such a policy, not least the absence of a functioning Palestinian state to recognise. But we shouldn't lose sight of another effect of this policy: in recognising a state which claims territory also claimed by Israel, Britain, France and Canada harm Israel's sovereign interests in territories where Jewish self-government can be traced back three millennia. This is one of the most inflammatory acts possible in statecraft, one which Whitehall has noticeably refrained from in other conflicts. Israel's angry reaction to Keir Starmer's announcement reflects the grievousness of this diplomatic punch in the face as well as the justified impression that Britain is rewarding the Palestinian leadership responsible for October 7. As I put it when David Cameron proposed recognition in the final months of Rishi Sunak's government, the message sent would be: 'Start a pogrom, get a state.' This is an obscene way to treat Israel, a friendly nation, but it also offends against the UK's national security interests. If terrorism has brought the Palestinians their biggest strategic victory in years — and it very much has — there is a lesson in that for terrorists in other theatres. Anyone who thinks there aren't homegrown jihadists in Britain now considering the logistics of domestic hostage-taking is dangerously naive. If Hamas got a state from Starmer, what could they get? There is anger in Jerusalem, and there should be, but anger is an empty force, futile unless it is channelled into something of substance. The British governing class is behaving as though it's the 1930s and Palestine is still being run by a good chap from the Foreign Office who reckons he could keep the peace with the Arabs if only those blasted Jews stopped causing trouble. It is in Israel's national interest, and its duty to the principle of hadar (dignity), to make it emphatically clear to Whitehall that it no longer calls the shots between the Jordan and the Mediterranean. The Israelis should tell Downing Street in no uncertain terms: this is our land. One of the strategic blunders that got Israel where it is today is the decision to make its case solely in security terms. Among earlier generations of Western leaders this was a winning argument but it has become an albatross for Israel in a new world order in which claims of victimhood and who is indigenous trump all other considerations. The Palestinian argument is that the land belongs to them. Instead of challenging that, the Israelis have for too long responded with a hand-wringing plea for security. This is the language of a burglar caught by the homeowner and begging for mercy. If you don't want to be insecure, don't steal other people's land. Which is why the core of Israel's case should be its legal claims to what is today called 'the West Bank' but was, prior to the mid-20th century, known as Judea and Samaria, the historical, cultural, linguistic and biblical cradle of Jewish civilisation. Security and other considerations should be secondary to the assertion of Israel's national rights in its historic homeland. The background to all this is too protracted to go into here but anyone interested in Israel's legal rights to the 'occupied' territories should consult the writing of international law professors Avi Bell, Eugene Kontorovich, and David M Phillips. So how does Israel make its case? By making new facts on the ground. The British are not the only ones who can act unilaterally. They have decided, with the encouragement of the Europeans and the Palestinians, to tell Israel where its rightful borders lie. It is within Israel's power and compelled by its interests to show Britain otherwise. Benjamin Netanyahu should table a Bill in the Knesset applying the law, jurisdiction and administration of the State of Israel to the settlement blocs and the Jordan Valley. The settlement blocs are Modiin Illit, Beitar Illit, Ariel, Maale Adumim, Gush Etzion and Givat Ze'ev, the six conurbations which are home to roughly 70 per cent of Israelis living in the West Bank. The Jordan Valley (Bik'at HaYarden) is a natural barrier between Israel and the Kingdom of Jordan and Jerusalem's sovereignty over the Israeli side of the valley is essential. Not only because it was part of the Palestine Mandate but — and here is where security comes in — it is also vital to regional stability. Given its strategically valuable topography, a terrorist entity which seized control of Bik'at HaYarden would pose a grave threat to both Israel and Jordan. To keep the Trump administration on board, or at least minimise the blowback, Israel should remain faithful to the president's own 'Deal of the Century' blueprint from 2020. That proposal, more substantive than it was given credit for, would have handed the Palestinians a viable state via land swaps. Naturally, the Palestinians did not engage with it beyond a few pro forma statements. Netanyahu should adopt the Trump plan's precept that, except where it is unavoidable, neither Arabs nor Jews should be evicted from their homes. To that end, any Arabs living in the areas Israel incorporates should be automatically granted Israeli citizenship, with the decision of whether to retain it left up to them. Applying its jurisdiction to these areas would reflect Israel's legal claims to the territory, enhance security on the ground, hinder Palestinian factions' ambitions to take over the West Bank, and send an unmistakable message to countries like Britain: you may not believe in enforcing your borders, but we believe in enforcing ours. The move would make a Palestinian state more difficult to achieve, though no more so than the past 25 years of Palestinian decisions. It would not, however, render such an entity impossible. The vast majority of the West Bank would remain untouched, continuing to be home to self-governing Palestinian areas, large swathes of vacant territory, and outlying Israeli settlements, which would stay under the military jurisdiction of the IDF. Israel does not, and should not, want to rule over millions of hostile foreigners, which is why it should only apply its jurisdiction where it is also prepared to grant citizenship. Jerusalem should maintain security control over the remainder of the West Bank and should focus future settlement building close to the current blocs. Should the Palestinians decide, at some point in the future, to come to the negotiating table and agree to a state of their own, Israel will enter those talks in a stronger position than today. Any suggestion of a retreat to the 1949 armistice lines will be out of the question, and negotiations would instead be about security buffer zones, Palestinian territorial contiguity, and the fate of the remaining settlements, as well as arrangements for access to holy sites. If the Palestinians go on rejecting bilateral talks and a negotiated settlement, that is their choice. It's a national tragedy but it's a self-inflicted one. Israel should remain open to the possibility of a state or state-like entity for the Palestinians but it can't force one on them. To the British political establishment, desperately trying to prop up the crumbling state ideologies of mass immigration, non-integration and multiculturalism, Israel is an ideal punching bag. Thump the Jews enough and perhaps the more unruly additions to your citizenry will simmer down and allow you to govern a little longer. Israel should refuse to be used as a prop by a precarious governing class prepared to trash its foreign relations to manage its domestic dilemmas. Keir Starmer has attacked Israel's sovereign rights. Israel should assert them in response.
