Deep-Sea Mining: The Battle Over Earth's Last Frontier
The Wild West is alive and well — it just moved underwater. As nations and companies race to stake their claim in the deep sea, industry is moving faster than regulation can keep up.
This year, the fight over deep-sea mining hit a critical turning point. In March, global negotiations at the International Seabed Authority (ISA) took center stage, only to be followed by a shocking move from The Metals Company (TMC), a Canadian firm, which is attempting to sidestep international law altogether.
So, what is deep-sea mining, why is it such a big topic, and what does this mean for the planet's future? Here's everything you need to know.
As demand for electric vehicle battery minerals like cobalt and nickel rises, the seafloor offers a potential source — potato-shaped rocks rich in these essential metals.
Companies like TMC argue that harvesting them is less destructive than land mining and that it's urgent for the renewable energy transition. But the reality isn't so simple.
Unlike land ecosystems, deep-sea habitats could take millennia to recover — if they ever do. Scientists warn of the deep sea's potential role in climate regulation, oxygen production, and biodiversity. Mining the seabed could cause irreversible damage to fragile ecosystems we're only beginning to understand.
Even if deep-sea mining started today, it would take decades to compete with land supply. Meanwhile, battery technology is already moving away from cobalt and nickel and toward alternatives like lithium iron phosphate, which don't use deep-sea metals. With better recycling and continued innovation, we may never even need deep-sea mining.
The International Seabed Authority (ISA) was established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) in 1994 to regulate international waters and ensure that the seabed is managed as the 'common heritage of humankind.' The ISA comprises 169 member countries, but the U.S. never ratified UNCLOS and therefore doesn't recognize the ISA's authority (this will be important later).
For years, TMC has been pressuring the ISA to draw up deep-sea regulations so they can start mining, but the rules are still incomplete. How can we draft regulations for an ecosystem we know so little about?
Frustrated and losing investors, TMC took to a more aggressive tactic, announcing it would apply for a license to mine in June 2025, with or without regulations. If successful, this could open the doors to large-scale industrialization of the deep sea.
At the March 2025 ISA meeting in Jamaica, negotiations were shifting toward a more science-driven, precautionary approach. But as opposition to mining grew, a desperate TMC announced plans to apply for an exploitation license in the U.S., taking advantage of outdated mining laws. These laws — written before UNCLOS and the ISA even existed — ignore international governance and decades of science.
This move shocked the world. By bypassing the ISA, TMC is disregarding international law, setting the stage for a 'Wild West' approach to ocean exploitation. Rumors are circulating that President Donald Trump plans to sign an executive order to open U.S. waters to deep-sea mining as well. The fear is that other major powers, like China and Russia, will follow suit, further undermining international governance.
Because the U.S. is not a member of the ISA, it can legally issue a mining license to TMC under its own laws, regardless of what the ISA decides. However, this doesn't mean the fight is lost. The rest of the world can still ban deep-sea mining. Other countries, consumers, and corporations can reject deep-sea minerals, making it difficult for TMC to find buyers. Pacific nations can make mining a logistical nightmare, refusing to let vessels refuel or dock. The goal now is to make mining the deep sea so unprofitable that it collapses under its own weight before it even begins.
SeaLegacy has teamed up with Sustainable Ocean Alliance (SOA), supporting their campaign for a global moratorium on deep-sea mining and ensuring that young people — those who will inherit the consequences of today's decisions — are heard in the halls of power.
Eugénia Barroca, SOA's regional representative for Europe and Lusophony, attended the ISA meeting in March. She recounted her eye-opening experience: 'While deep-sea mining poses an irreversible threat to marine ecosystems, concerns are growing that industry interests could be placed above science and equity.'
But despite pressure from TMC to move forward, global resistance is building. More nations are advocating for a precautionary pause or moratorium. 'It has been encouraging to see a strong coalition of states standing up for the ocean,' Eugénia said. 'Meanwhile, youth and civil society continue to play a vital role in safeguarding our planet's last untouched frontier.'
The next ISA meeting in July 2025 will be pivotal in determining how the world reacts to TMC's disregard for international law. SeaLegacy will be attending with SOA, standing up for the future of our oceans. This isn't just about deep-sea mining — it's about whether a handful of billionaires get to dictate the planet's future.Stay in the loop by following us and SOA on Instagram for real-time updates. If you'd like to learn more, sign up for SOA's free course on deep-sea mining and watch the Deep Rising documentary!
Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier co-founded SeaLegacy in 2014. SeaLegacy's mission is to inspire people to fall in love with the ocean, amplify a network of changemakers around the world, and catalyze hands-on diplomacy through hopeful, world-class visual storytelling. For more updates on their meaningful work, learn more about SeaLegacy, and subscribe to Ripple Effect, Katie Couric Media's sustainability newsletter.
The post Deep-Sea Mining: The Battle Over Earth's Last Frontier appeared first on Katie Couric Media.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China calls on WTO for greater oversight on unilateral tariffs
BEIJING (Reuters) -China's commerce minister has called on the World Trade Organisation to strengthen supervision over unilateral tariffs, and put forward objective and neutral policy proposals, the ministry said on Wednesday. At a WTO ministerial meeting in France, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reiterated China's stance on upholding a multilateral trading system and said WTO has the country's backing for a more important role in global economic governance. Wang also met with European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and had a "pragmatic and frank" discussion with his Canadian counterpart.

USA Today
42 minutes ago
- USA Today
Donald Trump pushes forward on tariffs despite court challenges: What to know
Donald Trump pushes forward on tariffs despite court challenges: What to know President Donald Trump is hiking tariffs on aluminum and steel as his administration presses countries to speed up trade talks, amid legal battles. Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel President Trump, during a visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania, announced he will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. WASHINGTON —President Donald Trump's trade agenda is about to enter a new phase, as the Republican moves forward − for now − with tariff hikes. In the face of mockery for repeatedly backing down from previous big tariff announcements, Trump is increasing tariffs on aluminum and steel imports to 50%. And he told nations in a letter this week that they have until June 4 to provide an update on the status of negotiations. The tariffs are expected to be a major topic of discussion during Trump's meeting on June 5 with Germany's new chancellor, Friedrich Merz, and in an as-of-yet unscheduled phone call that the White House says the United States president will be holding this week with his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping. At the same time, court challenges threaten to keep his administration from enforcing county-specific tariffs. The legal challenges to Trump's tariffs in court have only been a minor setback, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a June 1 appearance on "Fox News Sunday." "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said, adding that even if higher courts upheld rulings that the law Trump cited to impose tariffs didn't grant him that power, the administration would find another legal power to use. Countries quickly came back to the table to negotiate deals after an appeals court allowed Trump's tariffs to remain in place while the administration makes its case. Trump increases tariffs on aluminum and steel Trump has already started to pull some of those levers, announcing plans last Friday to double tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. Trump said a previously imposed tariff of 25% would increase to 50% on June 4. He signed an order formalizing the hike on June 3. The tariffs were expected to affect Canada, which is the largest supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States, and Mexico among other nations. The European Union promptly warned that it could expand a list of countermeasures it is preparing to go into effect in mid-July if a trade agreement with the United States is not reached. Canadian ambassador to the United States Kirsten Hillman told USA TODAY in an interview that the increase was "unideal" but Canada's steel and aluminum exports have other markets that producers have already started to pivot to where they remain in demand. The higher tariffs will be "very negative for the U.S. economy" and for trade between the two countries, Hillman said. She predicted that the hike would lead to "a wall" being erected between the countries for the two metals, prompting shortages and increased costs for Americans. "Those are really costs that are going to be borne by Americans through price increases in everything from cars to home goods, anything that's manufactured with those two metals, which is an awful lot of what we use in our everyday lives," Hillman said. White House downplays trade letter to countries In a separate escalation against America's trading partners, the office of the United States Trade Representative pressed countries to respond by June 4 with their best offers to avoid higher country-specific tariffs. Trump had previously told countries they had until July 8 to cut deals with the United States as part of a 90-day pause on so-called "reciprocal" tariffs he imposed and then halted earlier this year. A universal tariff of 10% that Trump put on most nations at the same time remains in place, as do the tariffs he put on Mexico, Canada and China that were tied to his efforts to combat illegal immigration to the United States and the flow of fentanyl. After a draft of the letter leaked to Reuters, two senior administration officials told USA TODAY that it was not a final notice. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt also sought to downplay the significance of the correspondence at a June 3 press briefing, where she told reporters, "This letter was simply to remind these countries that the deadline is approaching, and the president expects good deals, and we are on track for that." Canada, China, EU in the crosshairs It was not immediately clear which nations received the letter. Hillman told USA TODAY that Canada, whose minister for trade with the United States Dominic LeBlanc is currently in Washington for talks, was not among them. The meeting is a continuation of the conversation that took place between Trump and Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, the ambassador said, and was not expected to immediately produce a major announcement. Trump currently has a higher tariff of 25% on products not covered by a trade deal between the United States, Canada and Mexico, and a 10% tariff on potash (a kind of fertilizer) and Canadian energy products that are not exempted under the agreement. The administration has said it is talking about deals with more than a dozen countries but none have emerged so far outside of a framework agreement with the UK. The president last month threatened, and then backed off, a threat to impose a 50% tariff on the European Union, as trade talks with the bloc continue. The EU declined on June 2 to comment on the reported USTR letter. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer is currently in Paris negotiating with trading partners, the White House said on June 3. Trump will also speak to Merz of Germany on June 5 when the leader visits White House for the first time since his May election. Leavitt told reporters that Trump has been "very direct" in his talks with foreign leaders and had told them "they need to cut deals" with his administration. "He's unafraid to use tariffs to protect our industries and protect our workers, but he wants to see these tailor-made deals be signed," Leavitt added. Trump is also expecting to speak with Xi of China this week, the White House has said. The president last week accused China of violating an agreement between the two nations to deescalate their trade war. China fired back that it was the United States undermining the deal that saw the U.S. reduce a 145% tariff to 30% while negotiations take place. Leavitt affirmed to reporters on June 3 that call between the leaders was likely to take place this week but declined to provide additional details during her briefing. A spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in Washington declined to comment on the possibility of a call, the status of negotiations and whether Beijing had received the letter from the United States' trade representative. Trump tariffs hit legal snags The tariffs have faced numerous legal challenges since Trump began rolling them out shortly after taking office. Most recently, the U.S. Court of International Trade paused tariffs that Trump imposed without congressional approval only to have the ruling temporarily blocked by a federal appeals court. A U.S. district court also blocked Trump tariffs from hitting two toy manufacturers at the end of May. The Trump administration appealed that decision on June 2. In another case, a judge on June 2 dismissed a challenge from the state California, saying the filing belongs in the international trade court that is based in New York. The decision will allow California to bring its case to another appeals court. In a series of TV appearances on June 1, administration officials said they were confident courts would ultimately side with Trump. But if a judge rules against the administration, there are "other alternatives that we can pursue as well," the president's National Economic Council director, Kevin Hassett, said in an interview on ABC News' "This Week." He offered provisions of U.S. trade law that give the executive branch the power impose tariffs on imports Trump deems a national security threat or in response to unreasonable or discriminatory trade imbalances as potential options. "This is something we've been studying from 2017 on," he said. "We picked the best way. It's going to be upheld in court."


Fox Sports
an hour ago
- Fox Sports
Oilers slightly favored over Panthers in Stanley Cup Final rematch
Associated Press LAS VEGAS (AP) — The Stanley Cup Final is so close to being a tossup, Florida would likely be favored if the Panthers had home-ice advantage. But that edge belongs to Edmonton, which largely explains why the Oilers are slight favorites to win the series, which begins Wednesday. 'However you want to look at this pie, you could make an argument that either team could be favored,' Caesars Sportsbook head of hockey Karry Shreeve said. 'Home ice is definitely playing a part. You're just playing the percentages. The team that wins Game 1 of the Stanley Cup, they go on to win roughly 75% of the time.' BetMGM Sportsbook lists the Oilers as -130 favorites to win Game 1 and take that important 1-0 series lead. The sportsbook makes Edmonton as the -125 favorite to become the first Canadian team since Montreal in 1993 to hoist the Stanley Cup. Defending champion Florida, which beat Edmonton in seven games last year, is the +105 underdog. BetMGM trading manager Christian Cipollini said about 55% of the money has come in on the Oilers. 'I would expect that to probably continue,' Cipollini said. 'I think we'll probably take a little more Oilers money just because of Connor McDavid, but this is a rematch. Florida won last year, so I think we will end up getting an even projection.' Hockey handicapper Alex B. Smith, who co-hosts The Ice Guys podcast, doesn't buy the Oilers should be favored. 'You don't see rematches too often in the Cup Final,' Smith said. "When you do, you always ask yourself the obvious question: Are these two teams better or worse than they were last year? I'd say Florida is a better version of themselves from last year. Edmonton (is) slightly worse than last year, especially when you look at no Zach Hyman available for this series. Connor Brown is returning for Game 1, but how healthy is he going to be? 'I give the edges to Florida based off of they've been playing better, sound defense. I think they're a tighter team than they were last year.' McDavid to repeat? Edmonton's captain became the second skater and sixth player to be awarded the Conn Smythe Trophy as the playoffs MVP last season while playing on the losing team. McDavid leads this postseason in scoring with 26 points, one ahead of teammate Leon Draisaitl, and is the +100 favorite at BetMGM to win the Conn Smythe, giving him a chance to make even more history even if the Panthers win. 'Are they really going to give McDavid back-to-back Conn Smythes in losing efforts?' Cipollini asked. 'He is the favorite because of the points scored and there's already a precedent that they could give it to him here, but that's something to watch as the games get going. If there is a Florida player that isn't really standing out ... there is a real world where it could be him again in a losing effort.' Relying on Skinner Oilers goalie Stuart Skinner has long been viewed as a weakness on the roster, a reputation that appeared to be sealed when he was benched two games into the playoffs. But Skinner is a major reason Edmonton is still playing. He has allowed one or zero goals in five of his past seven starts, three of them shutouts. Another great run in the net could put Skinner, listed +3500 at BetMGM, in position to win the Conn Smythe. 'I would not have told you this was sustainable before,' Smith said of Skinner's hot play. 'Now, with one series left, it certainly is sustainable.' Experienced vs. tired Panthers Florida is making its third consecutive appearance in the Stanley Cup Final, another deep run in which fatigue could finally catch up to the Panthers. Or they could simply be on a heater having won 10 of their previous 11 playoff series. Shreeve said the metrics point to a Panthers championship and though either outcome would be fine with Caesars, a Florida victory would be better. 'I don't hate where we're at with this one,' Shreeve said. 'Last year was a little bit tougher because more people liked Florida, but people are all about Edmonton this postseason, which I like.' NBA romp could benefit NHL Because this series apparently could go either way and Oklahoma City is heavily favored over Indiana in the NBA Finals, that could increase betting interest in the Stanley Cup Final. 'I think it helps the NBA is getting the less sexier matchup,' Shreeve said. 'The more bettable series is going to be Edmonton-Florida. If things stay tight, it has a chance to go six or seven games, which would help.' ___ AP NHL playoffs: and recommended