
‘Shameful': Students, alumni say Brown deal with Trump administration disrespects trans students
A weekday briefing from veteran Rhode Island reporters, focused on the things that matter most in the Ocean State.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'To have made an agreement on the backs of our queer and trans friends is really shameful,' said Talia Reiss, co-president of Planned Parenthood Advocates at Brown, a student club that advocates for reproductive rights and gender-affirming care.
Advertisement
'Students want to feel like their identities are supported by the university,' Reiss said.
Related
:
Reiss and co-president Cara Hutton, who are both studying public health, said the group was not 'immediately concerned' about Brown's promise, as part of the agreement, to not provide gender-affirming surgery or puberty blockers to minors, since few students at the university are under 18.
Advertisement
Brown has never performed such surgeries, and said it would refer those students to outside medical care; the agreement does not affect
'I'm not naive to the fact that Brown is a business and they need that money,' Hutton said. 'It just seems like some really hard trade-offs for that money.'
Peter Swope, a 2024 graduate, said he saw the concession on gender as likely 'symbolic,' but concerning nonetheless.
'While the practical impacts may be fairly limited, I'm disappointed in Brown equivocating at all on trans rights,' Swope said.
He questioned how the adoption of Trump's definition of biological sex would apply to housing, for example, noting that a friend who identifies as a transgender woman had lived in single-gender housing on campus.
'Single-gender under the Trump administration's definition means exclusively cis people, and not trans people,' Swope said.
According to
President Christina Paxson was not available for an interview Thursday. But in a letter to students and faculty Wednesday Paxson wrote that Brown 'agreed to abide by Title IX and NCAA eligibility rules regarding the participation of transgender athletes in intercollegiate sports,' and said the university will 'continue to provide housing and restroom access in a way that allows for gender-inclusive, women-only and men-only options."
Advertisement
It is not clear if there are currently any transgender student athletes at the university.
James Kraemer, a 2008 Brown graduate who studied biophysics, said he was 'shocked and upset' when he read the agreement. He and other alumni
to help the university defend itself against Trump's demands.
'I think they're really doing a disservice to marginalized members of the community,' Kraemer said. 'It's really throwing non-cis-gender people to the wolves.'
He said that when he attended the university, Brown was at the forefront of progressive gender studies. 'For the university, which has championed the study of this for decades to then say, 'OK, we're going to agree to that,' is truly shameful and hurtful,' Kraemer said.
'It pains me to see the university ceding moral ground to this administration in exchange for research funding,' said Dylan Spaulding, a senior scientist in the Global Security Program at the Union of Concerned Scientists who graduated from Brown in 2004. 'Brown is throwing people under the bus in exchange for staying out of the cross-hairs, which is a cowardly betrayal of its principles.'
A Brown spokesperson, Brian Clark, said housing assignments for first-year students 'will continue to be based on sex assigned at birth, with the ability for students to opt into gender-inclusive housing as they wish.'
'We remain fully committed to serving the health needs of all Brown students in a manner consistent with our long-established policy of nondiscrimination, which includes sex, gender identity and gender expression,' Clark said.
Advertisement
Christina Paxson, the president of Brown University, struck a deal with the Trump administration on Wednesday to restore federal funding.
Jonathan Wiggs/Globe Staff
While the gender-related concessions drew the loudest reaction, Brown also agreed to provide data to the federal government to prove race is not a factor in admissions. The university also agreed not to have any programs with 'race-based outcomes' or 'diversity targets,' nor will the university 'promote unlawful DEI goals.'
The agreement says Brown will maintain its academic freedom and the federal government will not interfere with what its professors teach. The Ivy League university agreed to provide $50 million to state workforce development efforts, and will not pay anything to the federal government, unlike Columbia University, which
It is unclear whether Brown's agreement will influence those
Education Secretary Linda McMahon celebrated the reversal of what she called the 'decades-long woke-capture' of higher education.
'Aspiring students will be judged solely on their merits, not their race or sex,' McMahon said.
A pro-Palestinian encampment at Brown University in Providence on April 24, 2024.
PHILIP KEITH/NYT
Rhode Island political and civic leaders offered split views on the settlement. Providence Mayor Brett Smiley's office said he was 'glad' Brown was able to preserve its 'critical funding,' while Attorney General Peter Neronha expressed disappointment the school made a deal of any kind with Trump.
'I think he's a blackmailer, frankly,' Neronha said. 'My overall view is to fight, not give in, even if it requires sacrifice.'
Advertisement
Meanwhile, Adam Greenman, president of the Jewish Alliance of Rhode Island, praised the agreement, saying it 'reaffirms the commitment that we have seen from President Paxson to ensure a thriving Jewish life on Brown's campus.'
But Rabbi Danya Ruttenberg, who
'I think this agreement will engender profound resentment towards Jewish students, and will draw a greater wedge between Jews and other communities with whom we have been in solidarity,' Ruttenberg said.
Steph Machado can be reached at

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOJ to launch grand jury probe over Russia allegations against Obama officials
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Monday directed Justice Department officials to open a grand jury investigation over how Obama administration officials handled intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 election. The grand jury probe marks another escalation of the Trump administration's focus on allegations of wrongdoing by Obama officials, including the former president. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has in recent weeks declassified various documents connected to Russia's election interference, claiming it showed 'treasonous conspiracy' by Obama administration officials. 'Following the compelling case outlined by DNI Tulsi Gabbard, which exposed clear and blatant weaponization by corrupt intelligence officials acting at the behest of the Democrat Party and likely former President Obama, the Administration remains committed to conducting a thorough investigation,' White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement. 'This effort aims to provide the American people with the truth about the extent to which former government officials worked to sabotage the Trump administration and undermine the will of the American people in a clear attempt to subvert our Constitutional Republic,' Fields added. Fox News first reported that Bondi had directed the start of a grand jury investigation. The documents Gabbard has released do little to suggest wrongdoing by the intelligence community in seeking to investigate Russia's efforts to influence the 2016 contest. Gabbard and other officials have pushed back on established findings from the intelligence community and a bipartisan Senate panel that Russia showed a preference for then-candidate Donald Trump in the 2016 election. Gabbard has alleged that Obama officials manipulated intelligence to harm Trump. Gabbard referred the documents to the Justice Department and FBI for potential criminal referrals, though the director repeatedly dodged when pressed on what crime former President Obama could be charged with. Obama's office issued a rare public statement calling the document drops a 'distraction' as Trump faced calls to release information about the prosecution of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. James Clapper, who served as director of national intelligence under Obama and has faced intense criticism from Trump officials, has called the allegations against him 'patently false and unfounded.'


NBC News
18 minutes ago
- NBC News
Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama admin review of 2016 election
Attorney General Pam Bondi has directed DOJ prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation of whether Obama administration officials committed federal crimes when they assessed Russia's actions during the 2016 election, a senior Trump administration official said. The move comes after the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, claimed in a White House press conference last month that top Obama administration officials carried out a 'treasonous conspiracy' against former President Trump. Gabbard said she was sending criminal referrals to the Justice Department. A former senior DOJ official condemned the move as 'a dangerous political stunt.' And a former senior national security official pointed out that multiple past reviews, including ones conducted by Republicans, found no such crimes. "There's no logical, rational basis for this," said the official, who asked not to be named. The senior Trump Administration official said there is no exact timetable for when the grand jury will meet and that it could take months for the proceeding to begin. The news of Bondi's letter was first reported by FOX News. The official said a letter signed by Bondi instructs an unnamed federal prosecutor to begin presenting evidence to a grand jury to secure potential federal indictments. But the letter did not say what the charges would be, who the grand jury will investigate, or where the grand jury will meet. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. Democratic lawmakers have accused the administration of seeking to distract attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case. Conservative media and influencers have criticized how the administration has handled the case and demand the release of more documents and information. President Trump, Attorney General Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have all been criticized by conservative media and influencers over their handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and material related to it. The idea that there was a conspiracy by the Obama administration officials against Trump was contradicted by a 2020 bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee review, which found significant evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Then Senator Marco Rubio, the acting chair of the committee at the time, signed off on the report. The plans for a grand jury investigation are the latest in a series of actions by the Trump administration designed to rewrite the history 2016 election and seek retribution against those the president accuses of trying to sabotage his first term in the White House. Democratic lawmakers and former senior officials say Trump and his deputies have used the tools of government authority to try to 'rewrite' the history of the 2016 election, seeking to reverse an eight-year-old assessment that Russia waged an information war to boost Trump's candidacy. Trump and his supporters have long claimed that intelligence and law enforcement officials sought to undermine his first term by allegedly overstating Russia's interference in the 2016 election and investigating Trump's aides over their possible contacts with Moscow. They have accused former FBI director James Comey and former CIA director John Brennan of using the probes as a way to undermine Trump. A lawyer for Comey did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Comey and Brennan, who is a paid contributor to NBC News and MSNBC, have both denied wrongdoing. The intelligence community's analysis of the 2016 election and subsequent government investigations failed to satisfy the far-right and far-left sides of the American political divide. A probe by special counsel Robert Mueller found that Russia intervened in 2016 to undercut Hillary Clinton. But it did not find evidence thay the Trump team colluded with the Kremlin, as some voices on the left had suggested. At the same time, the special counsel Trump appointed in his first term, John Durham, disappointed far-right activists with his three-year investigation. Durham found no criminal conspiracy among Obama administration officials to fabricate intelligence about Russia's actions in 2016. He also filed no charges against the intelligence officers who oversaw a 2017 assessment that found Russia had tried to skew the election outcome in Trump's favor.


E&E News
21 minutes ago
- E&E News
Court OKs Trump plan to curtail unions at EPA, Interior, DOE
A federal appeals court cleared the way last week for the Trump administration to pursue plans to end collective bargaining for employees at the Interior and Energy departments, EPA and other agencies, even as unions are challenging the changes in court. On Friday, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals paused a lower court order that prevented the administration from enforcing President Donald Trump's March executive order barring collective bargaining at more than two dozen agencies and sub-agencies based on national security concerns. The new order, an emergency stay, is in effect while the challenges to the EO works its way through the courts. Advertisement 'Whatever harm to collective bargaining rights that Plaintiffs will experience due to a stay is mitigated by the direction to agencies to refrain from terminating collective bargaining agreements until litigation has concluded,' the court said in an unsigned order.