Watch: Sea Cow Lake fire still burning as toxic smoke chokes residents
The area's Ward councillor, Andrew Akkers, wrote to the SA Human Rights Commission (SAHRC), accusing authorities of failing to protect residents' constitutional rights to a safe and healthy environment.
Related story: Toxic smoulder takes over Sea Cow Lake
The fire, burning since early June on private land in Gum Tree Road in Sea Cow Lake, affects multiple communities, including Kenville, Sea Cow Lake, Effingham Heights, Avoca, and Greenwood Park, as well as parts of neighbouring Ward 36.
'The situation constitutes a violation of our constitutional rights,' Akkers wrote in his complaint, citing residents' right to an environment not harmful to health (Section 24 of the Constitution) and the right to access health care services (Section 27).
According to Akkers, illegal dumping has plagued the site for more than a decade, with rubbish now spilling into a protected D'MOSS conservancy area, threatening ecologically sensitive land. Efforts to extinguish the fire have hit multiple roadblocks.
The landfill's towering height, reportedly around 17m, and the unstable terrain, have made it impossible to smother the fire with retardants or to deploy firefighters safely.
'The municipality's inaction constitutes a failure to protect the community from environmental harm,' Akkers said, accusing officials of neglecting their duty to prevent ecological damage and uphold environmental laws.
In his letter, Akkers has urged the SAHRC to investigate the fire, determine whether constitutional rights have been breached, and compel state organs to intervene and rehabilitate the land. He also called for affected residents to be given a platform to voice their concerns.
'I sincerely hope the Commission will intervene in this urgent matter to safeguard the rights, imminently endangered health, and dignity of our affected communities,' Akkers said.
The SAHRC responded to Akkers stating that it would assess the complaint to determine whether it falls within the mandate of the SAHRC; or whether it should be dealt with by another organisation, institution, statutory body or institution created by the Constitution or any applicable legislation.
Health implications
Ward 36 resident Crystal Little, who lives in Acutt Avenue, said she has to sleep with room doors closed in an attempt to keep the toxic smell out.
'It smells like rubber and chemicals burning. The stench gets worse towards early morning, around 02:00, and it wakes me up. I have to close all the doors and windows but the smell still creeps in. I cover my head with blankets when I go to sleep. I suffer nose bleeds and battle with a throat burning. Everyone in this area is hoping the matter will be sorted,' she said.
Little added that she and other residents are aware that a landslide could occur if the fire department tries to douse the smoulder.
'We have had terrible flooding over the recent years and no avalanche has happened. The safe thing to do is to evacuate everyone living at the bottom of the illegal dump site and for the fire department to spray a fine trickle of continuous water, similar to a soaking rain, in order to stop the toxic matter from burning,' said Little.
'I live in Riverside and I have never experienced air pollution like we have at the moment. It is a pungent acrid smell in which you cannot breathe. It is totally unacceptable that we have to live like this,' said Bruce Forrest.
'That is totally unacceptable to us the citizens and ratepayers residing in the area. The officials are not taking this seriously at all and are just fobbing us off,' he added.
eThekwini Municipality spokesperson Gugu Sisilane said the City's Emergency Services, Environmental Health Practitioners, and Air Quality Specialists are working jointly to mitigate the impact of smoke currently emitting from an illegal dumpsite in the Gum Tree Road area.
#GumtreeRoad #ToxicFumesDurban #Ward34 ♬ original sound – caxtonlocalmedia @caxtonlocalmedia Three eThekwini Municipality departments were called out to Gumtree Road in Ward 34 last Thursday after residents raised the alarm over toxic fumes emanating from an old illegal dumpsite. Toxic chemicals had been dumped on this site in previous years until Metro SAPS intervened last year and fined the culprit. These chemicals, now underground, is what is burning and expelling toxic fumes into the air. Anil Beekrum, chairman of the Kenville and Sea Cow Lake Residents and Ratepayers Association and vice-chairman for the Kenville and Sea Cow Lake Community Policing Forum said he has stopped a vehicles from dumping in the area and reported registration numbers to law enforcement and the City's parks and gardens department. Municipal spokesperson Gugu Sisilane said: 'A multi-disciplinary operation is working round the clock to alleviate the impact of pollution and restore air quality in the affected areas as swiftly as possible.' #CaxtonLocalMedia
For more from Berea Mail, follow us on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also check out our videos on our YouTube channel or follow us on TikTok.
Click to subscribe to our newsletter – here
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
13 hours ago
- The Citizen
ConCourt declares appointment of 5 CGE commissioners invalid due to limited public participation
The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. The Constitutional Court (ConCourt) has ruled that the appointments of five commissioners to the Commission for Gender Equality (CGE) are invalid, citing Parliament's failure to ensure adequate public participation in the selection process. The ruling follows a legal challenge brought by the non-profit organisation Corruption Watch. The respondents in the matter included the speaker of the National Assembly, the president, the Information Regulator, and the five CGE commissioners. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank unlawfully interfered in Absa chair appointment, says court Media Monitoring Africa was admitted as amicus curiae (friend of the court). Corruption Watch contested the appointments of CGE commissioners chairperson Nthabiseng Sepanya-Mogale, deputy chairperson Prabashni Subrayan Naidoo, Thando Gumede, Bongani Ngomane, and Leonashia Leigh-Ann Van Der Merwe, all of whom took office in March 2023. These appointments, for terms of up to five years, were made by the president upon recommendation by Parliament. CGE commissioners' appointment process challenged The nomination process was led by Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Women, Youth and Persons with Disabilities. It began in June 2022 and closed nearly a month later. A shortlist of four candidates was compiled in late August, while public comment was invited between 2 and 16 September. Submissions were to be made via an online form linked through Parliament's website. The link led to a spreadsheet listing candidates' names and qualifications, but their full CVs were not published. READ MORE: Initiation schools: Commission wants answers on why recommendations haven't been carried out Despite Corruption Watch requesting an extension of the public comment period to 30 days, the removal of the character limit on submissions, and the release of CVs, the National Assembly proceeded with its recommendations to the president following candidate interviews. The appointments were announced on 25 February 2023, and the commissioners assumed office on 1 March. Corruption Watch then brought its application before the ConCourt under section 167(4)(e) of the Constitution, which grants the court exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether the National Assembly has failed to fulfil a constitutional obligation. The organisation argued that Parliament's process was flawed due to the limited public access to information about candidates, a 2 000-character restriction on submissions, and the short 14-day window for public comment. (4/4) CCT 333/23 Corruption Watch (RF) NPC v Speaker of the National Assembly and Others August 1, 2025 The speaker defended the process, stating it was reasonable and consistent with past procedures. It was argued that the 14-day period was sufficient, that public comments were properly considered, and that CVs could not be published without candidates' consent in accordance with the Protection of Personal Information Act (Popia). However, the Information Regulator clarified in an affidavit that such consent is not required when the information is needed for the performance of public duties. ConCourt judgment In a unanimous ruling delivered on Friday, the ConCourt sided with Corruption Watch and found that the public participation process was insufficient. 'In the circumstances, the appointment process conducted by the National Assembly therefore did not comply with the obligations imposed by section 59(1)(a) of the Constitution and is therefore invalid,' the summary of the 1 August judgement reads. The declaration of invalidity has been suspended for 12 months from the date of the order, giving Parliament time to conduct a constitutionally compliant appointment process and allowing the president to make appointments. Reactions The CGE acknowledged the ruling in a brief statement on Friday. 'The commission remains committed to its legislative mandate and will continue to discharge its responsibilities while Parliament undertakes its processes. 'The commission will not make further public pronouncements or respond to media enquiries on this matter,' the statement reads. In addition, Corruption Watch welcomed the outcome. 'South African citizens have a right to participate fully in these processes, particularly where such institutions are at the forefront of ensuring justice and enforcement of human rights in the country. 'The opportunity for people to have their say in the appointment of representatives to Chapter 9 institutions like the CGE, is an important example of that process,' the organisation said in a statement. The CGE operates under section 187 of the Constitution, with a mandate to promote and protect gender equality. In March last year, six other commissioners – Seeham Samaai, Mulalo Grace Nemathaheni, Mfundo Nomvungu, Yanga Malotana, Kamohelo Rodney Teele, and Marion Lynn Stevens – were recommended by Parliament and subsequently approved by the president. NOW READ: MK party and Zuma suffer blow as ConCourt rules in Ramaphosa's favour
The South African
16 hours ago
- The South African
Cyril Ramaphosa replaces Senzo Mchunu with new Minister of Police
Professor Firoz Cachalia has been sworn in as the new Minister of Police during ceremony held at the Union Buildings in Pretoria on Friday. 'In terms of the powers vested in me by Section 91(3)(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996, I have decided to appoint the following person as Minister for the portfolio indicated in the signed President's Act. The said Minister-Designate, who is about to become Minister, is Professor Firoz Cachalia… (sic),' said President Cyril Ramaphosa during the ceremony. The swearing in follows President Ramaphosa's announcement last month that he had placed Police Minister Senzo Mchunu on a leave of absence with immediate effect. The affirmation was administered by Acting Judge President, Aubrey Ledwaba, following Cachalia's appointment by President Cyril Ramaphosa. The President further announced the establishment of a judicial commission of inquiry, led by Acting Deputy Chief Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, into allegations made by KwaZulu-Natal Police Commissioner, Lieutenant General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. Mkhwanazi had raised concerns about an alleged criminal syndicate that has infiltrated law enforcement and intelligence structures. He also accused Mchunu of colluding with criminal elements to disband the Political Killings Task Team based in KwaZulu-Natal. Director-General in The Presidency, Phindile Baleni, who spoke at the swearing-in, congratulated the newly appointed Minister. 'Minister, we congratulate you on your appointment and wish you much success in your duties and endeavours to make South Africa and the world a better place for all,' Baleni said. Addressing members of the media after the ceremony, President Cyril Ramaphosa acknowledged the concerns regarding the seeming duplication in the police ministry. 'I know there is a technicality about seeming to have two Ministers in the same portfolio, and that is a matter I do believe is going to be resolved within a short space of time. 'I directed the commission [of inquiry] to complete its work as quickly as possible, so whatever confusion there might be is going to be of a short duration. I expect a report from the commission within three months and if they have to ask for an extension, we will give consideration to that. 'I do want this matter to be resolved as quickly as possible but at the same time, we have had to provide leadership to the police service. We can't leave a vacuum. Whilst all of this is happening, Minister Mchunu is on leave while this matter is being resolved, and he is preparing himself, as I hear, to appear before the commission,' the President said. Speaking to the media about his new role, Cachalia said he had not yet had an opportunity to meet with the President but had been informed that the first Cabinet meeting would take place on Wednesday, and he assumed the President would engage with him in due course. Cachalia assured the public that he is fully aware of the responsibility that comes with the role and is committed to prioritising their safety and security. 'I don't think there are any specific fears going into this portfolio. I understand the moment the country is in and the weight of the responsibility that I have, together with the others in government. I want to assure the public that their safety and security is uppermost in my mind. That's what I am going to focus on, and I hope that I will be able to take the country forward,' he said. Responding to a question on whether he supports the work of the Political Killings Task Team, Cachalia said he would comment after meeting with National Commissioner Fannie Masemola on Thursday next week. 'I don't think it will be appropriate for me to comment on that without having the benefit of a discussion with him,' he said. Cachalia also touched on his dual role as chairperson of the National Anti-Corruption Council, whose term ends at the end of the month. 'I do think that my appointment as a Minister of this portfolio, while I am still the chairperson of the National Anti-Corruption Council – the term of which expires at the end of this month… I am now in a better position than I was as chairperson to take the recommendations of the Council forward, and I will certainly be doing so.' Cachalia said he would ask the National Commissioner, during their upcoming meeting, to arrange a session between the Anti-Corruption Council and the police management team to discuss the Council's recommendations, adding that it is his intention to work closely with the Minister of Justice, as the recommendations impact both their portfolios. 'We will together be in a much better position going forward to take those recommendations forward. The recommendations that the Council has made are the ones I am committed to fully implementing,' Cachalia said. On when he will travel to KwaZulu-Natal to meet with General Mkhwanazi, Cachalia said the visit will depend on his discussion with the National Commissioner. 'As the national Minister, I have to visit all the provinces – in what sequence and with what priorities in mind, that still has to be determined. So, I will answer that question in the coming days,' he said. Minister Cachalia vowed to work hard and remain focused on his responsibilities despite the challenges surrounding his appointment. 'I will work hard. I am not distracted by the noise, and I am not driven by political ambition. I have been given a task. I am going to tackle the task without fear or favour, subject of course to the President's guidance and direction as a member of the Cabinet,' the Minister said. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
The South African
18 hours ago
- The South African
Major court battle looming over City of Cape Town rates
The City of Cape Town is heading into a potential legal battle over its recently implemented 'city cleaning levy,' with civil rights organisation AfriForum preparing to challenge the charge in court. This legal challenge follows the North Gauteng High Court's recent decision to overturn a similar levy imposed by the City of Tshwane, declaring it 'invalid and unlawful.' AfriForum successfully argued that Tshwane's R194-per-month fee amounted to illegal double taxation, violating both constitutional and municipal regulations. Now, AfriForum is setting its sights on Cape Town's version of the charge, which came into effect on 1 July. The group has instructed its legal team to initiate proceedings, calling the levy a 'fundraising ploy' that mirrors Tshwane's flawed approach. Unlike Tshwane's flat-rate levy, Cape Town's cleaning fee is calculated progressively based on property values and applies to all property owners. The City insists the charge forms part of its 'pro-poor budget,' which includes R40 billion in infrastructure investment over the next three years. Officials maintain the levy is a necessary tool to fund core services and improve urban cleanliness. However, critics argue the fee lacks a proper legislative basis and serves more as a revenue-generation mechanism than a targeted service fee. The South African Property Owners Association (SAPOA) and the Cape Town Collective Ratepayers' Association (CTCRA) have both expressed strong opposition. 'This is not just about Cape Town,' said a CTCRA spokesperson. 'If this levy is allowed to stand, it sets a dangerous precedent for municipalities across the country to impose similar charges without transparent legal justification.' In Tshwane's case, the court found the city had violated Section 229(1) of the Constitution and Section 74(1) of the Municipal Systems Act, which limit how municipalities can raise revenue. AfriForum CEO Kallie Kriel argues that Cape Town's cleaning levy falls into the same constitutional trap. 'The City is using the levy as a disguised tax to plug budget gaps caused by mismanagement,' Kriel said. 'We believe the courts will agree.' SAPOA has already filed for a judicial review of the levy, while the CTCRA is applying to join the proceedings as amicus curiae (friend of the court). If the court rules in their favour, the City could be ordered to refund residents – mirroring Tshwane's outcome. While Cape Town argues the fee is vital for maintaining essential services, opponents view it as a test case for municipal accountability and financial transparency. The outcome could reshape how South African cities structure service charges and tax residents. As legal filings proceed, Cape Town residents and property owners remain in limbo, uncertain whether the cleaning levy will be upheld – or scrapped, with refunds to follow. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
