Toyota to shift some GR Corolla production to UK, eyes faster US deliveries
Toyota plans to move some production of its GR Corolla sports car to Britain and will spend around $56 million on a dedicated line there to build exports for North America, according to two people familiar with the matter.
By shifting some production from Japan, Toyota aims to use excess capacity in Britain to help it cut delivery wait times for the car, said the people, who spoke on condition of anonymity. The move was not in reaction to President Donald Trump's tariffs on automobile imports, they said.
The Trump administration agreed this month to cut tariffs on auto imports from Britain to 10 per cent for up to 100,000 vehicles a year. Japan, which has been hit with 25 per cent auto tariffs, is seeking to have them repealed.
Toyota produces the GR Corolla in Japan for the Japanese market and for export to North America and other markets. But it hasn't been able to keep up with North American demand, given keen interest in the gasoline-powered car from engine enthusiasts, the people said.
It will set up a production line at the Burnaston plant in Derbyshire and invest around 8 billion yen ($56 million) to produce 10,000 cars annually for export to North America from the middle of 2026, according to the people.
Burnaston began operations in 1992 and possesses advanced production technology. It has suffered a decline in production since Brexit, said the people. The plant already produces the Corolla GR's base model, the Corolla hatchback, making it a natural choice, one of the people said.
Engineers will be temporarily dispatched from Japan to share production technology and other expertise, the people said.
In response to Reuters questions, Toyota said it was always looking for ways to optimise production. The report was not something the company had publicly announced, it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
11 minutes ago
- Time of India
Indian-American Congressman criticises Trump administration's freeze on student visa interviews
Live Events Indian-American Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi has criticized the Trump administration 's decision to freeze student visa interviews and consider strict social media screening for international students . He called it a "reckless decision" that could damage the country's economy and national security, as per a report by The Times of also said that shutting international students out is a "strategic blunder" that weakens US global competitiveness. "I strongly oppose the Trump Administration's reckless decision to freeze new student visa interviews and consider sweeping, undefined social media vetting for international students. International students help drive cutting-edge research, fuel our universities, and build the industries of tomorrow," said Krishnamoorthi to TOI."These young people are not only scholars and innovators—they are vital to America's economic strength and national security. By developing the next generation of technologies and the good-paying jobs that come with them, they help ensure the United States remains a global leader," he remarks came after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered embassies and consulates to stop scheduling new visa interviews for student applicants. The Trump administration is also considering requiring students to undergo expanded vetting of their social media activity.(Join our ETNRI WhatsApp channel for all the latest updates)In a separate move, Trump suggested that Harvard University should cap the number of foreign students it admits at 15 percent. He claimed that the current figure, around 31 percent, includes students from "very radicalised" regions.(With inputs from TOI)


India.com
29 minutes ago
- India.com
Masterstroke by Modi govt, India makes big move for this country, Pakistan, China in tension due to...
Masterstroke by Modi govt, India makes big move for this country, Pakistan, China in tension due to... New Delhi: India has given Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) a special exemption from some foreign investment rules. The decision has been taken by the Indian government with an aim to attract more capital and boost financial ties between the two countries. This will also strengthen relations between New Delhi and Riyadh. The move will also enable the Middle East country to invest more in India. A lot of money from Saudi Arabian companies is invested in Mukesh Ambani's companies. According to the current rule, if a foreign company of any country invests in India, then its investment coming from different parts will be considered as one, with an investment limit of 10 percent. Because of this rule, companies of Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) were not able to invest much in India. This move by India will give tensions to China and Pakistan as both the countries also want to improve their economic relations with Saudi Arabia. What Will Happen Now? The Indian government has exempted Saudi Arabia's PIF from the current rule. It simply means that different companies of PIF will now be able to make separate investments in the country. This will make it easier for them to invest money in the Indian stock market. India wants Saudi Arabia to invest more in the country. Saudi Arabia has a lot of money to invest and India needs that money for development work. The middle east country also wants to invest in fast-growing countries such as India. Under 'Vision 2030', Saudi wants to remove its economy from dependence on oil. Discussion Between The Two Countries? During Prime Minister Modi's April visit to Saudi Arabia, both nations committed to boosting investment collaborations in energy, infrastructure, and healthcare. Simultaneously, negotiations are underway for a bilateral investment treaty. However, a Reuters source indicates that restrictions on combining investments from various sovereign entities may hinder the Saudi fund and its affiliates from investing autonomously. What Is PIF? The Public Investment Fund (PIF), a major global sovereign wealth fund with approximately USD925 billion in assets, has invested USD1.5 billion in Jio Platforms and USD1.3 billion in Reliance Retail, both Indian companies. This investment aligns with India's aim to attract long-term capital from Gulf nations, particularly given India's significant oil imports, and Saudi Arabia's 'Vision 2030' plan to boost investment in rapidly expanding economies. To achieve these goals, both the countries have formed a high-level task force last year. It aims to expedite Saudi's plan to invest USD 100 billion in India. Tax exemption can be available As per reports, the Indian government is also mulling about giving tax exemption to PIFs. The fund coming from the investments will be used in infrastructure and energy sector.


Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Hardly any savings left': Indian IT professional torn between US stability and job offer in India
The H-1B visa programme, long regarded as a pathway for skilled professionals to establish careers in the United States, is facing increasing scrutiny, with Indian nationals—who constitute over 70% of recipients—being the most affected. Also read: Amazon hire unable to start job due to this H-1B visa hurdle, Reddit weighs in Recent developments, including a controversial executive order by US President Donald Trump, have intensified concerns. The order revokes birthright citizenship for children born in the US to parents on temporary visas like the H-1B—'unless at least one parent is a US citizen or holds a green card.' This major policy change has left many immigrant families uneasy about their future, already strained by employment uncertainty, challenges in renewing visas, and long green card backlogs. Amid this atmosphere of insecurity, a Reddit post by an Indian engineer has shed light on the emotional and practical struggles shared by many. The anonymous user revealed that after spending most of his professional life in the US, he was recently offered a job in India with decent pay and the added comfort of being based in his home state. He currently resides in the US with his wife and two young children, 'one of whom is in kindergarten.' Although his current salary just meets household expenses, he values the work-life balance and family time that living in the US affords. However, the idea of moving back to India brings its own concerns. 'I like the family time and weekend joys with my family,' he wrote. 'I may not get that in India where the work demands more additional work time.' The post sparked a wide range of reactions. One user commented, 'It's a hard choice, and honestly, no one can really help you decide. You just have to commit to one option, not look back, and accept that you can't have the best of both worlds.' Others raised concerns about children's future adjustments. 'Move back before the kids grow up. Getting adjusted will be difficult as they get older,' one person advised. Also read: Indian-American Megha Vemuri faces vicious trolling after pro-Palestine MIT speech, deactivates LinkedIn profile Some viewed it from a financial standpoint, stating, 'If you can't increase your salary in the U.S. and can live comfortably in India with additional savings, then it makes sense to move back,' adding, 'Your expenses will only rise once both kids start school.' Several voices in the thread spoke of the emotional and cultural benefits of returning home. 'India is the happening place. I'd want to connect with my dear ones and let my kids enjoy family affection. I would think long term and switch back,' one comment read.