Mediawatch: Sudden surge of political concern about social media
Photo:
TikTok
On their ZM show last Wednesday, Fletch, Vaughn, and Hayley listed things they'd ban for teenagers if they could.
"When I go to the mall, they're bloody crawling everywhere, aren't they? Oh, my God," spluttered Fletch.
"How do they get the money? I was at the mall the other day and there were all these kids and they had like, shopping bags. I know, it's like, where do you get the money?" asked Hayley.
It was a mocking response to news from the day before.
The Prime Minister and National MP Catherine Wedd teamed up on social media to
unveil her Member's Bill
to restrict social media for under 16s.
"As a Dad, I feel very strongly that we need to do more to keep our kids safe from online harm," Luxon said on TikTok - and other platforms he didn't want under-16s to use.
"We have restrictions to keep our children safe in the physical world, but we don't have restrictions in the virtual world - and we should," he said
What young people should and shouldn't do has been a theme in politics lately - and our media have picked it up and run with it.
Last week
a call to bring in compulsory national military service
for young Kiwis received some enthusiastic backing on talk radio.
The ban on phones in schools last year got widespread media approval too. (The effort to cut back their school lunches ... not so much).
"Restricting access puts the onus on social media companies to verify someone is over the age of 16. It mirrors the approach taken in Australia and follows work in other countries like the UK, the EU and Canada," Wedd said, alongside the PM.
If the goal was to get the
Media Age-Appropriate Users Bill
talked about in the media, it worked.
Within minutes, Wellington Mornings host Nick Mills endorsed the idea on Newstalk ZB.
At the other end of the working day, the idea was discussed at length on RNZ's Panel and Newstalk ZB's equivalent, The Huddle.
"It's a good idea in principle. Evidence shows there's harm to younger people. Kids younger than 13 are not allowed on social media ... but I think there's strong evidence to show that 16 is a good age for that," former Facebook CEO for Australia and New Zealand, Stephen Scheeler
told Newstalk ZB
.
The proposed ban was big news on both 6pm TV news bulletins too.
But it's in the Members Bill biscuit tin along with dozens of others drafted by hopeful MPs. It will only go before Parliament if it's picked out in the ballot.
The odds are even longer for this Bill under this government, even though the PM himself backed it.
If online safety is really a big issue for National and the PM, a bigger hitter in his Cabinet could have backed the Bill.
Communications and media minister Paul Goldsmith for example - who the PM hailed as one of his 'aces in place' when he gave him that job last year - is currently pushing proposals to update the way media are regulated.
The other sensible choice would be the Minister of Internal Affairs, whose department oversees digital safety and online services.
But in this coalition, that's Brooke Van Velden - also deputy leader of ACT, which doesn't believe this is the government's business.
"I'm really worried about social media's effect but for every problem there's a solution that is simple, neat and ... wrong. Just slapping on a ban hastily drafted won't solve the real problem," Act leader David Seymour
told reporters
last Tuesday.
"Australia's passed a law that hasn't come into effect yet and already they've had to carve out YouTube," he added.
Australia's impending ban - also personally backed by their PM who has just won an election- does indeed exclude YouTube.
TikTok complained it was like
banning fizzy drinks
, but exempting Coca-Cola].
In
an RNZ article
about that last week the Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden said: "A minimum age for social media is not something the New Zealand Government is considering."
Catherine Wedd told the media this week she'd been working on her Bill for a year. Clearly she and Act and are not on the same page.
Or Labour.
The former government's proposals for a one-stop shop to regulate media -
Safer Online Services and media Platforms
- were
scrapped by Van Velden a year ago
.
Soon after Wedd's Members Bill was unveiled on Tuesday, former District Court Judge David Harvey - an expert on internet law - said the main problem was the onus on social media companies to verify users' age.
"Currently, there are no legally enforceable age verification measures for social media platforms in New Zealand," he said
on his Substack
.
Wedd had called the bill "a result for concerned parents" on RNZ's Morning Report, but Mike Hosking challenged MP Catherine Wedd on that soon after.
"I'm a parent. Don't sell me the emotion. Sell me the technical answer. You don't have it. Technically, we simply don't know how to do it," he told her.
On Substack, David Harvey also said if the problem is bullying and inappropriate content, we already have a law for that:
the Harmful Digital Communications Act
.
Also, many children and young people today already live their lives online and via social media - including those now under 16 who would be forced to stop.
That's set it out in
Content that Crosses the Line
, a report on how young New Zealanders operate online, what alarms them and what they think they need protection from.
It's the work of The Classification Office, an agency set up long before the internet ever existed.
The survey found social media platforms use is widespread, in spite of minimum age requirements.
Young people interviewed said taking away their devices and banning them from social media would be a significant interference with the way in which they lived their lives.
"(They) engage with social media and other online content for the same reasons as adults: to make and maintain social connections, access entertainment, stay informed, explore their interests, and express themselves. Most young people grow up with consistent access to online content, and the use of social media is generally seen as a normal part of life."
The report also concluded young users know their content feeds are shaped by their own activity. This highlighted "how little control they often feel they have" over what they're shown by the opaque algorithms of the platforms.
"Some participants talked about how harmful or disturbing content can appear unexpectedly while scrolling through social media platforms like TikTok, Instagram or Snapchat --- even when they hadn't searched for it."
There's plenty more in that report - but it was ignored by media when was released last week.
That's in stark contrast to the announcement of a Members Bill that may never even be debated in Parliament, let alone passed into law.
If so, it'll be another failed effort in the lives of an entire generation that has grown up online without any serious steps to moderate the internet.
Back in 2011, justice minister Simon Power ordered a review into what he called the ''wild west'' online world. The Law Commission recommended major reform of New Zealand's regulators and watchdog agencies.
A decade and a half later, New Zealand still has the same pre-Internet era organisations regulating media.
None of them really marshall the internet for the good of New Zealanders, whether they're over 16 or not.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
'Times do need to change': RSA to modernise to support younger veterans
Photo: RNZ / Nathan McKinnon The Returned Services Association (RSA) say they are modernising their approach to supporting younger millitary veterans. Members of the RSA, Defence Force, members of Parliament and veterans from recent operational deployments attended an event at Parliament on Tuesday night unveiling new initiatives aimed at "relaunching" the organisation. Speaking at the event, board chairperson Lieutenant General (retired) Rhys Jones said the RSA had been the backbone of support to veterans for 109 years, but "times do need to change". "There is a new generation of veterans that are being produced every year that have different requirements to the World War I or World War II, or Korean veterans," he said "They are an environment of social media. They are an environment of wanting to do things actively that are not necessarily about just coming together and talking, but actually actively doing things." Jones announced four new initiatives; a renewed national support and advocacy network, improving the RSA's online capability, a new membership and communication system and a push to collect stories from contemporary veterans. The national support and advocacy network, Jones said, would "focus more on central funding and management" for a more "standardised" approach to resources. "That support still needs to be locally provided, but a far stronger emphasis on how do we support that nationally." That would include help with career transitions out of the Defence Force and assistance getting in contact with Veterans Affairs, ACC and psychological or medical support, he said. Today's world is a digital world, Jones said, and the RSA still had a "long way to go" to catch up on its online capability. The initiative would include "more things that are on your phone" instead of the "clunky, mechanical, hand driven system" in use, Jones said. "That will improve our reach and engagement with contemporary veterans [because] that's how they operate, that's how they interact, and that's what they expect an organisation to be able to provide." he said. The collection of more contemporary veteran stories was something Jones admitted sometimes "drop through the gaps". "There are lots of histories and official histories of World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam and so on. But modern deployments, and there may be individuals going to UN missions or larger collective groups, East Timor or Afghanistan... those kind of things often come through the gaps." "[There is] a dedicated need for us to capture those stories so the public can understand what the modern, contemporary veterans are about," Jones said.
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
UAE Deal Passes, Unlocking $500 Billion Market
Minister for Trade and Investment Minister of Agriculture The NZ-UAE Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) legislation has passed into law today, clearing the way for Kiwi exporters to tap into a $500 billion market that imports 90 per cent of its food, Agriculture, Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay announced. 'The NZ-UAE CEPA delivers real benefits for New Zealand exporters, lowering costs, increasing access, and securing a stronger presence in the Middle East,' Mr McClay says. This is the highest-quality, and fastest, agreement negotiated by New Zealand that will immediately remove tariffs on 98.5 per cent of New Zealand's exports upon entry to force, rising to 99 per cent in three years. 'This high-quality trade agreement builds on New Zealand's strengths. UAE consumers are actively seeking safe, fresh products from around the world and are willing to pay more for them. This agreement gives New Zealand exporters an opportunity to lead in this competitive market,' Mr McClay says. Two-way trade between New Zealand and the UAE was worth $1.35 billion last year, and the CEPA will accelerate growth by reducing red tape, boosting services trade, and supporting investment links. 'Trade agreements are about opening doors and levelling the playing field for New Zealand exporters,' Mr McClay says. 'The CEPA is another step toward achieving the Government's goal of doubling the value of exports in 10 years. Growing our trade relationships helps boost the economy, lift incomes, and provide the public services Kiwis deserve.' The CEPA will enter into force following ratification procedures by both parties.
1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Hipkins over claims of 'flop'
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has challenged Labour to front up with any policy at all as he comes under pressure over National's struggling childcare support scheme. Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate, well short of the 21,000 families the Government said would be eligible for the full amount when it was unveiled last year. Speaking on his way into a Tuesday morning caucus meeting, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure. "I'm not taking any any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess. "You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour." ADVERTISEMENT Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings. "Isn't that great?" he said. "We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders." The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free ECE. On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme — a weekly rebate on childcare costs. The coalition launched a review of the policy in April, given the unexpectedly low uptake and then expanded the initiative in early July. It said Inland Revenue had initially overestimated the number of eligible families despite best efforts. Hipkins labels National's policies 'absolute disaster zone' Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out-of-touch. "They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record." ADVERTISEMENT Hipkins defended Labour's lack of public policy and said that would all be laid out in full before next year's election. "We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," he said. "But, unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have, add up." Labour wanted to see the Government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, Hipkins said, and suggested a lot of policy work was underway in the background. "The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment, because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone." National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year, but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel. Finance Minister Nicola Willis: "I view butter as a beautiful, beautiful thing." The two party leaders also sparred on Tuesday morning over the price of butter which has soared to about $8.60 for a 500g block. ADVERTISEMENT Nicola Willis speaks to media on July 7, 2025. (Source: 1News) In recent weeks, Hipkins has repeatedly drawn attention to the issue, posting on social media last week: "The price of butter is up nearly 50 percent since this time last year. That's it. That's my X post." Asked what Labour would do about it if in power, Hipkins said the onus was on the coalition: "we're not the government... all we've had from them is tough talk." Luxon said dairy prices were largely dictated by global commodity prices and New Zealand dairy farmers were reaping the benefits "tremendously". He said Finance Minister Nicola Willis would be meeting with diary giant Fonterra on Tuesday evening in the context of supermarket competition. If Willis raised the issue of butter prices "good on her", Luxon said. Willis, who previously worked for Fonterra, told reporters she would raise the topic in her conversation as she was concerned butter was becoming out-of-reach for many New Zealanders. ADVERTISEMENT "I view butter as a beautiful, beautiful thing. I eat too much of it," she said. "When you see it on my piece of toast, it looks like some cheese." Willis said Fonterra was transparent about how it determined milk prices but it was less clear to her how that then translated to butter. "What we're talking about here is at the margin — 10 or 20 cents — but 10 or 20 cents really matters when you're a Kiwi family at the supermarket checkout." She also accused Labour of "crocodile tears", given its lack of proposed solutions.
