The (incomplete) truth about the BBC's Gaza headlines
Donald Trump's press secretary was confident she had the BBC bang to rights.
Responding to a question about the shooting of civilians at the new US-backed aid distribution centres in southern Gaza, Karoline Leavitt accused the BBC of misreporting the story.
Her evidence was a list of different headlines for the same story, which she then read out.
'Israeli tank kills 26.' 'Israeli tank kills 21.' 'Israeli gunfire kills 31.'
In case there was any doubt about her opinion of Britain's national broadcaster, Ms Leavitt presaged her remarks with: 'Unfortunately, unlike some in the media, we don't take the word of Hamas as total truth.'
Behind closed doors in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, fists will have punched the air.
Israel's reputation managers have had a battering in the past few days, with allegations of three shootings of civilians by the IDF near the already controversial new aid stations.
It has threatened to discredit entirely the current phase of its military operation to flush out Hamas.
What is currently happening in the 25-by-6-mile pocket of land in the corner of the Levant is arguably the most acute military and humanitarian situation in the world.
But trusted information here is scarce.
Israel banned independent journalists from entering the Strip straight after the October 7 Hamas massacre.
The world now relies on highly polarised and often competing statements from both sides of the divide.
And when they cannot be trusted, there is a network of local on-the-ground reporters living under continuous bombings.
They are serially displaced people who are out of contact for hours a day.
Some of those Gazan reporters on the ground have helped The Telegraph piece together what happened in the latest deadly incident when hungry Palestinians attempted to reach heavily guarded aid.
Mervat Zidan, a 20-year-old woman, told us how she ventured from the tent where she lives towards the site with her mother at 4am on Tuesday in the hope of getting food.
'When we reached the area of the Muawiya mosque…heavy shooting started,' she said.
It was not clear where from.
'We lay down in the street, trying to escape the bullets. As soon as my mother raised her head, she was shot in the middle of her head and fell to the ground. No one could try to help us. Everyone was trying to escape.'
Mervat, who lost her brother in January 2024, also said she saw snipers in a nearby tall building – the only one still standing in the neighbourhood.
She says there was also shelling by the IDF.
Later in the day, she found her mother, Reem Salmah Al-Akhras, in the mortuary of the Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, which said it had received 27 bodies from an Israeli shooting.
That facility, ultimately, comes under the control of Hamas.
However, the International Committee of the Red Cross does not, and it said it sent over the 27 corpses to Nasser, Nineteen of them had been dead on arrival at their field hospital and eight subsequently died of their wounds.
There is no confirmation of how these people died or where and by whom they were shot.
Israel said its troops fired warning shots at Palestinians walking the wrong way, and when these didn't work, they fired 'near' the civilians.
Hamas has publicly warned citizens not to collect aid. The Telegraph has found no evidence that it killed civilians in this incident.
The picture, as ever, remains incomplete.
Another witness of the shootings corroborated what Mervat saw.
Our reporters also spoke to Saeed Al-Feri, a 35-year-old from Beit Lahia in the north of the Strip, who had spent four days trying to get to the aid centre in the south, braving bandits, walking for miles, and finally reaching it on Tuesday.
'Suddenly, shooting and artillery shells began,' he said.
'Whoever was injured had no one to rescue. Everyone was rushing to get aid and a shell was fired at us.
'A quadcopter [drone] came and ordered us over a loudspeaker to retreat.'
In recent days, the use of quadcopters and artillery, as well as the general allegations of shooting, have been corroborated by other reporters and witnesses.
They are believed to be weapons only Israel has access to.
A 29-year-old called Musaa from Khan Younis, who spoke to a different local colleague, described the use of quadcopters and artillery at Sunday's incident.
The full, unvarnished truth about what happened at the aid centres may never been known.
Verified footage from Tuesday is hard to find. As usual, there is no shortage of people saying that this is because the whole thing is fabricated.
Unverified photographs and videos from social media typically fill the vacuum when facts are scarce.
They run parallel with statements from officials often linked to Hamas and, of course, the IDF, Israel's military.
Independent organisations and charities inside Gaza have slowly been vanishing as the war in the Strip has become more violent.
Some have also been blocked by Israel, or excluded from aid distribution.
Online misinformation, especially early after an incident takes place, is persistent and aggressive, and the statements of on-the-ground players routinely contradict each other.
Take air strikes, for example.
The IDF says it targets terrorist command centres. The civilian casualty figures are often published quickly by the health ministry in Gaza, which is ultimately under Hamas control.
There is often no way for local reporters or aid workers to reach the bomb site.
However, the BBC's network is wide and the organisation cites 'trusted sources' in the Strip – without stating who they are – when it produces fast news reports. It also publishes clarifications.
The BBC has entirely rejected Ms Leavitt's criticism, claiming its story and headline from Sunday's shooting were 'updated throughout the day with the latest fatality figures as they came in from various sources'.
'They were always clearly attributed … this is totally normal practice on any fast-moving news story,' a spokesman said.
The outlet has certainly come in for some fair criticism since the start of the war – such as misreporting an alleged hospital bombing in the early days.
Last month, the Today programme reported a claim by Tom Fletcher, the UN's humanitarian chief, that 14,000 babies in Gaza could die within 48 hours. The corporation later issued a correction when it emerged the figure was an estimate for the number of children at risk of 'severe malnutrition' by March next year.
The practice of updating headlines and the wording of stories as the day goes on is not unique to the BBC.
However, the reporting of Sunday's attack included one disappearing headline referring to Israeli tanks. This has not yet been confirmed.
Israel, as well as some Western analysts, have also argued that Hamas persistently inflates mortality figures, partly by failing to distinguish between combatants and civilians.
The terrorist army has a well-oiled propaganda machine.
And there have been widespread allegations about their use of fake news to try to deter ordinary Gazans from accessing the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) aid hubs.
The fingerprints of Hamas or their supporters can often be traced to examples of misattribution involving some, although not all, of the most heartbreaking and bloody videos.
Israel also tries to control the narrative in its own way.
Under Benjamin Netanyahu's government, ministers brand allegations of IDF wrongdoing as 'lies', even when they are later acknowledged to be true.
Foreign powers, including key allies, who question the conduct of the ongoing war are accused of siding with Hamas.
On Sunday, government aides circulated to foreign media a video appearing to show a Hamas gunman murdering a civilian who was carrying a bag of flour.
Credit: IDF
It appeared to be an attempt to suggest that the terror group was responsible for the disorder and bloodshed at the GHF distribution sites.
But the incident portrayed in the video turned out to have nothing to do with it.
It is unlikely that many in Gaza will have noticed Tuesday's noises about BBC reporting in the White House press room.
Having been deprived of aid for nearly two months, there are increasing reports of impending starvation.
The row between the White House and the BBC is unlikely to help solve the situation.
Credit: X
Civilians, many of whom have been displaced multiple times, are being forced south towards the already flattened city of Rafah under the current seize-and-hold military escalation of the IDF campaign to finally defeat Hamas.
There, they are faced with trying to get food from centres whose wider security is provided by the IDF, a military force in one of the most hostile environments, trained to engage – and not to distribute aid.
At the same time, Hamas steps up its campaign of execution and torture of civilians – and associated propaganda videos – in an attempt to keep control of a disintegrating population.
According to one civilian who spoke to The Telegraph, people are getting so desperate that it is increasingly hard to distinguish between armed gangs robbing food trucks for money, and those just hoping to feed themselves that day.
Meanwhile, on Wednesday, GHF announced it was temporarily closing its aid distribution centres in order to work on better security for the sites.
Unusually for Gaza, no one contradicted it.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
22 minutes ago
- UPI
Army, Trump ready June 14th birthday parade with tanks, rocket launchers
President Donald Trump congratulates a cadet at the United States Military Academy graduation ceremony in Michie Stadium at West Point, New York, on May 24, and will review the Army's 250th birthday parade on June 14. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 7 (UPI) -- The U.S. Army celebrates its 250th birthday on June 14th in the nation's capital, which coincides with President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, and will be marked by a parade that may include tanks, rocket launchers and more than 100 military vehicles. With the two birthdays occurring on the same day, the previously scheduled parade that was intended as a relatively small event at the National Mall in Washington, D.C., has grown in size and cost. Up to 300 soldiers and civilians, the U.S. Army Band and four cannons were initially slated to honor the Army's 250th birthday, with seating available for 120 attendees, The Washington Post reported. U.S. Army leaders last year sought a permit for the event, but Trump's election victory has changed its scope, while doubling as an unofficial celebration of the president's birthday. Axios reported the parade will live up to Trump's request for a showcase the U.S. miliatary's might, with dozens of tanks, rocket launchers, missiles and more than 100 other military aircraft and vehicles participating. About 6,600 Army troops will participate, and the Army is paying to house them in area hotels. The parade route has been moved to the northwest portion of Constitution Avenue and will include a flyover of F-22 fighter jets, World War II planes and Vietnam-era aircraft. The event is scheduled to start at 6:30 p.m. EDT at 23rd Street and continue along Constitution Avenue N.W. to 15th Street. Trump will review the parade on the Ellipse. The event has an estimated cost of nearly $45 million, including more than $10 million for road repairs after the heavy military equipment passes over. The parade's estimated cost has Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., skeptical about its benefits. "I would have recommended against the parade," Wicker told an interviewer on Thursday, but the Department of Defense wants to use it as a recruiting tool. "On the other hand, [Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth] feels that it will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for thousands of young Americans to see what a great opportunity it is to participate in a great military force," Wicker said. "So, we'll see."


Fox News
22 minutes ago
- Fox News
Drama Between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk
The failed friendship between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk continues, Bill Maher has some advice for the Democratic party, and social media drama between gold medalist Simone Biles and Riley Gaines. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit


Politico
26 minutes ago
- Politico
Negotiate or fight? Trump has colleges right where he wants them.
President Donald Trump's campaign against two of the planet's best-known universities is laying bare just how unprepared academia was to confront a hostile White House. Schools never imagined facing an administration so willing to exercise government power so quickly — targeting the research funding, tax-exempt status, foreign student enrollment and financial aid eligibility schools need to function. That's left them right where the president wants them. Even as Ivy League schools, research institutions, and college trade associations try to resist Trump's attacks in court, campus leaders are starting to accept they face only difficult choices: negotiate with the government, mount a painful legal and political fight — or simply try to stay out of sight. Groundbreaking scientific research, financial aid for lower-income students and soft power as an economic engine once shielded schools' access to federal funds. Trump has now transformed those financial lifelines into leverage. And the diversity and independence of U.S. colleges and universities — something they've seen as a source of strength and competition — is straining efforts to form a singular response to the president. 'Perhaps it's a failure of imagination on the part of universities,' said Lee Bollinger, the former president of Columbia University. 'It feels now like there has been a naïveté on the part of universities. There's been no planning for this kind of thing.' Schools are accustomed to tension with their faculty, governing boards, legislatures and governors. But punishments for resisting the Trump administration plumbed untested levels of severity this week when the president issued an executive order to bar foreign students from entering the country to study at Harvard University as his administration threatened Columbia's academic accreditation. Even though Project 2025 — The Heritage Foundation's roadmap for a second Trump administration — previewed some of the tactics the administration would use, many school leaders may have underestimated the president's determination. 'It just seemed inconceivable that we would be in this position of having massive amounts of federal funding withheld, threats to have legislation that attacks your tax status, and now these new issues with international students,' Bollinger said. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday night that blocked Trump's directive to restrict Harvard's access to international students. But the administration is brandishing its response to Harvard's resistance as a warning to other schools who might resist, as federal officials pressure schools to negotiate the terms of a truce over the administration's complaints about campus antisemitism, foreign government influence and its opposition to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. 'We've held back funding from Columbia, we've also done the same thing with Harvard,' Education Secretary Linda McMahon told House lawmakers this past week. 'We are asking, as Columbia has done, to come to the table for negotiations,' she said, just hours before telling the school's accreditor it was violating federal anti-discrimination laws. 'We've also asked Harvard. Their answer was a lawsuit.' A Harvard spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. 'What we've seen so far when it comes to Harvard is the playbook for holding these radical schools accountable is way deeper than anyone anticipated or expected,' a senior White House official told POLITICO. 'You're starting to get to the bone, so to speak, of holding these people accountable,' said the official, who was granted anonymity to freely discuss White House strategy. 'Harvard knows they cannot endure this for long, they just can't. They're going to have to come to the table, and we'll always be there to meet them. But this was a test case of what to do.' The university described Trump's latest foreign student order this week as 'yet another illegal retaliatory step.' A federal judge in May blocked a separate administration attempt to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. Harvard is still locked in a legal fight over more than $2 billion in federal grants the White House blocked after the school refused to comply with demands to overhaul its admissions and disciplinary policies. Trump announced plans to cancel Harvard's tax-exempt status in early May, then later floated redistributing billions of dollars in university grants to trade schools. 'It is not our desire to bring these schools to their knees. The president reveres our higher educational facilities. He's a product of one,' the White House official said. 'But in order to hold these people accountable, we will be unrelenting in our enforcement of the law and hitting them where it hurts, which is their pocketbook.' Many institutions have chosen a more muted response following months of conflict, including major public institutions in states that have also grown reliant on the full-freight tuition paid by international students. 'Universities don't have as many degrees of freedom, at least in the public sector, as you might think they do,' said Teresa Sullivan, the former president of the University of Virginia. 'One reason they seem to be relatively slow to act is there's a certain disbelief — can this really be happening?' 'We seem to be in uncharted territory, at least in my experience,' Sullivan said. 'All of a sudden, the rules don't seem to apply. I think that's disconcerting. It shakes the ground beneath you, and you don't necessarily know what to do next.' Still, some higher education leaders are trying to confront the government. More than 650 campus officials have so far signed onto a joint statement that opposes 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' Sullivan and a group of other former presidents used an op-ed in The Washington Post to argue the Trump administration's offensive 'won't be confined to Harvard University.' Trade associations including the American Council on Education, Association of American Universities, and Association of Public and Land-grant Universities have joined schools in a lawsuit to block some of Trump's research funding cuts. The Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, a collective of school leaders, has also sued to challenge the Trump administration's attempts to target the legal status of thousands of foreign students. 'Your first obligation as president is you don't want to hurt the institution you represent,' Sullivan said of the relative silence coming from non-Ivy League institutions. 'These days it's hard to tell what hurts and what doesn't. I think that's the motive. The motive is not cowardice.' Schools still face a choice between negotiating with the government — and risk compromising on their principles — or inviting Trump's rage by putting up a fight. 'Every school has had an option to correct course and work with the administration, or stand firm in their violations of the law,' the administration official said. 'They have an option, they know very well what to do.' The real question, according to Bollinger, the former Columbia president, is how far the White House will go and how much resistance the schools are willing to put up. 'The power of government is so immense that if they want to destroy institutions, they can,' he said. 'What you do in that kind of environment is you stand on principle.'