logo
Canadians like the idea of public service for young adults. Should it be mandatory?

Canadians like the idea of public service for young adults. Should it be mandatory?

CBCa day ago
Though he recalls feeling anxious ahead of his military service, Daniel You planned to make the most of it.
"It's required for all Korean males; we grow up expecting it," said the 32-year-old Torontonian, "but I wanted to make sure it didn't hinder my growth in terms of career."
You immigrated to Canada in high school and attended two years of university before returning to South Korea in 2014 for compulsory military service. He also completed some English proficiency exams beforehand, leading to a role as an army translator.
"I had the opportunity to work in a U.S. garrison ... but also it opened up the opportunity to apply overseas and actually work in the UAE for about eight months. So I was happy with that experience," he said.
Various nations worldwide have some form of compulsory military or civic service that starts with young adults and, according to a recent poll, Canadians support the idea of citizens under 30 devoting a year to serving their country similarly. Young adults who volunteer gain a host of benefits, experts say — but making it mandatory is a thornier proposition.
Support for civilian service, but divided on military
At least seven in 10 people responding to a recent Angus Reid poll supported the idea of one year of mandatory public service for Canadians under 30 — things like tutoring kids or working in national parks. Mandatory military service, however, was more divisive, with 43 per cent in support and 44 per cent opposed.
Amid Canada's Elbows Up wave, the idea was to gauge our appetite for this kind of national initiative, according to Angus Reid Institute president Shachi Kurl.
"We live in an era where society feels way more stratified ... way more divided in terms of how they see their country," she said from Vancouver.
"There's nothing like being in a situation where you are interacting with people from different walks of life, different cultures, different linguistic backgrounds ... [to] have a better understanding of where people are coming from."
However, volunteering has declined, impacted by factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation and labour shortages.
Canadians over 15 years old who volunteer for charities or non-profits dropped from 41 per cent to 32 per cent between 2018 and 2023, according to Statistics Canada data from June.
It's a significant drop, noted Megan Conway, president of Volunteer Canada, which helps groups create volunteer initiatives.
Being tuned into social media algorithms feeding us specific information, we're not necessarily seeing what our society actually looks like, Conway said.
"Volunteering helps you to understand that," she said. "It builds a stronger sense of connection and also belonging."
WATCH | How young adults benefit from volunteering:
How volunteering can build knowledge, connection
4 minutes ago
Applied learning, personal fulfilment
When the pandemic pushed Priscilla Ojomu into virtual learning, she ventured out of her comfort zone first with online volunteering and, later, in-person experiences. Since then, the 23-year-old has co-founded a youth-led education platform about racial and social injustice, attended a United Nations conference and received Canada's Volunteer Award.
"A lot of youth, they're looking for a purpose, they're looking for how they can apply what they're learning into something tangible and something practical. And those opportunities gave me a venue ... to really do that," said Ojomu, who's studying law at the University of Leicester.
Direct acts — like stuffing donated backpacks for school kids back home in Calgary — still draw her in, she said: "You're really seeing that impact right in front of you."
Ojomu calls public service a "third space" outside of home and school, where young people can build social connections and develop real-world skills. Instead of "sleeping or watching Netflix ... you're doing something that is leading up to the future," she said.
For Aryan Gautam, volunteering is how he serves a cause he's passionate about: climate change. It grew from street and park clean-ups in his hometown of Mississauga, Ont., to founding an eco-education non-profit as a nine-year-old, to more recently working on an energy-efficient cryptocurrency.
"I have a connection with this cause and it's something I want to contribute to," said the 19-year-old Johns Hopkins University student, just starting his second year in Baltimore.
No matter what they are, acts of service "alter the way you see the world," Gautam said. "They motivate you on a hyper level ... because it really is making a difference."
You, whose service in Korea spanned age 21 to 23, recalls it as a period of self-reflection. "The first two years of university, I really didn't know what I wanted to do," he recalled.
Military service provided him more time to contemplate his future, You said; a year of volunteering for Canadians "would give that similar opportunity."
Acknowledging the costs of volunteering
Despite these benefits, making public service mandatory is tricky because not every young person is able to carve out a full year for it while balancing financial or other personal circumstances.
"Volunteering — there is a cost associated with it," beyond those borne by the hosting organizations, said Volunteer Canada's Conway.
Canada faces an affordability crisis, she noted, and young people are worried about entering the workforce, landing jobs and making a decent income. "Not [everyone] is coming to the table in a equitable way," she said.
A vast amount of work is also needed to build up Canada's volunteering infrastructure and capacity if we wanted to ponder compulsory public service for 18- to 29-year-olds, she added. But right now, "it's just not possible."
While some provinces have required high schoolers to fulfil volunteer hours for course credit or graduation going back a few decades, that hasn't necessarily sparked generations devoted to community service. According to the Statistics Canada data from June, the highest drop in volunteering and volunteer hours came from those aged 25 to 34, a cohort that completed high school before the pandemic.
Yet at a moment where we're reflecting on what it means to be Canadian, Conway feels it's the perfect time to make volunteering "fun and easy," drop the notion of service as punitive and establish a national strategy — one that perhaps includes a pilot for compulsory public service.
Instead of discussing mandates, she wonders, how about brainstorming how "to spark people's interest in really exciting ways"?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LILLEY: Carney government hires Democrats to learn how to speak to Republicans
LILLEY: Carney government hires Democrats to learn how to speak to Republicans

Toronto Sun

timean hour ago

  • Toronto Sun

LILLEY: Carney government hires Democrats to learn how to speak to Republicans

Embassy staff in Washington hired a firm headed up by Democrats to learn how to speak to American conservatives Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inbox U.S. President Donald Trump meets Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, May 6, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) If you need proof that the Liberal government doesn't have a clue how to deal with the Trump administration, just look at this contract. Signed just over a week after Mark Carney became Liberal leader and days after he was sworn in as prime minister, it's a complete waste of money. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Uncovered by Ottawa-based media outlet Blacklock's Reporter, it seems the Canadian Embassy in Washington signed a contract with an almost entirely Democrat Party firm to teach them how to engage with conservative and right-wing media in the age of Trump. In the grand scheme of things, this contract isn't a big deal, it's worth just US$6,000 or about C$8,300 but on an hourly basis it works out to US$2,000 per hour or C$2,775 per hour. The question is what did we get for this? The contract was signed on March 17, 2025 – perhaps five months or more after they should have looked into this – and the description according to the documents obtained by Blacklock's doesn't sound good. 'Signal Group will conduct a two-hour session on right-wing media and messaging including questions and answers,' the contract states. 'This session will cover a deep dive into the conservative media landscape, right-wing messaging analysis, and workshops on adapting messaging on key issues to Canada.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Sounds good, we should want our embassy staff and diplomats to know these things, though they already should. 'Signal Group will conduct a one-hour executive level media training for the embassy,' the contract stated. 'Printed materials Signal Group will provide concern the conservative media landscape and right-wing message analysis.' OK, so what did we get? That part we don't fully know, but here is what you need to know about Signal Group LLC. This company is headed up by Blake Androff, whose claim to fame is helping Nancy Pelosi win the 2018 mid-term elections and allowing the Democrats to take control of the House of Representatives for the first time since 2010 while Trump was in his first term. A publicly available presentation deck posted on Signal's website advises clients who want to understand Trump and his team to read the Wall Street Journal, watch Fox News, and follow the online news site Breitbart. These are things that embassy staff should already know and shouldn't have to pay for, not based on the salaries they are getting. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. There is no mention of major influencers in the American conservative media landscape such as Megyn Kelly, Glenn Beck, Matt Walsh, Jordan Peterson, Benny Johnson, or Ben Shapiro. Instead, there are vague references to Newsmax, the Washington Times, and The Spectator. I have my doubts about any group that would put out a public document like this being able to point me in the right direction. But the Liberals have no clue about the American right, they simply sneer at it, which is why we are in such mess in dealing with the Trump administration. When Alberta Premier Danielle Smith met with Ben Shapiro, she was widely criticized in Canadian media and by the Canadian political establishment. There were stories aired on national newscasts about how controversial Shapiro was and why it was wrong for Smith to meet with him. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. This is a man who was invited to sit in the gallery for Trump's joint address to Congress and who holds incredible sway in the MAGA movement. In other words, he is exactly the kind of person Canadians should be talking to in order to make our case. Despite the sneering from the smart set, Smith was right to meet with him and days after the meeting, Shapiro was telling his audience of millions about the benefits of trading with Canada and explaining why Trump targeting Canada was wrong. Our embassy and the Carney government wouldn't know to do this — that's why they hired a Democrat consulting firm to teach them how to speak to Republicans. This is beyond ridiculous. blilley@ Columnists World Toronto & GTA Sunshine Girls Sunshine Girls

Appeals court tosses Trump's ‘excessive' US$515M NY civil fraud penalty
Appeals court tosses Trump's ‘excessive' US$515M NY civil fraud penalty

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

Appeals court tosses Trump's ‘excessive' US$515M NY civil fraud penalty

A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out U.S. President Donald Trump's massive civil fraud penalty while upholding a judge's finding that he exaggerated his wealth for decades. The ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. The decision came seven months after the Republican returned to the White House. A panel of five judges in New York's mid-level Appellate Division said the verdict, which stood to cost Trump more than $515 million and rock his real estate empire, was 'excessive.' After finding Trump engaged in fraud by flagrantly padding financial statements that went to lenders and insurers, Judge Arthur Engoron ordered him last year to pay $355 million in penalties. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. The total — combined with penalties levied on some other Trump Organization executives, including Trump's sons Eric and Donald Jr. — now exceeds $527 million, with interest. Story continues below advertisement An 'excessive' fine 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton wrote in one of several opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and he was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. 0:38 Trump posts US$175M bond in civil fraud case, halting $454M asset seizure The court, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause on any punishments taking effect. Story continues below advertisement The panel was sharply divided, issuing 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Two judges wrote that they felt New York Attorney General Letitia James' lawsuit against Trump and his companies was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any of Trump's lenders felt cheated, they could have sued him themselves, and none did. One judge wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial began that the attorney general had proved Trump engaged in fraud. The appeals court, the Appellate Division of the state's trial court, took an unusually long time to rule, weighing Trump's appeal for nearly 11 months after oral arguments last fall. Normally, appeals are decided in a matter of weeks or a few months. James has said the businessman-turned-politician engaged in 'lying, cheating, and staggering fraud.' Her office had no immediate comment after Thursday's decision. 2:21 Trump calls civil fraud case 'disgrace,' slams judge, N.Y. attorney general Claims of politics at play Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. In a six-minute summation of sorts after a monthslong trial, Trump proclaimed in January 2024 he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Story continues below advertisement Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued many of the case's allegations were too old, an assertion they made unsuccessfully before trial. The defense also contends James misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump and improperly policed private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. 2:57 Trump blasts civil fraud trial judge's 'Trump-derangement syndrome' State attorneys said the law in question applies to fraudulent or illegal business conduct, whether it targets everyday consumers or big corporations. Though Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, the state contends that the numbers led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. Story continues below advertisement The state has argued that the verdict rests on ample evidence and that the scale of the penalty comports with Trump's gains, including his profits on properties financed with the loans and the interest he saved by getting favorable terms offered to wealthy borrowers. Legal obstacles The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Story continues below advertisement Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store