Minister accuses Farage of being on side of ‘pornographers' in online safety row
Mr Farage labelled the comments 'disgusting' and called on Peter Kyle to apologise, after the Cabinet minister said the Reform leader is 'on the side of turning the clock back' to when 'strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children'.
Former Reform chairman Zia Yusuf claimed the remarks are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things apolitician has said in the political arena'.
Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide.
Mr Yusuf said on Monday that the party would repeal the legislation if they got into Government, claiming it works to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-government speech'.
Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, Mr Kyle said that children have been living in a 'wild west' and labelled the new law 'a big step forward'.
He added: 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws. So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Asked to clarify his comments, Mr Kyle said: 'Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers can get in touch via messaging apps with children.'
Mr Farage reacted on X by calling Mr Kyle's remarks 'disgusting' and said 'he should do the right thing and apologise'.
Mr Kyle then doubled down on his comments in response, and said that 'if you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.'
Mr Yusuf claimed that Mr Kyle's remarks showed 'how deeply unserious' the Government was about child safety, adding: 'Talking about Jimmy Savile in that way does nothing other than denigrate the victims of Jimmy Savile.'
He told Sky News that the comments are 'one of the most outrageous and disgusting things a politician has said in the political arena that I can remember. And that's quite a high bar, frankly.'
Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters 'We're not censoring anyone'.
'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.'
He added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Swindon drivers in line for £10m pay out over mis-sold car finance
Residents living in Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander's constituency in Swindon could be set to receive millions following the UK Supreme Court decision on car finance. Courmacs Legal, a leading consumer rights law firm based in Blackburn, today responded to the UK Supreme Court's decision in Hopcraft, Johnson and Wrench. Courmacs Legal is currently representing over 1.5 million car finance victims and is dealing with 4 million claims in relation to motor finance mis-selling and allegations associated with civil bribery and hidden commissions. It has calculated how many claims it is handling from constituents living in the areas represented by each cabinet member. And in South Swindon, the area represented by Heidi Alexander, there are 5,471 claims worth an estimated £10,903,924 Darren Smith, Managing Director of Courmacs Legal, said: "The Court has ruled on the position in relation to certain types of commission arrangements. It has not ruled on the position where a discretionary element was applied to the commission. "It is even more important now that lenders make clear to customers the nature of their agreements, and whether they were discretionary. "This still leaves many victims who will be entitled to redress, but the story does not end here. "The next chapter will be in September when the Court of Appeal will be hearing a case relating to the way the Financial Services Ombudsman has dealt with discretionary commission arrangements. The FCA have itself identified this case as being relevant to the actions they may take, so we call on the Government, the Regulators, the Lenders and their associations to allow the judicial process to be completed and to respect the rule of law before seeking to interfere in any way with the redress that these victims may be owed." For more information, and to help you determine whether you are eligible to claim, visit: Courmacs Legal is dealing with claims across all the UK's 650 parliamentary constituencies, including the following car finance cases in Labour Cabinet members' constituencies: Rachel Reeves (Chancellor of the Exchequer): 5,053 claims worth an estimated £10,080,735 Sir Keir Starmer (Prime Minister): 1,488 claims worth an estimated £3,794,771 Angela Rayner (Deputy Prime Minister): 6,483 claims worth an estimated £13,490,847 Shabana Mahmood (Justice): 3,245 claims worth an estimated £6,954,263 Heidi Alexander (Transport): 5,471 claims worth an estimated £10,903,924 Ed Miliband (Energy Security and Net Zero): 7,267 claims worth an estimated £15,588,308 Jonathan Reynolds (Business and Trade): 7,513 claims worth an estimated £16,148,462 John Healey (Defence): 6,806 claims worth an estimated £14,469,650 Ian Murray (Scotland): 3,497 claims worth an estimated £7,540,811 The case is financed by a third-party litigation funder and is fully insured. There is no cost to individuals taking part and no cost if the case is unsuccessful.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
President Trump sets new deadline of '10 to 12 days' for Russia to end war in Ukraine
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said he's moving up a deadline for Russia to agree to a ceasefire with Ukraine, warning that it in "10 or 12 days" Russia must end the war or face sanctions and tariffs from the United States. The president's threat came as he continued to express frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin for refusing to scale back his country's war in Ukraine. "I'm going to make a new deadline of about ten or twelve days from today," Trump said on July 28 during a meeting in Scotland with United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "There's no reason in waiting." More: Putin stalls. Trump changes his mind. Ukraine targets Moscow. Latest on the war. Trump said he will likely announce the new deadline by July 29. "I want to be generous, but we just don't see any progress being made," he said. "It would be sanctions and maybe tariffs ‒ secondary tariffs." Trump on July 14 announced the United States would put secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia if a peace deal is not reached within 50 days, which falls on Sept. 2. Trump's new, shortened deadline would be sometime between Aug. 7 and 11. "He's got to make a deal," Trump said of Putin. "Too many people are dying it. It's a really bloody war." More: Russia continues record-setting attacks on Ukraine after Trump call, US arms cutoff When Trump's second term began, the president placed equal blame on Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine and the war still raging three and a half years later. But Trump has zeroed in on Putin in recent weeks as the Russian leader repeatedly rebuffs the American president's attempts to broker a ceasefire and pushes forward with drone and missile attacks on Ukrainian cities. Losing patience with Putin, Trump has accused his Russian counterpart of being open to a ceasefire during private conversations, only to carry out attacks on Ukraine afterward. "You would think, based on common sense, you would think he would want to make a deal. We'll find out," Trump said. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: President Trump gives Russia less than two weeks to end war in Ukraine
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Planned Palestine Action protest will not try to overwhelm police
A campaign group has denied that its planned mass protest in support of Palestine Action will try to overwhelm the police and justice system. The Metropolitan Police and other forces nationwide have warned anyone found to be expressing support for Palestine Action will be arrested, following the Government's decision to ban the organisation last month. Defend Our Juries said it planned to bring together at least 500 people for its planned demonstration against the ban on Saturday with organisers 'very confident' they have recruited enough participants, a spokesperson for the campaign group said. A formal announcement will be made on Tuesday as to whether that figure has been reached and the demonstration will go ahead. More then 200 people were arrested at a wave of protests across the UK in response to the proscription last month, as part of the campaign co-ordinated by Defend Our Juries. Many of the protesters were detained after writing and holding up the message 'I oppose genocide I support Palestine Action' on placards or pieces of cardboard. A Defend Our Juries spokesperson told the PA news agency: 'It is wrong to characterise this (planned demonstration) as a plan to overwhelm the police and court systems. 'If we are allowed to protest peacefully and freely, then that is no bother to anyone.' In a further statement on its website, the campaign group said the Government had 'overreached itself' by banning Palestine Action and it was 'vital' that its campaign succeeded. 'Our groups and movements are coming together like never before, finding unity under repression,' it added. 'By refusing to give into fear and by standing together, we will face down this assault on us all.' No location for the protest has so far been shared, but it is understood that it will take place in London and will be the only demonstration that Defend Our Juries organises on Saturday. The Metropolitan Police have been approached for comment. Those interested in joining the demonstration have been asked to come to briefing calls on Tuesday or Thursday, while some have had non-violence training arranged for them, Defend Our Juries said. The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident it subsequently claimed, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. A High Court ruling on Wednesday decided that Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori had several 'reasonably arguable' beliefs in her challenge over the group's ban that would be heard at a three-day hearing in November, but a bid to pause the ban temporarily was refused. The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
