
Court rejects drug dealers' claim that house full of drugs, cash and weapons wasn't theirs
An appeals court has rejected claims by two drug dealers that they didn't own a large amount of drugs, weapons and $750,000 in cash found in a Thunder Bay, Ont., home where the two were sleeping.
The appeal detailed how drug dealers are drawn to northern Ontario because of the massive profits to be made.
Previous cases have shown dealers often use two locations when selling drugs. One site, the 'trap house,' is where the drugs are actually sold, often the home of an addict who is provided drugs in exchange for the use of their residence.
Dealers have minimal money and drugs on hand at the trap house. That way, they minimize their risk in case they are robbed or if they are busted by police.
As their supply runs low, they return to the 'safe house' to resupply and to drop off the cash they received selling drugs, before returning to the trap house.
'Expert evidence was led at trial suggesting that Thunder Bay had become somewhat of a hub for drug trafficking, a place where various drugs were sold at higher-than-average prices,' the appeals court decision said.
'The expert testified that drug dealers from outside of Thunder Bay were known to have taken over residential premises in Thunder Bay and were using them in two ways.'
'Expert evidence was led at trial suggesting that Thunder Bay had become somewhat of a hub for drug trafficking, a place where various drugs were sold at higher-than-average prices.'
— Court of Appeal for Ontario
While trap houses are relatively accessible, the court said access to safe houses is 'limited to other mid-level and higher-level drug traffickers that were doing business at the homes.'
The two dealers in this case -- Adrian Myles Puentes-Reed and Khalid Yousuf – were convicted on Feb. 24, 2023, of eight counts of drug trafficking, as well as weapons offences and possession of the proceeds of crime.
Puentes-Reed received a nine-year sentence and Yousuf eight years. Both appealed their convictions.
Police discovered the safe house thanks to the landlord, who entered to make a repair and found firearms in plain view.
'When the police entered the residence, they found it bursting with drugs and drug paraphernalia, cash and firearms,' the court said.
Officers saw crack and cannabis on a kitchen counter, alongside a Glock firearm and $90,000 in cash. Another $27,000 in cash was in a bag in the kitchen.
Another Glock was on a living room table, alongside a Brevete handgun and a .380 calibre Browning handgun. They found 800 grams of cocaine in a bag on a couch, $400,000 in cash in a duffle bag in a closet and more than $75,000 in cash stored in shoe boxes.
Handguns on the living room table
'There were also scales, hydromorphone pills and over 800 oxycodone pills discovered in the residence, along with a money counter and envelopes of cash,' the court said.
When all the cash was counted, it totalled about three-quarters of a million dollars.
After entering the house, police eventually moved up to the third floor, where they found the two men asleep 'in a drug-induced state.'
'The critical issue at this judge-alone trial was whether the appellants were in possession of the proceeds of crime, drugs and firearms,' the decision said.
'The trial judge concluded that they were and entered convictions.'
In his appeal, Puentes-Reed insisted he was in Thunder Bay not to sell drugs, but with the goal of building and operating a hip-hop studio.
'He tried to distance himself from the safe house, claiming that it was not his intention to build his hip-hop business from there,' the court said.
'Indeed, he claimed that he was not even staying in the home on this visit to Thunder Bay.'
Was just a 'coincidence'
He claimed that a third person had brought him and Yousef to the house 'in a drug-induced state,' and he had no recollection of how he got there.
The fact that he was sleeping in a bedroom with more than $450,000 in the closet was pure 'coincidence.'
The trial judge rejected that testimony as 'entirely incapable of belief,' and pointed to the fact that his passport was found in a drawer, along with Canada Revenue Agency documents in his name. Plus, a jacket hanging in the closet had a credit card in his name in the pocket.
The appeals court ruled the trial judge had 'ample evidence' upon which to base a guilty verdict.
The case against Yousef, however, was less obvious. In his appeal, he claimed that there was evidence only that he 'was found in a residence containing a significant amount of contraband' and nothing else.
However, the trial judge reasoned that 'only individuals involved in the drug operation would be left unsupervised in the safe house.'
With such a large quantity of drugs, cash and weapons in plain view, it is something that Yousef would have had to notice as he passed through the house on his way to the third floor to sleep, 'even someone in an inebriated state.'
'In my view, Mr. Yousuf's proximity to these items, having to pass them on the way up the stairs, contributes to my finding that he had those items together with Mr. Puentes-Reed in their constructive possession or custody,' the trial judge wrote.
'Further, the fact that he was one of two people found in the residence leads to the only logical conclusion he was in occupation of the residence for the use or benefit of himself and of Mr. Puentes-Reed.'
The residence had only one purpose: to be a safe house and it was 'bursting at the seams with contraband,' the trial judge said.
Only two people were inside when police arrived. The appeals court concluded that the trial judge had enough evidence to logically conclude that Yousef was 'in constructive possession' of the contraband and was guilty of trafficking and the other offences.
Read the full decision here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Bullets fired into Bradford home during the night, police investigating
Police in Bradford responded to multiple reports of gunshots in the area of Settlers Crescent on Wednesday. It happened around 3 a.m., after witnesses reported a person wearing a black hoodie standing on the sidewalk holding a pistol-type weapon. Police say the suspect bolted off and hopped in a white sedan going southbound. When officers arrived, they found multiple bullet casings on the boulevard and sidewalk in front of a home on Settlers Crescent. Through investigation, several holes were found in a window and door of the residence, and it was determined that the holes were caused by bullets. Police say the residence was occupied at the time, but no injuries were reported. Based on the information available, police believe that the incident is isolated and there is no risk to public safety. The investigation remains ongoing by members of the South Simcoe Police Uniform Patrol, Forensic Identification Unit, and Criminal Investigations Bureau. South Simcoe Police are appealing to anyone with information or surveillance footage from the area to contact the South Simcoe Police Street Crime Unit at 905-775-3311 ext. 1057.


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
LaSalle officer thwarts alleged attempted illegal entry into Canada
A routine property check turned into a surprising discovery early Wednesday morning, according to police. Shortly before 1:00 a.m., a LaSalle police officer checking a commercial property on the 1800 block of Front Road spotted a man at the water's edge of the Detroit River with two backpacks and a kayak. Investigators say the 51-year-old U.S. citizen was attempting to illegally enter Canada. He was detained and handed over to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for further investigation. Police Chief Michael Pearce praised the officer, saying, 'This is an outstanding example of how proactive policing can yield positive results. While conducting a simple property check, our officer helped prevent an illegal entry into Canada.'


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Mentally ill man ruled criminally responsible for brother's murder in Timmins, Ont.
A man who has schizophrenia has been found guilty of second-degree murder in the shooting death of his brother in 2009 in Timmins. Byron Spence, now past age 40, was originally found guilty of first-degree murder in 2014 for killing Jonah Trapper, his half-brother. That conviction was overturned in 2017 on the basis of errors by the trial judge, in particular the way he instructed the jury to rule out the role of Spence's mental health struggles as a plausible defence. The appeal has made its way through the system since the 2017 decision, before Superior Court Justice Kathleen Erin Cullin made her ruling Wednesday afternoon. There was no doubt, Cullin said, that Spence used a shotgun to shoot Trapper in the back on Oct. 24, 2009, in Timmins. Understood what he was doing What had to be decided was whether schizophrenia rendered him incapable of understanding what he was doing and whether he was able to form the intent to kill someone. Cullin said the evidence was that Spence showed signs of schizophrenia since he was 15 and living in Moose Factory with his father. The signs were noticed by both his biological parents by the time he was 17 or 18. Getting a diagnosis was difficult because of the lack of services in the community and the fact that he had turned 18 and was in denial about his mental health challenges. At the time of the offence, he was working at Detour Lake Mine and was staying at his mother's house in Timmins during a break. Lillian Trapper, Spence's mother, was away that night and he was there alone with Jonah. The pair had argued that evening because Jonah said Spence was messy and didn't clean up after himself. The sink was clogged and full of dirty dishes. Angry about an argument The exchange angered Spence, who went downstairs where he had his shotgun. An experienced hunter, he brought the gun upstairs, went past the bedroom where Trapper was sitting in front of the computer, and went to another bedroom. He removed the gun from its case, cocked it and put a bullet inside. Then Spence went to Trapper's bedroom and shot him, hitting him just below the shoulder. Trapper got up, staggered past him, and fell down the stairs. Spence went to Trapper's computer and typed, 'I am sorry. I am very, very sorry.' He then left the house, bringing the gun with him, and drove to his aunt and uncle's home. He told them what he had done and said they should call for help. While there was evidence that Spence was suffering from delusions, and that his condition has grown much worse since 2009, Justice Cullin ruled that at the time of the shooting, his symptoms appeared mild. 'I am not satisfied that (the mental disorder) rendered him incapable of the nature and quality of his act or that his act was wrong,' she said in delivering her decision. 'I couldn't look at him ... I didn't want to watch him die. I just left.' — Byron Spence, speaking with Timmins police 'Mr. Spence was capable of judging the nature and quality of his acts.' The evidence showed that his 'symptom burden' at the time of the offence was not sufficient for an acquittal. For example, he was holding down a job at the mine and his parents were of the opinion that his symptoms had receded. He also immediately typed an apology on his brother's computer, showing that he knew what he had done was wrong. He also told police that he left the home right away because Trapper 'was there bleeding.' 'I couldn't look at him,' Spence told police. 'I didn't want to watch him die. I just left.' Knew it was wrong Police also asked Spence if he knew what he did was wrong 'Yes, I do,' he told them. 'That's why I went to my uncle's house to tell them what I did.' Those statements, Cullin said, are not statements of someone in a mental health crisis, but 'statements of someone who had just shot his brother over dirty dishes.' 'It is impossible to know exactly what he was thinking at the time of the offence,' she said. But his statements to police 'were most telling.' For example, he told police that 'the way Jonah acts, sometimes, it's just totally ignorant.' 'The shotgun was there. I got mad. It was there.' 'He got mad about the sink being clogged.' 'He knew what he had done and was able to recount it coherently and in detail.' — Superior Court Justice Kathleen Erin Cullin 'He got mad at me and slammed the door. Like I said, I got mad, too.' Those and other comments to the police showed he was aware of what he had done -- and that it was wrong. 'He argued with his brother -- argued with him and shot him intentionally,' Cullin said. 'He knew what he had done and was able to recount it coherently and in detail.' However, she wasn't convinced that he had formed the intent to kill him. It seems more likely that he was acting impulsively and recklessly without a clear plan. 'He opened the bedroom door and shot his brother,' Cullin said. Immediately afterward, 'he was panicked and remorseful,' she said, adding she's not persuaded he understood that shooting him would 'actually lead to his death.' So she acquitted him of first-degree murder. The case returns to court Sept. 10 at 9 a.m. to set a date for sentencing. Jonah Trapper's family has said they want to provide victim impact statements as part of the process.