Will anyone miss a council flood committee?
On its first day in charge of Lincolnshire County Council Reform UK abolished one of the authority's most important and powerful committees.
The Flood and Water Management Scrutiny Committee oversaw nearly every aspect of flood defence in a county that has been devastated by flooding in recent years.
Despite cross-party pleas to save it, Reform UK's new council leader Sean Matthews said he wanted to save money and "streamline" the authority.
But will scrapping the committee make any difference to the experiences of those who live with the threat of flooding?
Forget politics for a second. Let's start with geography.
When it comes to flooding, Lincolnshire is one of the most vulnerable places in Britain; this low-lying region is criss-crossed by a complexity of rivers and drains.
The county also has more than 50 miles (80km) of coastline and nearly all of this needs defending from the North Sea.
Every drop of rainfall that falls on Lincolnshire must be managed. This means either pumping it out to sea via the river and drainage network or diverting water and storing it.
And the flood risks are far from being theoretical. In recent years Lincolnshire has been battered by a succession of powerful weather systems.
Most notably Storm Babet and Storm Henk between October 2023 and February 2024, when 900 homes were flooded and 13 river defences were seriously damaged.
According to the Met Office, this part of the country recorded its wettest ever winter on record, experiencing a month's rain in just a 24 hour period.
No one ever lost sleep over the scrapping of council committee, right?
Well, drive through this watery landscape on a rainy November morning and you might see their point.
Conservative councillor Ian Carrington, who sat on the Committee said "it was very unfortunate" that it had been scrapped.
"The committee did not just listen and scrutinise, it took steps to improve the protection that the people of Lincolnshire enjoy from the scourge of flooding", he said.
Defending Lincolnshire from flooding involves a number of public bodies as well as specialist officers from the Council.
These include The Environment Agency, which plays a leading role in protecting people and property.
There are also at least 15 Internal Drainage Boards or IDBs.
These IDBs have specialist local knowledge and operate hundreds of pumping stations, sluices and flood gates.
There are lots of moving parts in a flood defence plan.
The Flood and Water Management Scrutiny Committee was there to try to make them all work together.
It made recommendations, including calls for more government money and it would hold to account the myriad private and public bodies.
The Flood and Water Scrutiny Committee met four times a year. It involved at least 18 councillors and dozens of other specialists.
These were drawn from the council itself, from the IDBs, The Environment Agency and private companies such as Anglian Water.
Conservative councillor Ian Carrington said the recent experiences of big storms in Lincolnshire demonstrated the need for the committee: "When you have been through the appalling experiences that many of our local residents have been through, any dilution of our ability to improve the situation has to be deeply worrying." he said.
But Reform UK scrapped the committee on its first day in charge of Lincolnshire County Council.
The new administration said the change would save money and simplify the council.
Reform UK Council leader Sean Matthews, said that flooding will now sit within the Environment Committee, which already deals with issues such as waste and pollution
Mr Matthews said: "I want there to be more meetings about flooding in the county and by moving it under the umbrella of Environment we get to talk about it more." he said.
"We will work longer and harder on flooding than ever before." he added.
Labour group leader Councillor Karen Lee described the change as "Reckless, foolhardy and wrong".
As the climate changes, as rain events become more frequent and more severe, it is clear that properties in Lincolnshire are under an increasing threat.
The immediate responses to flooding incidents are unlikely to change in the short term.
There are well-rehearsed protocols between the council, the fire service and the police.
Seasoned professionals who work hard to mitigate the worst of what nature throws at us.
But the longer-term strategies of defence, response and recovery will also need to function effectively; what we learn from flood events, whom we hold to account and where we spend the money to improve protection for communities.
All this against a backdrop of tightening budgets.
Even the government's Environment Secretary Emma Hardy has described the state of the UK's flood defences as being in the 'worst state on record'
Despite resounding criticism from its political rivals Reform UK is arguing that its "simplified" approach will better serve the thousands of vulnerable residents, some of whom look nervously to the skies every time the clouds darken.
Cllr Sean Matthews denied he was watering-down the council's role: "Absolutely not. We were elected on a mandate of reducing waste and simplifying the council, and this [decision] will do that."
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
New Reform council abolishes flood committee
Repairs 'to cost £45m' after storms hit county
'Do something for a change' - Flooded farmers
Lincolnshire County Council
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How popular is Reform UK at the moment - and who's voting for it?
A civil war has erupted in Reform UK. Zia Yusuf, its chairman, quit the party on Thursday, saying working to get it elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'. It followed a row in which he criticised a "dumb" question from new MP Sarah Pochin to Sir Keir Starmer in Parliament on Wednesday about a ban on burkas. Reform figures - including leader Nigel Farage - had backed Pochin. The infighting is an unwelcome setback for the party, which is riding high in polling among the public and achieved third place in Thursday's Scottish by-election, finishing within 1,500 votes of the winning Labour candidate. In the latest YouGov voting intention tracker, based on surveys from 1 and 2 June, Reform topped the polls on 28%. This compares to Labour on 22%, the Tories on 18% and Lib Dems on 16%. The tracker's more detailed results indicate Reform is most popular among over-50s with some 40% of Britons between 50 and 64 choosing the party in the latest survey. This compares to just 18% favouring Labour and the Tories. Meanwhile, 34% of over-65s are backing Farage's party, compared to 30% who are currently supporting the Tories. In terms of gender, Reform is also the most popular party among British males (31%) and females (25%). In England, it is also leading in the north (32%), Midlands (30%) and south (28%). In London, it is only the fourth most popular party (15%). The party's apparent increasing support translated into MPs during last year's general election, which saw it win five seats: Ashfield, Boston and Skegness, Clacton, Great Yarmouth (though its winning candidate Rupert Lowe is no longer a Reform MP) and South Basildon and East Thurrock. It came in second place in a further 98 constituencies. The party's electoral momentum continued at a local level last month. As well as winning the Runcorn and Helsby parliamentary by-election (which sent Sarah Pochin to the House of Commons), Reform won two mayoralties (Greater Lincolnshire and Hull and East Yorkshire) and control of 10 councils. In the Scottish Parliament by-election for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse on Thursday, Reform came "from nowhere" to finish third - and within 1,500 of first. After not putting a candidate forward in 2021, Reform's Ross Lambie won 7,088 votes, compared to the SNP's 7,957 and Labour's 8,559. In 2021, Reform UK finished a lowly 13th, with just 58 votes. Deputy leader Richard Tice said: "We've come from nowhere to being in a three-way marginal, and we're within 750 votes of winning that by-election and just a few hundred votes of defeating the SNP, so it's an incredible result.' But if the popularity of Reform UK is gathering momentum, internally, the party has been hit by a series of high-profile internal problems. Formerly a Tory member, Yusuf came to prominence in June last year as a major Reform donor - giving £200,000 to the party - ahead of the general election A businessman who co-founded a luxury concierge service app called Velocity Black, which he reportedly sold for £233m in 2023, he was labelled a "star of the show" by Farage. And after Reform won its first Commons seats in the election, Yusuf was appointed chairman with a brief of "professionalising the party, building national infrastructure and continuing to grow membership". He was at the heart of another Reform "civil war" in March when the party stripped MP Rupert Lowe of the whip and reported him to the police, accusing him of making 'threats of physical violence' towards Yusuf. The Crown Prosecution Service said last month no criminal charges would be brought against Lowe, who then accused his ex-colleagues of a 'sinister' attempt to use the police to silence him. Yusuf also appeared to have an increasingly prominent role representing Reform in the media. After last month's local elections, it was him - not any of Reform's MPs - who spoke for the party on the BBC's flagship Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg politics programme. But just one month later, he was out following his clash with senior figures in the party. On Wednesday, Pochin asked Starmer during Prime Minister's Questions whether he would support a ban on burkas. A day later, Yusuf said on social media it had been 'dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do'. Shortly after that, he announced he was quitting as Reform's chairman, saying that working to get the party elected was no longer 'a good use of my time'. Party leader Farage said he had only 10 minutes' notice Yusuf was going to resign, adding he was 'genuinely sorry' he was departing. Reform has set out a number of policies in recent months. The party has said it would reinstate the winter fuel allowance and scrap the two-child benefit cap in what is a clear attempt to target Labour supporters angry at the party's welfare cuts. More controversially, Reform has vowed to make "big savings" by scrapping the UK's net zero, asylum hotel and DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) policies. Farage has also said it would lift the income tax threshold to £20,000: something the Institute for Fiscal Studies questioned, saying it would cost up to £80bn. Starmer seized on this, saying Farage's "fantasy" economics would lead to a Liz Truss-style economic meltdown. Quite how this translates into how the public continues to view the party remains to be seen. But with the next general election still four years away, there are plenty more twists and turns to come for Farage & Co. The policies Reform UK and Nigel Farage have announced this year (Yahoo News UK) The tightrope Farage is walking on race – and why he can only lose (The Telegraph) Reform-led councils in 'paralysis' as dozens of meetings cancelled in first weeks (The Independent)

Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Calls to Ban Burqas in the UK Rekindle Debate Over Religious Freedom and Public Safety
Calls by British MPs to ban burqas have reignited public debate over the wearing of Islamic face veils in public spaces. The burqa, the most concealing of all Islamic veils, covers the face and body, typically leaving only a mesh screen for the wearer to see through. The renewed controversy was Starmer dismissed the suggestion, saying, 'I am not going to follow her down that line.' Pochin's proposal revealed internal divisions within Reform and opened the floodgates for broader political commentary. Party Chairman Zia Yusuf publicly criticised Pochin's question as Related Stories 1/2/2025 8/10/2018 He resigned on Thursday, citing that continuing in his role was no longer a 'good use of my time.' Other Reform MPs, however, backed Pochin's position. Richard Tice and They further Tice called for a 'national debate' and questioned whether burqa-wearing women were truly making a free choice. From the Conservative benches, Nick Timothy Advocacy group 'If you care about freedom, care about the women forced to wear the burqa. It's time to ban the burqa,' the group said. Zia Yusuf sits behind Sarah Pochin as she speaks at a Reform UK press conference in London on May 27, not all responses aligned with this view, as Liberal Democrat and Labour MPs pushed back. Lib Dem MP Joshua Reynolds Labour MP Mike Tapp Tapp added that if a woman is being forced to wear an item of clothing, 'then that's likely to be part of a bigger problem within that relationship.' He said the government is working to strengthen laws addressing violence against women and girls, including coercive control, making it as serious as physical abuse. The Muslim Council of Britain 'Instead, we will continue to focus on what matters to all Britons: the cost of living crisis, the strain on our NHS, and the need for unity, dignity, and real solutions,' it said. Recurring Debate in the UK This is far from the first time the UK has grappled with whether to regulate or ban Islamic face veils such as the burqa and niqab. While no nationwide ban has been enacted, the topic has surfaced periodically over the past two decades. The UK has repeatedly debated banning Islamic face veils like the burqa and niqab, but no national law has ever been passed. The issue gained attention in 2006, when then-Foreign Secretary Jack Straw publicly expressed discomfort with face veils, sparking national discussion and controversy. In 2013, Conservative MP Philip Hollobone introduced a bill to Local people protest following comments made by former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson against the wearing of Burkas by Muslim women, outside the Hillingdon Conservative Association office in Uxbridge, England, on Aug. 9, issue resurfaced in 2018 when His remarks were widely condemned as Islamophobic, though he defended them as a critique of oppressive dress codes. Despite periodic calls for bans, successive UK governments have upheld the Currently, a Bans Across the Continent Several European nations have already implemented full or partial bans on face-covering garments such as the burqa, often citing national security, social cohesion, and secularism. France led the way in 2011 with a nationwide public ban. Austria, In Germany, while some states prohibit face veils in schools and public spaces, there is no nationwide ban on wearing them publicly. In 2021, the EU's highest court ruled against two Muslim women in Germany who were suspended from their jobs for wearing hijabs at work, saying employers may require employees not to wear religious clothing if they work in a job that deals with the public. These measures have However, governments argue they are essential for promoting open communication and safeguarding public order. According to the The group, which includes leading legal and community figures, is expected to present its recommendations by August 2025. PA Media contributed to this report.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Zia Yusuf didn't leave Reform because he was a victim of racism
Zia Yusuf was billed by some as one of the rising stars of British politics – so his abrupt resignation as chairman of Reform UK has created quite a splash. Wading in with his typical opportunistic identitarianism, former leader of the SNP, Humza Yousaf, said on X that Yusuf's departure from Reform should serve as an example to all 'people of colour' – that the 'hard-right' would never accept them, even if they make sizeable financial donations. He added that it was no surprise that the insurgent challenger party of the Right eventually dispensed with their 'brown, son-of-an-immigrant, Muslim' party chairman. While there have been reports of Yusuf being sidelined within Reform for some time, the straw that broke the camel's back appears to be a disagreement between him and the party's newest MP, Sarah Pochin. In PMQs, the recently elected MP for Runcorn and Helsby asked Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer whether he would entertain the possibility of introducing restrictions on the wearing of the burqa in the UK. Yusuf seemingly took issue with this by publicly rebuking Pochin on X. He said it was 'dumb' to argue for measures which were not official Reform policy. The writing was on the wall for Yusuf after the spat with Pochin. She is Reform's first female MP, and insulting her in public over a question in the Commons about banning the burqa – being a Muslim man – was political self-destruction and contradicted his own emphasis on 'professionalising' the party. The question itself was an entirely reasonable one. Morocco – a predominantly Muslim country where Sunni Islam is the state religion – banned the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of the burqa back in 2017. This was on the grounds of security considerations and part of a broader approach to combat Salafist influences in the North African country. If Yusuf was disappointed that certain procedures should have been followed by Pochin, this should have been discussed in private and he should have raised the importance of party discipline and order as chairman. This would have been responsible and professional chairmanship. While there is no doubt that Yusuf suffered a great amount of racist and anti-Muslim abuse from what the Reform leader Nigel Farage has labelled 'alt-right' trolls, a more plausible explanation for Yusuf's resignation is that he found the transition from business to politics difficult – and understandably so. In the world of business, he is unquestionably successful: he co-founded a luxury concierge company which was later sold to Capital One in a £233 million deal. But chairing a fledgling political party requires a greater degree of patience – especially when it comes to instilling organisational discipline and order as part of a broader professionalisation strategy. Whether it was restlessness, disillusionment, or clashing with other personalities, Yusuf the businessman had clearly grown frustrated in his political role. And nobody can blame him for that. While the likes of Humza Yousaf would love nothing more than to portray Zia Yusuf as a non-white Muslim victim of ethno-nationalist persecution, the reality is far more complicated. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.