logo
NASA 2026 budget proposal: The impact on prospects for space exploration

NASA 2026 budget proposal: The impact on prospects for space exploration

Broadcast Pro13-05-2025

These historic budget cuts mark a turning point for US space ambitions, targeting Artemis programmes plagued by unsustainable cost overruns.
By Shaw, Senior Consultant at Novaspace, specialising in space policy and exploration.
The White House’s proposed discretionary budget for fiscal year 2026 includes some of the steepest cuts to NASA in recent memory – targeting the backbone of its Moon-bound ambitions under the Artemis programme; a downside scenario that was predicted by Novaspace’s most recent edition of the Prospects for Space Exploration report, released in May. This article highlights the implications of the proposed budget cuts on international partners and the future of the Artemis programme.
The End of SLS, Orion, and Gateway
At the heart of the budget proposal is the phased cancellation of three key components of the Artemis Programme: the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, the Orion crew capsule, and the Lunar Gateway, a planned space station orbiting the Moon. All three would be phased out as early as 2026 after three flights. The administration argues that these legacy systems, specifically SLS and Orion, could be replaced by more cost-efficient commercial alternatives.
But experts warn that the transition won’t happen overnight. “As no commercial alternatives are expected to be operational and certified [in time for the fourth flight], significant delays to the Artemis program timeline are unavoidable,” cautions the Novaspace report. Delays to said timeline would likely hand China a critical first-mover advantage in lunar science, resources, and geopolitical symbolism, directly contradicting the Administration’s urgent goal of “returning to the Moon before China”.
The Lunar Gateway Terminated
Meanwhile, the proposed cancellation of the Lunar Gateway could shake the foundations of international collaboration in space. While the station’s technical utility has long been debated—with the Novaspace report foreseeing the Gateway as the most probable element to be cancelled—its diplomatic role is far from questionable. Agencies from Europe, Japan, the UAE, and Canada have already invested heavily, with agreements tied to hardware contributions like the European Service Module, cargo spacecraft, airlocks, and robotic arms.
Should Gateway be scrapped, those partners may be left stranded mid-development, forced to freeze or abandon billions in investments. It could also erode trust in U.S.-led space initiatives, pushing countries to look elsewhere – perhaps opening new doors. If confidence in Artemis continues to falter, international space agencies may seize this moment to take on greater leadership roles—initiating missions and partnerships once thought unfeasible without U.S. backing. Greater collaboration with other countries could also be a result – India, for example, has plans for its own lunar station by 2040. As Novaspace notes, such a shift could reshape the dynamics of international space cooperation in space exploration.
A Future Still in Flux
Of course, it’s important to remember this proposal isn’t set in stone. Congress will have the final word. But the sheer scale of the suggested cuts makes one thing clear: a substantial boost to NASA’s space exploration budget in FY2026 is unlikely. In fact, the forecasted NASA space exploration budget for 2026 under previous conditions stood at over $17bn – these proposed cuts would slash that budget to approximately $15bn according to Novaspace’s estimations. This uncertainty alone casts a long shadow over Artemis—and over NASA’s broader ambitions for space exploration.
Conclusion: A Historic Retrenchment with Global Consequences
These historic budget cuts mark a turning point for US space ambitions, targeting Artemis programmes plagued by unsustainable cost overruns. As Novaspace foresaw, SLS, Orion, and Gateway are now primary casualties—disrupting the Artemis timeline and undermining the Administration’s goal of beating China to the Moon. The repercussions extend beyond technical delays, potentially fracturing international trust and reshaping the global landscape of space exploration. Artemis now faces its most uncertain future yet.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Question marks over Nasa's plans after Trump withdraws nomination for Jared Isaacman
Question marks over Nasa's plans after Trump withdraws nomination for Jared Isaacman

The National

time12 hours ago

  • The National

Question marks over Nasa's plans after Trump withdraws nomination for Jared Isaacman

Nasa has been left without a confirmed administrator after the White House unexpectedly withdrew Jared Isaacman 's nomination to lead the agency. Mr Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur, pilot and commercial astronaut, was nominated by US President Donald Trump in December. The withdrawal comes as Nasa deals with a shrinking budget and pressure to deliver on its Artemis Moon programme and other deep-space goals. President Trump has not yet put forward a new nominee. The US leader said he was withdrawing the nomination following a review of Mr Isaacman's 'prior associations,' without elaborating further. 'Nasa has been operating with an acting administrator to date, Janet Petro, who was the director of Kennedy Space Centre,' David Barnhart, chief executive of California space infrastructure company Arkisys, told The National. 'She has been shepherding the agency through multiple changes, including budget reductions and programme shifts. But the absence of a Senate-confirmed leader may delay major programme changes.' Shift towards Mars? The choice of Mr Isaacman was widely seen as bold and unconventional, aligning with the administration's focus on commercial partnerships in space. The decision to withdraw the nomination was made two days after billionaire Elon Musk, a close friend of Mr Isaacman, finished his tenure in Washington as a 'special government employee'. Last month, the Trump administration put forward an $18.8 billion budget for Nasa for 2026, down 24 per cent from last year, with much of that to be allocated for human exploration of the Moon and Mars. The lower budget cuts or reshapes major programmes, including ending the Gateway project, a lunar-orbiting station that Nasa and many countries were building parts for, and the Space Launch System (SLS) rocket. Nasa had developed the SLS rocket for its Artemis Moon programme but each launch would have reportedly cost $4 billion and the entire programme is behind schedule. Mr Musk, founder of SpaceX, has said Starship projects would be at a fraction of that cost. Mr Barnhart said the withdrawal of Mr Isaacman as the next Nasa chief could cause more delays in programme changes. 'It is uncertain whether a focus on lunar activities will shift to Mars, for example, or whether the Space Launch System will be cut back in favour of only using commercial launch providers,' he said. 'Politicised' leadership Sahith Madara, founder of Paris-based advisory firm Bumi & Space, said Mr Isaacman could have helped bridge the public-private divide, especially as Nasa relies more heavily on commercial providers such as SpaceX and Blue Origin to deliver key parts of its missions. 'This says a lot about how politicised the Nasa leadership has become,' he said. 'Jared brought real technical and commercial chops and could've helped bridge public and private space efforts, especially with programmes like Artemis and deep space exploration on the table.' Mr Isaacman issued a statement on X after news of the withdrawal, saying he had gained 'a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government' over the course of the nomination process. 'The President, Nasa and the American people deserve the very best – an administrator ready to reorganise, rebuild and rally the best and brightest minds to deliver the world-changing headlines Nasa was built to create,' he said. 'I have not flown my last mission, whatever form that may ultimately take, but I remain incredibly optimistic that humanity's greatest spacefaring days lie ahead.' Blow to the commercial sector Mr Isaacman, who has flown aboard SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule and carried out a spacewalk as part of the Polaris Programme, had no previous government experience. His commercial accomplishments, however, and experience in space made him a favourite with those advocating for a more industry-driven Nasa. 'Mr Isaacman's experience lent credence to commercial industry excitement,' Mr Barnhart said. 'It was felt he would help transition more Nasa functions to the commercial sector. In general, it was seen as a favourable transition from past administrators and a recognition that Nasa's focus on doing more with industry as partners would allow them to focus on science and innovation.' Retired Nasa astronaut Dr Leroy Chiao, who spent 229 days in space across multiple missions, told The National that the withdrawal of Mr Isaacman's nomination left questions unanswered. 'I was in favour and am disappointed that he was withdrawn,' Dr Chiao said. 'I don't know the reason, but the official ones given are vague and don't really make sense to me. 'In the meantime, Nasa will be OK, as there is an acting administrator who has been running the agency since February.'

Musk aiming to send uncrewed Starship to Mars by end of 2026
Musk aiming to send uncrewed Starship to Mars by end of 2026

Dubai Eye

time4 days ago

  • Dubai Eye

Musk aiming to send uncrewed Starship to Mars by end of 2026

Two days after the latest in a string of test-flight setbacks for his big new Mars spacecraft, Starship, Elon Musk said on Thursday he foresees the futuristic vehicle making its first uncrewed voyage to the red planet at the end of next year. Musk presented a detailed Starship development timeline in a video posted online by his Los Angeles area-based rocket company, SpaceX, a day after saying he was departing the administration of US President Donald Trump as head of a tumultuous campaign to slash government bureaucracy. The billionaire entrepreneur had said earlier that he was planning to scale back his role in government to focus greater attention on his various businesses, including SpaceX and electric car and battery maker Tesla Inc. Musk acknowledged that his latest timeline for reaching Mars hinged on whether Starship can accomplish a number of challenging technical feats during its flight-test development, particularly a post-launch refueling maneuver in Earth orbit. The end of 2026 would coincide with a slim window that occurs once every two years when Mars and Earth align around the sun for the closest trip between the two planets, which would take seven to nine months to transit by spacecraft. Musk gave his company a 50-50 chance of meeting that deadline. If Starship were not ready by that time, SpaceX would wait another two years before trying again, Musk suggested in the video. The first flight to Mars would carry a simulated crew consisting of one or more robots of the Tesla-built humanoid Optimus design, with the first human crews following in the second or third landings. Musk said he envisioned eventually launching 1,000 to 2,000 ships to Mars every two years to quickly establish a self-sustaining permanent human settlement. NASA is currently aiming to return humans to the surface of the moon aboard Starship as early as 2027 - more than 50 years after its last manned lunar landings of the Apollo era - as a stepping stone toward ultimately launching astronauts to Mars sometime in the 2030s. Musk, who has advocated for a more Mars-focused human spaceflight programme, has previously said he was aiming to send an unmanned SpaceX vehicle to the red planet as early as 2018 and was targeting 2024 to launch a first crewed mission there. The SpaceX founder was scheduled to deliver a livestream presentation billed as "The Road to Making Life Multiplanetary" from the company's Starbase, Texas, launch site on Tuesday night, following a ninth test flight of Starship that evening. But the webcast was cancelled without notice after Starship spun out of control and disintegrated in a fireball about 30 minutes after launch and roughly halfway through its flight path without achieving some of its most important test goals. Two preceding test flights in January and March failed in more spectacular fashion, with the spacecraft blowing to pieces on ascent moments after liftoff, raining debris over parts of the Caribbean and forcing scores of commercial jetliners to change course as a precaution.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store