
Pets no longer ‘property' in domestic abuse cases as family law changes come into effect
Pets are now recognised as 'companion animals' not 'property'.
Some victim-survivors say their abusers 'weaponised' pets making it harder to leave. This article contains references to domestic violence and animal abuse. From 10 June 2025, major amendments to Australia's family law came into effect. Under the Family Law Amendment Act 2024 , the legal definition of family violence now includes "invisible" abuse such as economic control — where a partner restricts finances, coerces debt or deliberately worsens someone's financial situation. Courts are now also required to consider a broader range of factors when deciding who keeps pets after separation. The reform effectively means pets are no longer treated as property, but as "companion animals". Judges must assess whether there has been violence between partners, mistreatment of the animal, and the emotional bond between the pet and adults or children in the household.
These reforms aim to make it easier for victim-survivors to leave violent relationships without being forced to give up their animals.
Why pets matter in domestic violence cases Monique Dam, CEO of Lucy's Project — which supports victim-survivors and their animals — called the legal change a "significant shift". "It reflects the understanding that people can have very close and significant relationships with their companion animals and that we do need to consider the safety of the people and the animals they love as well," she said. Suzanne Painter, CEO of family violence support service Safe Steps, said pets were often a barrier to leaving violent homes. '(Pets) can be 'weaponised' by a person using violence. People who call us for help have told us about cases where their intimate partner or family member has made threats to harm their animals," Painter said.
"People may also not want to leave a violent situation for fear of what might happen to their pets if left behind."
Animal abuse often linked to family violence The RSPCA says animal cruelty is significantly more likely in homes where domestic violence is present — and it can sometimes be a warning sign for more serious harm. In July alone, Second Chance Animal Rescue received more than 28 requests for help from people fleeing violence. CEO Marisa Debattista said: "I myself have taken at least eight calls today." "We generally offer an emergency, two-week stay for a pet so that owners can get out of an immediate crisis and have some breathing space. We can then talk about the next options available to them."
For many, animals are not just pets — they are family, confidants and a reason to keep going.
One woman, interviewed as part of a national study , recalled leaving her abusive partner only to return days later out of fear for her pet's safety.
I left once without my pet, but I had to go back because I worried so much about her and missed her. Then I found a way to take my pet with me and I left for good. Animal Welfare Institute report 2014 Some survivors describe their animal as their only remaining bond — the one constant through ongoing abuse.
"We found a way to (take our pet with us) and now we are healing together," one mother said, according to the Animal Welfare Institute report 2014.
Domestic violence rates continue to rise Domestic violence affects people from all walks of life, regardless of age, background, location, income or social status. Since June 2024, 66 lives have been lost to domestic violence across Australia and in 2025 alone, that number includes 13 women and nine children, according to Safe Steps . Experts say reports of abuse have continued to rise year-on-year, a trend they attribute to better awareness and improved access to reporting.
A Victorian government spokesperson told SBS: "When women are still dying at the hands of men, we must do more — that's why we are changing laws, changing culture and delivering additional support for victim-survivors of family violence … so (they) can access the support they need and perpetrators are held to account." Stigma and social attitudes make it difficult for many victim-survivors to seek help, so organisations like Lucy's Project are working to shift the conversation by drawing attention to the often-overlooked link between domestic violence and animal welfare. "We share research to inform evidence-based solutions, and we deliver education to workers as well. And essentially, one of our main goals is to build a deeper understanding across sectors that the safety and well-being of people and animals is interconnected," Dam said. Lucy's Project contributed to the draft bill to amend the Family Law Act and gave evidence at the Senate hearing. In the past year, Lucy's Project has trained nearly 700 professionals across domestic violence, homelessness, animal welfare and veterinary services. If you or someone you know is impacted by family and domestic violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732, or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au . In an emergency, call 000.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
What are the rules for storage cages and shared garages in apartments?
If you have ever lived in an apartment complex, you know that space and storage is often a challenge. Many complexes offer car parking, storage areas or individual storage cages. But there are rules around the items you can store and how you can use the space, which can be helpful to know for insurance purposes, and to avoid theft or upsetting your neighbours. The purpose of a storage cage is to allow for overflow of personal items that you do not have room for in your apartment, such as sports equipment, suitcases or even furniture. A storage cage is considered a "utility lot" under strata law, which means it cannot be used as a place of residence, an office or a shop. Joshua Baldwin is president of the Strata Community Association Australasia, based at Norwood/Kaurna, South Australia. He says the best place to check what is allowed is by requesting a copy of the strata by-laws from your property manager or landlord. "Usually there's blanket kind of by-law article in your strata that will govern the use of these areas. "And a lot of it relates to what's able to be stored and what's able to be used in that area." He says there might also be signs hanging in car park common areas that specify things like "no storage of flammable goods" or "no roller skating". Canberra/Ngunnawal emergency nurse Mark Gipson rarely uses his storage cage at his apartment complex after one of his expensive mountain bikes was stolen recently. "The lock wasn't even broken, basically, the padlock hinge was just ripped off, the lock was still intact, and the bike was gone," he says. He recommends that people don't put anything in the cages that they're not willing to have stolen. "Just make the room in your apartment," he says. "The building manager, he's put up a sign inside the elevator saying, 'don't put anything that's valuable inside the storage cage'." Storage cages are not "common property", so it's important to know that strata insurance does not cover damage or theft of personal property. Specific items of value would need to be insured under your home contents policy. The Victorian Police Service recommends not keeping anything of significant value, such as electronics, jewellery, or important personal documents in your storage cage. Storage cage theft is becoming a growing issue in high-density residential areas. The following steps are recommended by police to keep your items safe and secure: Experts say other things to consider are pest control measures to deter rats and mice, and storing items in waterproof boxes in case fire sprinkler systems are activated. Mr Baldwin says you need to ensure your storage cage is not being used in a way that's causing a nuisance to other residents. He says if someone wanted to use the area for another purpose not outlined in the bylaws, like woodworking for example, they would need to seek permission first. "It would be advantageous for that person to say, 'I would like to do x, y, z at this location and here's what I'm going to do to ensure that it's not a nuisance anyone else'," he says. "And ensuring that the strata committee and or the group of owners etc is being practical and reasonable and with their decisions." He recommends that strata groups also ensure they are also keeping policies up to date. "A member has told me that there's group with such old laws that it restricts the use of a horse and carriage through the common property," he says. "So, we would obviously encourage those bylaws to be updated with current measures." If you've noticed an issue with a storage cage or carpark area, Mr Baldwin says you should first reach out to the manager or landlord, then if you're not satisfied, raise a formal complaint through your state or territory's body corporate management act. "The strata managers aren't on site every day, so they don't know if there's 10 x 10-gallon drums of petrol in the cage and obviously contravening the bylaw," he says. "I think it's imperative that it's starts with a conversation."

ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Truck driver Adam Ohlmeyer jailed for the manslaughter of Martin Stait
A Queensland truck driver whose load detached and killed a motorist in northern New South Wales has been jailed. Grafton man Martin Stait died after a 30-metre roll of fencing wire came off the back of a passing truck and hit his car, causing him to crash at Swan Creek near Grafton on August 8, 2021. The 35-year-old was driving home from his family's farm with his two young children. Adam Ohlmeyer, 48, from Kingaroy, was working as second driver at the time of the accident and was sitting in the passenger seat of the truck, which had been travelling from its depot in Toowoomba to Grafton. He pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of Mr Stait, as well as being an accessory before the fact of dangerous driving occasioning death and driving an unsafely loaded vehicle. Ohlmeyer was sentenced in Grafton District Court on Friday to three years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 13 months. Agreed police facts tendered in court said the truck broke down near Byron Bay and had to be towed to a service station in Ballina. A driver with a prime mover met Ohlmeyer there and the trailer was transferred onto the second truck. According to the facts, CCTV showed the rolls of wire wobbling as the second trailer was attached, but this went unnoticed by Ohlmeyer and he did not check the load again during the changeover. The pair then continued the journey south. Eight rolls of wire came off the truck at Ulmarra, north of the accident site, and the ninth roll, which struck Mr Stait's car, came off the truck about 10 kilometres down the road. Ohlmeyer was not aware the load was gone until he arrived in South Grafton, the facts said. Judge James Bennett said Ohlmeyer had failed to take reasonable steps to ensure the load was secure. "The rolls of wire were grossly inadequately secured, which should have been obvious to the offender," he said. During sentencing the court heard Ohlmeyer felt shame and deep regret and had suffered panic attacks, depression and PTSD since the incident. The court heard Mr Stait was the heart of his family, the one everyone called for advice, help, or just for a chat. He loved his family, fossicking for gemstones and fishing, which often resulted in a "happy dance" whenever he made a good catch. Ohlmeyer cried as he sat in the dock to hear the victim impact statements of seven of Mr Stait's family members. Mr Stait's wife, Ni Komang Muliastuti, described herself as "a butterfly who has lost its wings" and said she had considered taking her own life. "It felt like the only way to escape the pain," she said. Mr Stait's sister, Jennifer, addressed Ohlmeyer directly. "I acknowledge you have taken account for your actions but I do not forgive you," she said. Mr Stait's brother Troy told the court he had tried to be brave for his family but inside he was "torn a part". He said he had become depressed and started drinking, had lost his business and separated from his wife. "It's like walking uphill in quicksand," he said. Outside court Troy said the sentence adequately reflected Ohlmeyer's role in his brother's death. Three other men have pleaded not guilty to charges relating to the incident. Their cases due to go to trial in April.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
400 video games with rape, incest, child abuse pulled from Steam
More than 400 games depicting rape, incest and child abuse have been pulled off of a gaming platform after an Australian non-profit called on payment processors to cut ties. Collective Shout, an Australian non-profit that fights the sexualisation of women and girls, shared an open letter on Monday calling on payment processors to cease ties with gaming platforms such as Steam. Steam, a digital storefront for gaming owned by American company Valve Corporation, was hosting close to 500 games that depicted rape, incest and child abuse material. MasterCard, PayPal, Visa, Paysafe Limited and Discover were some of the payment processors named in the open letter. 'A Collective Shout team member has conducted extensive research using a Steam account set up for this purpose. She has documented content including violent sexual torture of women, and children including incest related abuse involving family members,' the open letter read. 'These games endorsing men's sexualised abuse and torture of women and girls fly in the face of efforts to address violence against women. We do not see how facilitating payment transactions and deriving financial benefit from these violent and unethical games, is consistent with your corporate values and mission statements. 'We request that you demonstrate corporate social responsibility and immediately cease processing payments on Steam and any other platforms hosting similar games.' Melinda Tankard Reist, the movement director of Collective Shout, told the push came after she appeared on a television show in the UK to discuss the game No Mercy — a game where players assumed a persona of a man who sexually assaulted women as a punishment for his mother's infidelity — that Collective Shout had gotten pulled off of Steam in April. 'The reporter mentioned she'd come across other related games so we did a deeper search and discovered almost 500,' Ms Tankard Reist said. 'These games features rape, sexual violation and extreme torture of women and girls. They also include incest-themes. Players can rape vast numbers of women including family members. Women are represented as deserving of punishment. 'The game descriptions are open about 'scenes of non-consensual sexual activity' and 'Sexual scenes with a woman during conversation or while sleeping'. 'In one game 'men abduct women, hold them hostage and rape and sexually torture them'. 'Another says 'The captured women will be violated every day … They will not stop. There is no human rights at all'.' Following the recent action, there are now 27 incest games and 55 rape themed games remaining on Steam. Steam has also updated its rules on what content can be published on the service. In addition to sexually explicit images of real people, defamatory statements and content that exploits children, a new clause reads; 'Content that may violate the rules and standards set forth by Steam's payment processors and related card networks and banks, or internet network providers. In particular, certain kinds of adult only content.' has contacted the Valve Corporation for comment multiple times. When first approached on the topic, a MasterCard spokesperson told 'We have zero tolerance for illegal activity on our network. When specific instances of potentially unlawful or illegal activity are identified, we investigate the allegations so that the appropriate action can be taken. 'We have not received the evidence or materials noted in the letter but will investigate the claims upon receipt.' understands that Steam does not directly connect to the MasterCard network but use 'acquirers' as intermediaries. Acquirers are responsible for conducting due diligence on customers. PayPal and Paysafe gave similar comments to with the latter stating it was investigating concerns that were raised. Since Collective Shout's open letter, the organisation has been inundated with abusive commentary online — including rape and death threats. Some went so far to call Collective Shout's act a 'declaration of war'.