logo
Trump announces massive new 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Here's how they might affect you.

Trump announces massive new 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Here's how they might affect you.

Yahoo02-04-2025

On Wednesday, President Trump announced that the United States will hit back at any country that imposes trade barriers on American exports by subjecting them to sweeping 'reciprocal' tariffs — an unprecedented move that threatens to upend the global economy, experts say.
For Trump, disruption appears to be the point. 'My fellow Americans, this is Liberation Day," the president said in a speech from the Rose Garden. "For decades our country has been looted, pillaged, raped and plundered by nations near and far. ... Foreign leaders have stolen our jobs, foreign cheaters have ransacked our factories and foreign scavengers have torn apart our once beautiful American dream."
"But it is not going to happen anymore," he continued. "Reciprocal — that means they do it to us and we do it to them. Very simple. Can't get any simpler than that."
The president has spent much of his second term teasing, delaying, triggering — and occasionally even retreating from — big taxes on friends and foes alike: a 25% tariff on certain Canadian and Mexican imports here, two rounds of 10% tariffs on Chinese goods there. His 25% tax on imported cars and auto parts is set to start Thursday; last month, he reinstated a 25% levy on imported steel and aluminum. He's even threatened to slap a 200% tariff on European alcohol.
But Trump's new tit-for-tat tariffs are different because they're not specific to a single country or industry. Instead, they're universal — a whole system of taxation meant to fundamentally alter America's relationship with the rest of the world.
For anyone who has followed Trump's political career, even this latest escalation shouldn't come as a surprise. 'I always say 'tariffs' is the most beautiful word to me in the dictionary,' the president repeated during his inauguration festivities earlier this year.
But the actual impact of Trump's reciprocal tariffs could be more of a jolt.
'Tariffs are gonna make us rich as hell,' he promised in January. 'They're gonna bring our country's businesses back that left us.'
Economists, however, tend to see things differently. Here's how Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs could affect you.
Tariffs aren't a new obsession for Trump. 'I believe very strongly in tariffs,' he told journalist Diane Sawyer in 1988, nearly 20 years before his first presidential run. 'America is being ripped off. We're a debtor nation, and we have to tax, we have to tariff, we have to protect this country.'
Trump has long insisted that universal tariffs will level the proverbial playing field by incentivizing companies to retain American workers and ramp up U.S. manufacturing — all while funneling 'trillions and trillions of dollars" in new revenue to the federal government.
Trump has also railed against trade deficits — how much more money we spend on another country's goods and services than we earn from selling it ours — and vowed that tariffs will balance them out.
Now the president is finally putting his pet theory into practice.
Yet nearly all economists disagree with Trump's take, noting that a tariff is actually an import tax paid by the company doing the importing — not by the foreign country (or foreign business) sending its goods to the U.S.
The same experts have found that most importers simply pass the added cost of tariffs on to U.S. consumers by jacking up their prices — rather than going out of their way to replace the affected goods with American-made alternatives, which still tend to be more expensive. Then other countries retaliate with tariffs of their own, risking a global trade war and recession.
Meanwhile, any efforts to shift manufacturing to the U.S. take a long time and cost a ton of money — which is another expense that consumers might have to shoulder, at least in the short term.
The 'effect [of reciprocal tariffs] will be lower economic growth, higher inflation, higher unemployment, the destruction of wealth and a tax increase on American families,' economist Jason Furman, a former chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, recently explained. 'It will deal a blow to the rules underlying the global trading system and further empower China.'
To understand how reciprocal tariffs could affect American consumers, it's worth looking first at something simpler: Trump's new 25% automobile tariffs.
The impact on foreign automakers — and the Americans who purchase foreign-made cars — is obvious. Most car companies are not extremely profitable, so they have limited room to maneuver. If importing a Volvo from Sweden is suddenly 25% more expensive, then the car itself is likely to get a lot more expensive, too.
But even domestic automakers — and foreign companies that manufacture their cars at least partially in the U.S. — will take a hit. A single car or truck can move back and forth between the U.S. and Canada up to eight times before it's fully assembled. Car parts come from all over the world. Taxing those imports at 25% whenever they cross the U.S. border will eat into profits, and prices will inevitably rise in response.
According to estimates by iSeeCars, an online car buying site, Trump's tariffs could add $15,000 to the price of a Ram 1500 pickup, $12,000 to a Toyota Tacoma pickup, $9,000 to a Subaru Forester S.U.V. and $6,000 to a Nissan Sentra sedan.
There are likely to be widespread knock-on effects as well. Used car prices could soar as demand surges. Car insurance could cost more (reflecting the rising cost of replacement parts). And U.S. car companies could find themselves further stretched by additional barriers from foreign governments.
So far, Trump and his allies have brushed off such concerns, dismissing them as short-term pain in the service of long-term gain. 'I couldn't care less if [automakers] raise prices, because people are going to start buying American-made cars,' the president recently told NBC News, adding that companies seeking to avoid cost increases could simply start building their cars in the U.S. with American-made parts.
But can automakers rely on Trump to keep his tariffs in place long enough for them to change how and where they manufacture cars? And what happens when Trump leaves office in 2028?
The president's new retaliatory tariffs are similar — except they're everywhere all at once. Seeking to counter not only other countries' tariffs but also 'nonmonetary barriers" such as currency manipulation, subsidies, exorbitant taxes and theft of intellectual property, the president held up a chart Wednesday showing the White House's calculated tariff rates for dozens of other countries — and said the U.S. will now charge those countries half as much, reciprocally.
Some of these new reciprocal rates, according the chart, are China at 34%, the European Union at 20%, Japan at 24% and India 26%.
Trump also announced that he will establish a universal baseline tariff of 10% that will apply to all countries — on top of any reciprocal tariffs or previous levies. That means a country like China will face a new 44% tariff in addition to the 20% Trump has already imposed.
Driven by uncertainty about the scope of Trump's plan, the S&P 500 ended March with its steepest monthly decline in more than two years. Businesses have paused on investing and planning ahead. European and Asian countries are poised to retaliate with tariffs of their own. If inflation accelerates — and the prices of groceries, housing and other everyday goods start to rise — consumers could pull back on spending. A recession could follow.
In order to encourage automakers to ramp up domestic manufacturing, Trump has insisted that his car tariffs are '100% permanent.'
But his new reciprocal tariffs could be more… flexible.
On a recent podcast, Trump explained that he is 'a big believer in tariffs because I think tariffs give you two things: They give you economic gain, but they also give you political gain.'
What Trump really means by 'political gain' is 'leverage' — leverage that is powerful enough, in his view, to stop a war.
'I can do it with a phone call,'' he boasted in August. 'We're going to charge you 100% tariffs.'' And all of a sudden, the president or prime minister or dictator or whoever the hell is running the country says to me, 'Sir, we won't go to war.''
With reciprocal tariffs, Trump has already signaled that he plans to use them to extract concessions from trading partners — much as he did recently on border issues with his on-again-off-again tariff threats against Mexico and Canada.
'I'm certainly open to it, if we can do something,' Trump said last week. 'We'll get something for it.'
This is hardly Trump's first go-round with tariffs.
During his first four years in office, the president almost immediately 'hit a slew of countries with tariffs on steel and aluminum,' according to the New York Times, then 'wielded those taxes as leverage against Canada and Mexico to renegotiate NAFTA.'
He followed up in 2018 with 'significant tariffs' on Chinese goods — including smart watches, chemicals, bicycle helmets and motors — 'then continued to ratchet them up over the next 18 months until his administration signed a trade deal with Beijing in January 2020.'
Ultimately, the percentage of total imports covered by tariffs more than doubled during Trump's presidency — and his successor, President Joe Biden, kept many of Trump's import duties in place.
'When people or countries come in to raid the great wealth of our Nation, I want them to pay for the privilege of doing so,' Trump tweeted in 2018. 'It will always be the best way to max out our economic power. We are right now taking in $billions in Tariffs.'
But according to a recent summary of the economic research conducted by the Harvard Business Review, Trump's 2017-21 'tariffs didn't lower the cost of imports from China' and 'manufacturing jobs didn't come back to the U.S.' — yet 'U.S. consumers paid more on specific goods' and 'sectors targeted by retaliatory tariffs,' especially agriculture, 'took a hit.'
Overall, Trump raised average tariffs by about 1.5 percentage points during his first term. But so far this year, they've gone up another six points — and reciprocal tariffs could ultimately lead to increases 'five to 10 times as large' as the ones Trump imposed last time around, according to Furman.
Their impact is likely to be much larger as a result.
'The 2018-to-2019 trade war was immensely damaging, and [Trump's universal tariff plan] would go so far beyond that it's hard to even compare,' Erica York, senior economist at the Tax Foundation, a right-leaning think tank that opposes the tariffs, told the Washington Post earlier this year. 'This threatens to upend and fragment global trade to an extent we haven't seen in centuries.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ahmedabad Air India Plane Crash: Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani confirmed dead
Ahmedabad Air India Plane Crash: Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani confirmed dead

Business Upturn

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Ahmedabad Air India Plane Crash: Former Gujarat CM Vijay Rupani confirmed dead

In a heartbreaking development, it has now been reportedly confirmed that former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani was among the victims of the Air India flight AI171 crash near Ahmedabad on Wednesday, June 12. Parimal Nathwani, Member of Parliament in the Rajya Sabha, had earlier posted a condolence message on social media confirming the demise of former Gujarat Chief Minister Vijay Rupani in the tragic Air India plane crash near Ahmedabad. However, the tweet was subsequently deleted, sparking speculation and raising questions about the official status of Rupani's presence on the flight and his condition. Authorities have yet to release an official confirmation, and the situation remains unclear. Rupani, along with several members of his team, was onboard the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft that was operating the Ahmedabad to London (Gatwick) route. The plane crashed shortly after takeoff from the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport, falling in the Meghani Nagar area, causing a massive blaze and widespread destruction. Initial reports had speculated Rupani's presence on the passenger manifest, which was later verified by both state authorities and Air India sources. The confirmation marks a deep political and personal loss for the state and the country. Rupani, a prominent BJP leader, served as Gujarat's Chief Minister from 2016 to 2021. As per official data, the aircraft was carrying 242 individuals, including 53 British nationals, 169 Indian nationals, 1 Canadian, and 7 Portuguese citizens. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) confirmed the plane gave a MAYDAY call moments after takeoff but failed to respond thereafter. The Indian government has initiated a high-level inquiry into the incident, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi has dispatched senior ministers to oversee the response efforts in Ahmedabad. More updates are awaited as rescue and recovery operations continue. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling

Business of Fashion

time26 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling

A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'

Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year

Forbes

time26 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year

Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store