logo
Over 150 US universities join Harvard to defend academic freedom from Trump

Over 150 US universities join Harvard to defend academic freedom from Trump

India Today28-04-2025
The battle for academic freedom in the United States has reached a pivotal moment as universities across the nation join forces to push back against the Trump administration's escalating attempts to control higher education. In an unprecedented move, Harvard University has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, challenging a 2.2 billion dollar funding freeze imposed on the institution.Harvard's legal action comes amid a broader campaign of intimidation and political interference targeting universities that have criticised or resisted the administration's policies.advertisementHARVARD'S BOLD LEGAL CHALLENGEHarvard's lawsuit represents a significant escalation in the fight for academic autonomy. The university argues that the government's demands to freeze research funding are unlawful and overstep its authority.
President Alan M Garber of Harvard stated that the government's actions would have "stark real-life consequences" for students, faculty, staff, researchers, and the future of American higher education.The funding freeze was triggered by allegations of antisemitism on campus, but Harvard contends that these concerns are unfounded and unrelated to the vital research being conducted at the university.Amongst the projects that could be jeopardized by the freeze are critical medical and scientific initiatives aimed at improving cancer treatments, preventing the spread of infectious diseases, and advancing cutting-edge technological research.In addition to freezing federal research funds, the Trump administration also threatened to withhold funding from several Boston hospitals affiliated with Harvard, despite the fact that these hospitals are independent entities not under the university's control. This move has been widely criticised as arbitrary and politically motivated.GROWING RESISTANCE AMONGST UNIVERSITIESadvertisementHarvard's legal challenge has sparked a broader movement amongst universities across the country. More than 150 university presidents have signed a joint letter condemning the Trump administration's "unprecedented government overreach."The letter, which represents a wide array of institutions, from large state universities to small liberal arts colleges, calls for a collective defence of academic freedom and institutional autonomy.The signatories argue that the government's attempts to manipulate university policies through the use of federal funding are a direct threat to the principles of liberal education that are foundational to democracy.The letter stresses that while universities should be open to constructive reforms, they must not be coerced into aligning with political agendas that undermine the core values of academic institutions.This collective stand is not limited to the leaders of these universities. A growing number of faculty members, students, and academic organisations have joined in opposing the government's interference in education.Todd Wolfson of the American Association of University Professors told The Guardian that the real pushback is coming from grassroots movements within universities, particularly from students, faculty, and labour unions, rather than from university administrators themselves.The Trump administration has ramped up its pressure on universities through a series of executive orders and policy changes aimed at curbing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programmes and punishing institutions that participate in certain social justice initiatives.advertisementOne of the most controversial aspects of this strategy is the threat of withholding funding from universities that refuse to align with the government's policies regarding Israel.The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the largest funder of medical and biological research in the US, has warned that it will pull grants from universities that participate in boycotts of Israeli companies or engage in DEI programmes that don't comply with federal guidelines.Harvard, which received nearly 500 million dollar in NIH funding last year, is one of the universities most affected by this policy.Experts have warned that the fallout from these cuts could be devastating for US universities, especially those relying heavily on federal research grants.The Trump administration's tactics have been described as part of a broader "flood-the-zone" strategy, overwhelming universities with a constant barrage of executive orders and directives. This has made it difficult for academic leaders to respond to each challenge in a timely manner, but Harvard's decision to take legal action has begun to shift the tide in favour of university autonomy.advertisementFIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH ON CAMPUSWhile universities are increasingly standing up to the Trump administration's encroachment on academic freedom, they are also facing their own challenges related to free speech.Several universities, including Yale and Columbia, have come under fire for punishing students involved in pro-Palestinian activism, particularly those who have criticised Israel's policies.These actions have raised concerns amongst civil rights advocates, who argue that universities must not only resist political interference from the government but also ensure that free speech is protected on campus.Tori Porell from Palestine Legal told The Guardian that universities must safeguard the right to express views critical of government policies, including those related to Israel. She added that the recent crackdown on pro-Palestinian protests has highlighted the tension between protecting academic freedom and maintaining political neutrality on campus.FUTURE OF HIGHER EDUCATIONAs the Trump administration continues its attacks on academic institutions, the fight for academic freedom is far from over. The stakes are high, with the future of research funding, free speech, and institutional autonomy hanging in the balance.While universities are slowly beginning to unite in opposition to government interference, the real challenge will be maintaining this momentum and ensuring that higher education in the US remains a bastion of intellectual freedom.advertisementThe resistance movement within universities is gaining strength, and experts believe that sustained pushback from students, faculty, and university leaders will be key to protecting the integrity of American higher education.As the situation unfolds, it will require bold action and unwavering commitment from all sectors of academia to ensure that the principles of free inquiry, academic freedom, and democracy are upheld in the face of mounting political pressure.Must Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting
'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting

Hindustan Times

time23 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

'Snipers in Anchorage': Commentator faces flak amid Putin assassination row ahead of Trump meeting

Commentator and social media influencer Brian Krassenstein faced flak on Friday after posting about having 'snipers in Anchorage', where Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are meeting. Several users alleged that Krassenstein was calling for the Russian president's assassination. President Donald Trump (R) greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson(Getty Images via AFP) At the time of writing this story, a meeting between Presidents Trump, Putin, and other officials was underway. Just before the summit, Krassenstein posted a video of the two leaders shaking hands on the tarmac. 'They should have had snipers in Anchorage, Alaska, ready to take him out as soon as he shrugged,' he posted on X, platform formerly known as Twitter. Read More: 'Stop Killing Civilians?' Putin dodges Ukraine ceasefire question at Alaska Airport This came after reporters yelled at Putin, asking him 'When will you stop killing civilians in Ukraine?'. The Kremlin boss shrugged and gestured that he couldn't hear the question. Social media users, including pro-Trump accounts, were quick to slam Krassenstein. 'Brian Krassenstein is now calling to ass*ssinate Putin on American soil,' one person tweeted. 'You really didn't suggest that we kill Putin?' another person asked. Krassenstein quickly replied: 'I did.' He did not stop there. 'Correction. We should poison him instead. Make it less obvious,' he wrote in a follow-up tweet. Read More: B-2 Bomber roars overhead as Putin lands in Alaska for Ukraine talks with Trump | Video 'Weird. Lots of Russian bots are reporting me to the FBI and Kash Patel for saying that I think the US policy should be to try and end Putin's life. It's almost as if there is no free speech in Russia.' 'In my opinion the US government should have taken care of him,' he further said. Brian and Ed Krassenstein are American twin brothers who are writers, entrepreneurs, and social media personalities. 'This will will be remembered as one of the most disgraceful moments in U.S. presidential history. In Anchorage, Alaska, Putin brushes off a question about killing civilians. Trump smirks, then drapes his arm around him while they both stand on the literal red carpet the Trump administration rolled out for him. I like presidents who don't roll out the red carpet for war criminals,' Ed posted.

Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin
Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin

Indian Express

time23 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Historic handshake, warm smiles and a ride together in ‘The Beast': What happened when Trump met Putin

The summit meeting between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin is underway at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, Alaska. Wearing a dark suit, white shirt and red tie, US President Donald Trump descended the stairs from Air Force One at 11:08am local time, and he walked along a red carpet. He stopped and, as Russian President Vladimir Putin approached, applauded him before offering a handshake and a tap on the arm. Putin appeared to make a joke, prompting smiles from both leaders. They walked together toward a platform marked 'Alaska 2025,'where again the two leaders exchanged a handshake, posed for photographs; but as reporters shouted questions at Putin about a ceasefire and civilian casualties, the Russian president shrugged as if indicating he couldn't hear them. American military aircraft—including fighter jets and what appeared to be a B-2 stealth bomber—thundered overhead. WATCH : Stealth bombers fly over as Trump greets Putin in Alaska#TrumpPutinSummit — The Indian Express (@IndianExpress) August 15, 2025 Putin then joined Trump in the presidential limousine, 'The Beast'. The two could be seen laughing inside. When not travelling aboard Air Force One or by helicopter on Marine One, US presidents are chauffeured in a heavily armoured presidential limousine known as 'The Beast.' President @realDonaldTrump and President Putin riding in The Beast together 🇺🇸🇷🇺 — Margo Martin (@MargoMartin47) August 15, 2025 'The Beast,' weighing 20,000 pounds and equipped with advanced security and communications systems, debuted during Trump's first term in 2018 and reportedly cost $1.5 million to build. While it resembles an elongated Cadillac XT6, its chassis comes from a Chevrolet Kodiak truck. Security features remain classified, but a report by NBC, suggests the vehicle has night-vision, tear gas launchers, electrified door handles, 3-inch-thick windows, and 8-inch armor plating—making it one of the most secure vehicles in the world.

'Trump let this convicted killer free': Martina Navratilova criticizes Donald Trump after Venezuela prisoner swap
'Trump let this convicted killer free': Martina Navratilova criticizes Donald Trump after Venezuela prisoner swap

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Trump let this convicted killer free': Martina Navratilova criticizes Donald Trump after Venezuela prisoner swap

Martina Navratilova criticizes Donald Trump after Venezuela prisoner swap (Image via Getty) Martina Navratilova, the former World No. 1 and 18-time Grand Slam singles champion, recently criticized U.S. President Donald Trump for allowing Dahud Hanid Ortiz, a Venezuelan-American ex-marine convicted of a triple murder, to return to the U.S. Ortiz, convicted in Venezuela in January 2024 for killing three people in Madrid during a jealous rage, was unexpectedly released in July 2025 as part of a prisoner-swap deal involving the U.S. , Venezuela, and El Salvador. Navratilova saw a video of MSNBC host Rachel Maddow harshly questioning Trump's decision and wrote simply on X: 'And trump let this convicted killer free…' Martina Navratilova calls out Donald Trump's release of Dahud Hanid Ortiz Martina Navratilova saw a viral video on social media. In the clip, Rachel Maddow strongly criticized Donald Trump for freeing Dahud Hanid Ortiz, a man convicted of murder. She wrote on X, in a brief yet pointed response. It came through clearly and simply. She is upset because Ortiz was convicted in Venezuela in January 2024 after murdering, out of jealousy, two women and a client in Madrid, Spain. Despite that, he was released in July 2025 under a three-way prisoner swap involving the United States, Venezuela, and El Salvador. Martina Navratilova condemns Donald Trump's 'cruel' immigration moves at Alligator Alcatraz Earlier in 2025, Martina Navratilova also spoke out when Donald Trump endorsed a new Florida immigration detention center called 'Alligator Alcatraz.' This site, surrounded by dangerous swamps and alligators, was meant to hold migrants. Also Read: 'It Would Not Be America': Martina Navratilova Slams Donald Trump For Taking Over Washington Police And Deploying Troops Dondal Trump even joked that escapees would have to run from alligators and suggested deploying Florida National Guard members as immigration judges. Martina Navratilova called the plan 'cruelty.' She condemned the move as inhumane and worrying, warning aloud that such actions steer the U.S. toward fascism. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store