logo
The Dja Dja Wurrung lead the way as Victoria edges closer to Australia's first state treaty

The Dja Dja Wurrung lead the way as Victoria edges closer to Australia's first state treaty

SBS Australia16-07-2025
In the sacred country of the Dja Dja Wurrung people in Central Victoria, a historic transformation is underway. In Bendigo, at a traditional meeting place lit by fire and ceremony, cultural dancers move to the rhythm of resilience, welcoming a new chapter in the long struggle for recognition and justice.
Here, where ancestral stories echo through the bush, the Dja Dja Wurrung have become the first Traditional Owner group to formally begin negotiating a local treaty under Victoria's state-led Treaty process.
Their aspirations are bold, grounded in cultural authority and future-focused – not only for the well-being of today's generations, but for their children and the many to come. 'We caught up as a whole group to talk about the treaty late last year,' says Djaran Murray-Jackson, a Dja Dja Wurrung man and board member of DJARRA, the Traditional Owner corporation. 'Our mob really wanted to be one of the first to negotiate a local treaty. We authorised it at our AGM — and now we're here. It's very exciting.' The Dja Dja Wurrung's vision is to elevate their local voice to the same level as state and federal decision-makers. It's about tangible change — home ownership, university education, and cultural pride for young Dja Dja Wurrung people. For Murray-Jackson, this work is also deeply personal. 'I've got a four-month-old daughter,' he says.
'If every Dja Dja Wurrung person feels something from the treaty process, I'll be satisfied we've done the right thing.'
Victoria: The national leader for a treaty While national treaty talks have stalled, Victoria has moved forward. In 2016, it became the first jurisdiction to commit to official treaty negotiations.
Since then, the First Peoples' Assembly of Victoria (the Assembly) has led a pioneering process to redefine the relationship between First Peoples and the state.
Reuben Berg, co-chair of the Assembly, describes the statewide treaty as a way to ensure decisions affecting First Peoples are made by First Peoples. 'The Assembly is a democratically elected group of Traditional Owners. Through this first statewide treaty, we want to see that body play an enhanced leadership role — appointing people to key positions, holding government accountable, and ensuring ongoing truth-telling.' Victoria's Treaty Authority — an independent governing body overseeing the negotiations — is currently engaging with around 40 Traditional Owner groups across the state. Board member Thelma Austin says the appetite for local treaties is growing. 'The interest is definitely out there. Our role is to educate and help communities navigate the process.' Premier Jacinta Allan has thrown her support behind the Treaty process, backing both the collective state treaty and local agreements.
'Our community have been clear — they want action, and they want meaningful treaty negotiations,' she told attendees at the Dja Dja Wurrung cultural gathering.
Local aspirations, global context The push for the Treaty in Victoria is part of a global movement for Indigenous self-determination. Indigenous leaders and legal scholars in the program The Case for a Treaty, airing on SBS's Living Black, highlight how Australia remains an outlier. It is the only British settler colony to have denied the presence of its First peoples to avoid treaty making. In comparison, New Zealand's Treaty of Waitangi — though imperfect and contested and largely ignored between 1841 and the 1970s — it has offered a platform for the Māori political voice, land settlements, and cultural revitalisation. Australia, by contrast, refused to acknowledge Aboriginal sovereignty or negotiate terms of co-existence. As legal expert Professor Megan Davis puts it, 'The British weren't competing with anyone in Australia, so there was no motivation for treaties. And we're paying the price for that today.' Victoria's Treaty process is attempting to correct that legacy. It's complex work, unfolding more than 230 years after colonisation, but it's beginning to come to fruition.
For communities like the Dja Dja Wurrung, this is about reclaiming autonomy and creating lasting impact.
Economic justice and cultural renewal Beyond symbolism, a Treaty is increasingly seen as a powerful mechanism for economic development and cultural strength. Darren Godwell, Chair of Indigenous Business Australia, says treaties offer a way to 'bridge historic disadvantage into inclusion.' 'Each of our sovereign nations is going to need a treasurer and a treasury,' says Godwell. 'Treaty allows Traditional Owners to pursue development on their own terms — whether it's fisheries, agriculture, sustainability or cultural enterprise.'
For the Dja Dja Wurrung, that means having a say in local economic planning, land use and service delivery, with an emphasis on housing, education and language revival.
A national path forward? While Victoria leads, other states lag behind. Queensland and the Northern Territory paused or abandoned their Treaty efforts after changes in government. Tasmania has opted for truth-telling without a formal Treaty process. South Australia has created a First Nations Voice to Parliament, with Treaty talks still emerging. In New South Wales, the Treaty Commission has just begun consultations under the Minns Labor Government. Despite this patchwork approach, leaders like Berg are optimistic. 'We don't need to wait for a national treaty to move forward locally. Victoria is proof that meaningful change can start in the states.' Senator Lidia Thorpe, a vocal advocate for Treaty and a Djab Wurrung Gunnai Gunditjmara woman, believes the real power lies with the grassroots.
'We need clans and nations represented at the local government level. Real change starts in community, not Canberra.'
A promise to the future As the fire crackles on Dja Dja Wurrung country, elders, dancers and young families gather to welcome history in the making. The Treaty journey is still unfolding — fragile, hopeful, contested. But the message is clear: First Nations people are not asking for permission.
They are reclaiming their future. And in Victoria, the road to Treaty has already begun.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Magistrate condemns 'terribly frightening' death threat to Senator Fatima Payman
Magistrate condemns 'terribly frightening' death threat to Senator Fatima Payman

ABC News

time28 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Magistrate condemns 'terribly frightening' death threat to Senator Fatima Payman

A western Victorian man has been released on bail after threatening to kill Independent senator Fatima Payman via email. WARNING: This article includes racist, violent and offensive language. Sean David Sharman, 51, of Ballarat, faced court after pleading guilty to using a carriage service to make a threat to kill. Sharman emailed Senator Payman twice in March in a communication the judge condemned as "disgraceful, racist and xenophobic". Sharman appeared in the Ballarat Magistrate's Court on Tuesday, supported by his wife. In one email, Sharman allegedly called Senator Payman "a domestic terrorist" and said she should not hold office in Australia. "Call me Racist all you want c**t. But there is a 38Cal with your name on it coming for your muslim hateful waste of oxygen c**t head VERY SOON," Sharman wrote in the email. "You and your muslim lot should go back to the desert, you lot have destroyed Australia." Mr Sharman then signed off "Best Wishes, Sean". It's understood "38Cal" refers to a .38 calibre bullet. Sharman pleaded guilty to the charge on June 24. The court heard Sharman sent his full name and address in another email in an attempt to "show I was a real person and not some bot." In a written victim impact statement from Senator Payman read to court, she said the "threats and vile language" had a significant impact on her physical, emotional and mental health. She said she felt "scared and deeply unsettled" after receiving the emails and was afraid to travel to Victoria as a result. In her statement, Senator Payman said the email was a personal attack on her and other Muslim women. "Actions have consequences and this behaviour should not be minimised," Senator Payman said. Police searched Sharman's home and arrested him in April. The court heard Sharman was compliant with police requests, allowed officers to enter the premises and provided the password to his laptop and email. His lawyer told the court her client was unemployed and suffered from various medical issues, including alcoholism. She said Sharman was "very embarrassed" by his behaviour, which the defence lawyer categorised as serious. The court heard he had no prior convictions and that he was trying to avoiod news or political views that reinforced his previous behaviour. The court heard he did not recall sending the emails due to his alcohol use at the time. Sharman was on a waitlist for detox services at Ballarat Community Health, his lawyer told the court. Magistrate Julia Barling said Sharman's email was "disgraceful, racist, xenophobic, [and contained] terribly frightening comments". "It is very concerning to me that someone with no prior history lashes out to the point they are behaving in this way," the judge said. Sharman's sentencing was deferred to allow him to attend detox. He was released on bail under the condition he had no contact or communication with Senator Payman or anyone from her office. A pre-sentencing report and broader assessment report were requested. Sharman is scheduled to return to court in November.

Environment Tasmania says Marine Environment Act and review into salmon farming is about 'being accountable'
Environment Tasmania says Marine Environment Act and review into salmon farming is about 'being accountable'

ABC News

timea day ago

  • ABC News

Environment Tasmania says Marine Environment Act and review into salmon farming is about 'being accountable'

Rebecca Howarth We really do welcome the announcement from the weekend to inform us that the Premier intends to commit to a new Marine Environment Act is a fantastic move and brings us in line with other states that have a more holistic and ecosystem-based approach to managing their marine environment like New South Wales and Victoria. Prior to now, it has been a very siloed and piecemeal way that we manage our marine environment. We've seen industry priorities over ecosystem health and that just has to change. We are really pleased with this announcement and we also welcome the announcement around the review of the salmon industry. I think this is a great example of coming to the table and compromising with the cost bench, offering to work together. Of course, it's going to take some work to ensure that this actually has some teeth and like you've already mentioned, a timeline to it, but we certainly are welcoming it at this stage. Kylie Baxter And in actual practical terms, what do you think these promises are going to look like for the salmon industry? Rebecca Howarth It's going to look like being accountable, which is what should have happened all along. The community have been calling for more accountability, more scrutiny, more independence in the oversight of the salmon industry. Our coastal waters are extremely important to the Tasmanian public. It's ingrained in our psyche, it's part of our lifestyle and upholds our economy as well. And so to see the decline that we've seen over the last couple of decades has certainly been so alarming. And so we really do feel that the Premier is listening to the community and offering to make some concessions at this stage. The industry really are going to have to come to the table and if they truly are world's best practice, which is what the industry has been claiming for a very long time now, then they should have nothing to fear. They should be ready to open up and welcoming this review.

Renewable energy expert accuses Victorian government of concealing true cost of transition plan
Renewable energy expert accuses Victorian government of concealing true cost of transition plan

ABC News

time2 days ago

  • ABC News

Renewable energy expert accuses Victorian government of concealing true cost of transition plan

Energy experts have accused the Victorian government of concealing the true cost of its plan to transition the state to renewable power. The government has released its final Victorian Transmission Plan (VTP), which outlines the investment and development needed for the state to achieve its goal to reach its targets of 65 per cent renewable energy generation by 2030 and 95 per cent by 2035. The plan divides the state into six onshore energy zones and a Gippsland offshore zone. It names seven priority projects to expand renewable power generation and infrastructure, including offshore wind in Gippsland and new transmission lines between Sydenham and Tarrone, Truganina and Deer Park, and Hazelwood and Yallourn. It was compiled by government body VicGrid, which has costed the shift to renewable generation at $7.9 billion dollars. It said the seven new projects were needed in addition to existing transmission projects, such as Marinus Link, Victoria to New South Wales Interconnector West and Western Renewables Link. In announcing the plan, Energy Minister Lily D'Ambrosio said Victoria had the most ambitious renewable energy targets in Australia. "Coal generators are getting older, they're getting less reliable and they're closing," Ms D'Ambrosio said. "Our government has been very clear in our ambition to grow the necessary replacement electricity that we need to sustain our way of life." VicGrid suggested the VTP would lead to cheaper wholesale power prices. "Overall VicGrid's modelling suggests that Victorian energy bills could be $20 lower per household and $50 lower per small business each year (real $2025)," the report stated. Those figures have been described as "nonsense" by the director of the Victoria Energy Policy Centre at Victoria University, Bruce Mountain. "I don't think this is a plausible plan," Professor Mountain said. Mr Mountain estimated the plan could cost up to $28 billion over the next decade. He said there was no doubt that Victoria needed to expand its clean energy production, but he accused the government of using "sleight of hand" tactics to disguise the true cost. "They are only including a very small subset of the transmission expansion plan that they have set out and they've done that by simply relegating the vast bulk of the expenditure into what they call the base case. "I think the government is petrified of the actual outlays that their plan entail." He said households and businesses would face substantially higher bills over the next decade. "It might well be that if the government proceeds with this plan, customers will simply find it unaffordable and so then taxpayers will be forced to bear some large part of it. "I estimate small household bills will increase by about half. "Large bills paid by large industry, for whom the electricity transmission charge is a much bigger portion of their bill, they can expect bills to increase by between two-and-a-half and three-and-a-half times." The $7.9 billion dollar figure stated in the VTP was double the cost estimate Ms D'Ambrosio gave to a parliament estimates committee two months ago. On Saturday, she attributed the rise to updated transmission costs projections by the Australian Energy Market Operator. "That report itself has already indicated pressures on building costs right across the country," Ms D'Ambrosio said. "But can I say, unequivocally, the cost of not building the projects in the Victorian transmission plan will end up costing every Victorian far more through increased energy bills." Mr Mountain disagreed with Ms D'Ambrosio's assessment. "It's kind of a refuge of the scoundrel to say 'but for our plan, something else would happen' when of course you conjure up any other possibility." Senior fellow of the Energy Program at Grattan Institute, Tony Wood, agreed the figures given in the VTP were misleading. "When it talks about the potential for consumer bills, household bills being $20 per annum less because of this plan, that's not less where they are now, that's less than what they would have been if we had a different plan," Mr Wood said. "Does that mean that we can expect our bills to go up or down? It's not clear at all." But Mr Wood said the plan was important for Victoria's future. "For the first time really, we've got a comprehensive plan on how we're going to build renewable energy in Victoria to replace coal and connect all that renwable energy into the grid. "That's a very important step forward." Opposition leader Brad Battin said Victorian power bills were already too high. "Household energy is getting to a stage that people genuinely can't afford it. Businesses are closing because they can't afford to pay the price of energy here in our state." VicGrid had originally proposed seven onshore zones. But todays final VTP revealed VicGrid has consolidated the Wimmera Southern Mallee and Grampians zones into the single Western renewable energy zone. It said modifications were also made to the zones following feedback from regional communities and Traditional Owners about the need to protect farmland, minimise the effects on biodiversity, water systems and regional areas, and account for natural hazards such as bushfires and flooding. It also said it had expanded the total size of the energy zones after the industry said it needed larger areas to develop technically and commercially viable renewable projects. The VTP has been heavily opposed by some communities, with some farmers vowing to lock developers out of their land. The report sets out that companies proposing projects would need to negotiate with landholders for the right to use their properties, declaring owners would have the right to say no to having new renewable generation on their land. "Landholders who do agree to new renewable development will receive financial compensation that is negotiated with the developer," the report states. Western Victorian farmer Ross Johns is the president of the Wimmera Mallee Environmental and Agricultural Protection Association. He said the final VTP has not provided any certainty or reassurance for farmers. "The government just keeps changing the plans, the rules, the objectives, how it's going to occur," Mr Johns said. Mr Johns said energy projects disrupt agricultural operations and amenities for rural communities. "It looks like to me government doesn't really fully understand the issues. "The footprint of some of these transmission lines is huge, like it's 40 metres by 40 metres so that land will never be able to farmed or operated again. "If it goes angle ways across the paddock, it actually significantly impacts the commercial viability of those farming operations." He declared the government would have to build the new infrastructure 'through enemy territory'. 'What you've got is a bunch of rural people and farmers who are extremely resourceful. Farmer Ben Duxson from Marnoo, also in Victoria's Wimmera region, said his community felt like it was being railroaded by the government. "Our stance has always been that they need to stop and actually get an energy plan that's good for Australia for the next 100 to 200 years and this certainly isn't a plan that's going to do that," Mr Duxson said. "We'll stand in our gateways and we'll fight." Alex Rae is on the board for the Golden Paradise Beach Community Development Fund, which represents communities affected by the Gippsland Shoreline Renewable Energy Zone. He said the communities of Golden Beach and Paradise Beach had been sidelined. "We've put in submissions [and] raised concerns throughout the process with VicGrid, but it just feels like our voice is being dismissed because we're small communities," Mr Rae said. "The maps don't even acknowledge us as being directly in front of the offshore wind zone, where turbines will permanently industrialise the seascape." Mr Rae said projects like Navigator North already had plans to install turbines about 30 kilometres from the coast, which would affect property prices and the local tourism industry. "We're not against renewables of course, but you we are talking about potentially hundreds of these turbines all the way along the coast. "[We are] tiny coastal towns and a lot of the economy here for the small businesses rely on tourism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store