
‘We've come back from hell': Sudanese jubilant after army retakes Khartoum from RSF militia
The streets of Khartoum erupted in celebration on Tuesday after the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) declared the city free from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.
RSF had occupied much of the Sudanese capital for the past two years of its devastating conflict with the SAF, seizing homes and displacing thousands.
Following intense street battles, the SAF officially announced its control over Khartoum, sparking jubilant scenes among those who remained in the city.
Sudanese displaced to other states and refugees in neighbouring countries also welcomed the news, hoping for a long-awaited return home.
As news of the SAF reclaiming Khartoum spread, hundreds of residents who had remained in the city poured onto the streets in celebration.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Mohamed Obaid, 40, from Nile East - a former RSF stronghold - described the terror of survival under occupation. 'I stayed indoors for days without food, too afraid to step outside,' he recounted to Middle East Eye.
'I don't even want to remember those days. You could die at any moment for no reason.
'If you received money from a relative through mobile banking, it was risky to go outside and collect it - they were everywhere, ready to loot your phone,' he added.
'If you managed to reach a Starlink shop to exchange money, you'd find RSF fighters running the place, seizing 30 percent of your cash for no reason. They controlled all supplies and sold them at outrageous prices.'
'The RSF looted, tortured, humiliated, lashed, and did every possible evil to us. I can't believe they're gone'
- Ahmed Suleiman
In the Al Daim neighbourhood, in the heart of Khartoum, 56-year-old Ahmed Suleiman had been trapped in his home for two years, cut off from food and basic necessities.
'We have witnessed unimaginable torture during this period. We did nothing wrong- except that we didn't have enough money to flee,' Suleiman told MEE, his voice heavy with emotion.
'The RSF looted, tortured, humiliated, lashed, and did every possible evil to us.'
'I can't believe they're gone. We've come back from hell.'
Emad Hassan, who fled to Cairo when the conflict erupted, told MEE: 'It's unbelievable. The 26th of Ramadan was the same day the war broke out two years ago - and now, on this very same day, Khartoum is free again.'
'I never thought I'd use this key again,' said Hassan, 37, waving the key to his long-abandoned home in Khartoum.
Hassan compared his experience to that of Palestinian refugees, forced from their homes but never giving up the hope of return. 'They still carry the keys to their houses wherever they go. We Sudanese love our land. We will return. The RSF expelled us in the most humiliating way, but we will come back.'
Sudanese exiles in Cairo and other capitals worldwide have joined in the celebrations, seeing the fall of RSF control in Khartoum as the first step towards reclaiming their homes.
Fighters return home
While many Sudanese have been waiting with the keys to their homes, others have taken up arms, joining the fight alongside the SAF to reclaim their city.
Among them is Amar Sid Ahmed, a fighter who finally set foot in his home on Tuesday after two years of war.
Amar is a member of the Islamist group Al-Bara Ibn Malik, which has been fighting alongside the SAF since Sudan's Sovereign Council leader, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, ordered the opening of military camps for young Sudanese to defend themselves.
People take to the streets of Port Sudan to celebrate the taking the capital Khartoum by the army from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces, on 26 March 2025 (AFP)
The 35-year-old, originally from the Al-Kalakla Al-Guba neighbourhood in southern Khartoum, entered his home in full military uniform - a sight unseen for the past two years.
Many fighters like him had not seen their families in that time, while others had only visited in secret, fearing RSF reprisals.
'I thank God that we have finally returned to our homes after years of displacement and humiliation, both inside and outside Sudan. We deserve to live with dignity,' Amar told MEE from outside his house in Al-Kalakla.
'Even before the army chief officially declared Khartoum free of RSF, I rushed to see my family. I missed them so much, and they welcomed me with ululations and pride.'
Symbolic return
Two years ago, SAF commander al-Burhan found himself in a desperate situation. RSF forces had surrounded him and his top officers, nearly capturing them as they seized control of most of Khartoum.
Al-Burhan managed to escape the besieged SAF headquarters in August 2023 using undisclosed tactics after four months of entrapment.
His dramatic exit fuelled numerous rumours - some claimed he was airlifted by special forces, while others speculated that he swam underwater across the Nile to reach Omdurman, where SAF still held territory.
'Right now, returning is impossible. There is no security, no healthcare, no education, no electricity - nothing'
- Sabry Alhassan
At the time, RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan "Hemeti" Dagalo and his deputy and brother, Abdul Rahim Hamdan Dagalo, mocked al-Burhan, claiming he was merely hiding in the SAF headquarters' basement.
Al-Burhan himself later revealed that RSF fighters stormed his house on 15 April 2023, killing 30 of his men.
Fast forward to today, and al-Burhan's return to Khartoum is in stark contrast to his former position. Now appearing confident and victorious, he arrived in the capital aboard a military helicopter, greeted by cheering troops.
His first stop was Khartoum International Airport, a symbolic move meant to demonstrate that the city is once again under SAF control.
Despite recent RSF drone attacks on the presidential palace - one of which killed army officers and journalists - al-Burhan insisted on addressing the nation from inside the palace.
Standing at the heart of Khartoum, he declared: "Khartoum is free now. This matter is finished."
Fragile victory
Despite the jubilant scenes, for many displaced Sudanese, the situation remains too volatile to risk returning home.
Sabry Alhassan, who fled Khartoum for Port Sudan on the Red Sea coast after the war erupted, told MEE he still fears going back.
'I want to return to Khartoum, but I'm afraid. The insecurity, the possibility of another RSF attack, and the risk of renewed war make it too dangerous.'
Sudanese army takes control of airport, forcing RSF out of central Khartoum Read More »
Beyond the security risks, Alhassan pointed out the severe lack of basic services. 'Right now, returning is impossible. There is no security, no healthcare, no education, no electricity - nothing. The city is heavily polluted, and the conditions are extremely difficult.'
Once a symbol of beauty at the confluence of the White and Blue Nile, the capital now bears the scars of war - widespread destruction, streets littered with debris, and homes filled with tragic stories. Dead bodies of civilians and soldiers alike serve as grim reminders of the suffering endured.
And despite the SAF's success, uncertainty lingers over the sustainability of its control.
The RSF has vowed to regroup and launch further attacks, while fighting continues in the regions of Kordofan and Darfur. Many fear that the battle for Khartoum is far from over.
The RSF has denied losing control of Khartoum, claiming instead that its forces conducted a 'tactical withdrawal' from the capital.
RSF adviser Albash Tibaig stated in a press release that the paramilitary group remains in 'top form' and fully prepared to continue fighting against the SAF.
On the same day that SAF declared the retaking of Khartoum, the RSF announced the practical launch of its military alliance with the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N), led by Abdul Aziz Al-Hilu. The two groups had signed a political agreement last month in Nairobi, Kenya, with the RSF declaring a parallel 'peace and unity' government in the territories it controls.
The conflict between SAF and RSF, which started in April 2023, killed at least 150,000 people in hostilities that have been marked by allegations of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, including mass rape and ethnically motivated killings.
Some 12 million have been forced to flee their homes, and over half the population is currently facing "high levels of acute food insecurity", according to the UN.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US embassy in Iraq prepares for partial evacuation ahead of Iran talks
The US is reducing staff levels at its embassy in Iraq on security concerns, US officials told several media outlets on Wednesday, as Iran threatened US bases if conflict breaks out. "Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq," a US official told AFP on condition of anonymity. Meanwhile, The Financial Times reported that US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth authorised the voluntary departure of military dependents throughout the Middle East. The withdrawals come as Iran's defence minister, Aziz Nasirzadeh, said on Wednesday that Tehran would target US military assets in the region in response to any attack 'without hesitation'. "God willing, things won't reach that point, and the talks will succeed," he said, adding that the US side "will suffer more losses" if it came to conflict. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Tehran and Washington have held five rounds of talks since April to negotiate a new nuclear deal to replace the 2015 accord that US President Donald Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. The next round of talks is scheduled for Thursday. 'Ordered departure from US Emb Baghdad could reflect a major threat, but also is impactful as a means of signaling possible near-term military action against Iran. It's a big move, hard to reverse quickly, comes at some cost. So if signaling, you play this card when you mean it,' Daniel Shapiro, the US's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. Shapiro added that it doesn't "necessarily" mean military action is imminent but said that the move provides "important leverage in nuclear talks". Trump had previously expressed optimism about the talks, saying during a Gulf tour last month that Washington was "getting close" to securing a deal. But in an interview published on Wednesday, Trump said he was "less confident" the US and Iran could reach a deal, in response to a question on whether he believed he could stop Tehran from enriching uranium. "Something happened to them, but I am much less confident of a deal being made... Maybe they don't wanna make a deal, what can I say? And maybe they do. There is nothing final." Trump maintained that Washington would not allow Tehran to obtain nuclear weapons, saying that "it would be nicer to do it without warfare, without people dying'. Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke on Monday. Trump says he had been holding back Netanyahu from launching preemptive strikes on Iran. Oil prices jumped almost four percent on Wednesday amid the tensions.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
How Turkey and Qatar are playing an outsized role in Trump's new Middle East
Turkey and Qatar are making themselves crucial to US President Donald Trump's reshaping of the Middle East. Look no further than in Syria, where Qatari gas and cash, along with Turkish military might, are helping war-ravaged Syria back on its feet while Trump tries to fulfil his promise to pull the plug on western interventionists and 'nation builders'. The two countries' rising stock is not going unnoticed among Arab officials. 'Trump has too much on his plate; China, Iran talks, the war in Ukraine. He doesn't want to intervene. In Syria, he has these two local allies who don't mind getting involved in the nitty-gritty details of Syria's reconstruction. He is going to lean on them,' one senior Arab official told Middle East Eye. Qatar and Saudi Arabia are paying the salaries of Syrian government employees. In March, Qatar began supplying gas to Syria via Jordan. Meanwhile, Turkey's government is in talks with Damascus on a defence pact amid Israeli air strikes in Syria. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters That Turkey and Qatar are the regional powers most active in Syria should not come as a surprise. Turkey shares a long border with Syria and was the last true backer of rebels who fought to oust Bashar al-Assad after most Gulf monarchies gave up on their cause. Qatar was the exception. It was the sole Gulf state to recognise and host Syria's opposition. Conversely, the UAE made a big bet on rehabilitating Assad. MEE revealed that the UAE was negotiating a grand bargain to lift US sanctions on Assad in return for reducing Iran's influence. The talks continued up until the last minute. Assad was toppled in an offensive led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham, whose commander, Ahmed al-Sharaa, is Syria's new president. The biggest deal Turkey and Qatar have made in Syria so far was in May. US ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack assumes Syria envoy post Read More » Along with the US, they signed a $7bn energy agreement that envisions the three countries building four gas power plants in Syria and one solar plant to boost the war-ravaged country's meagre energy supplies. Qatar's UCC construction and energy company, owned by the prominent al-Khayyat family, is set to lead the project. Speaking in Damascus at the signing ceremony, US envoy to Syria Thomas Barrack took the opportunity to praise the 'alignment of these amazing countries". 'A young and prosperous Qatar, one of the most incredible and ancient civilisations in Syria; [and] one of the most dominant empires that ever existed in the Ottoman Empire and the succession of Türkiye.' Barrack framed Syria as the poster child for Trump's vision of a Middle East, where the US was empowering local countries to redress the wrong of Sykes-Picot, the agreement that colonial Britain and France used to divide Syria during WWI. 'That mistake cost generations. We will not make it again,' he wrote on X. 'Need to address the PKK' If there is any doubt about whose voice the US will give the most credence to in Syria, look to Ankara, where Barrack also serves as Trump's ambassador to Turkey. 'The Trump administration understands the Turks have a vital national security interest in Syria. He respects that in a way others in Washington haven't,' Robert Ford, the last US ambassador to Syria, told MEE. 'The US has to work with the Turks otherwise, there will be another war' - Bassam Barabandi, former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist During the Biden administration, Syria was a sore point in US-Turkey ties. US troops first entered Syria in 2014 to fight the Islamic State militant (IS) group. They partnered with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). Turkey views the SDF as an extension of the outlawed Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK). The PKK has waged a decades-long guerrilla war in southern Turkey and is labelled a terrorist organisation by the US and the European Union. 'You can't have a stable Syria without addressing the PKK. The US has to work with the Turks, otherwise there will be another war,' Bassam Barabandi, a former Syrian diplomat and opposition activist, told MEE. During his first term in office, Trump tried to withdraw US troops from Syria. His own officials hamstrung him, and his former defence secretary, Jim Mattis, resigned over a partial troop withdrawal. Although US troops were ostensibly in Syria to fight IS, they came to be seen as a force denying territory to Iran. With Tehran's ally Assad gone, that rationale no longer exists. Trump himself says Turkey has 'taken over Syria', alluding to its close ties to Sharaa. He appears to sense this as his chance to withdraw troops, despite pleas from Israel and the SDF to keep them there. Barrack told Turkish media in June that the US planned to downsize from eight bases to one in northeastern Syria. How Trump's allies view Turkey and Qatar Turkey and Qatar have long been seen as close partners. In a sense, they complement each other. Turkey has the second largest army in Nato, but is cash poor. Qatar is one of the world's top exporters of Liquefied Natural Gas, but has just 300,000 nationals. Turkey has a military base in Qatar. Doha made tens of billions of dollars in investments in Turkey during its inflation crisis, providing Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan with an economic lifeline. The two countries' alignment was solidified during the 2011 Arab Spring, when they backed popular protests against rulers like Assad in Syria and Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. Saudi Arabia and the UAE accused them of supporting political Islamists who Abu Dhabi and Riyadh feared would unsettle their monarchies. The rift got nasty in 2017, when a Saudi-led blockade was imposed on Qatar. That Trump should welcome Qatar and Turkish investment in Syria now shows how rapidly the region has reorganised itself. In 2017, he gave a White House speech throwing his weight behind the blockade. Until recently, Trump's Middle East director at the National Security Council was Eric Trager, who has been critical of Qatar. 'You certainly have those in the administration, not the Witkoffs or Barracks, who still believe in a Muslim Brotherhood boogyman. This is deep-seated. So it's interesting to see Trump's really close cohort move beyond this,' Natasha Hall, a Syria expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, )said, referring to US Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff. Both of Trump's close advisors enjoy good relations with Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The UAE's hotspot troubles The Arab Spring descended into a slew of conflicts, of which Syria was just one. After the Nato-led removal of Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, Turkey backed a government in Tripoli while Saudi Arabia and the UAE threw their support behind a rogue general and one-time CIA asset, Khalifa Haftar. The UAE also backed Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, the general who overthrew the democratically elected president, Mohammed Morsi, whom Erdogan backed. Turkey and Qatar's growing clout in the Middle East vis-a-vis Syria contrasts with mounting troubles for the UAE in some of these hotspots. UAE lobbying Trump administration to reject Arab League Gaza plan, officials say Read More » Ties between Egypt and the UAE are becoming seriously frayed, although both sides are trying to downplay it, Arab officials tell MEE. Sisi's economy is in crisis, but he has failed to push through the reforms that the UAE, his top backer, wants. The Emiratis have lobbied against Cairo in Washington, MEE revealed. The UAE's ambassador to the US publicly backed a plan floated by Trump to forcibly displace Palestinians from Gaza - a thought that unnerves Egyptian generals. Libya remains divided. Haftar's bid to conquer Tripoli failed in 2020. His son and likely successor, Saddam, has even courted Turkey and Qatar as their power rises. He visited Doha and Ankara this year. The parliament in Eastern Libya controlled by him is weighing whether to agree to a contentious maritime deal that Turkey favours. As Turkey and Qatar sign energy deals in Damascus under US auspices, the UAE is bogged down in a brutal civil war in Sudan. There it is backing the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) against the Sudanese army, which is backed by Turkey, Egypt and Iran. Litmus test Syria is going to be a test case as the first post-Arab Spring country to be rebuilt after the 2021 al-Ula agreement, in which the Gulf states agreed to put their differences behind them and mend fences. Qatar and Saudi Arabia have patched up ties, but the Qataris and Emiratis still have a chilly relationship. The same goes for the Turks. 'Syria's greatest benefit is that Assad was ousted after al-Ula,' a Syria analyst in the UAE told MEE, speaking on condition of anonymity. Trump announced in Saudi Arabia that he was lifting all US sanctions on Syria, and he credited both Erdogan and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with convincing him to do so. 'The Saudis have been just as instrumental as the Turks and Qataris, if not more, in convincing Trump to drop sanctions on Syria. They want a stable Syria in order to focus on their own economic development at home,' Anna Jacobs, a non-resident fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told MEE. 'The new Saudi looks for interest, not emotion or ideology,' Barabandi told MEE. 'They are with Turkey and Qatar on Syria. The US's goal is to facilitate the flow of GCC money into Syria. That's it.' Even the UAE is stepping in and trying to gain influence. In May, state-owned Dubai Ports World signed a pledge to invest $800m to modernise the port of Tartus. The analyst in the UAE said Sharaa's government welcomed the UAE's investment in Tartus because it needed a country that was seen as agreeable to Russia, which still has a military base there. France's CMA CGM shipping inked a 30-year deal to operate Latakia port in Syria. 'Sharaa couldn't have Turkey or a European state come in. Russia would have complained about that. The UAE is a friend of Russia,' the analyst said. The UAE's Al Habtoor group, a massive conglomerate that spans real estate to the automotive industry, is set to send a delegation to Syria this week. Ford said that Turkey, Qatar, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia all have a convergence of interests in Syria to ensure its transition is stable, and Iran, Assad's old patron, stays out. 'I'm not saying Abu Dhabi is comfortable with a conservative Islamist in power, but they all want to see Sharaa reduce Iran's influence,' he said. No nation-building The UAE, which has the closest ties to Israel among Gulf states, also brokered secret talks between Syria and Israel, Reuters reported in May. Israel pummelled Syria after Assad's removal and has sent troops to occupy a swath of the southeast, south of Damascus. MEE previously reported that the US lobbied Turkey and Israel into deconfliction talks. 'I think the Emiratis, and other Gulf states' number one concern is that there not be an outbreak of violence between the Turks and Israelis in Syria or the Iranians and Israelis,' Ford said. Syria after Assad: Sharaa's delicate balancing act with Israel Read More » He said while Turkey and Qatar have stepped up in Syria, it's a leap to say the US is recognising it as a sphere of their influence. 'That is too nineteenth century,' he said. 'The Trump people don't object to Turkey and Qatar getting involved in Syria. But they don't object to the Saudis and Emiratis getting involved either. Ultimately, the goal is for commerce between Israel and Syria.' Still, regional officials say Sharaa's ascent to power has bolstered Turkey and Qatar's power in the Levant. 'Sharaa will take Emirati money, but he won't trust them with security,' the Arab official told MEE. 'The UAE is on their back foot.' However, the real change is that Syria is not talking about elections. 'Sharaa has gone out of his way to prove that he won't be part of any political Islamist movement beyond Syria's borders,' the UAE-based analyst said. 'And he isn't mentioning democracy.'


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Argentina's embassy to move to Jerusalem in 2026, President says
Javier Milei, who made the announcement in the Knesset, has been supportive of Israel amid the war in Gaza and votes in its favour at the UN