Could a ceasefire finally be struck in Gaza? Here's what to know
After the 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran concluded with a ceasefire, the US president has been pushing hard for a truce between Israel and Hamas, saying he was 'looking for it to happen next week,' when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is set to visit the White House.
Trump announced Tuesday that Israel had 'agreed to the necessary conditions' to finalize a 60-day ceasefire. Netanyahu will convene his full cabinet on Saturday night to discuss it. Hamas, meanwhile, said it was considering the latest proposal, without indicating whether it would accept it.
The two sides have long had conflicting demands that negotiators have been unable to bridge, but there are renewed hopes of a deal as the war enters its 21st month. Here's what to know.
Since the Israel-Iran ceasefire on June 24, mediators Qatar and Egypt – as well as the United States – have redoubled their calls for a new Gaza truce. A Qatari foreign ministry spokesman told CNN the Israel-Iran agreement had created 'momentum' for the latest talks between Israel and Hamas.
CNN speaks to families devastated by the Israeli strike on a waterfront cafe in Gaza City Netanyahu's government has faced mounting international criticism for the suffering its war is inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza.
Israel imposed a total blockade on humanitarian deliveries to the enclave in March. It somewhat eased the blockade in May, after a chorus of global experts warned that hundreds of thousands of people could soon starve.
Hundreds of Palestinians in Gaza have been killed by Israeli strikes in recent days. And aid distribution has been marred by violence, with hundreds killed on their way to try to obtain food from the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the controversial US-backed aid initiative.
Pressure is also growing on Netanyahu from within Israel. Opposition leader Yair Lapid said Wednesday that he would join the coalition government to make a hostage deal possible.
Trump predicted Tuesday that Netanyahu wanted to end the war. 'He wants to. I can tell you he wants to. I think we'll have a deal next week,' Trump told reporters.
The precise details of the new proposal for a 60-day ceasefire and hostage release deal remain murky.
The Qatari prime minister previously said Qatar and Egypt had been working to find a 'middle ground' to move forward from the US-conceived truce proposed months ago. That proposal outlined a 60-day ceasefire during which Hamas would release 10 living Israeli hostages and the bodies of a further 18 hostages taken by Hamas during its attacks on October 7, 2023.
Of the 50 hostages still in Gaza, at least 20 of them are believed to be alive, according to the Israeli government.
The United States and the mediators have provided stronger assurances about reaching a settlement to end the war in Gaza as part of the updated proposal, the Israeli official told CNN. The official did not provide the specific language in the document, but said the wording is stronger than previous assurances.
As part of the latest proposal, Israel has also agreed to allow a surge of humanitarian aid through traditional UN-run humanitarian channels rather than through the controversial US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the Israeli official said.
In addition to the aim of bringing the hostages home, Netanyahu has not wavered from his more maximalist aims: disarmament of Gaza and the destruction of Hamas' military capabilities and governance abilities.
'I'm telling you — there will be no Hamas. No 'Hamastan.' We are not going back to that. It's over,' Netanyahu said Wednesday. 'We will bring back all our hostages.'
But over the weekend, the prime minister made a rhetorical shift in laying out Israel's goals – for the first time prioritizing the return of hostages ahead of what he once called the 'supreme objective' of defeating Hamas.
Netanyahu said 'many opportunities have opened up' following Israel's military operations in Iran, including the possibility of bringing home everyone still held captive by Hamas. 'Firstly, to rescue the hostages,' he said. 'Of course, we will also need to solve the Gaza issue, defeat Hamas, but I believe we will accomplish both missions.'
It comes as the Israeli military this week recommended pursuing a diplomatic path in Gaza after nearly two years of fighting and the elimination of much of Hamas' senior leadership.
On Tuesday, a military official told CNN that Israel has not fully achieved all of its war goals, but as Hamas' forces have shrunk and gone into hiding, it has become more difficult to effectively target what remains of the militant group. 'It's harder now to achieve tactical goals,' the official said.
Hamas has three main demands: a permanent end to the fighting, for humanitarian assistance to be carried out by the United Nations, and for Israel to retreat to the positions it held on March 2 this year, before it renewed its offensive and occupied the northern part of the Strip.
A senior Hamas official told CNN in late May that the group is 'ready to return the hostages in one day – just we want a guarantee that war will not come again after that.'
In response to the earlier Trump administration-backed ceasefire proposal in May, Hamas requested US assurances that permanent ceasefire negotiations will continue and that fighting will not resume after the 60-day pause.
Whether the ceasefire will be temporary or a pathway to a permanent truce is the biggest sticking point between the warring parties.
Hamas has also shown no willingness to relinquish its political and military power in Gaza.
In the 21 months of war between Israel and Hamas, ceasefires have been in place for a total of only nine weeks.
More than 57,000 people, of which more than 17,000 are children, have been killed in Gaza during the fighting, according to the Palestinian health ministry.
The first ceasefire came into effect in November 2023, but lasted only a week. In that time, 105 hostages were released from Gaza, in exchange for scores of Palestinian prisoners.
A second ceasefire was not struck until January 2025, shortly before Trump's return to the White House. In just over 8 weeks – the first 'phase' of the ceasefire – Hamas freed 33 hostages, with Israel releasing around 50 Palestinian prisoners for every Israeli freed.
Under the planned second stage, Israel was supposed to agree to a permanent ceasefire. But Israel resumed its offensive on March 18, shattering the ceasefire and derailing the talks, saying it did so to put pressure on Hamas to release the remaining hostages.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
29 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A big Trump bill, but ‘beautiful' it is not
Waban Senator Tillis ought to stand his ground — and seek reelection While I generally admire Renée Graham's perspective, I cannot agree with her accolades for Senator Thom Tillis in declining to run for reelection next year ( Advertisement After all, haven't we seen many Trump-supported candidates go down in flames even with his backing? Is Tillis's ego so large he would rather flee than stand to risk a primary loss? That's not backbone. It is just another voice of reason lost to the sideline, out of the way of our authoritarian president. It is enabling, not admirable. Paul Siegenthaler Needham Stop using Trump's absurd name for this wretched bill I would like the media to stop using the phrase 'Big Beautiful Bill' for Donald Trump's legislation dismantling programs that actually help people. It may be big but it is not beautiful. All the press is doing in using that phrase is promoting Trump's propaganda regarding what is in the bill. Please stop. A better description would be 'bloated and bankrupt.' Advertisement Dan Fennelly Scituate
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Trump Official's POTUS Praise Goes Viral For Cringiest Reasons
State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce drew widespread criticism and ridicule for her latest effusive tribute to Donald Trump during a press briefing. While discussing Middle East policy on Tuesday, Bruce abruptly shifted into glowing praise of the president, even thanking God for him. Bruce hailed Trump's supposed sacrifices and character: 'We can say this simply by having watched him most of his adult life in some capacity, but certainly with what he's given up and sacrificed to be the leader of this country.' She later described Trump as 'very honest' and 'transparent,' adding that she knows 'to trust him' and 'not second guess him.' She also praised 'the power of his personality and leadership' and expressed her gratitude that 'he's the one making the decisions.' Tammy Bruce: "The work of the President of the United States -- thank god for him -- is going to make sure that this is not a lost opportunity. We can say this simply by having watched him most of his adult life in some capacity, but certainly with what he's given up and… — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 2, 2025 Critics online mocked the moment as cultish, and more: Man, this is some bizarre mashup of 1984, Jonestown and North Korea. — Michael Freeman (@michaelpfreeman) July 2, 2025 These people have lost their freaking minds. — Anthony Wilson 🥏🙄 (@anthonybwilson) July 2, 2025 This is not just sycophancy, it is a creepy level of submission to Trump's Kim Jong-un style of measuring loyalty. — Michael Dominowski (@dominowski) July 2, 2025 Sickening sycophancy. — 𝐂𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐢 (@ChidiNwatu) July 2, 2025 US North Korean TV Show host — Commentator of Life (@Pundit2000) July 2, 2025 We are North Korea. — Nicole (@SHassenn) July 2, 2025 She has truly embraced the kool-aid with open arms. — Pat Cochran (@pcochran16) July 2, 2025 🤮🤮🤮🤮 — SkyeDemo (@demo_skye) July 3, 2025 Does she think she's talking to a Sunday school class and Trump is Jesus in this scenario? — Lib Dunk (@libdunkmedia) July 2, 2025 The Cult. Feel like these folks know what is coming- and it is greatly in their favor. — Jenelle V 🇺🇸 (@JenelleComedy) July 2, 2025 Lawrence O'Donnell's Unfiltered Reaction To Bonkers Trump Presser Moment Says It All Critics Snap At White House's Latest Wild Image Of Trump Michael Steele Issues Ominous Alert For ALL Republicans: 'Trust Me, Baby' Trump Asks DeSantis The Weirdest Question About Marjorie Taylor Greene, In Front Of Her BF
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
South Africa's political marriage of convenience avoids divorce
South Africa's two biggest political parties are in an unhappy marriage, but neither side wants to file divorce papers as it could damage them and, ultimately, their offspring - South African voters. But as the children of all toxic relationships know, it can be painful to watch the tantrums played out in public as each side tries to prove they are the better parent. The loveless union in this case is what is called the Government of National Unity (GNU) - which was formed in the wake of elections last year when the African National Congress (ANC), the party that brought in democratic rule in 1994 with Nelson Mandela, lost its parliamentary majority. Its arch rival, the pro-business Democratic Alliance (DA) party, agreed to join the ANC as its biggest partner in a coalition, which has just celebrated its first year anniversary. There was no popping of champagne - there have only been cross words. But the two leaders, President Cyril Ramaphosa of the ANC and John Steenhuisen of the DA, have shown how their partnership can ideally work when they supported each other in the Oval Office showdown with US President Donald Trump in May. After Trump confronted the delegation with a video in support of discredited claims of a white genocide in South Africa, it was Steenhuisen - the agriculture minister in Ramaphosa's cabinet - who assured the US president that the majority of white farmers wanted to stay in the country. Their performance proved to South Africans the GNU was worth the bickering at home. Together the unlikely pair hold the political middle ground in South Africa and have the potential to be a stabilising force - this is certainly the opinion of big business. Their alliance initially raised some eyebrows, given that that they were opposed "ideologically [and] historically", but the business community largely welcomed the move, political analyst Dr Levy Ndou told the BBC. For the DA it was a chance to get its hands on the levers of power - and stop what it regards as radical opposition parties like uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) forming a "Doomsday coalition" with the ANC. Both these parties are led by former ANC officials whom Ramaphosa would rather not cosy up to - plus it would make the cabinet even more of a battleground. Investors would also not be happy - and Ramaphosa would be left with more of a migraine than a headache. However, as any relationship counsellor will tell you, you cannot force someone to change their behaviour. "This GNU... does not mean that the ANC or DA will change their characters," said Dr Ndou, who is based at the Tshwane University of Technology in South Africa. "The ANC will always want to push the transformation agenda, the DA will always come with pushback strategies and... that will be a permanent source of conflict in the GNU." The latest crisis - over Ramaphosa's sacking of Andrew Whitfield, a deputy minister from the DA party - has really upset Steenhuisen, who held a press conference detailing his heartfelt complaints. These include Ramaphosa's decisions to push ahead with various bits of controversial legislation "that have far-reaching consequences for our economy and economic growth as has been seen by the reaction form some of South Africa's largest trading partners". This is a reference to the US's anger over the law that will give the state the power to expropriate some privately owned land without compensation for owners. "This was done without even the common courtesy of informing the fellow partners in the government of national unity about his intention to do so," said Steenhuisen. He also spoke about the budget crisis, when in March Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana proposed hiking VAT by 2%. The backlash - which included court action, led by the DA - forced him to scrap the proposal. It is not the only time the DA has taken legal action - playing the opposition card whilst being part of the GNU. Its opposition to the Expropriation Act is at odds with the fact that Public Works Minister Dean Macpherson - a member of the DA - has defended the legislation and will be in charge of implementing it. It points to divisions within the DA - with one wing led by Steenhuisen believing it is better to be in the tent, but another conservative faction angered by what it sees as the ANC's "hypocrisy". "In some cases, DA ministers have literally achieved more in 12 months than ANC ministers did in 30 years," Steenhuisen said. Yet, nodding to critics within the party, he came down hard on alleged cabinet corruption by ANC members: "The president's refusal to act against corruption within his own ranks, but singling out as a priority a DA minister risks confirming that his oft-repeated public commitment to clean governance is a sham." This meant, Steenhuisen said, that the DA would not back the budgets for departments led by those it considered corrupt, which includes higher education, led by Nobuhle Nkabane. She has been under fire for appointing ANC politicians to chair various vocational training boards - and for allegedly misleading parliament about their appointment. Ramaphosa had refused to comply with a DA ultimatum, after Whitfield's sacking, to remove her and others the party considers corrupt. Yet the president too has to deal with factions in his party - there are agitators, like his deputy, who would prefer the EFF. To some extent Ramaphosa has allowed the DA to continue playing a dual role - of opposition and GNU member - but at times he likes to make it clear who is boss. This is what happened over Whitfield's dismissal as deputy trade minister - sacked for taking an unsanctioned trip in February. When South Africa's relationship with the US had taken a nose-dive earlier in the year, Whitfield had travelled to the US as part of a DA delegation. He had repeatedly asked for permission to do so, but received no answer from the presidency. The 42-year-old is from the Eastern Cape province, the heart of South Africa's car industry which benefits from the US's African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). This legislation guarantees duty-free access to American consumers for certain goods from Africa. Agoa - brought in 25 years ago by former US President Bill Clinton - is up for renewal this year but some fear this will not happen given Trump's tariff wars and a Republican-dominated Congress. Whitfield went to the US as part of the DA delegation to lobby for South Africa to stay in Agoa, which also benefits Steenhuisen's agricultural portfolio. For Steenhuisen, the ANC's alleged lack of collaboration has meant a failure to create jobs and the GNU stalling on its economic growth targets. Political analyst Sandile Swana believes that Ramaphosa and the ANC may be dissatisfied by some of the DA's dramatic antics - with court action and ultimatums - but are reluctant to split ways completely. He blames a lack of self confidence, telling the BBC: "The current ANC has a big inferiority complex and they are dependent on big business and the DA." Dr Ndou also suggests Ramaphosa may be playing it diplomatically, not wanting to be the side to initiate a divorce because the ANC would not want "everyone to say they have kicked the DA out of government." Both parties would likely be punished by voters if this was the case. "There is no way that the DA would easily take a decision to pull out of the GNU. It is in the interest of the DA, as a party, and those who are appointed as ministers [to stay]," the academic said. Mr Swana believes the coalition government as a whole "is a marketing platform" for all parties, which are using it to campaign ahead of next year's local government elections. And the DA did make it clear at the weekend that there would not be a big bang announcement of them quitting the GNU, but Steenhuisen cautioned that the party's executive had considered launching a motion of no confidence in the president in parliament - and might do so in the future. "It is clear that the DA is in the process of losing confidence in the president's ability to act as a leader not only of the ANC, but of the GNU of which we are the second largest component," Steenhuisen said. Ramaphosa was clearly rattled over the weekend - South Africa's TimeLive news site reported he cancelled an official trip to Spain at the last minute as he awaited the DA's decision on the future of the GNU. Steenhuisen's speech did reveal what seems to be a real communication breakdown in the coalition - with the DA leader blaming Ramaphosa for failing to bring the GNU party leaders together to iron things out after a crisis. "Similarly a proposed breakaway for the cabinet to deal with how we interact with each other and resolve disputes that will inevitably arise in a government made up of 10 political parties, a year later nothing has happened," he said. "No breakaway, no dialogue and no mechanisms internally to determine how we deal with disputes between each other when they arise." A marriage counsellor would surely suggest they stop squabbling and sit down and talk frankly - without the megaphone politics. South Africa in 'uncharted waters' as budget splits coalition government Unpacking the South African land law that so inflames Trump How Ramaphosa might gain from US showdown Ramaphosa fires stinging rebuke at coalition partner Is South Africa's coalition government about to fall apart? Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa
