logo
The VAT betrayal: how SA's political charlatans sold out the people

The VAT betrayal: how SA's political charlatans sold out the people

IOL News03-05-2025
WHEN the ANC announced plans to increase Value-Added Tax (VAT) in 2025, it struck a dagger into the heart of every struggling South African. VAT - a tax that punished the poor for simply surviving - was once again being weaponized to protect the rich and punish the working class.
Today, the so-called "leaders" of South Africa's political parties stand exposed, naked before the nation, stripped of their empty rhetoric and false promises. The VAT saga has laid bare their treachery, their hypocrisy, and their unforgivable betrayal of the very people they swore to serve.
The real impact of VAT on the poor
Let's be clear: VAT is not just another tax. It is a tax on survival. When government raises VAT, it increases the price of bread, milk, school shoes, and bus fare -essentials that millions of South Africans already struggle to afford. VAT doesn't ask if you are rich or poor. It strikes hardest at the empty pockets of the working class, pensioners, and the unemployed.
In a country where over 18 million people depend on social grants, unemployment has soared to over 32% and more than 55% of citizens live below the poverty line, a VAT increase is economic violence.
And yet, knowing all this, the ANC still proposed a VAT increase of up to 3% in internal discussions - a brutal attack on the most vulnerable. Only a massive public outcry forced them to reduce the immediate increase to 0.5%.
Had the ANC still held its old majority, the VAT increase would have sailed through Parliament unchallenged. It was the entry of the MK Party into Parliament that weakened the ANC's iron grip. But even then, the betrayal was only beginning.
The fiscal framework farce
When the Fiscal Framework - the blueprint for government spending, including the VAT increase - came before Parliament, the ANC desperately needed allies.
They found them among parties that had loudly campaigned against the ANC, sworn never to work with the ANC, and claimed to stand for the people.
Yet when the moment of truth arrived, ActionSA, BOSA (Build One South Africa), Rise Mzansi, Gayton Mackenzie's Patriotic Alliance, and others stood not with the people - but with the ANC.
In a narrow vote, the Fiscal Framework was adopted, giving life to the VAT increase.
These so-called opposition parties handed the ANC a knife and pointed it at the neck of the poor. ActionSA, a party that had thundered against ANC corruption and mismanagement, voted for the ANC's Fiscal Framework.
BOSA, led by the so-called "new hope" Mmusi Maimane, voted with the ANC.
Rise Mzansi, the party that brands itself as the future, voted for a future with higher VAT and deeper poverty. Gayton Mackenzie, who styles himself as a man of the people, handed the ANC the majority it needed.
The great lie: "The fiscal framework had nothing to do with VAT"
When caught, these parties scrambled to spin a narrative so ridiculous it insults the intelligence of every South African. They claimed: "We voted for the Fiscal Framework, but it had nothing to do with VAT." Lies.
Blatant, shameless lies. The Fiscal Framework explicitly includes the assumptions and parameters for government revenue — including the VAT increase. It is the foundational document that dictates taxes, spending, and borrowing. Without the Fiscal Framework being adopted, the VAT increase had no legislative path forward.
On Monday, the Western Cape High Court confirmed what any honest politician already knew: The Fiscal Framework contained the VAT increase.
The court set aside the adoption of the Framework and suspended the VAT hike, exposing the lies told to the people. The spin has failed. The betrayal stands naked before us.
The reality voters must never forget
South Africans must remember this treachery. Remember that these parties made public pledges - and broke them when it mattered most.
Remember that in the corridors of Parliament, when faced with a choice between standing with the people or kneeling before the ANC, they chose to kneel.
They are not opposition parties. They are political charlatans.
They are the ANC's convenient enablers, eager for scraps from the table of power.
The tragedy of South Africa is not just a corrupt ruling party. It is an entire political class - old and new - that talks revolution during elections but practices betrayal in Parliament.
A systemic betrayal
This is not a once-off event. It is a symptom of a deeper sickness: A political elite more interested in self-preservation than public service. A culture of spin doctors, legal loopholes, and manufactured consent. An economy managed for the rich, subsidized by the poor.
And VAT is just the beginning.
Behind every act of betrayal today lurks the threat of more: More taxes on the working class. More protection for monopolies and billionaires. More lies dressed up as governance.
MK Party: a different road
In this sea of betrayal, the MK Party has stood firm.
From the outset, MK MPs opposed the Fiscal Framework, exposed the hidden VAT increase, and demanded that the burden of fixing the economy be placed where it belongs: on the backs of the wealthy, not the poor.
Tax the billionaires, tax the monopolies, nationalize key industries and use the wealth of the country for its people, not for its elite. That is the road to freedom.
Not endless VAT hikes. Not squeezing pensioners and single mothers to please global markets and local oligarchs.
The final verdict: voters must choose
South Africa is at a crossroads. The mask has slipped. The lies have been exposed.
In the next election - and every election to come - South Africans must remember who voted for higher VAT. They must remember who lied to them.
And they must punish every political party and every political opportunist who chose betrayal over bravery. Never again must we allow political charlatans to dictate the destiny of our children. The VAT saga is a warning. Let us heed it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lucky Star Pilchards under fire over shock 'shrinkflation'
Lucky Star Pilchards under fire over shock 'shrinkflation'

The South African

time5 hours ago

  • The South African

Lucky Star Pilchards under fire over shock 'shrinkflation'

Lucky Star has come under fire after consumers have been posting the contents of their near-empty tinned pilchard cans. The canned fish company is a staple in many South African homes, and was a favourite of the late former minister, Tito Mboweni. LUCKY STAR PILCHARDS UNDER FIRE OVER CONTENTS On the X app, user Pranesh Luckan shared pics of his decanted Lucky Star Pilchards can. The pictures show three small pieces of canned fish and a substantial quantity of tomato sauce. 'Guys, I know this is our national tinned fish brand, but what kind of shrinkflation is this? 3 and 1/2 pieces of fish weighing 136g in a 400g can. Is @LuckyStarSA selling pilchards or tomato sauce?' he asked in a tweet that has gone viral. Another X user – @@_spreadhappines – received just one pilchard in their can. On its official account, the brand responded to the posts, stating: 'We are sorry to hear this – and can assure you that this is not the proper standard that Lucky Star strives to uphold'. According to Luckan, Lucky Star would also be investigating the production batch of the can. In the past few years, rising food prices have drastically increased the cost of tinned pilchards like the Lucky Star brand. However, earlier this year, the Competition Commission's latest Essential Food Pricing Monitoring (EFPM) report revealed that pilchards were one of a few essential items whose price had slightly decreased. A 400 gram can of pilchards is priced between R25 and R30 at major retailers. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Costs may reduce voter registration to one weekend before 2026 elections
Costs may reduce voter registration to one weekend before 2026 elections

TimesLIVE

time7 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Costs may reduce voter registration to one weekend before 2026 elections

The Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) has warned that the ongoing fiscal challenges could limit registration opportunities for the 2026 local government elections and potentially give South Africans only one chance to register. Chief electoral officer Sy Mamabolo said on Thursday the IEC expected the registration weekend to be in June 2026. However, he noted there was no guarantee there would be a second chance to register. 'The reason for that is financial. We are in discussion with the National Treasury so it may well be that ahead of the elections there may be one general registration weekend,' he said. 'Our preference is two but we all know the fiscal position of the country.' Mamabolo was part of the IEC delegation that addressed members of the KwaZulu-Natal legislature in Pietermaritzburg on the opening day of its multi-stakeholder engagement in the province. He confirmed that electronic voting will not be implemented next year, although there were policy discussions about using it in the future. The commission added that it was taking steps to prevent a repeat of the technical problems it experienced in the 2024 elections but reiterated that its systems were not compromised and the national elections maintained their integrity despite those setbacks. Mamabolo said the 2024 elections were relatively peaceful in comparison to past elections, despite being the most competitive and witnessing a significant increase in tension and legal disputes. 'The commission had to defend no less than 80 applications in various courts but we have to compliment the fact that the prevailing environment was fairly peaceful in comparison with previous iterations of elections.' The complaints came mostly from the technical challenges the commission experienced, mainly the functioning of the voter management devices (VMDs) in the voting stations and the 'crash' of its results dashboard. The IEC had in 2024 introduced, for the first time, independent candidates as part of the evolving electoral framework. However, Mamabolo reiterated that their ICT system was not hacked and the elections met the international standards of free and fairness, despite those challenges. The IEC's elections results dashboard was infamously interrupted during the counting of the national and provincial votes. Addressing the interruption of the election results dashboard, Mamabolo reiterated that the results were secured. Mamabolo also reflected on the 'suboptimal' performance of the VMDs on election day last year, saying the commission was also unhappy because it led to long queues and created a lot of of consternation at voting stations He said there were five applications (apps) that were operational in the VMDs but one of them, the voters roll app, experienced a glitch that caused it to the create multiple records for a single voter when their ID was scanned, instead of capturing a single record and sending it through the network. 'As that one transaction replicated over many times, sometimes as many as 20,000 times, it created a backlog between the local machine and our application pulls in the network.' He said the IEC has put measures in place to prevent future problems as they prepare for the 2026 elections. 'We have identified that problem, ameliorated it and, at the moment, we are procuring an external independent tester to test the application from the code itself - its transmission to the network - and we should be able to give the executive summary of that testing to political parties in the party liaison committee so that you can be assured that the testing has happened by an independent company and what the outcome is.' He urged political parties to work on their candidates' lists early because the commission cannot extend the cut-off date. 'The courts have repeatedly said the IEC can't unilaterally change the date of the election timetable so when the date for submission of candidates list is set, it can't be changed unless there is a tsunami or similar natural disaster. Parties must work on that with a view to around June/July (2026).' The proclamation date is expected to be around July from co-operative governance and traditional affairs minister Velenkosini Hlabisa.

PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward
PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward

Eyewitness News

time8 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

PROF ZONDI: Despite early controversy, Ramaphosa's National Dialogue signals a path forward

The idea of a National Dialogue to get the nation talking about things that matter for the present and the future has been on our lips for a while now. It was first suggested as a Convention for a Democratic South Africa (CODESA) 2 over 15 years ago. It was also suggested as an economic CODESA in the past, but there was no urge to convene it. Now that President Cyril Ramaphosa has kick-started the process, there is contestation about the process and approach to this. The controversies preceding the 15-16 August National Convention put these differences in the open for all to see. First, the legacy foundations representing the legacies of major political figures in South African history announced a dispute within the preparatory team and pulled out of the convention. In a joint letter, these entities, including the Thabo Mbeki Foundation, the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, Steve Biko Foundation and the FW De Klerk Foundation, protested against a government takeover of what was announced to be a citizen-led national dialogue. As a result of this alleged government takeover, the foundations said, there was a rush to convene the convention before all was ready for this and decisions to undertake emergency procurement in possible violation of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA). The government, through the Presidency, disputed this, and the president convened the preparatory task team to confirm that there was no merit to the foundations' concerns. Indeed, the National Convention happened with much fanfare and produced some notable decisions. The convention went off quite smoothly and signalled a thoughtful process. It seemed the foundations' decisions had not harmed the process and signalled that they do not have as much influence as some thought. But their decision had put a damper on the idea and caused many questions to be raised, including in talk shows, on social media and other public exchanges. Of course, a discussion of this nature could not avoid displaying the agony of many about the failure of the post-apartheid transition to deliver a better life for all. This is the failure to overcome poverty and reduce unemployment. The transition has not been successful in reducing inequalities according to race, class, gender and other dimensions. The beautiful post-apartheid democracy has been marked by a long period of lower economic growth, growing crime and corruption, fragmentation and disillusionment in the population. The sixth administration elected with great hope has delivered failures and disappointments while promising positive change. Couple this with a growing population, including illegal immigration swelling the numbers of the poor and climate change effects, the crisis keeps deepening, and despair is growing. This was evident in the discussions and submissions at the national convention. Some of the areas of consensus achieved are significantly important for moving forward. The decision to give a strong focus to discussions of problems and solutions in the economy towards an inclusive economy and livelihoods is a noble one. This subject is closely tied to the matter of land reform, agrarian transformation and food security. This was elevated into a priority on its own. We hope the discussion will reflect on why we have failed to achieve what was set out in the National Development Plan about this. Crime and corruption were ranked the second most important priority by virtue of public concern and the scale of it as a national crisis. On that score, the scourge of gender-based violence and femicide (GBVF) stood out as a matter for focused attention as the dialogue begins. The subject of education and health is framed as about winning the future. The discussions elevated the State as a subject of discussion because of its association with problems and its key role in managing many solutions to national crises. Indeed, the National Development Plan (NDP), too, made building a capable developmental State a key task of the nation back in 2012. If discussions clarify what has been achieved and what has not been achieved, and why it would have helped the country move forward. The subject of values and culture as a matter critical for rebuilding the social fabric on which the nation and the State are built was made prominent by civil society voices worried that failures were not incidental but systemic. The NDP had enjoined us to work hard to achieve social cohesion, a sort of renewal for the nation's soul. The convention re-emphasised the vagaries of inter-generational trauma and called for healing. This dialogue could help us find out how progress can be achieved. In the final analysis, what is said and recommended in response to growing poverty and inequality will be a measure by which the success of the dialogue will be judged. All these issues were interlinked. The attainment of one relies on the achievements in other areas. It seems that the National Dialogue is now back on track. But there are pointers to consider, which, when applied, would improve the process. The first is that it is to be expected that the National Dialogue will not be a smooth, quiet and united discussion but could have tough edges as stakeholders jostle for the nation's soul. It could even be messy and chaotic, without being a disaster. It can be dogged by controversy without collapsing. Professor Siphamandla Zondi Director: Institute for Pan-Africa Thought & Conversation; and co-director: Institute for Global African Affairs Professor: Department of Politics and International Relations

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store