logo
I lost 2st at 49 after cancelling my gym membership

I lost 2st at 49 after cancelling my gym membership

Telegraph24-05-2025
I'd always been one of those lucky naturally slim people, with my weight ranging from 9st to 9st 7lb throughout my entire adult life, and I definitely rested on my laurels. I didn't believe my mum when she told me that I'd see the weight creep on by my late 40s.
When it did, I was pretty shocked. I remember stepping on the scales and seeing 10st 5lb appear and being horrified because it was not like me at all. I was 48 and battling perimenopausal symptoms – that traditional weight gain around the middle, as well as feeling tired and achy with brain fog.
At the time, I was spending £100 a month on a gym membership but going just once a week. I'd fallen out of the habit of a few sessions each week because, honestly, I just found it really boring. I felt like I was forcing myself to go, then begrudgingly doing the same routine of a few weights and the running machine before heading home. I know loads of other people feel like that as well.
But the weight gain (and not being able to get into my size 10 jeans anymore) really spurred me on to take action, and I knew I had to do something different. So, within a couple of months of hitting 10st 5lb, I quit the gym.
I tried a few at-home workout videos on YouTube and social media, in the hopes that one of those would get me back into the swing of things but none of it was inspirational or helping me to lose any weight at all.
Then, in early January 2024, I got a marketing email from Joe Wicks, known as The Body Coach on social media. I've always liked and followed him and the email about his app popped up at the right time. I just thought, you know what, I'm going to try that.
I downloaded it, put in my body measurements and uploaded photos of myself. It then let me choose whether I was a beginner, intermediate or advanced and then I began my first month-long 'cycle' that provides tailored workouts (I did four a week, on average) that ramp up in difficulty as you get fitter.
Each cycle has five workouts to choose from and they're around 25 to 35 minutes. Outside of the cycles, there are endless other exercises to choose from. On those manic days, I would squeeze in a 10-minute core workout. I always exercised first thing before work (I'm a communications and engagement leader for global markets) as I found it easier to just get up and go.
All I needed was an exercise mat and then two sets of dumbbells (I used 3kg for a light set and 5kg for a heavy set at the start, but now use 4kg for my light weights and 7kg for my heavy set). The app is £14.99 per month, so I saved so much money compared to my gym membership, and I could do it all from home – either in the garden or in my living room.
The workout videos – strength, abs, HIIT, cardio, Pilates – were more motivational than any gym trip I'd ever done. Joe is very inspiring, it's like he's in the room with you and telling you to 'keep going, you can do it, come on' – it was like having your own personal trainer. It really helped me fall in love with exercise again.
A lot of people rely on diet alone, but it doesn't tone you up, it doesn't give you a nicer body shape – your stomach can be a bit flabby.
My transformation
My body started heading in the right direction straight away. The changes were subtle – there was no losing half a stone in a week. I was seeing the pounds come off, week by week. My motto was consistency, consistency, consistency. I just focused one day at a time and kept my eye on the prize, focusing on my long-term health over quick fixes.
You do a monthly check-in on the app, which encourages you to input your body measurements again and upload more photos. It was after month three that I could really see a massive difference in my appearance. I'd lost fat from my tummy and thighs and those areas had become toned from the muscle I had built up.
By month four, I'd lost 1st 8lb (10kg) and by month five it was to 1st 12lb. Last June, six months in, I hit 8st 5lb, meaning I'd lost 2st.
The whole process felt quite quick, considering it is a sustainable, committed weight loss and not a crash diet. One year on, I'm still at that same weight, though of course it fluctuates a few pounds either way.
The mental benefits
It was one thing seeing the number on the scale come down, but seeing my inside leg measurement reduce by a few centimetres, it's incredibly motivational. I lost 12cm from hips, 8cm from top of each leg and my waist is now 27 inches. I feel like I'm 20 years younger.
It's still a bit of a 'pinch me' thing. I can't believe I'm in size six and eight clothes. I never thought I'd be this size. I've had to throw away loads of clothes – my old size 10 to 12 trousers are too big. I'm wearing things I'd never have considered before because I was too conscious of my stomach, like short skirts and pencil skirts.
So many people have been asking me how I did it and found it really inspirational.
As well as the physical benefits, I've noticed that mentally, I'm brighter, feel more resilient, stronger and better able to cope with stress. I'm also so much more confident. Not only in my body but in everything I do. When you're happier with how you look, you attack life in a different way.
I'm so much more comfortable getting my photo taken. I'm going away to Barbados with my family for my 50th birthday and to Provence, France, with some friends this summer. I had a big party for my 50th where I didn't shy away from the camera. I even donned some boxing gloves at one point to have a joke gym-off with a friend who dressed up as Joe Wicks.
My husband, Anthony, who is already quite healthy, couldn't believe how committed and disciplined I'd been. He was already working out but it definitely motivated him to squeeze in a few more weight sessions. It's inspiring for my two girls, nine and 10, as well, who join in with the workouts sometimes.
My diet
Of course, eating healthily was key to my results. The main changes I made was reducing my sugar and carb intake and cutting back on snacking – I stopped eating chocolate and sweets after dinner. Though I'd still snack on dark chocolate occasionally during the evening as a treat.
Before losing weight, fruit juice and a sugary cereal was my breakfast go-to but I discovered that this is the worst thing I could have been doing.
Just before I started losing weight, I listened to a podcast about how bad sugar was for our bodies and it had a real impact on me. I found out that my glass of fruit juice was causing a glucose spike and then a slump that was leaving me reaching around the cupboard for snacks to try and keep up with the sugar high that I was on. It meant I was on a glucose roller-coaster all day.
So I swapped my breakfast to a healthy granola – a homemade coconut one from the Body Coach app that you make a big batch of and it lasts a month. I have it with Greek yogurt. Straight away, I noticed that I was no longer craving a sugary morning snack.
People always say to cut out bread for weight-loss but I did my research and sourdough is one of the lower sugar breads, so I stuck with that – I love bread, so for lunch I'd have Jason's sourdough with sardines or a noodle soup.
For dinner, I'd have something like a breaded chicken breast with vegetables, so I wouldn't have carbs in the evening and I still don't very often.
I didn't cut out wine either, which some people are surprised about. I do enjoy a glass of wine in the evening to unwind and still enjoy it a few evenings a week. A lot of people don't think you can lose 2st and still drink wine but you can in moderation. I now tend to eat nuts instead of chocolate and sweets when I have wine, which also helps.
On the whole, I pretty much stopped snacking between meals but if I got peckish, I'd have carrot and cucumber batons, malt loaf or dark chocolate with ginger in it. I didn't find it difficult to change my diet because I could see that it was working and that I was losing weight gradually. Every pound was a win and I knew the exercise wouldn't be working as well if I wasn't eating the right food.
It was this combination of doing exercise four times a week religiously, reducing my snacking, sugar and carb intake and being informed about the changes in my body that was behind my body transformation.
The icing on the cake of my weight loss journey was going to an exercise session in the park with Joe last summer. I took my young girls and bumped into him on the way there and told him my story. He was so supportive, hugged me and was saying to my kids 'doesn't mum look amazing!' It was a brilliant part of the journey meeting my guru who has helped me get here.
So many women are using weight-loss drugs and other quick fixes to lose quite a lot of weight these days but it can easily go back on. I'm really proud that I didn't go down that route when loads of people do, particularly as they edge towards 50.
I'm really passionate about sustainable, long-term health – not crazy diets. If someone asks if I've been dieting (I hate that word), the answer is no, this is just me now.
This is a brilliant time of year to start working towards weight loss so you can get really trim for the summer. It's the best thing I've done. If you told me in January last year that I'd lose 2st, feel like I did in my 20s and fit into size eight jeans, from the comfort of my own home with a few dumbbells, I would never have believed you.
What I ate before
Breakfast
Sugary cereal and fruit juice
Lunch
Unhealthy sandwiches
Dinner
Often takeaways and pre-packed foods
Snacks
Lots of chocolate and sweets after each meal
Alcohol
A few glasses of wine per week
What I eat now
Breakfast
Coconut granola with Greek yogurt or Weetabix
Lunch
Jason's sourdough with sardines or a noodle soup
Dinner
Breaded chicken breast or fish with vegetables
Snacks
Dark chocolate, nuts and vegetable batons
Alcohol
A few glasses of wine per week - the same as before
As told to Emily Craig
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letby babies could have survived with better medical care, claims expert
Letby babies could have survived with better medical care, claims expert

Telegraph

time16 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Letby babies could have survived with better medical care, claims expert

Babies who died at Lucy Letby 's hospital may have survived with better medical care, a leading child expert has said. In a new ITV documentary about Letby's case, Prof Neena Modi, of Imperial College, said she had examined medical notes and concluded that critically ill babies had not been monitored or treated appropriately. Letby, 35, from Hereford, is serving 15 whole-life orders for killing seven babies and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016. But Prof Modi, a former president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said the babies should never have been admitted to the ill-equipped and understaffed neonatal unit. 'On reading through the detailed medical notes, what was harrowing was seeing a story unfold where possibly things could have been recognised earlier and interventions could have been put in place, and perhaps for some of the babies, the outcomes might not have been what they were,' she said. 'This was deeply distressing. This was a neonatal unit that was being required to look after babies who should not have been cared for there. 'The babies that we're referring to were all extremely vulnerable. Some of them were demonstrably and recognisably on a knife edge. 'Others could have been recognised to have been on a knife edge, but they were not monitored appropriately, and they were not treated appropriately. 'Problems went unrecognised until the point at which a baby deteriorated very abruptly. So the babies might not have died had their difficulties been addressed earlier.' Prof Modi is part of a panel of world-leading experts who have challenged the verdicts and who have compiled a report that has been presented to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which looks into potential miscarriages of justice. The CCRC is expected to report back before Christmas. The documentary also heard that test results which the prosecution relied on to prove that several of the babies had been poisoned with insulin were not fit for purpose. Prof Matthew Johll, a forensic chemist from Illinois Valley Community College, said that an immunoassay test should not have been used to convict Letby without follow up forensic testing to rule out a false positive. 'You would not strip a gold medal from an international athlete on an immunoassay,' he said. 'It's not good enough for drug testing for pilots or anyone who has mandatory drug testing. So how can it be good enough to put someone in prison?' Lucy Letby: Beyond Reasonable Doubt? is currently available on ITVX. The show's producers said: 'After two trials, nurse Lucy Letby was found guilty of killing seven newborn babies and attempting to kill seven others in one of the most shocking murder cases in British history. 'Described as a cold-blooded, calculating killer, Letby was said to have used her trusted role to cause catastrophic harm to the most vulnerable newborn babies. 'So why are a growing number of expert voices now questioning the evidence used to convict her? This programme explores the views of a team of international scientists who say the prosecution case simply doesn't stand up to scrutiny.' Letby could also face further charges. In July, Cheshire Constabulary passed a new file to the Crown Prosecution Service relating to new baby deaths and non-fatal collapses at the Countess of Chester Hospital and Liverpool Women's Hospital between 2012 and 2016. The CPS confirmed that it had received the file and said it would 'carefully consider the evidence to determine whether any criminal charges should be brought'. Cheshire Constabulary is also investigating three former managers from the Countess of Chester over allegations of gross negligence manslaughter and corporate manslaughter.

I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?
I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

I found it agonising to quit smoking. So why are people ignoring the new treatments on offer?

If there was a five-minute nuclear warning, I'd run straight to my local shop and buy a pack of cigarettes. Even now, after all these years. I stopped more than a decade ago – note that I say 'stopped' rather than 'gave up' because the latter implies a sacrifice, and I have been brainwashed (OK, hypnotised) not to use the term. But you are never really a non-smoker. You are just a smoker who is currently not smoking. In your soul, you are forever one of the people who leave the table after eating to go and have a conversation outside, even if you physically stay put these days. So, as someone who found it difficult to quit, it's baffling to hear that although two stop-smoking medications have been available in the UK since 2024, only 0.2% of those attempting to give up have used them, according to an analysis of NHS data on smoking in England. Cytisine (which also goes by cytisinicline) is a plant-based product that has been used in eastern Europe since the 70s and may appeal to those who prefer a natural option over a synthetic drug. It mimics the effects of nicotine, and tricks your brain into thinking you've had a cigarette. Varenicline – withdrawn in 2021 over concerns about impurities, but now reformulated and rereleased – can apparently reduce the urge to smoke, make you enjoy it less when you do and ease withdrawal symptoms. I tried everything when it came to my struggle with Silk Cut. Patches, gum, lozenges – I carried on smoking while I wore, chewed and sucked them all. I read the world-famous success story The Easy Way to Stop Smoking by Allen Carr (no, not that one). I attended the NHS in-person sessions, three times, to no effect. I was a triple failure, and oddly proud of it for a reason I still don't quite understand. I had neurolinguistic programming, where the man shook my hand as he greeted me, asking, 'And how long was it that you smoked for?' 'Oh, I still smoke now. I just had one outside,' I volunteered cheerfully. He tutted and told me that for some clients, talking about smoking in the past tense like that was all it took. I scoffed at those weaklings as I walked to my train afterwards – in a cloud of smoke, obviously. The closest I came to victory back then was a hypnotist recommended by a friend, with the caveat that he sounded so much like Cliff Richard it was hard to take him seriously. She didn't mention that he worked out of an extremely insalubrious portable cabin at the back of a building site. As I knocked on the tin-can door (while simultaneously putting out yet another last ever cigarette), I reasoned that if he murdered me, I would technically have given up smoking, therefore this would have been a success. Reader, he did not murder me. In gentle, dulcet tones, he told me I felt sleepy, while I felt embarrassed for him because I definitely wasn't hypnotised. When he 'brought me round' he asked me how long I thought I'd 'been under'. I'd been thinking about what to have for dinner the whole time, so stifled a giggle as I told him: about 10 minutes. He replied that it had been two hours. The next morning, it occurred to me that I hadn't even thought about smoking, let alone done it. Thrilled, I sent another friend, who had the same experience. However, a year later, almost to the day, we both started smoking again. I went back for a do-over but it didn't work. In the end, I probably spent about as much on trying to stop smoking as I had on cigarettes, and the thing that finally worked was free: boring old willpower. It was agony. Personally, I would have bitten the doctor's hand off if they could have given me a treatment that worked. And while of course no treatment is 100% effective, as I found out, stopping smoking is hard and gruelling. The more options people have, and the more visible and accessible these options are, the better. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Study: Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss
Study: Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Study: Avoiding ultra-processed foods while dieting can double weight loss

By Consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss , promising research suggested today. Additive-laden foods such as crisps and sweets have been vilified for decades over their supposed risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes , heart disease and cancer . Experts have even called for UPFs—typically anything edible that has more artificial ingredients than natural ones—to be slashed from diets. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. 'But not all ultra-processed foods are inherently unhealthy based on their nutritional profile.' In the study, the researchers tracked 50 people who were already consuming diets packed with UPFs and split them into two groups. Half were given an eight-week diet plan comprising minimally processed foods, such as overnight oats and spaghetti bolognese, while the other half were given foods like breakfast oat bars or lasagne ready meals. After completing one diet, the groups then switched. Researchers matched the two diets nutritionally on levels of fat, saturated fat, protein, carbohydrates, salt and fibre using the Eatwell Guide, which outlines recommendations on how to eat a healthy, balanced diet. They found those on the minimally processed diet lost more weight (2.06 per cent) compared to the UPF diet (1.05 per cent loss). The UPF diet also did not result in significant fat loss, the researchers said. Dr Dicken added: 'Though a 2 per cent reduction may not seem very big, that is only over eight weeks and without people trying to actively reduce their intake. 'If we scaled these results up over the course of a year, we'd expect to see a 13 per cent weight reduction in men and a 9 per cent reduction in women on the minimally processed diet, but only a 4 per cent weight reduction in men and 5 per cent in women after the ultra-processed diet. 'Over time this would start to become a big difference.' Those on the trial were also asked to complete questionnaires on food cravings before and after starting the diets. Those eating minimally processed foods had less cravings and were able to resist them better, the study suggests. However, researchers also measured others markers like blood pressure, heart rate, liver function, glucose levels and cholesterol and found no significant negative impacts of the UPF diet. The Eatwell Guide recommends the average woman should consume around 2,000 calories a day, while an average man should consume 2,500. Both diet groups had a calorie deficit, meaning people were eating fewer calories than what they were burning, which helps with weight loss. However, the deficit was higher from minimally processed foods at around 230 calories a day, compared with 120 calories per day from UPFs. Professor Rachel Batterham, senior author of the study from the UCL centre for obesity research, said: 'Despite being widely promoted, less than 1 per cent of the UK population follows all of the recommendations in the Eatwell Guide, and most people stick to fewer than half. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat, and prioritizing high-fibre foods such as fruits, vegetables, pulses and nuts. Tracy Parker, nutrition lead at the British Heart Foundation, also said: 'The way this study was designed means it is more reflective of real-world conditions than previous research on UPFs. 'The small size of the study is a limitation, and the fact that most participants were women limits how much we can generalize the findings to the general population. 'We also can't be certain how closely the diets were followed, as participants self-reported what they ate during the study. 'Larger, longer-term studies will be needed to see if the greater weight loss on the minimally processed diets seen here translates into bigger improvements in risk factors, including blood pressure and cholesterol and blood sugar levels, and a reduced risk of developing heart and circulatory diseases.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store