Supercare Dental and Cosmetics patients left with missing teeth and superannuation after clinics collapse
Melinda Amourous was slowly losing her top teeth and struggling with self-confidence when she visited a Supercare Dental and Cosmetics clinic in 2022.
It offered what seemed like the ideal solution: a full mouth of dental implants, giving her the perfect smile.
The cost was $48,000, but they reassured her they would help the single mother of four apply to the tax office to access her superannuation.
"I have never spent that kind of money ever in my life. I literally jumped at the chance because it's not anything I would ever be able to afford on my own," Ms Amourous said.
Three years later, she has lost more than half her total superannuation balance, cannot eat without removing her teeth, has a bleeding mouth and had to superglue her broken temporary implant dentures together so she can leave the house.
"I've missed birthday parties, weddings, school reunions — all sorts of things — because there was just no chance in hell I was putting myself out there for people to look at me with no teeth in."
Despite dozens of emails and phone calls to the Kotara Supercare Dental and Cosmetics clinic and its owners, Ms Amourous has been unable to have the work repaired.
ABC NEWS can reveal Supercare Dental and Cosmetics was struggling to keep staff after repeatedly failing to pay its dentists.
Ms Amourous is among hundreds of patients across the country who have paid millions of dollars up-front for dental work not yet completed at Supercare Dental and Cosmetics clinics, according to a report to creditors.
The NSW Health Care Complaints Commission has begun an investigation into the company's Kotara branch after reviewing documents from Ms Amourous showing the standard of care she received.
"They are highly, highly unprofessional. I have been through horrific physical pain as well," Ms Amourous said.
WARNING: This section contains a reference to suicide.
ABC NEWS has spoken to more than a dozen former staff and patients of Supercare Dental and Cosmetics after two of its clinics at Kotara and Tuggerah and a related entity, Usman Dental Pty Ltd, were placed into voluntary administration last month.
Late Tuesday, the NSW Supreme Court ordered Usman Dental Pty Ltd be wound up and a liquidator appointed to take control of the company. A hearing will be held to determine the fate of the Tuggerah clinic later on Wednesday.
Supercare Dental and Cosmetics has three other NSW clinics — at Penrith, Wilton and Corrimal.
As of last week, the company was still taking bookings for new patients at some clinics, even as patients battled to get their money back for unfinished treatment.
Do you have a story to share? Email Specialist.Team@abc.net.au
A preliminary report issued to creditors revealed the three entities under administration have a deficit of $5.76 million.
It listed "defective work performed by contractors, unrecoverable loans to related entities, inadequate cash flow and high cash use, and poor financial control" as reasons behind the company's failure.
There were more than 441 patients between the Kotara and Tuggerah clinic who appeared to have paid over $2.1 million dollars for dental work yet to be delivered, the administrator's report to creditors stated.
Much of that money, according to patients and former dentists who worked for Supercare Dental and Cosmetics, was likely to have come from patient superannuation balances.
On May 14, the Kotara and Tuggerah clinics posted on Facebook confirming it had entered voluntary administration. It reassured patients the practice would continue to "operate as normal and all scheduled and ongoing treatments are proceeding as planned".
A report issued to creditors noted that the administrator's review found "the companies clearly traded while insolvent" and that at least one of the companies "became clearly insolvent by 30 June 2024, however there remains arguments for an earlier date of insolvency".
Company records show the director of the three entities under administration is Syma Usman, the wife of dentist Dr Khurram Usman, who treated patients and provided treatment plans at some of the clinics.
The combined report to creditors noted Ms Usman may be guilty of two offences under the Corporations Act — failure to exercise due care and diligence and failure to prevent insolvent trading, both of which can carry civil penalties.
Five dentists who worked for the company told ABC NEWS they were collectively owed hundreds of thousands of dollars in wages and were concerned for patient welfare.
Several former staff described the company as "predatory" and "aggressive" in pushing patients to withdraw their superannuation to pay for treatment plans, costing tens of thousands dollars.
"I've noticed they kept increasing prices, they were at $70,000 for the most expensive treatment but I noticed them trying to increase to $80,000 or $100,000 for a full mouth of implants," one dentist told ABC NEWS.
"They are very aggressive in pushing people to take out their superannuation," the dentist said, adding patients were often lower to middle-class with little financial literacy or way of accessing cash other than from their superannuation.
"My worry is someone will look at the facts and say my money is gone and might commit suicide."
The case reflects a growing concern about the rising number of Australians who are applying for compassionate early release of superannuation to fund medical and dental procedures, with more than a billion dollars accessed last financial year.
Dental treatment made up more than half that number, surging to half a billion dollars last financial year — a figure that has more than tripled in the past three years.
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) allows patients to withdraw their superannuation to pay for medical and dental work to treat a life-threatening illness or injury, or to alleviate acute or chronic pain.
ATO rules do not allow superannuation to be used for cosmetic dental procedures.
Despite that, multiple Supercare Dental and Cosmetics advertisements spruiked that dental implants and porcelain veneers "to achieve the smile you've always wanted" were "potentially affordable through your super fund".
Speaking more broadly, Xavier O'Halloran, CEO of Super Consumers Australia, said there was now a whole industry of businesses set up to help patients access their superannuation to pay for surgical and dental work.
"Some charge fees of around $700 in order to just access super from the ATO, which is a free process, so no one should be paying for that."
Mr O'Halloran said some patients did not realise you needed to pay extra tax of up to 22 per cent when withdrawing superannuation early, which can already have a huge impact on your super balance at retirement age.
"If you're taking out something in the order of $50,000, you could pretty easily be in excess of $100,000 worse off by the time you retire," he said.
"The promotion of these kind of early release schemes leave a lot to be desired and I don't think the promoters have the best interests of consumers at heart.
"We can see that through the excessive fees and the coaching practises that have been involved in order to get people to take their money out of super," Mr O'Halloran said, adding it was a practice he believed should be banned.
Supercare Dental and Cosmetics patients have had little success getting their money back even after multiple complaints to the ATO, fair trading and healthcare regulators.
Newcastle woman Clorissa Bishop said she was left "heartbroken", $22,000 out-of-pocket and with unfinished dental work, as a result of Supercare Dental and Cosmetics' Kotara clinic going into voluntary administration.
Ms Bishop, 42, took $55,000 out of her superannuation to fix lifelong issues with her teeth and gums. She says she was also taxed an additional $15,000 when withdrawing her superannuation.
Supercare Dental and Cosmetics assisted her to get approval from the ATO and Ms Bishop transferred them the entire amount, as required under the contract she signed.
Treatment to have her top teeth removed and replaced with implants began at the Kotara clinic in August 2024, with a dentist who flew in from the Gold Coast.
Halfway through the treatment, Ms Bishop says she was warned by the dentist that the company was in financial difficulty.
The dentist told her to ask for a refund for work yet to be completed but she was unable to get her money back.
Ms Bishop said she was a "mess" when she learnt Supercare Dental and Cosmetics had gone into voluntary administration.
"I spoke to the Tax Office and there's nothing they can do."
Ms Bishop has made a claim to the administrator for $22,000.
She has had no follow-up appointments for her upper teeth implants and her tongue does not sit properly in her mouth.
Ms Bishop's lower teeth remain unfixed.
"I now can't afford to get that work done and just have to live with it."
A former patient of the Tuggerah clinic said Supercare Dental and Cosmetics exaggerated his condition in documents submitted to the ATO by saying he was in a lot of pain when he wasn't.
David, who did not want his last name used, withdrew $13,000 from his superannuation but about four months into the treatment, was told by Supercare Dental and Cosmetics that his dentist had left and the work could not be finished.
Emails earlier this month from Supercare Dental and Cosmetics' "customer success coordinator" informed David the company was in voluntary administration and the dentists that practiced from their clinics were "independent and responsible for their own treatment and patient care".
Even though David paid Supercare Dental and Cosmetics directly, the staff member advised him to contact the treating dentist at his new clinic.
That dentist told ABC NEWS his lawyer had advised him to stop treating Supercare Dental and Cosmetics patients because he had not been paid for months and was owed tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid wages.
Ms Amourous — who is still wearing her superglued dentures, which cause her pain — said she was also told to directly contact the dentist who did the work to pursue any claims.
Emails provided to ABC NEWS show Supercare Dental and Cosmetics staff told Ms Amourous "as a facility provider, we are not the ones who performed the treatment" and said they could assist her to sue the dentist that treated her.
"Compensation must be pursued through Dr. [name redacted] insurance or via legal action against Dr. [ name redacted] directly]," the email stated.
"We are happy to refer you to a solicitor who specialises in these types of cases if you would like legal representation to pursue compensation directly from Dr. [name redacted]."
Ms Amourous said she was then told that after the dentist personally refunded her, she could then pay that money back to Supercare Dental and Cosmetics for a second time to do the repairs.
Eventually Ms Amourous was seen by a new dentist at Supercare Dental and Cosmetics last year who she said agreed the work was not up to scratch and offered to fix it.
Shortly after that, the new dentist advised he was not being paid either and had left the clinic.
Almost three years after the process started, Ms Amourous is still waiting to have her teeth fixed.
At 53 years old, she cares for four children, including one with a disability.
She remains toothless and said she would never have enough superannuation to comfortably retire.
"I have been through horrific physical pain. I've kind of been screaming out for somebody to hear me."
Supercare Dental and Cosmetics did not respond to questions before deadline.
A creditors meeting is due to be held this Thursday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
28 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Ley rebuffs Liberal Party member's comments on "reverse quotas" for men
Ley rebuffs Liberal Party member's comments on "reverse quotas" for men Published 5 June 2025, 7:54 am Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has slammed comments made by senior member of the Liberal Party Alan Stockdale that women had become so assertive, the party may need reverse quotas for men. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese says the Coalition has lost its way, as he faced questions over Labor's newest recruit.


SBS Australia
28 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Prosecution begins cross examination of Erin Patterson in mushroom murder trial
Prosecution begins cross examination of Erin Patterson in mushroom murder trial Published 5 June 2025, 7:53 am Accused triple-murderer Erin Patterson has denied intentionally putting death cap mushrooms into a beef wellington dish that left three lunch guests dead and one gravely ill. Under prosecution questioning, she was accused of lying about a cancer diagnosis because she anticipated her in-laws wouldn't survive the meal, and therefore be able to hold her accountable.

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Albanese government will not rule out ‘carbon tariffs' on building materials despite current industry pressures
Australia's under pressure building industry could be set for another round of setbacks following comments from Energy Minister Chris Bowen this week. As construction companies go broke at alarming rates across the country, new environmental measures slated for the near future could drive up operating costs even further. Speaking about Australia's 2030 emissions goal, Mr Bowen hinted the Albanese government could consider so-called carbon tariffs on high-emission imports like cement and steel in its next term, imploring that the nation needs to 'do more' to meet climate targets. Later this year, the government will need to outline its emissions reduction target for 2035, guided by recommendations from the independent Climate Change Authority. Mr Bowen indicated the government is open to new policy tools if current measures prove insufficient. Among them is the idea of a carbon border adjustment mechanism, which would apply tariffs to imports from countries without equivalent carbon pricing. The government, like many others around the world, is trying to avoid what's known as carbon 'leakage', where emissions-intensive production is simply moved offshore. The mechanism is currently under review by ANU Professor Frank Jotzo, whose early analysis flagged clinker, cement and lime as particularly exposed sectors. Steel, ammonia, and glass were identified as medium risk. 'We have been clear that we want to ensure Australian industry is best placed to compete in a decarbonising world,' Mr Bowen said. 'What could be the case is … we look at particular sectors first around cement and lime, [which] are places that we looked at in particular, but I'm not going to get in front of the process … We'll have more to say during the course of this term.' His comments have beet met with heavy criticism from conservatives, who traditionally favour stability for businesses as opposed to regulations with ambiguous outcomes. Opposition energy spokesperson Dan Tehan accused Mr Bowen of pulling the rug out from under industries that would be negatively impacted by environmental regulations. 'Before the election, Chris Bowen, this arrogant minister, said nothing about carbon tariffs. Yet here he is immediately after the election talking about putting them in place,' Mr Tehan said. Australia's emission target 'on track': Bowen Mr Bowen said that while 2024 emissions data showed limited progress, Australia remains broadly on track to reduce emissions by 43 per cent by 2030. 'We've never suggested it's a linear line … But with the right approach from government, yes, we can continue to be on track [despite] facing headwinds and challenges from time to time,' he said. The comments come days after the federal government extended the licence for the North West Shelf, Australia's largest oil and gas project, for another 40 years. That particular move was heavily panned by environmentalists. Mr Bowen defended the approval, which came from Environment Minister Murray Watt, saying it adhered to existing legal frameworks that don't factor in emissions. He added that reforms to those laws remain pending. 'The decision … was made according to the very strict criteria of the environmental approvals legislation,' he said, noting that the site is already covered by Labor's safeguard mechanism, which requires major polluters to cut emissions or offset them. 'It's already obliged to be reducing emissions today and it is,' he said. 'The whole idea of the safeguard mechanism is to send the message to the boards to say, 'Hey, you know, you should start investing in onsite emissions abatement here, because we're going to require you to buy offsets if you don't.'' Meanwhile, the US government recently raised tariffs on steel imports in a move that prompted pushback from Canberra amid disruption concerns. Mr Bowen downplayed the influence of the Trump administration's stance on global climate efforts. 'The United States is around 12 per cent of emissions globally. That's a lot, but it doesn't mean that the rest of the 88 per cent of us stop doing things.' He reaffirmed Australia's bid to host a future global climate conference in Adelaide, describing it as a platform to highlight the country's transition. 'A conference that knocks it out of the park is our intention for Australia to showcase ourselves, to highlight the jobs opportunity for a traditional fossil fuel country like ours, that we can and will embrace the transition.'