Ringgit Rises Against Greenback Following Govt Response To Impact From US Reciprocal Tariffs
By Danni Haizal Danial Donald
KUALA LUMPUR, May 5 (Bernama) -- The ringgit ended higher against the US dollar at the close on Monday, amid the government's response towards the impact of the reciprocal tariff from the United States (US), said an analyst.
At 6 pm, the ringgit surged to 4.1990/2035 against the greenback, compared to last Friday's close of 4.2560/2600.
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said today's special parliamentary meeting indicated that the government is being pragmatic in dealing with the tariff shocks enacted by US President Donald Trump.
'The session suggests that the government has acknowledged the fact that the tariff shocks are expected to impact the economy significantly, and they are ready to take necessary steps to mitigate the impact.
'It demonstrates the government's resolve to be forthcoming in their communication to the public. So, to some degree, this could help contribute to the confidence in our economy and the government and ultimately our ringgit,' he told Bernama.
Additionally, Mohd Afzanizam said that the better-than-expected non-farm payroll last Friday failed to resuscitate the value of the US dollar, with the US Dollar Index (DXY) continuing to linger at around 99 points.
SPI Asset Management managing partner Stephen Innes said a mix of regional optimism and domestic developments buoyed the ringgit's positive performance.
He said at the regional level, renewed hopes of a US-China tariff resolution have sparked a broad-based re-rating of Asian currencies, giving a notable boost to the ringgit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
Trump's tariffs made fast fashion faster — and dirtier
WASHINGTON, June 10 — When US President Donald Trump introduced sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports the goal was to bring manufacturing back to American soil and protect local jobs. However, this process of re-shoring is complex and requires years of investment and planning — far too slow for the world of ultra-fast fashion, where brands are used to reacting in weeks, not years. Many clothing companies started to move production out of China during Trump's first term. They relocated to countries such as Vietnam and Cambodia when the initial China-specific tariffs hit. This trend accelerated with the newer 'reciprocal' tariffs. Instead of re-shoring production, many fashion brands are simply sourcing from whichever country offers the lowest total cost after tariffs. The result? The ultra-fast fashion machine adapted quickly and became even more exploitative. From Guangzhou to your wardrobe in days Platforms such as Shein and Temu built their success by offering trend-driven clothing at shockingly low prices. A US$5 (RM21) dress or US$3 top might seem like a bargain, but those prices hide a lot. Much of Shein's production takes place in the so-called 'Shein village' in Guangzhou, China, where workers often sew for 12–14 hours a day under poor conditions to keep pace with the demand for new items. When the US cracked down on Chinese imports, the intention was to make American-made goods more competitive. This included raising the tariff on Chinese goods as high as 145 per cent (since paused), and closing the 'de minimis' loophole, which had allowed imports under USUS$800 to enter tariff-free. But these tariffs did not halt ultra-fast fashion. They just rerouted production to countries with lower tariffs and even lower labour costs. The Philippines, with a comparatively low tariff rate of 17 per cent, emerged as a surprising alternative. However, the country can't provide the industrial scale and infrastructure to match what China can offer. So why does Australia matter? Much of the cheap fashion previously bound for the US is now flooding other markets, including Australia. Australia still allows most low-value imports to enter tax-free, and platforms such as Shein and Temu have taken full advantage. Australian consumers are among the most frequent Shein and Temu buyers per capita globally. Just 3 per cent of clothing is made in Australia and most labels rely on offshore manufacturing. This makes Australia an ideal target market for ultra-fast fashion imports. We have high purchasing power, lenient import rules and strong demand for low-cost style, especially due to the cost-of-living crisis. The hidden costs of cheap clothes The environmental impact of fast fashion is well known. However, amid the chaos of Trump's tariff announcements, far less attention has been paid to how these policies — together with the retreat from climate commitments — worsen environmental harms, including those linked to fast fashion. The irony is that the tariffs meant to protect American workers have, in some cases, worsened conditions for workers elsewhere. Meanwhile, consumers in Australia now benefit from faster delivery of even cheaper goods as Temu, Shein and others have improved their shipping capabilities to Australia. Australian consumers send more than 200,000 tonnes of clothing to landfill each year. But the deeper problem is structural. The entire business model is built on exploitation and environmental damage. Factory workers bear the brunt of cost-cutting. In the race to stay competitive, many manufacturers reduce wages and overlook hazardous working conditions. Will ethical fashion ever compete? Fixing these problems will require a global rethink of how fashion operates. Governments have a role in regulating disclosures about supply chains and enforcing labour standards. Brands need to take responsibility for the conditions in their factories, whether directly owned or outsourced. Transparency is essential. Alternatives to fast fashion are gaining traction. Clothing rentals are emerging as a promising business model that help build a more circular fashion economy. Charity-run op shops have long been a sustainable source of second-hand clothing. Australia's new Seamless scheme seeks to make fashion brands responsible for the full life of the clothes they sell. The aim is to help people buy, wear and recycle clothes in a more sustainable way. Consumers also matter. If we continue to expect clothes to cost less than a cup of coffee, change will be slow. Recognising that a US$5 T-shirt has hidden costs, borne by people on the factory floor and the environment, is a first step. Some ethical brands are already showing a better way and offer clothes made under fairer conditions and with sustainable materials. These clothes are not as cheap or fast, but they represent a more conscious alternative especially for consumers concerned about synthetic fibres, toxic chemicals and environmental harm. Trump reshuffled the deck, but did not change the game Trump's trade rules aim to re-balance global trade in favour of American industry, yet have cost companies more than USUS$34 billion in lost sales and higher costs. This cost will eventually fall on US consumers. In ultra-fast fashion, it mostly exposed how fragile and exploitative the system already was. Today, brands such as Shein and Temu are thriving in Australia. But unless we address the systemic inequalities in fashion production and rethink the incentives that drive this market, the true cost of cheap clothing will continue to be paid by those least able to afford it. — Reuters
Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Stocks climb, dollar dips with US-China trade talks eyed
The S&P and Nasdaq rose, but Dow Jones gains were capped by a McDonald's dip after a Morgan Stanley downgrade. (AP pic) NEW YORK : Global stocks climbed on Monday while the dollar retreated as talks began in London between the US and China, aimed at cooling a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies. The dispute has expanded beyond tit-for-tat tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening to cripple supply chains and slow global growth. US President Donald Trump said his administration was doing well and that he was getting good reports as US officials hold the talks with China in London. 'The market deems any dialogue with Beijing as progress, whether or not it leads to tangible results. The market is just going to take the administration's word for it, until proven otherwise,' said Jake Dollarhide, CEO of Longbow Asset Management in Tulsa, Oklahoma. On Wall Street, the S&P and Nasdaq closed higher, with the Dow ending flat as declines in Travelers and McDonald's, the latter of which was downgraded by Morgan Stanley to an 'equal-weight' rating, curbed gains. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1.11 points, or flat, to 42,761.76, the S&P 500 rose 5.52 points, or 0.09%, to 6,005.88 and the Nasdaq Composite rose 61.28 points, or 0.31%, to 19,591.24. Small-cap stocks outperformed, with the S&P 600 index up 0.9%. MSCI's gauge of stocks across the globe advanced 1.94 points, or 0.22%, to 893.90 and was on track for its second straight session of gains. It has risen in five of the last six sessions. In Europe, the pan-European STOXX 600 index closed down 0.07% to snap a four-session winning streak, its longest run of consecutive gains in three weeks. The US dollar slipped against most major currencies, as optimism over a better-than-expected US employment report on Friday was offset by caution ahead of the trade talks. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and trade representative Jamieson Greer are representing Washington in the talks in London, Trump said in a social media post. China's foreign ministry said vice premier He Lifeng was in Britain for the first meeting of the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. US economic data showed wholesale inventories increased in April amid stockpiling of prescription medication in anticipation of tariffs from the Trump administration. Investors are also awaiting US inflation data on Wednesday that may adjust expectations for the timing of any rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Analysts at Morgan Stanley said they see May as the starting point for a string of increasingly strong core inflation prints, with the push from tariffs peaking in the third quarter and beginning to fade in the fourth quarter. The market does not see the Fed likely to cut before its September meeting, currently pricing in a 62% chance for a cut of at least 25 basis points, according to LSEG data. Fed officials are in a blackout period ahead of the June 18 policy decision. The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies, lost 0.14% to 98.97, with the euro up 0.25% at US$1.1423. Longer-dated US Treasury yields were lower at the start of the week, reversing after Friday's jobs report pushed yields higher. The yield on benchmark US 10-year notes declined 2.8 basis points to 4.482%. Investors will monitor auctions of three-, 10- and 30-year US notes and bonds this week for signs of investor demand. US crude settled up 1.1% to US$65.29 a barrel and Brent settled at US$67.04 per barrel, up 0.86% on the day on hopes a trade deal could spur the global economic outlook along with a softer dollar.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
U.S. stocks close mixed as investors monitor trade talks
NEW YORK, June 9 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks ended mixed on Monday, as investors looked ahead to a key round of China-U.S. trade negotiations. The Dow Jones Industrial Average edged down 1.11 points to 42,761.76. The S&P 500 added 5.52 points, or 0.09 percent, to 6,005.88. The Nasdaq Composite Index increased by 61.28 points, or 0.31 percent, to 19,591.24. Six of the 11 primary S&P 500 sectors ended in red, with utilities and financials leading the laggards by losing 0.66 percent and 0.55 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, consumer discretionary and materials led the gainers by going up 1.08 percent and 0.62 percent, respectively. The first meeting of the China-U.S. economic and trade consultation mechanism opened in London on Monday. Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, attended the meeting with U.S. representatives. In an interview with American outlet CNBC, Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council at the White House, on Monday said that the U.S. expectation was that "immediately after the handshake, any export controls from the U.S. will be eased, and the rare earths will be released in volume, and then we can go back to negotiating smaller matters." Meanwhile, investors are also keeping a wary eye on escalating tensions in Los Angeles after U.S. President Donald Trump sent in the National Guard to deal with anti-deportation protests. Shares of major technology companies, which have been central to the market's momentum, were mostly higher. Amazon and Alphabet both advanced nearly 1.5 percent, while Tesla rose 4.55 percent, continuing its volatile stretch following last week's public clash between its CEO Elon Musk and Trump. Microsoft and Nvidia posted modest gains. In contrast, Apple shares slipped 1.2 percent as the company's Worldwide Developers Conference opened with a keynote from Apple's CEO Tim Cook. Broadcom and Meta also fell. Semiconductor stocks posted strong gains to start the week. The iShares Semiconductor ETF jumped 2.36 percent, fueled by a 4.77 percent gain in Advanced Micro Devices, a 4.41 percent rise in ON Semiconductor, and a 4.13 percent surge in Arm Holdings. Elsewhere, shares of Robinhood Markets and Applovin declined by 1.98 percent and 8.2 percent, respectively. Both companies had recently hit milestones that raised speculation about their potential addition to the S&P 500, but the index's rebalancing did not include either stock, disappointing some investors. Wall Street strategists are growing more confident about the outlook for U.S. equities, with analysts at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs now signaling a more optimistic tone. "We have high conviction that the sharp drawdown in April was the end of a much longer correction that began a year ago with the peak rate of change on earnings revisions breadth," Morgan Stanley strategist Michael Wilson wrote in a note. A pick-up in analyst upgrades "keeps us positive on U.S. equities on a 12-month basis."
