Fact Check: Fake claim of UK officers 'captured' in Ukraine – DW – 08/07/2025
The AI-generated images resemble cheap cartoons, the floating passport covers are illegible and there is no evidence that their alleged holders even exist.
Nevertheless, an entirely fabricated story of three British military officers being "captured" in a Russian raid on a Ukrainian naval base has spread online in the past week – even being shared by two former British members of parliament and gaining traction from Norway to Pakistan.
DW takes a look at a narrative which bears all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation and the channels via which such stories spread.
Claim: "Russian Spetsnaz RAID and capture senior UK officers in Ochakov!"
DW Fact Check: False
A story appeared in Russian media last week that three British military officers – supposedly two colonels in the British Army and an officer from British military intelligence (MI6) – were captured in a Russian raid on a Ukrainian naval base in the small southern city of Ochakiv (known in Russian as Ochakov).
One of the most prominent social media posts (screenshot above) regurgitating the story has accrued almost 500,000 views on X (formerly Twitter), another has almost 400,000 and another has over 222,000.
The "colonels" were named as "psychological ops specialist Edward Blake" and "Richard Carroll – a Ministry of Defence official with Middle East experience" who were captured during a "lightning-fast" nighttime raid by elite (special forces) troops in an operation codenamed "Skat-12."
A spectacular military and diplomatic coup were it true – which it's not; it's completely made up.
As Craig Langford from the specialist UK Defence Journal (UKDJ) analyzed, there is no trace of "Edward Blake" or "Richard Carroll" in any recent British Armed Forces or Ministry of Defence (MoD) records.
"In short, there is no proof these individuals exist, let alone that they were captured," wrote Langford, while a spokesman for the MoD refused to even acknowledge the story when asked by DW.
What's more, four different images used to illustrate the story across various media outlets and social media channels don't only depict six different men (who don't exist); they have also demonstrably been generated using artificial intelligence.
The AI image detection tool SightEngine puts the probability of the four images being AI-generated at between 91% and 99%, but obvious visual errors suffice: cartoonish faces, oversized limbs, upside-down rifles, illegible passport covers, gibberish documents and an officer's cap missing its peak.
"The uniforms worn by the kneeling men also reveal the image as a fake," explained Langford for the UKDJ, referring to one of the main image at the top of this article, which appeared in some of the fake reporting.
"While the camouflage superficially resembles British Army patterns, the details are wrong. Military clothing follows strict patterns and standards, especially in operational environments, and these deviations suggest that the uniforms were generated based on visual approximations rather than real references."
But this didn't stop the story from appearing in several Russian outlets (here, here and here) before being reproduced in English on the Kremlin-controlled and Serbia's state-owned . DW is banned in Russia but B92 didn't respond to a request for comment on why they ran the story.
For Roman Osadchuk, Director of Threat Intelligence at LetsData and Non-Resident Fellow at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, the whole story is typical of a Russian disinformation operation.
"The Kremlin effectively has sub-contractors such as the Social Design Agency or Storm 15-16 who will have groups of people conceiving stories and drawing up options for dissemination," he tells DW from Kyiv, Ukraine.
"The idea is simple: seed it on fringe or fake websites, forward it via Telegram channels until more outlets pick it up and begin to cite each other, a process known as media laundering. Then more mature Telegram channels with more followers will pick it up, and finally mainstream Russian media kick in, and the echo chamber grows. Then, there's a chance that certain foreign actors will pick it up."
Indeed, the story soon found mouthpieces in western Europe, including the Norwegian communist and conspiracy theorist Pal Steigan – who later retracted the story after recognizing that it was "poorly fact-checked on our part."
In the United Kingdom, the story was amplified by former members of parliament George Galloway – who worked as a presenter on the Russian state-owned RT broadcaster for nine years until 2022 and has blamed NATO and the West for Russia's invasion of Ukraine – and Andrew Bridgen, who was expelled from the center-right Conservative Party in 2023 for tweeting that the use of COVID-19 vaccines was "the biggest crime against humanity since the Holocaust."
While DW approached both Galloway (who has over 825,000 followers on X) and Bridgen (over 300,000) for comment, requests which have gone unanswered, the story even made it as far as Pakistan.
According to Osadchuk, the target audience abroad is "disgruntled people who believe that 'the mainstream media won't publish this.'" But he thinks the bigger audience is actually inside Russia itself, "to show Russians how mighty the military is."
This is supported by an element of the story which would likely strike a greater chord among Russian readers than elsewhere; the idea of the United Kingdom as a shadowy geopolitical operator.
"A key trope of Russian propaganda is that the 'Anglo-Saxons' are puppeteers conducting the war," explains Osadchuk.
"It's the trope of the external enemy. It's not Ukraine resisting; the British must be behind it. The British in particular are often considered responsible for military intelligence and covert operations, hence the claim that they captured a 'psychological operations officer' specifically."
So, when confronted with intentionally erroneous stories such as this, how best to respond? Is it best to simply ignore them to prevent them spreading? Or does there come a point when some engagement is necessary?
"We can ignore disinformation until certain thresholds, which vary according to topic, platform and country," advises Roman Osadchuk.
"If it's just a crazy comment beneath a social media post with five views, then just ignore it. But if a story starts to be disseminated on multiple platforms or if, in this case, former members of a country's parliament are sharing it, it starts to become more substantial and should be debunked."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
5 years after protests in Belarus: Have things changed? – DW – 08/08/2025
Five years ago, mass protests rocked Belarus — but the regime clamped down hard. What's changed since then? And could things have turned out differently? No one saw it coming when the largest protests in Belarus' history erupted five years ago — in a country that had already been ruled autocratically by Alexander Lukashenko for more than a quarter of a century. At the time, people took to the streets to protest against the results of the August 9, 2020, presidential election, which was rigged in Lukashenko's favor. They were also angered by the authorities' lack of steps to protect the population against the COVID-19 pandemic and the arrest of the most promising opposition presidential candidates and thousands of citizens. Women organized marches and students took to the streets. Workers, actors, and athletes protested, diplomats were dismissed, and doctors and teachers wrote open letters to voice their dissatisfaction. In turn, the country's security forces responded with a wave of violence. Many people were hurt and even killed, with a steady stream of injured people taken directly from police stations to hospitals. And the Hollywood story of the then housewife Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, who entered the race for the Belarusian presidency in place of her then-imprisoned husband Siarhei Tsikhanouski, ended without a happy ending. She was forced into exile in Lithuania. Over the years, Alexander Lukashenko increasingly worked to secure Russia's support. He helped Vladimir Putin in the war against Ukraine, triggered a migration crisis on the border with the European Union, gained power for another five-year term, and still has no intention of stepping down. But could things have turned out differently? The developments in Belarus could not have turned out any differently at the time, says Artyom Shraibman, an expert at the Carnegie Center, a foreign policy think tank. "The West had no leverage at these critical moments to weaken the Lukashenko regime in any way," the Berlin-based political scientist said in an interview with DW. DW columnist Alexander Friedman, who teaches Eastern European history at German universities, points to the global political paradigm, which was different in 2020. "From a European perspective, Belarus was perceived as a zone of Russian interests where extreme caution was required," he said. The situation might have been different if Putin had not supported Lukashenko and had instead taken a neutral position. Five years on, there are no longer even digital traces of the mass protests in Belarus. The media outlets that reported on them at the time are now closed or operate from abroad. Their websites are blocked by the Belarusian authorities. Many people have also deleted their private photos and videos of the events of 2020, fearful that authorities will use them to identify participants in the protests. Articles, reports, archives, and social media posts have also disappeared. At the same time, it is increasingly difficult for the regime in Belarus to hide the enormous scale of the repression. According to the human rights center "Viasna" in Belarus, at least 8,519 people have been prosecuted for political reasons since 2020, and a total of more than 60,000 people have been imprisoned. Among the most prominent prisoners is activist and flutist Maria Kolesnikova, who was sentenced to 11 years in prison. Her relatives have had no contact with her to this day. The same applies to banker and philanthropist Viktor Babaryka, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence. And human rights activist Ales Bialiatski is currently the only Nobel Prize winner in the world who has to work six days a week in a penal colony. "Bialiatski's health is deteriorating; he has problems with his eyesight and his legs," said Leonid Sudalenko, a former political prisoner and Bialiatski's colleague at Viasna, in an interview with DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Even today, Belarusians are still being persecuted in connection with the 2020 protests. Since the beginning of the year, more than 1,700 people have been arrested on administrative, criminal, and politically motivated charges. And those are only the numbers known to human rights activists. The reasons for detention are manifold. Some were photographed during the protests. Others liked "extremist" web content – although in Belarus, all independent media is classified as "extremist", including DW. Some left "incorrect" comments on the web, campaigned for the "wrong" candidate in the 2020 elections, made donations or sent parcels to political prisoners. The list of "extremist" offenses is long. For example, a company that produced jewelry pendants in the shape of a map of Belarus was recently labeled "extremist." In recent months, the regime has released political prisoners in small groups — more than 300 people in total. In June 2025, this included Siarhei Tsikhanouski, blogger and husband of the leader of the Belarusian democratic forces, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. He was released from custody on the day Alexander Lukashenko met with US President Donald Trump's special envoy, Keith Kellogg. The Belarusian regime makes no secret of the fact that it would release political prisoners in exchange for concessions from the West. Lukashenko declared on July 31 that he was prepared to hand over several thousand people. "If you want them, take them! What do you offer in return?" he wrote after talks with the US delegation. Artyom Shraibman believes the West could do more to support people in Belarusian prisons. "It could negotiate more actively for the release of these people and offer Lukashenko concessions in terms of his reputation and diplomacy — phone calls, visits and contacts." In theory, Western countries could go even further, he said, and "consider lifting some sanctions in order to reach a kind of exchange with Lukashenko to end the migration crisis and release political prisoners." But the expert said that such steps would be unlikely to radically change the situation in Belarus. Instead, they could change the prospects of individual victims of this regime. Their fates are largely in the hands of the West. However, since Belarus has not been and is not a priority, there has been no sign of serious willingness to get involved so far.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Will EU-India ties survive the latest Russia sanctions? – DW – 08/08/2025
Experts say Brussels' sanctions are largely symbolic, while the real threat to New Delhi comes from looming US tariffs. Ironically, the EU may still stand to gain. The year began on a high note for the European Union and India. In February, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen visited New Delhi and, alongside Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, instructed officials to resolve remaining differences and move forward on a long-delayed free trade agreement. But that momentum was disrupted in July, when India was drawn into the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia. The move targets New Delhi's refining of discounted Russian crude and the export of those products, some of which are sold to Europe. Could this sanctions development derail a potential EU-India trade deal? Experts argue it won't, saying the US threat of imposing tariffs of up to 50% on Indian goods poses a far greater challenge than the impact of the EU's sanctions. And, paradoxically, that may work in the EU's favor. As part of efforts to cut off funding for Russia's war in Ukraine, the EU last month banned imports of refined petroleum products originating from Russian crude. This ban applies to such products coming from any third country, including India. The EU sanctioned Nayara Energy, an Indian refinery partly owned by Russian energy giant Rosneft. "For the first time, we're designating a flag registry and the biggest Rosneft refinery in India," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas posted on X. Nayara Energy was quick to push back, calling the move hypocritical. "While many European countries continue to import Russian energy through various sources, they take a high moral ground by chastising and sanctioning an Indian asset for processing Russian crude largely used by its domestic population of 1.4 billion Indians and businesses," Nayara Energy said in a statement in late July. However, experts told DW the EU's single designation is largely symbolic and unlikely to significantly impact India's energy trade or EU-bound exports. "The EU's sanctions lacks bite and will be difficult to enforce," said Garima Mohan of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, who researches Europe-India ties. "These exports are by no means running the Indian economy." India could easily pivot by substituting its exports with fuel refined from non-Russian sources, such as Iraqi oil. Jacob Funk Kirkegaard, an economics expert at the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank, agreed. "It is definitely an escalation by the EU. But I would also say it won't hurt trade negotiations," he said. Instead, he argued the bigger pressure on India right now is coming from the United States. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video As both the EU and India seek to secure stable trade relationships amid an increasingly volatile global economy, experts say the threat of high US tariffs on Indian goods could strengthen their mutual interest in finalizing a free trade agreement. "First of all, the fact that there is no trade agreement between the US and India, then this mindless escalation by [US] President Trump," Kirkegaard said, "means India's desire to diversify away from the US and towards the EU has probably increased. "India now needs a deal with the EU a little more than when it had arguably better ties with the US," he added. Mohan arrived at a similar conclusion. "In a roundabout way, I think the shake-up in the India–US dynamic will end up benefiting the EU," she said. "Given this tariff announcement, India needs reliable and predictable economic partners, it needs investments." The EU has also taken a more measured approach during trade negotiations — particularly in the agricultural sector which employs close to 44% of India's population. If India were to provide greater access to European or US companies, there are fears it could cause job losses at home. "The EU understands that if we insist on a larger opening in the agriculture sector there will be no deal," said Kirkegaard, adding that the EU "understands India's political and economic sensitives in the agriculture sector far better than Trump." If India were to scale back purchases of Russian oil to avoid triggering punitive US tariffs, it could reduce a key Russian revenue stream for Moscow's war effort. That would align with EU and Ukrainian interests. However, an Indian diplomat who spoke with DW on the condition of anonymity warned that removing Russian oil from the global supply could lead to a spike in prices — which would in turn hurt everyone, not just Russia. Kirkegaard questioned why Trump "has not threatened China with the same, which buys more Russian oil." Experts agree that the EU's designation of Nayara Energy is unlikely to shift the war calculus for Russian President Vladimir Putin. But India's own math might change — and that could depend more on Washington that Brussels. So, while EU-India relations have faced a setback, the overall momentum toward a trade agreement remains resilient. What began as a promising year could still culminate in a breakthrough — especially if shifting geopolitical dynamics bring New Delhi and Brussels closer together.
Int'l Business Times
6 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Vance And Lammy Talk Gaza, Fish As US VP Starts UK Holiday
British foreign minister David Lammy and JD Vance talked Gaza during a meeting on Friday as the US vice president kicked off his holiday in the United Kingdom. Lammy hosted Vance at his country retreat in Chevening in Kent, southeast of London, where the pair went fishing in a carp pond before getting down to business. Vance told reporters the United States had "no plans" to follow Britain by recognising a Palestinian state, as the meeting got under way at the 17th-century mansion. "I don't know what it would mean to really recognise a Palestinian state, given the lack of functional government there," Vance said. He added that he expected President Donald Trump to "talk at some point to the media about his response" to Israel's plan to "take military control" of the Palestinian territory of Gaza. "Our goals are very clear. We want to make it so that Hamas can't attack innocent people. We want to solve humanitarian problems in Gaza," Vance said. The two men also discussed the war in Ukraine ahead of a possible summit next week between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin as the US president tries to end the more than three-year-long conflict. Lammy, of the centre-left Labour party, and the Republican Vance have struck up a warm relationship despite their different political strands, bonding over their difficult childhoods and shared Christian faith. Lammy reportedly attended mass at the vice president's residence in Washington in March. Vance said Lammy had become a "good friend" but teased that his three young children were better at fishing than Britain's top diplomat. "Unfortunately, the one strain on the special relationship is that all of my kids caught fish, but the foreign secretary did not," he joked. Vance is due to stay at Chevening throughout the weekend, according to Britain's foreign ministry. His family will then spend some time in the Cotswolds region in western England, UK media have reported. Reports have also said Vance will visit Scotland, where Trump spent five days at his golf resorts last month. While there, he signed a trade deal with European Union chief Ursula von der Leyen and met with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Trump also played golf and opened a new 18-hole course. He is due back in the UK for a state visit in September.
