Uganda's parliament introduces bill to let military courts try civilians
The top court's January verdict forced the government to transfer the trial of opposition politician and former presidential candidate Kizza Besigye to a civilian court, where state prosecutors have charged him with several crimes including treason.
Political allies and lawyers for Besigye, who has lost to President Yoweri Museveni in four elections, say the accusations are politically motivated.
Minister of Defence Jacob Marksons Oboth introduced the "Uganda People's Defence Forces Bill, 2025" on the floor of the House on Tuesday, where it was referred to a House committee for scrutiny.
Civilians may be tried under military law in exceptional circumstances, such as when they are in "unlawful possession of arms, ammunition or equipment ordinarily being the monopoly of the defence forces," according to the draft law seen by Reuters.
Besigye was forcefully removed from the Kenyan capital Nairobi in November, and presented in a military court in neighbouring Uganda a few days later, where he was charged with offences including the illegal possession of firearms.
Kenya's government denied involvement in what it called Besigye's abduction.
The new bill also includes crimes of abetting or aiding a soldier to commit crimes including treason, murder and aggravated robbery, among others.
Human rights activists and opposition politicians have long accused Museveni's government of using military courts to prosecute opposition leaders and supporters on politically motivated charges.
The new law will be used to "persecute regime opponents and deal with the growing resistance against the regime," said David Lewis Rubongoya from the National Unity Platform (NUP), Uganda's largest opposition party.
Information Minister Chris Baryomunsi did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
NUP's leader Bobi Wine said on Friday he plans to contest the presidential ballot due in January, in which Museveni is widely expected to seek reelection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
41 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
It's time to save the whales again
Diving in a kelp forest in Monterey Bay recently, I watched a tubby 200-pound harbor seal follow a fellow diver, nibbling on his flippers. The diver, a graduate student, was using sponges to collect DNA samples from the ocean floor. Curious seals, he told me, can be a nuisance. When he bags his sponges and places them in his collection net, they sometimes bite into them, puncturing the bags and spoiling his samples. Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, coming closer than 50 yards to seals and dolphins is considered harassment, but they're free to harass you, which seems only fair given the centuries of deadly whaling and seal hunting that preceded a generational shift in how we view the world around us. The shift took hold in 1969, the year a massive oil spill coated the Santa Barbara coastline and the Cuyahoga River, in Cleveland, caught fire. Those two events helped spark the first Earth Day, in 1970, and the shutdown of America's last whaling station in 1971. Protecting the environment from pollution and from loss of wilderness and wildlife quickly moved from a protest issue to a societal ethic as America's keystone environmental legislation was passed at around the same time, written by a Democratic Congress and signed into law by a Republican president, Richard Nixon. Those laws include the National Environmental Policy Act (1969) , the Clean Air Act (1970), the Clean Water Act (1972) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (1972), which goes further than the Endangered Species Act (1973) in protecting all marine mammals, not just threatened ones, from harassment, killing or capture by U.S. citizens in U.S. waters and on the high seas. All these 'green' laws and more are under attack by the Trump administration, its congressional minions and longtime corporate opponents of environmental protections, including the oil and gas industry. Republicans' disingenuous argument for weakening the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act is that the legislation has worked so well in rebuilding wildlife populations that it's time to loosen regulations for a better balance between nature and human enterprise. When it comes to marine mammal populations, that premise is wrong. On July 22, at a House Natural Resources subcommittee meeting, Republican Rep. Nick Begich of Alaska introduced draft legislation that would scale back the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Among other things, his proposal would limit the ability of the federal government to take action against 'incidental take,' the killing of whales, dolphins and seals by sonic blasts from oil exploration, ship and boat strikes or by drowning as accidental catch (also known as bycatch) in fishing gear. Begich complained that marine mammal protections interfere with 'essential projects like energy development, port construction, and even fishery operations.' Rep. Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael), the ranking member on the House Resources Committee, calls the legislation a 'death sentence' for marine mammals. It's true that the marine mammal law has been a success in many ways. Since its passage, no marine mammal has gone extinct and some species have recovered dramatically. The number of northern elephant seals migrating to California beaches to mate and molt grew from 10,000 in 1972 to about 125,000 today. There were an estimated 11,000 gray whales off the West Coast when the Marine Mammal Protection Act became law; by 2016, the population peaked at 27,000. But not all species have thrived. Historically there were about 20,000 North Atlantic right whales off the Eastern Seaboard. They got their name because they were the 'right' whales to harpoon — their bodies floated for easy recovery after they were killed. In 1972 they were down to an estimated 350 individuals. After more than half a century of federal legal protection, the population is estimated at 370. They continue to suffer high mortality rates from ship strikes, entanglement in fishing gear and other causes, including noise pollution and greater difficulty finding prey in warming seas. Off Florida, a combination of boat strikes and algal pollution threaten some 8,000-10,000 manatees. The population's recovery (from about 1,000 in 1979) has been significant enough to move them off the endangered species list in 2017, but since the beginning of this year alone, nearly 500 have died. Scientists would like to see them relisted, but at least they're still covered by the Marine Mammal Protection Act. A 2022 study in the Gulf of Mexico found that in areas affected by the BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill 12 years earlier, the dolphin population had declined 45% and that it might take 35 years to recover. In the Arctic Ocean off Alaska, loss of sea ice is threatening polar bears (they're considered marine mammals), bowhead and beluga whales, walruses, ringed seals and harp seals. On the West Coast the number of gray whales — a Marine Mammal Act success story and now a cautionary tale — has crashed by more than half in the last decade to fewer than 13,000, according to a recent report by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA, the nation's lead ocean agency, is an endangered species in its own right in the Trump era). Declining prey, including tiny shrimp-like amphipods, in the whales' summer feeding grounds in the Arctic probably caused by warming water are thought to be a major contributor to their starvation deaths and reduced birth rates. The whale's diving numbers are just one signal that climate change alone makes maintaining the Marine Mammal Act urgent. Widespread marine heat waves linked to a warming ocean are contributing to the loss of kelp forests that sea otters and other marine mammals depend on. Algal blooms off California, and for the first time ever, Alaska, supercharged by warmer waters and nutrient pollution, are leading to the deaths of thousands of dolphins and sea lions. What the Trump administration and its antiregulation, anti-environmental-protection supporters fail to recognize is that the loss of marine mammals is an indicator for the declining health of our oceans and the natural world we depend on and are a part of. This time, saving the whales will be about saving ourselves. David Helvarg is executive director of Blue Frontier, an ocean policy group. His next book, 'Forest of the Sea: The Remarkable Life and Imperiled Future of Kelp,' is scheduled to be published in 2026.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Printout identifying gift, menu at Trump-Putin summit left at hotel printer
WASHINGTON — An eight-page printout containing non-public information such as President Trump's gift for Vladimir Putin and their anticipated lunch menu was allegedly left at an Anchorage hotel printer hours before the high-profile Ukraine peace summit. The embarrassing snafu revealed little if any sensitive security information — as most scheduled items on the agenda for the summit on the military's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson already were public information — but immediately became a media sensation after being reported by NPR. The formerly publicly funded news outlet reported that three guests at the four-star Hotel Captain Cook found the papers in a public printer. Advertisement 3 A US official mistakenly left planning documents for Friday's Anchorage peace talks in a public printer. REUTERS Two pages contained the menu for an ultimately aborted lunch, which was to include filet mignon with brandy peppercorn sauce and a salad with champaign vinaigrette, and a third included a seating chart with the two presidents centered around a board room-style table. Two additional pages contained the names, photos and participants of an anticipated expanded meeting between Russian and US officials — with aides instructed that the Russian leader's name is pronounced 'POO-tihn.' Advertisement It also revealed Trump intended to gift Putin was an American bald eagle desk statue, and listed three phone numbers of advance staffers who help set up the events. The White House had already published most of the scheduled events listed in the document, though much ultimately didn't happen or were abbreviated as Trump ditched his plan to seek an immediate cease-fire and instead returned to Washington optimist about brokering a full peace deal. 3 The documents contained few bombshells because most of the planned events were already announced in the daily White House schedule. REUTERS 3 Russian and US leaders ultimately left early as Trump phoned Europe to discuss a possible full peace deal rather than a cease-fire. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due at the White House Monday to discuss Putin's request that he relinquish the remainder of Donetsk province in exchange for a robust international peacekeeping force including British and French troops to shield against further Russian aggression.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump's efforts at Alaska summit applauded by world leaders, while Russia rejoices at no longer being world's pariah: ‘A glimmer of hope has finally opened'
World leaders hailed President Trump's push for a diplomatic breakthrough in the deadly war in Ukraine, calling his sitdown with Vladimir Putin a 'glimmer of hope' on Saturday — a jarring contrast to the triumphant mood in Moscow at no longer being viewed as a global pariah. 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. 'His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. 6 Starmer said the world was closer than before to an end to the war in Ukraine. The reactions came after Trump debriefed European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, about his summit with Putin during a Saturday morning phone call. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelensky,' Starmer added. 6 The German Chancellor was relieved that no land swap had been negotiated without Ukraine at the table. Leaders expressed relief that no land was negotiated without Ukrainian leaders present, after Trump last week had hinted that discussions could include 'some swapping of territories.' 'There were no territorial negotiations between Putin and Trump over the heads of Ukraine and the Europeans, said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in a video address. 'That is good news.' 'A glimmer of hope has finally opened to discuss peace in Ukraine,' rejoiced Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. 6 Meloni expressed cautious optimism after the bilateral summit. REUTERS European leaders stressed their desire to see unwavering security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a deal, including possible NATO and EU membership. 'I welcome, in this regard, the readiness of the United States to contribute,' French President Emmanuel Macron posted on X Saturday. 'It will also be essential to draw all the lessons from the past 30 years, in particular from Russia's well-established tendency not to honor its own commitments,' he added. 6 Macron expressed some skepticism at Russia's track record of honoring its committments. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Others, however were much more skeptical of Moscow's intentions. 'The results of the Alaska summit confirm that while the US and its allies are seeking paths to peace, Putin is still only interested in the greatest possible territorial gains and the restoration of the Soviet empire,' said Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala. 'Today, it is even clearer that Russia respects only the strong, and Putin has once again proven to be a cunning and ruthless player,' Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on X. 6 The leaders met for over three hours in Alaska Friday. In Russia, the summit was seen as a clear win — the red carpet was even rolled out for Putin. The Russian strongman left the world stage facing no immediate sanctions despite not agreeing to calls for a long sought-after cease-fire. 'The President of Russia personally and in detail outlined to the President of the United States our conditions for ending the conflict in Ukraine,' Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev wrote on Telegram. 'Following a nearly three-hour conversation, the head of the White House refused to escalate pressure on Russia.' 6 Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin, a gesture that didn't go unnoticed in Russia. REUTERS The meeting, where Putin received the red-carpet treatment, also signaled the end to Moscow's diplomatic isolation, a status the Kremlin had faced since beginning its war on Ukraine in 2022. In March 2023, the Russian strongman was convicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Court and a warrant for his arrest was issued. 'Western media are in a state that can be called insanity, bordering on complete madness,' wrote the foreign ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, on Telegram. 'For three years, they have been talking about Russia's isolation, and today they saw the red carpet that greeted the Russian President in the United States.'
