Pope Leo flags AI's impact on children's intellectual and spiritual development
Pope Leo XIV has warned that artificial intelligence could negatively impact the intellectual, neurological and spiritual development of young people as he pressed one of the priorities of his young pontificate.
History's first American pope sent a message to a conference of AI and ethics, part of which was taking place in the Vatican in a sign of the Holy See's concern for the new technologies and what they mean for humanity.
In the message, Leo said any further development of AI must be evaluated according to the 'superior ethical criterion' of the need to safeguard the dignity of each human being, while respecting the diversity of the world's population.
He warned specifically that new generations are most at risk, given they have never had such quick access to information.
'All of us, I am sure, are concerned for children and young people and the possible consequences of the use of AI on their intellectual and neurological development,' he said in the message.
'Society's wellbeing depends upon their being given the ability to develop their God-given gifts and capabilities' and not allow them to confuse mere access to data with intelligence.
'In the end, authentic wisdom has more to do with recognising the true meaning of life, than with the availability of data,' he said.
Leo, who was elected in May after the death of Pope Francis, has identified AI as one of the most critical matters facing humanity, saying it poses challenges to defending human dignity, justice and labour.
He has explained his concern for AI by invoking his namesake, Pope Leo XIII. That Leo was pope during the dawn of the Industrial Revolution and made the plight of workers, and the need to guarantee their rights and dignity, a key priority.
Towards the end of his pontificate, Francis became increasingly vocal about the threats to humanity posed by AI and called for an international treaty to regulate it.
Francis said politicians must take the lead in making sure AI remains human-centric, so that decisions about when to use weapons or even less-lethal tools always remain made by humans and not machines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Donald Trump calls for special prosecutor to investigate 2020 election
President Donald Trump has called for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate the 2020 election won by Democrat Joe Biden, repeating his baseless claim that the contest was marred by widespread fraud. 'Biden was grossly incompetent, and the 2020 election was a total FRAUD!' Mr Trump said in a social media post in which he also sought to favourably contrast his immigration enforcement approach with that of the former president. 'The evidence is MASSIVE and OVERWHELMING. A Special Prosecutor must be appointed. This cannot be allowed to happen again in the United States of America! Let the work begin!' Donald Trump has also instructed his administration to investigate Joe Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his 'cognitive decline' (David J Phillip/AP) Mr Trump's post, made as his Republican White House is consumed by a hugely substantial foreign policy decision on whether to get directly involved in the Israel-Iran war, is part of an amped-up effort by him to undermine the legitimacy of Mr Biden's presidency. Earlier this month, Mr Trump directed his administration to investigate Mr Biden's actions as president, alleging aides masked his predecessor's 'cognitive decline'. Mr Biden has dismissed the investigation as 'a mere distraction'. The post also revives a long-running grievance by Mr Trump that the election was stolen even though courts around the country and a Trump attorney general from his first term found no evidence of fraud that could have affected the outcome. The Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity arm pronounced the election 'the most secure in American history'. President Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) It was unclear what Mr Trump had in mind when he called for a special prosecutor, but in the event Attorney General Pam Bondi heeds his call, she may face pressure to appoint someone who has already been confirmed by the Senate. A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment on Friday. The Justice Department has appointed a succession of special counsels in recent years — sometimes, though not always, plucked from outside the agency — to lead investigations into politically sensitive matters, including into conduct by Mr Biden and by Mr Trump. Last year, Mr Trump's personal lawyers launched an aggressive, and successful, challenge to the appointment of Jack Smith, the special counsel assigned to investigate his efforts to undo the 2020 presidential election and his retention of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida. A Trump-appointed judge agreed, ruling that then-Attorney General Merrick Garland had exceeded his bounds by appointing a prosecutor without Senate approval and confirmation, and dismissed the case. That legal team included Todd Blanche, who is now deputy attorney general, as well as Emil Bove, who is Mr Blanche's top deputy but was recently nominated to serve as a judge on a federal appeals court.
The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
The Israel-Iran conflict is splitting Trump's MAGA movement in two
Ted Cruz on Iran. Full interview tomorrow. — Tucker Carlson (@TuckerCarlson) June 18, 2025 AS WAR CLOUDS gather over the Middle East and Donald Trump edges closer to authorising military strikes, an objector has emerged from inside his own ranks. Meet the lead dissenting voice: Tucker Carlson. You may have come across footage of a tense exchange this week between two of Trump's most loyal allies – Republican Senator Ted Cruz and right-wing broadcaster Tucker Carlson – clashing over the situation in Israel and Iran. In a fiery interview, Carlson grilled Cruz on why the United States, and Trump in particular, are flirting with the idea of striking Iran in support of Israel. Cruz defended the president, citing biblical obligation and national security threats. Iran, he argued, is 'trying to murder Donald Trump'. Carlson, on the other hand, rejected both the religious framing and the geopolitical justification, labelling the strikes a mistake and warning that Trump's foreign policy credibility hangs in the balance. The exchange revealed a widening schism within the MAGA movement — between those who support Trump's 'America First' pledge to end 'forever wars', and those who see Iran as a pressing threat to US and Israeli security that must be addressed militarily. MAGA civil war? Trump's supporters are no longer unified on foreign policy. At its core, the MAGA divide is over what 'America First' actually means. For some, it's about rejecting foreign entanglements and endless wars. For others, it includes projecting strength abroad and standing by allies like Israel, especially against common enemies like Iran. Trump, who once decried the invasion of Iraq as 'the worst decision ever made,' now flirts with another conflict in the region . 'I may do it, I may not do it,' he said cryptically when asked whether the US would join Israeli efforts to hit Iranian nuclear sites. A destroyed building in Tehran, Iran. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Trump's comments shook his base, exposing a growing divide. On one side are traditional conservatives like Senators Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell, who believe the US must act to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon. 'President Trump understands the threat the ayatollah presents to us, not just Israel,' Graham said, voicing confidence that Trump would ultimately side with Israeli forces. On the other side are populist nationalists like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Marjorie Taylor Greene, who see any military action as a betrayal of Trump's promise to avoid foreign wars. 'Anyone slobbering for the US to become fully involved in the Israel-Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Greene wrote on X. 'We are sick and tired of foreign wars.' Even Trump's own vice-president, JD Vance, long sceptical of foreign intervention, has attempted to bridge the gap, insisting that Trump 'is only interested in using the American military to accomplish the American people's goals.' But the balancing act is proving more difficult as rhetoric escalates and the conflict enters its second week. Advertisement Online MAGA resistance The Trump backlash hasn't been limited to Capitol Hill. Trump's broad online coalition is now fractured, with many influencers who strongly supported the president taking sharply different stances. Tucker Carlson's public opposition drew a rebuke from Trump, who called him 'kooky'. That, in turn, sparked defence from various pro-Trump voices. Right wing content creator Candace Owens called the moment 'unbelievable', arguing that Trump had 'completely fractured his base.' Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones warned that backing war against Iran was 'the stuff nightmares are made of.' Still, some in the MAGA media ecosystem have remained firmly pro-Trump. Far-right influencer Charlie Kirk declared his 'full and complete trust' in Trump's judgement, while activist Laura Loomer reminded followers that 'America First is whatever President Trump says it is.' Others, like Jack Posobiec, have tried to hold the movement together, warning that 'regime change war would break up the MAGA coalition', which he suggested the neoconservatives are counting on. Voters say no to foreign wars US polling reflects the internal disunity. A YouGov/Economist survey found 60% of Americans (including a majority of Trump supporters) oppose US military involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict. In an Echelon Insights poll, 45% of voters said they supported Israel's strikes on Iran, while 35%were opposed. Asked what role the US should play, only 8% said that they would favour joining Israel in military attacks, while 41% said they want America to stay completely out. The message is clear: Trump's voters are worried about another foreign war. Even Trump's own intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, has voiced caution. In recent congressional testimony, she acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment was at a record high, but said there was no evidence they were building a nuclear weapon. She later warned that the 'political elite' was 'carelessly fomenting fear' that risked global catastrophe, a stance which reportedly infuriated Trump. Some Republicans such as Congressman Thomas Massie have even joined with Democrats to try to block any unauthorised military action. 'This is not our war,' Massie posted. 'Congress must decide such matters.' What happens next? For now, the future of US involvement remains uncertain. Trump has insisted that Iran 'cannot have a nuclear weapon,' while hinting at further escalation, posting ominously that the US knows 'exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding.' Whether Trump ultimately strikes or holds back, the political damage may already be done. The Iran-Israel conflict has laid bare ideological tensions in the MAGA movement that have simmered beneath the surface for years. In the words of Carlson: 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency.' Perhaps it will reshape his movement altogether. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Independent
6 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Pope Leo flags AI's impact on children's intellectual and spiritual development
©Associated Press Today at 09:19 Pope Leo XIV has warned that artificial intelligence could negatively impact the intellectual, neurological and spiritual development of young people as he pressed one of the priorities of his young pontificate. History's first American pope sent a message to a conference of AI and ethics, part of which was taking place in the Vatican in a sign of the Holy See's concern for the new technologies and what they mean for humanity.
