Hillsdale College refuses federal funding. It makes me a better teacher.
Advertisement
This bold idea need not be a mere thought experiment. It's a part of my reality, as a guy who works at a college that refuses federal largesse; it's a denial that delivers a blessing. It protects me and my colleagues from bossy bureaucrats and makes me a better teacher.
Hillsdale College was founded by Free Will Baptists in Michigan in 1844. Its
Advertisement
The graduates of Hillsdale College include
In 1975, Hillsdale College received a letter from the federal government, as did Harvard and every other college and university in the United States, ordering it to sign a document to say it complied with affirmative-action regulations, and then to provide data on the race and ethnicity of its students and employees.
Hillsdale declined, on the grounds that it never had discriminated, as well as to defend the principle that even a federal government with good intentions has no business meddling in its affairs. A years-long legal battle ended when the Supreme Court said that recipients of federal aid must comply with federal dictates, including schools that merely enroll students who take federal loans and veterans who seek to use GI Bill benefits.
Once again, Hillsdale College
Advertisement
Rather than imposing hardship, this principled position has created opportunity. Hillsdale College can focus on providing a high-quality liberal arts education, rather than mustering an army of compliance officers who fuss over federal directives. One of these directives is the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, which has led regulators to insist that professors can't talk to the parents of their students about classroom performance. It doesn't matter if mom and dad pay the tuition.
This rule intends to protect student privacy, and there's something to be said for treating college students as adults rather than as wards. Yet FERPA bans a valuable form of communication.
I've learned this firsthand because of Parents Weekend, which Hillsdale College holds every semester. Its main event is a chance for parents to have one-on-one meetings with the professors who teach their children. Other colleges and universities also have Parents Weekend, but without this element.
During these conversations, I give out syllabi and describe the objectives of my courses. I trade information about academic interests, career ambitions, and more. I've heard about mental health challenges and other personal struggles. On multiple occasions, based on what parents have said, I've helped students find internships and jobs. The bottom line is that Parents Weekend allows an exchange that makes me better at what I'm charged to do.
And I get to do it because Hillsdale College can ignore federal regulations.
Another reward of resistance is that millions of Americans have resolved to support Hillsdale College's freedom, and they've helped the college build an endowment of about $900 million. That's a fraction of Harvard's treasure chest, but also the envy of many other liberal arts colleges, which have come to fear that they can't function without government subsidies.
Advertisement
It turns out that sometimes the right choice is to declare independence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House Democrats' bill would combat LGBTQ elder abuse
Legislation introduced Friday, during Pride Month, by more than a dozen House Democrats would help combat abuse against elderly LGBTQ Americans. The Elder Pride Protection Act would establish a task force within the Department of Justice to study the 'increased incidence of elder abuse' against LGBTQ seniors and develop best practice solutions to be implemented by state and local law enforcement, according to a copy of the bill, shared first with The Hill. 'No one, especially our vulnerable seniors, should ever be mistreated because of who they are or who they love,' said Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), who introduced the bill Friday alongside Rep. Angie Craig (D-Minn.), who recently launched a bid to replace retiring Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) in the Senate next year. In November, Gottheimer announced he would run for governor of New Jersey. Craig, who is gay and one of 13 openly LGBTQ members of Congress, said the measure would help shield seniors from abuse and discrimination 'as we continue the struggle for LGBTQ+ rights.' 'LGBTQ+ seniors led the fight for so many of the rights LGBTQ+ Minnesotans enjoy today, and now it's our turn to fight for them,' she said in a statement. LGBTQ older adults are at heightened risk for adverse health and social outcomes compared to their cisgender and heterosexual peers, according to the Center for Health Care Strategies, a New Jersey nonprofit. SAGE, an advocacy group for LGBTQ elders that has endorsed Gottheimer and Craig's bill, has said LGBTQ seniors are more vulnerable to abuse and neglect. Comprehensive data on elder abuse is lacking, though the Justice Department estimates that more than 10 percent of Americans age 65 and older experience some form of elder abuse each year. In limited data, LGBTQ seniors, who are at higher risk of isolation, report elevated rates of abuse, according to SAGE. 'These are challenging times, and now more than ever, LGBTQ+ elders deserve to age without fear of elder abuse,' said Aaron Tax, SAGE's managing director of government affairs and policy advocacy. The bill, which has 14 Democratic co-sponsors, stands little chance of passing the GOP-controlled House. Republicans and President Trump have denounced initiatives that prioritize diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), claiming they stoke divisions and promote 'woke ideology.' A National Center on Elder Abuse webpage previously dedicated to 'advancing justice for LGBTQ elders' appears to have been deleted this year in the administration's purge of government websites following Trump's executive orders targeting DEI and 'gender ideology.' Updated at 10:32 a.m. EDT Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
USA Today
36 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk
Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk Show Caption Hide Caption 'Two big egos.' Americans not surprised by Trump-Musk feud Americans across the country say they're not surprised by the public feud between President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Tesla is no longer hot, the president says. After playing influencer-in-chief and hosting a car show in the South Lawn of the White House for the brand in March, Donald Trump is considering getting rid of his red Tesla, a day after his public spat with his close adviser and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. A White House official confirmed on background June 6 that Trump no longer wants the Tesla Model S he bought in March in a show of support for the company after incidents of vandalism at Tesla dealerships across the country. The electric car, worth about $80,000 new, still sits in the White House parking lot. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk, who served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, a position from which Trump revealed Musk was asked to leave last month. 'Elon was wearing thin,' Trump posted on Truth Social, seemingly indicating that Musk had worn out his welcome. Musk lobbed a series of online jabs at Trump's signature tax and spending bill after he left the White House, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and asking Americans to tell their representatives in Washington to "Kill the Bill." Trump said Musk was upset about electric vehicle subsidies from the bill that would have benefited Tesla. The Congressional Budget Office has said the bill would lead to an increase of $2.4 trillion in total deficits over the next 10 years, a figure Trump has disputed. The feud reached an apparent point of no return after Musk accused Trump of being named in classified files on financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A White House official told USA TODAY on background on June 6 that Trump had no plans to have any contact with Musk. Throughout his tenure as the cost-cutting czar, Musk has suffered ongoing losses for the car company. His deep cuts to federal staffing and programs spurred "Tesla Takedown" protests, with Tesla owners being harassed and multiple dealerships across the United States being vandalized. On March 11, Tesla's stock price plummeted 15%, the greatest one-day drop in five years. In the aftermath of the June 6 feud, Tesla's stock price fell 14% but showed signs of rebounding on Friday by 5%, trading at $300 on NASDAQ at 10:50 a.m.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it. This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions. Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago. So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley. The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction. The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.'' Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5. Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion. 'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5. Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health. Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means. About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us. To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees. Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow. People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest. Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty. To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account. While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
