
Bernie Sanders urges people in Ireland to unite to stop the rise of oligarchy
Bernie Sanders has urged working people in Ireland and across the world to unite to stop the rise of oligarchy as he delivered a keynote speech in Dublin.
The 83-year-old Vermont senator used an address at the Robert Tressell Festival at Liberty Hall to criticise what he characterised as a new generation of billionaires who do not believe in government or democracy.
He also expressed concern that artificial intelligence and new technology were being used against working people, to take their jobs, rather than being harnessed to benefit workers and generate wealth across society.
He denounced President Donald Trump, describing his administration as a 'government of the billionaires, by the billionaires and for the billionaires'.
The independent senator, who lost out to Hillary Clinton in a bid to become the Democratic presidential candidate in 2016, also accused the party of cutting ties with the working class people of the US.
'Why did he (President Trump) win the support of the majority of the American people? The answer is everything to do with the fact that working class people believe that the Democratic Party no longer represents them,' Mr Sanders told the event on Saturday night.
'And by the way, this is not just an American phenomenon, it is happening to social democratic parties all over the world. And these parties have to make a choice - if they think they are going to survive defending a status quo which is destroying the lives of millions of workers in America and around the world, they are dead wrong.'
He added: 'All over this world is an understanding that we are at war with an oligarchy that couldn't care less about the people in Palestine, care less about the people in Ireland, or care less about the people in the United States of America.
'These oligarchs are not like the rich (of the past) - I'm not a historian, but my impression is they are not like the wealthy of past generations.
'The rich have always wanted tax breaks. The rich have always wanted to break unions, anti-unionism. (But) these guys are different. And the difference is they do not believe in the concept of government. They do not believe in democracy.
'You know, 150 years ago there was this divine (right), the kings in Europe, the tsar in Russia, they told their the constituents that they had the right to rule, the divine right to rule.'
The senator said many leading billionaires of the present day subscribed to the same theory.
'They believe they are high IQ people who have developed these big technology companies, they are so smart they have created billion-dollar companies, they have the right to rule, and they don't want you or democracy or government or unions or consumer groups to get in the way,' he said.
'I will tell you that they are moving very, very rapidly, (with) this artificial intelligence and robotics. What they did to (US) federal employees (cutting jobs), and we're seeing right now, literally, what they did to federal employees is a signal to every corporation in America - 'Hey, we did it. You can do it. And if your workers stand up, you tell them, they got machinery coming in, we got AI coming in, we got robotics coming, we don't need that any more'.
'So if we do not get our act together, if we do not raise a class consciousness which understands that that technology must be used to benefit working people, not just to make the billionaires even richer, if we don't raise the consciousness to understand that in the world we live today, there is no reason why we should be experiencing the kind of poverty and economic misery that we are.
'Economic rights, as I think most people in this room know, are human rights.
'People have a right to proper health care. They have a right to decent housing. They have a right to good quality education. They have a right to decent incomes. This is not a utopian vision. We're not living in the 1850s any more.
'We have the technology to know how to create the wealth that we need to create a decent life for every man, woman and child. We can do it. But we can't do it unless we come together globally, unless the working class stands up and says 'enough is enough' to the oligarchs, they are not going to have it all.
'It is our world, and we're going to take power and create a society that works for all of us.'
U.S. senator Bernie Sanders has accompanied his wife Jane to a Co Kildare town where she traces her roots for the unveiling of plaque commemorating an anti-war song.
Dr Jane O'Meara Sanders, an activist and political strategist, has ancestral links to Athy.
The couple were special guests at St Michael's Cemetery in the town for the unveiling of the plaque dedicated to the 19th century anti-war folk song 'Johnny I Hardly Knew Ye'.
The song tells the story of a woman who, on the road to Athy, meets a former lover who has returned from war badly injured.
The plaque is part of the Made Of Athy Project, a local initiative that recognises people with links to the town who have made significant contributions to world culture.
Mr and Mrs Sanders attended the event during their short visit to Ireland.
On Saturday evening, the 83-year-old US senator urged working people in Ireland and across the world to unite to stop the rise of oligarchy as he delivered a keynote speech in Dublin.
He used an address at the Robert Tressell Festival at Liberty Hall to criticise what he characterised as a new generation of billionaires who do not believe in government or democracy.
Mr Sanders also expressed concern that artificial intelligence and new technology were being used against working people, to take their jobs, rather than being harnessed to benefit workers and generate wealth across society.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The art of political dressing: As Michelle Obama's new book will highlight, fashion choices can make political statements
It's an experience that's not unique to the former US first lady: politics and fashion go hand in hand. While some may think fashion is frivolous, getting dressed is a conscious act and one that can have even more weight when you're on the public stage. That's the reason world leaders often wear something from the country they are visiting when on official trips: think of Queen Elizabeth's shamrock-adorned dress for her historic state dinner in Dublin in 2011. But more often, it's a subtle form of communication that the best political movers know how to use to their advantage. Take the focus on Michelle Obama herself, for example. While she was criticised for having her arms on show or being too sexy in some of her looks, she championed designers from diverse backgrounds such as Jason Wu and Naeem Khan. Khan is the epitome of the American dream. Having grown up in Mumbai, he moved to America to pursue a career in fashion at 20. Barack Obama's campaign poster had 'hope' written in bold lettering, and what is more hopeful than the tale of a young immigrant who went on to dress the first lady? While fashion can display an important message, it's not always a positive one. Current US First Lady Melania Trump has had a plethora of well-deserved critiques on her fashion choices. The most notable was in 2018 when she visited a shelter in Texas where children of suspected illegal immigrants were housed. She chose to wear a Zara jacket that had 'I really don't care, do u?' written on the back. Though initially her representatives dismissed any significance to the message, saying it was 'just a jacket', she later claimed that she had been sending a message to the 'left-wing media' who criticised her. There seems to have been no lasting damage done – in the eyes of the fashion world at least. Where during their first term in office many designers refused to dress the Trumps and their wider circle, this time they have been embraced by big names such as Oscar de la Renta. It's not only women who are critiqued on their fashion choices: when Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky showed up to meet President Donald Trump at the White House wearing his signature sweatshirt in February, he was met with hostility. Trump remarked 'You're all dressed up today', to which Zelensky replied he would wear a suit when the war is over — his wardrobe is a deliberate nod to his countrymen who are fighting on the front lines. Interestingly, Trump doesn't seem to expect the same standard of dress from ex-bestie-turned-enemy Elon Musk, who has been pictured in the Oval Office wearing slogan T-shirts and baseball caps. Proof that dressing down can also be a power play. As Michelle Obama put it when writing about her forthcoming book: 'The Look is about more than fashion. It's about confidence. It's about identity. It's about the power of authenticity.' What your Trump victory sneakers say about you… You don't exist. No really, does anyone actually own these gold, American flag-adorned 'Never Surrender' high-tops? For a mere $399 you too can be on the wrong side of history! Putting politics aside for one minute, who on earth is trusting Donald Trump with fashion choices? Presumably the same people who bought the $199 Fight Fight Fight desert boots, the $249 America's Superhero low-top trainers, and the $499 Trump golf shoes – limited to 1,000 pairs and available for both men and women from These sneakers are gaudy and cheap looking. In fact, if you bought these sneakers, I'm glad you're down $399, you don't deserve the cash.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
EU's tariff ‘hitlist' will hurt Ireland more than other member states, says lobby group Ibec
The EU's planned countermeasures against Donald Trump's proposed tariffs would have a 'disproportionate' impact on Ireland and Irish business, according to an analysis by Ibec.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
The Irish Independent's View: Troops on the streets is a chilling moment for US democracy
He passionately believed change must be pursued without recourse to mob rule, even though he was often a victim of it. 'The limitation of riots, moral questions aside, is that they cannot win and their participants know it,' he said. 'Hence, rioting is not revolutionary but reactionary, because it invites defeat. It involves an emotional catharsis, but it must be followed by a sense of futility.' As protests over immigration raids spread to cities across the US, including Los Angeles, Chicago and Milwaukee, the danger of explosive clashes intensifies. Immigration Control and Enforcement (Ice) officers are said to have been given a quota of 3,000 arrests a day. Having National Guard troops and Marines deployed on city streets seems peculiarly un-American. And after five nights of demonstrations, California's Democratic governor Gavin Newsom has accused US president Donald Trump of misusing his power by mobilising troops. He has warned other states to prepare for similar unrest. Rioting has to be condemned, but many Americans believe the deployment was unnecessary, and calling in a Marine battalion as back-up could be inflammatory and provocative. Instead of de-escalating tensions, Mr Trump seems intent on confrontation. The president has vowed to 'liberate' Los Angeles, but has been accused by Mr Newsom of an attack on democracy. 'Democracy is under assault right before our eyes. This moment we have feared has arrived,' he said. We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now This Saturday, Washington will stage a military parade to coincide with the US army's 250th anniversary. It also happens to be Mr Trump's 79th birthday. Coming as it does a week after Mr Trump put the National Guard on the streets of LA – the first time in six decades a president has done so – in defiance of the state governor makes the situation extremely fraught. Mr Trump has exulted in his role as enforcer-in-chief in his less than 200 days in the White House. Steamrolling over institutions and legal norms, he has obliterated opponents. Many would prefer to see a less aggressive response to protests. Mr Newsom has appealed to the courts to become more involved. The fear is that the sovereignty of citizens is being undermined. There is also a worry Mr Trump could invoke the Insurrection Act, which would free National Guard units to suppress civil disorder. Using troops against US citizens could provoke a backlash. Deportations should follow due process and the rule of law, but putting soldiers on the streets to confront civilians is not something we are accustomed to seeing in the world's showcase for democracy. Dr King believed a riot was the 'language of the unheard', but his faith lay in unity. As he said: 'We may have all come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now.' It falls to Mr Trump to take care it does not capsize.