logo
Bill to add Ten Commandments to schools in GA proposed in state house

Bill to add Ten Commandments to schools in GA proposed in state house

Yahoo15-02-2025

SAVANNAH, Ga. (WSAV) — A new bill introduced in the state house this week could require all public schools in Georgia to display the Ten Commandments.
Georgia isn't the first state to introduce legislation that would bring religious text into public schools, but House Bill 313 has struck up a lively debate about free speech and the separation of church and state.
'I think I understand the reasoning or the heart behind that. I think when we think about the Bible as just a book of rules, then we miss the entire point of it,' Michele Smith, a local parent, said.
Many parents and lawmakers are split on adding the Ten Commandments to the list of state-approved documents and records considered appropriate for display in public schools.
The list is comprised of documents that are considered reflective of U.S. history, like the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Emancipation Proclamation.
'As long as there's not an abide that you must read this and you must do this,' State Rep. Carl Gilliard, (GA-162), said. 'I also think it gives back the morality of what we need in our society now. If we don't have prayer and God in schools, then we don't have schools.'
However, Gilliard also argued that lawmakers must not operate under a double standard.
'We also have to tell the whole story,' he said. 'There are other stories that we cannot eliminate those other books and those other opportunities for people to get history. They're going to open up those opportunities when they say, you all got this bill passed, and now I'm putting a bill together for the Quran.'
While some lawmakers are in favor of the bill with stipulations, organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union are against it entirely.
'Attempting to indoctrinate children by mandating the display of a preferred religious text is completely inappropriate in Georgia's public schools, where students of all faiths and backgrounds should feel equally welcomed in the classroom,' Legal Director of the ACLU of Georgia, Cory Isaacson, said.
According to the text of the bill, schools wouldn't be allowed use public funds to pay for any costs associated with displaying the commandments. Instead, they would need to raise private funds or rely on donations.
When asked whether adding the commandments in schools should be considered a priority, local parent Shawn Martin said, 'Not right now. There's so much other stuff that they need to be learning.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to "second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions," referring to the federal government's executive branch. "The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach," the filing said. The department, created by a U.S. law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85% of public school funding comes from state and local governments. It provides federal grants for needy schools and programs, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programs and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the $1.6 trillion in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many U.S. conservatives. Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorized by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Trump called the order a first step "to eliminate" the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its "final mission." Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. "This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling "misguided." The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Joun.

Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump asks Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Donald Trump's administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based U.S. District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to "second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions," referring to the federal government's executive branch. "The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach," the filing said. The department, created by a U.S. law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85% of public school funding comes from state and local governments. It provides federal grants for needy schools and programs, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programs and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the $1.6 trillion in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many U.S. conservatives. Attorneys general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorized by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the U.S. Constitution. Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Trump called the order a first step "to eliminate" the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its "final mission." Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. "This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself," the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling "misguided." The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Joun.

We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up
We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

We're all going to die but Joni Ernst wants to speed it up

By now, I'm sure you all have seen U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst's statement to an Iowa town hall audience, after a woman cried out that people are going to die because of Medicaid cuts. Ernst's response was, "Well, we all are going to die." If that ridiculously glib statement wasn't enough, Ernst's sarcastic 'apology,' given in a cemetery, was even worse. She's in a graveyard, using dead people as props, looking eerily like the crypt keeper. That apology was so insincere, it should have come with a laugh track. Ernst is saying that people are just too sensitive to understand that cutting health care is just natural selection. She should have made her video in a funeral home instead. She could tell watchers that they don't need health care because they are all going to be here soon, anyway. More: What's next for the Iowan who shouted 'people will die' at Joni Ernst over Medicaid cuts Then, Ernst told people that if they really want eternal life, maybe they should just get right with Jesus. Sen. Ernst, you're gutting Medicaid. I think Jesus said, "Love thy neighbor," not, "Strip their health insurance, and then sell them a prayer cloth on eBay." Nothing says do unto others, like gutting Medicaid while standing in a graveyard, like a ghoul. Why worry about your cancer diagnosis when you can just accept Jesus? And get ready to meet him, real soon. The Republican Party is not only pro-life until birth, they are pro-death once you can't pay your doctor bill. Opinion: Sen. Joni Ernst helps GOP find its authentic voice: 'We all are going to die.' Jesus said to feed the hungry and heal the sick. Ernst's idea of Christian charity is to hand out shovels and tell you to dig your own grave. This self-appointed apostle of corn-fed Christian virtue, with a Bible in one hand and a military budget in the other, acts like she's in the "Real Housewives of Gallilee." Ernst is the kind of Christian who invites you to Bible study, and then sends your kids to war, to keep us safe, but not safe enough to give the kids affordable health care when they come back. Jesus said to welcome the stranger and let him in. Republicans say that we can't let "woke" Jesus mess with our America First policy of arresting, detaining and deporting refugees. The next time Joni Ernst tells you about her deep Christian faith, remember, if Jesus were handing out loaves of bread and fish, Ernst would be demanding he privatize the fish market. People are gonna die, and Ernst is making sure they die faster, with the most insincere apology video the world has ever seen. No Medicaid? No problem. The cemetery is open all day long. So here's to you, Sen. Ernst. May your "We all are going to die" tour sell out fast − faster than your next fundraiser with Big Pharma. And you are right, we all are going to die. But it ain't supposed to be because of you. Mel Shuller, Montgomery This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Joni Ernst thinks gutting Medicaid is just natural selection | Letter

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store