Bill to add Ten Commandments to schools in GA proposed in state house
Georgia isn't the first state to introduce legislation that would bring religious text into public schools, but House Bill 313 has struck up a lively debate about free speech and the separation of church and state.
'I think I understand the reasoning or the heart behind that. I think when we think about the Bible as just a book of rules, then we miss the entire point of it,' Michele Smith, a local parent, said.
Many parents and lawmakers are split on adding the Ten Commandments to the list of state-approved documents and records considered appropriate for display in public schools.
The list is comprised of documents that are considered reflective of U.S. history, like the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Emancipation Proclamation.
'As long as there's not an abide that you must read this and you must do this,' State Rep. Carl Gilliard, (GA-162), said. 'I also think it gives back the morality of what we need in our society now. If we don't have prayer and God in schools, then we don't have schools.'
However, Gilliard also argued that lawmakers must not operate under a double standard.
'We also have to tell the whole story,' he said. 'There are other stories that we cannot eliminate those other books and those other opportunities for people to get history. They're going to open up those opportunities when they say, you all got this bill passed, and now I'm putting a bill together for the Quran.'
While some lawmakers are in favor of the bill with stipulations, organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union are against it entirely.
'Attempting to indoctrinate children by mandating the display of a preferred religious text is completely inappropriate in Georgia's public schools, where students of all faiths and backgrounds should feel equally welcomed in the classroom,' Legal Director of the ACLU of Georgia, Cory Isaacson, said.
According to the text of the bill, schools wouldn't be allowed use public funds to pay for any costs associated with displaying the commandments. Instead, they would need to raise private funds or rely on donations.
When asked whether adding the commandments in schools should be considered a priority, local parent Shawn Martin said, 'Not right now. There's so much other stuff that they need to be learning.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
8 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Texas Schools Religious Requirements Stir Debate
If you didn't know, Texas public schools are introducing a new slate of regulations this year after state legislators passed hundreds of laws, including banning cellphones and school-sponsored DEI or LGBTQ+ clubs. The laws that have gained the most attention are not just what's being removed from the institutions but what's being added — mandatory prayer time and the Ten Commandments in every classroom. Here's a quick breakdown of what will be prohibited in Texas schools. House Bill 1481 will prohibit students from using cellphones and any other personal electronic devices at school. The legislators believe this new law will improve performance and reduce distractions in the Bill 12 will prohibit any school-sponsored clubs based on gender identity or sexual orientation, and any diversity, equity, and inclusion programs or policies in K-12 Senate Bill 13, school boards and parents will have a final say over which books are allowed in some school libraries, not librarians. If 10% or at least 50 parents request an advisory council to approve/remove materials in school libraries, the institution must create free or reduced school lunches and breakfast programs, Senate Bill 314 will ban certain additives (brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, red dye 3, and more). According to lawmakers, the additives introduce long-term health risks and disorders to everything is being taken away from Texas schools. Some things are being added to campuses due to these new laws. House Bill 27 will require financial literacy classes to be added to the high school curriculum starting in 2026. Public schools will receive new funding for teachers, early childhood development, special education, insurance, and more. Families will also have public access to private school vouchers thanks to Senate Bill 2. What's being added to schools is what is really gaining attention and going viral. Senate Bill 11 will require schools to designate Bible reading and prayer time during the school day. And Senate Bill 10 will require public elementary and secondary schools to display the Ten Commandments in every classroom on a visible 16" x 20" poster. According to Texas news reports, organizations like Texas Values, a faith-based conservative nonprofit, partner with like-minded groups to donate Ten Commandment posters to classrooms. While the new law requires donated posters to be displayed, some districts have actually purchased their own posters. Even lawmakers in support of the bills have started raising money to buy posters to prepare the schools for the Sept. 1 deadline. The new Texas laws have gone viral and have sparked many concerned reactions and comments. "No phones? Ten Commandments? Thank goodness I graduated when I did because this all sounds so miserable. I feel bad for the kids," one person wrote. Another person said, "i'm genuinely astounded by how texas managed to get away with such blatant violations of the separation of church and state as 'every classroom must have a visible 16" x20" poster of the ten commandments on display.' this country is headed backwards so fast it's unbelievable." Someone else added, "there's nothing inherently wrong with being christian but forcing every classroom to display the ten commandments is so fucking dystopian." This person said, "Prayer Time and the Ten Commandments are a jump scare." "The Ten Commandments in school thing is so funny. Gotta remind first graders not to kill someone or bang their neighbor's wife," another person said. "the ten commandments must be on display when the president has broken at least 8 of them so why are they acting like they matter," someone else commented. And finally, someone brutally wrote, "Oh, good- so when one of the students (in the state with the most registered firearms) shows up with their parents gun and decides to light it up, the students will have prayer hour and a ten commandment poster to look at but not the ability to call 911 or their parents." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.


Fox News
a day ago
- Fox News
Israeli NGO works behind the scenes to coordinate aid to Gazan civilians
An Israeli nongovernmental organization is working behind the scenes to provide a critical link between the Israeli military and international organizations with one goal in mind: Get humanitarian aid to Palestinian civilians. "We really became this informal connector and facilitator between the Israeli authorities and the humanitarian community," IsraAID CEO Yotam Polizer said. IsraAID has worked in 64 countries and is currently the largest humanitarian organization based out of Israel. Polizer says there is broad consensus now that a concerning humanitarian level was reached in Gaza with pockets of malnutrition across the strip. He notes that it isn't only food that is needed by the civilian population, but also medicine, water and nutritional provisions. "When we reach severe malnutrition levels, we know that just rice and flour is not going to solve the problem," Polizer added. "We need nutritional supplements, we need people to get protein." For nearly five months, there was no consistent flow of aid. That has changed in recent weeks with thousands of trucks being distributed along with airdrops of supplies to civilians. Recently, the entry of commercial trucks was partially approved. "The declared policy of Israel for two and a half months after the ceasefire collapsed was that nothing comes in," Polizer said. "That was the policy because the plan was to pressure Hamas." The IsraAID CEO says the focus must be on saving lives, not on playing the "blame game." He urges the United Nations, the Israel Defense Forces, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) and all humanitarian organizations to work together and find solutions. "As a humanitarian organization, the concept of 'do no harm' is really our Bible," Polizer added. A few months after the war started, IsraAID started to receive requests from global humanitarian organizations they had worked with in Afghanistan and Ukraine, asking for help to facilitate aid deliveries to Gaza. These groups had issues with customs clearance and approval from the Israeli military to deliver supplies to Palestinians in Gaza. These were problems IsraAID could help solve. Despite the political and cultural differences, Polizer said the Jewish community of the United States is stepping up to donate and support finding solutions for the hunger crisis in Gaza. "You can support the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, but it does not mean you are anti-Israel," he concluded.


Chicago Tribune
2 days ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's rhetoric about DC echoes a history of racist narratives about urban crime
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has taken control of the District of Columbia's law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation's capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are in response to an urgent public safety crisis. Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a 'historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' His rhetoric echoed that used by conservative politicians going back decades who have denounced American cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressive politicians, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention. 'This is liberation day in D.C., and we're going to take our capital back,' Trump promised Monday. As District of Columbia National Guard troops arrived at their headquarters Tuesday, for many residents, the prospect of federal troops surging into the district's neighborhoods represented an alarming violation of local agency. To some, it echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint historically or predominantly Black cities and neighborhoods with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify aggressive police action. April Goggans, a longtime Washington resident and grassroots organizer, said she was not surprised by Trump's actions. Communities had been preparing for a potential federal crackdown in the district since the summer of 2020, when Trump deployed National Guard troops during racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd. 'We have to be vigilant,' said Goggans, who has coordinated protests and local civil liberties educational campaigns for nearly a decade. She worries about what a surge in law enforcement could mean for residents' freedoms. 'Regardless of where you fall on the political scale, understand that this could be you, your children, your grandmother, your co-worker who are brutalized or have certain rights violated,' she said. According to White House officials, National Guard troops will be deployed to protect federal assets in the district and facilitate a safe environment for law enforcement to make arrests. The administration believes the highly visible presence of law enforcement will deter violent crime. It is unclear how the administration defines providing a safe environment for law enforcement to conduct arrests, raising alarm bells for some local advocates. 'The president foreshadowed that if these heavy-handed tactics take root here, they will be rolled out to other majority-Black and Brown cities, like Chicago, Oakland and Baltimore, across the country,' said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's D.C. chapter. 'We've seen before how federal control of the D.C. National Guard and police can lead to abuse, intimidation and civil rights violations — from military helicopters swooping over peaceful racial justice protesters in 2020 to the unchecked conduct of federal officers who remain shielded from full accountability,' Hopkins said. Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by nonwhite populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence. Republicans have called for greater police crackdowns in cities since at least the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles. President Richard Nixon won the White House in 1968 after campaigning on a 'law and order' agenda to appeal to white voters in northern cities alongside overtures to white Southerners as part of his 'Southern Strategy.' Ronald Reagan similarly won both his presidential elections after campaigning heavily on law and order politics. Politicians ranging from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to former President Bill Clinton have cited the need to tamp down crime as a reason to seize power from cities like Washington for decades. District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump's takeover of the local police force 'unsettling' but not without precedent. The mayor kept a mostly measured tone during a Monday news conference following Trump's announcement but decried the president's reasoning as a 'so-called emergency' and said the district's residents 'know that access to our democracy is tenuous.' Trump threatened to 'take over' and 'beautify' the nation's capital on the campaign trail and claimed the district was 'a nightmare of murder and crime.' He also argued the city was 'horribly run' and said his team intended 'to take it away from the mayor.' The president repeated comments he'd previously made about some of the nation's largest cities during his news conference, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland, California, and his hometown of New York City. All are currently run by Black mayors. 'You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities in a very bad, New York is a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen,' he said. Civil rights advocates see the president's rhetoric as part of a broader political strategy. 'It's a playbook he's used in the past,' said Maya Wiley, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. The president's rhetoric 'paints a picture that crime is out of control, even when it is not true, then blames the policies of Democratic lawmakers that are reform- and public safety-minded, and then claims that you have to step in and violate people's rights or demand that reforms be reversed,' Wiley said. She added that the playbook has special potency in the capital because the district's local law enforcement can be directly placed under federal control, a power Trump invoked in his announcement. Trump's actions in Washington and comments about other major American cities sent shock waves across the country, as other cities prepare to respond to potential federal action. Democratic Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said Trump's plan 'lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous' in a statement and pointed to a 30-year-low crime rate in Baltimore as a reason the administration should consult local leaders rather than antagonize them. In Oakland, Mayor Barbara Lee called Trump's characterization of the city 'fearmongering.' The administration already faced a major flashpoint between local control and federal power earlier in the summer, when Trump deployed National Guard troops to quell protests and support immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles despite opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. Civil rights leaders have denounced Trump's action in Washington as an unjustified distraction. 'This president campaigned on 'law and order,' but he is the president of chaos and corruption,' said NAACP President Derrick Johnson. 'There's no emergency in D.C., so why would he deploy the National Guard? To distract us from his alleged inclusion in the Epstein files? To rid the city of unhoused people? D.C. has the right to govern itself. It doesn't need this federal coup.'