Boeing fighter jet workers go on strike after rejecting contract offer with pay raises
Boeing Defense said it was ready for the work stoppage and it will implement a contingency plan that uses non-labor workers.
According to the company, the rejected four-year contract would have raised the average wage by roughly 40% and included a 20% general wage increase and a $5,000 ratification bonus. It also included increasing periodic raises, more vacation time and sick leave.
Advertisement
Striking Boeing workers at the company's plant in Berkeley, Mo., early Monday.
REUTERS/Lawrence Bryant
'We're disappointed our employees in St. Louis rejected an offer that featured 40% average wage growth,' Dan Gillian, Boeing vice president and general manager of the St. Louis facilities, said in a statement.
The offer was largely the same as the first offer that was overwhelmingly rejected one week earlier.
Advertisement
Members of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers' District 837 'deserve a contract that reflects their skill, dedication, and the critical role they play in our nation's defense,' District 837 head Tom Boelling said in a statement.
Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg downplayed the impact of a strike when talking with analysts on Tuesday about second-quarter earnings, noting that the company had weathered a seven-week strike last year by District 751 members, who build commercial jets in the Northwest and number 33,000.
'I wouldn't worry too much about the implications of the strike. We'll manage our way through that,' he said.
A rendering of the F-47A, which Boeing will produce in the St. Louis Air Force for the US Air Force.
via REUTERS
Advertisement
District 837 workers assemble Boeing's F-15 and F/A-18 fighters, the T-7 trainer, and the MQ-25, an aerial refueling drone being developed for the U.S. Navy.
Boeing's defense division is expanding manufacturing facilities in the St. Louis area for the new US Air Force fighter jet, the F-47A, after it won the contract this year.
District 751's strike ended with approval of a four-year contract that included a 38% wage increase.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US cattle ranchers slowly start to rebuild decimated herd
By Tom Polansek August 7 (Reuters) -Nebraska cattle rancher Craig Uden bought 200 extra mother cows and their babies over a few weeks in May to expand his herd as dry weather gave way to rain that rejuvenated land used for grazing. In South Dakota, Troy Hadrick kept 16 more young female cows, known as heifers, on his farm than he did last year to be used for breeding, rather than sending them to be slaughtered for beef. More than 1,400 miles south in Texas, the biggest cattle-producing state, Fausto Salinas was also preserving heifers to increase his herd. In major U.S. livestock regions, some ranchers have slowly begun taking the first steps to boost cattle production after the nation's inventory shrank due to a years-long drought that dried up pasture land used for grazing and hiked feeding costs. By the beginning of the year, the herd had dwindled to 86.7 million cattle, the smallest number for the time period since 1951, according to U.S. government data. When grass failed to grow on pasture land that turned from green to brown and as feed grains became too expensive, ranchers began to ship off more cattle to be slaughtered. Some producers searched miles away for hay to nourish their remaining animals. The drop in supply drove U.S. food companies to increasingly import beef from other countries, including Australia and Brazil. Though in its early stages, the herd expansion is now a sign of hope for consumers shelling out for expensive steaks and for meatpackers losing money buying high-priced cattle to slaughter. "Cattle availability should improve in coming years," Tyson Foods CEO Donnie King said during an earnings call this week. Farmers' cautious plans to rebuild mark a turning point after a continuous downsizing of the herd for six years in a row pushed beef prices to record highs in 2025. Cattle prices reached records too, slashing the profits of processors like Tyson and providing income for farmers who also grow grains and have struggled to turn a profit from selling crops. Cattle production is the nation's most important agricultural industry, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which said the sector consistently accounts for the largest share of total cash receipts for farm commodities. After delays due to persistent dryness, improved rains are motivating the expansion, along with expectations that cattle prices will remain lofty during the long rebuilding process, ranchers said. In Nebraska, the second biggest cattle-producing state, the portion of the herd in areas suffering from drought dropped to 19% in late July from 79% two years earlier, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. Near Cozad, a city of 4,000 people where Uden works with his son-in-law, rains have not quit since starting around Mother's Day in May, Uden said. Grass conditions look the best since 2011, he added. The dramatic improvement comes as a record U.S. corn harvest is expected to boost available feed supplies. "Everything has kind of fallen into place," said Uden, 64. "The cattle will have plenty to eat this year." Ranches in South Texas also benefited from one of the greenest summers in years, a welcome reprieve after the punishing drought turned forage brown and dry and killed some cattle. "Right now, we're in the process of rebuilding," said Salinas, a rancher in Rio Grande City, Texas, who sold cattle during the drought. TIGHTER SUPPLIES When ranchers retain heifers, beef production temporarily slows because the animals are not being sent to be slaughtered; it will also likely push meat prices even higher before they come down, agricultural economists said. Consumers have shown resilience to the climbing cost of beef, but increased prices will test demand, they said. It takes about two years before beef output rises after ranchers make initial moves to expand because that is how long it takes to raise full-grown cattle, ranchers said. U.S. cattle and beef supplies are set to decline even further after President Donald Trump's administration halted imports of Mexican livestock in July to keep out New World screwworm, a devastating pest. U.S. beef imports from Brazil, a key supplier of meat used to make hamburgers, are also expected to fall after Trump imposed a 50% trade tariff on Wednesday. MEATPACKERS LOSE BIG Beef producers such as Tyson and Cargill have waited years for ranchers to begin rebuilding herds because companies must increasingly compete with one another to buy limited supplies. Processors were losing about $300 on each head of cattle they slaughtered on Tuesday, according to livestock marketing advisory service Farmers have worried a processor may shutter a beef plant due to hefty losses, though Cargill told Reuters it had no plans to do so. "It's not overwhelmingly glaring that, 'Hey we're starting to rebuild the cow herd,' but I think there are quite a few signals," said Jarrod Gillig, senior vice president of Cargill's North American beef business. For one, strong prices for heifers at a major video livestock sale in July signaled the animals will be retained on farms, Gillig said. In rural feedlots, about 4.2 million heifers were being fattened for slaughter as of July 1, down 5% from 2024, according to USDA data. The decline likely reflects that ranchers are keeping at least a few more heifers on farms to reproduce, analysts said. Tyson said a 16% drop in beef cow slaughtering from January to June was another early indicator of ranchers retaining heifers on their farms. The meatpacker reported cattle costs climbed by about $560 million in the quarter that ended on June 28, compared to a year earlier. Herd rebuilding will begin in earnest next year, and the beef business will see benefits in 2028, King said. DIFFICULT DECISION Ranchers who retain heifers must make a difficult decision to forgo immediate profits from selling cattle for slaughter in a bet that prices will stay high. Many are cautious about passing up the opportunity because they remember when prices tanked following a rapid production increase in 2014. High interest rates also discourage farmers from expanding operations. Hadrick, 49, said he would have liked to hold back more than 16 cows at his farm in Faulkton, South Dakota, but he was spooked by a lack of moisture earlier this year. High cattle prices encouraged him to expand a bit now that his son has returned home from college and provides extra help. "The market's screaming for more cattle," Hadrick said. "We're dipping our toe in." Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-Angola gets back $200 million collateral from JPMorgan after bond rebound
By Duncan Miriri LUANDA (Reuters) -Angola got back $200 million of collateral in May that it had to post to JPMorgan earlier in the year, the finance ministry said, after the price of its bond rebounded, easing pressure on its finances. JPMorgan and Angola agreed in December a $1 billion, one-year derivative contract known as a total return swap backed by $1.9 billion in its government dollar bonds. In early April, JPMorgan demanded extra security from the Southern African crude oil exporter after a sharp oil price decline in the wake of tariff turmoil hit the value of Angolan bonds provided as collateral. "The improvement in the price of Angola's Eurobonds has a positive impact, allowing the amount paid in compliance with the margin call to be returned to the State. This refund has already taken place," the finance ministry told Reuters, adding that it received the cash in May. JPMorgan declined to comment. The price of the collateral bond for the loan from JPMorgan fell from 100 cents on the dollar at the end of March to a low of 86 cents during the selloff in early April when the margin call was invoked, before recovering to the March levels. It was quoted at 100 cents on Wednesday, traders said. Angola, which is saddled with high external debt to various creditors, including oil-backed loans from China, faces a slowing growth outlook and violent protests sparked by a fuel price hike on the back of removal of oil subsidies. COMPLEX INSTRUMENTS The total return swap deal with JPMorgan saw the Wall Street bank provide the government with two financing tranches of $600 million and $400 million. The $1.9 billion freshly issued bonds that provide collateral for the deal did not generate any cash for the country. The bond, which will mature in 2030, is listed internationally and its price is usually quoted in line with movements in the broader market and Angola's other bonds. Total return swaps are seen as complex and risky financing instruments, and are very rarely used in sovereign funding. Angola's JPMorgan total return swap has added to concerns that heavily indebted, low-rated African countries are increasingly turning to "off-screen" transactions like bank loans, private placements and derivatives which could bring challenges including margin calls and higher interest rates. Africa's debt has soared to more than $1.8 trillion, according to data from the African Development Bank, leading to three sovereign debt defaults in the past four years and unconventional financing deals as governments seek to stay afloat. In Angola, concerns have been growing about falling social spending by the state amid demands for more investments into infrastructure projects like roads. The International Monetary Fund cut Angola's preliminary growth outlook for 2025 to 2.4% from an initial 3%, citing lower crude oil prices and tighter external financing conditions. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Swiss Shock - Can Switzerland Reverse The 39% Tariff?
The imposition of a 39% tariff on Swiss exports to the US has been greeted with shock, despair and much ire in Switzerland – the main newspaper NZZ greeting the move as 'absurd'. Considerable offense was taken by the fact that the announcement came on the Swiss National holiday (August 1st). Equally, local business leaders and economists have been perplexed by the fact that the tariffs have been calculated on the back of a trade deficit that was skewed by the export of gold – the deficit is now a surplus. Equally, many of the goods that Switzerland exports to the US, do not have competitors there (Swiss chocolate, watches and more importantly specialized industrial goods which are used by the likes of Boeing). Neither is the Swiss franc a weak currency. There is also a feeling in Switzerland that its role on the international stage, and facilitator of American diplomacy (the Swiss embassy in Tehran has traditionally acted 'for' the US), has gone un-noticed. Swiss politics is normally a very staid affair but this episode has led to infighting across the spectrum, and considerable blame has been focused on the President of the government Council, Karin Keller-Sutter. As a result, the Swiss negotiating team that will return to Washington this week will have representation from the conservative SVP, and more officials from the trade and finance divisions. The Swiss case highlights the flaws in the methodology of the White House approach. While its economy is extremely resilient, the Swiss will not be able to suffer a 39% tariff lightly. Our sense is that the counterargument will centre around a re-framing of the trade relationship between the two countries, a re-evaluation of how Swiss industry in particular helps US firms, and an undertaking for Swiss industry to invest in the US. The hope here is that Switzerland ends up with an EU style deal, of tariffs of 15%, and a somewhat empty promise to invest 'billions' into the US. From a diplomatic point of view, given that the Swiss had traditionally been so helpful to US interests, this is an own-goal by the White House. At the time of writing, there is no indication at all as to whether this episode pushes Switzerland closer to the EU (in terms of trade – there is no question of Switzerland joining the EU). For its part, the EU is still trying to get the White House to agree the wording of deal reached in Scotland – there is ongoing lobbying from the spirits industry in Europe, not to mention the auto manufacturers. The deal is not yet watertight and needs to be implemented by individual members. There is still uncertainty over the threats to place specific tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals firms based in Europe next week (Ireland in particular) and the USD 600bn that is supposed to be invested by European firms in the US. If sector specific tariffs are severe the backlash to the deal could grow and there is rising chance that it could fall apart.
