logo
A fair water flow: Justice for Miami Gardens ratepayers

A fair water flow: Justice for Miami Gardens ratepayers

Miami Herald28-04-2025

The city of North Miami Beach runs its own public water utility whose sole water treatment plant is in the city of Miami Gardens and relies on the water coming from beneath the city of Miami Gardens.
For as long as Miami Gardens has been a city, North Miami Beach has taken the water, treated it in Miami Gardens, imposed a 25% surcharge and sold it right back to the residents and businesses of Miami Gardens, which I represent on the Miami-Dade County Commission.
This water feud by the neighboring cities has been going on for a decade, with both sides having a different take on the reason for the surcharge. I have been fighting on the side of Miami Gardens since I was a council member in the city and then its mayor.
When first established in the late 1990s, the surcharge was intended to provide a way for cities to pay for infrastructure when they had to extend water service to another city. However, North Miami Beach never extended the infrastructure to Miami Gardens; the infrastructure was already there. The surcharge was not meant to help one city get rich off of another.
For years, we have heard from North Miami Beach that the funds generated from the 25% surcharge support the operations, maintenance and capital plan of the water utility.
As noted in North Miami Beach's bond documents, the surcharge is imposed by North Miami Beach and placed directly into the North Miami Beach general fund.
The surcharge, paid by ratepayers in Miami Gardens, Aventura, Sunny Isles Beach, Golden Beach and portions of unincorporated Miami-Dade, is then used by North Miami Beach to pay for services that only benefit the residents of North Miami Beach.
The North Miami Beach Commission is building out their city on the backs of residents who will never be able to vote for or against them. That is the literal definition of taxation without representation.
Florida Senate Bill 202 aims to end this practice by requiring North Miami Beach to charge the residents of Miami Gardens the same rates and fees they charge their own residents. The companion, House Bill 11, was already unanimously passed.
For years, opponents of this legislation have tried to delay the removal of the surcharge. This year's opposition is based around the notion that removing the surcharge may lead to increases in water rates to other customers. Implying that removing the surcharge from Miami Gardens customers would increase water rates is simply not true. We now know that eliminating the surcharge does not have to affect the water rate.
From North Miami Beach's public bond documents, we know that the funds generated from the 25% surcharge are not a part of the water utility's gross revenues. Those funds are a part of their general fund. The rates and fees currently imposed by North Miami Beach without the surcharge applied cover the costs of all related expenses for the water utility.
As a direct result, the $9 million settlement that North Miami Beach must pay Miami Gardens customers for illegally imposing the surcharge when the utility was privately operated is coming out of the North Miami Beach general fund and not the water utility service.
We have been fighting to right this wrong for a long time. Over the last month, I have met with Senate leadership, the speaker of the House and legislators from across the state to ask for their support.
State Sen. Shevrin Jones and Rep. Felicia Robinson have done an extraordinary job in advocating for their bills. SB 202 and HB 11 are closer than ever to becoming law and I trust that the Legislature and the governor will ensure that the North Miami Beach's water customers in Miami Gardens are no longer unjustly taxed for the right to clean drinking water that comes from their own backyard.
Oliver G. Gilbert, III is a Miami-Dade commissioner and a former mayor of Miami Gardens.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Venezuelans in exile urge U.S. to deny visa to soccer player over ties to Maduro regime
Venezuelans in exile urge U.S. to deny visa to soccer player over ties to Maduro regime

Miami Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Venezuelans in exile urge U.S. to deny visa to soccer player over ties to Maduro regime

A Miami-based Venezuelan exile organization has asked the U.S. State Department to deny the visa of a Venezuelan soccer player set to participate in the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, due to his close ties to the Nicolás Maduro regime. In a letter sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Politically Persecuted Venezuelans Abroad, or VEPPEX, expressed concern over the imminent entry into the U.S. of Matías Lacava, a player on the South Korean team Ulsan HD, which will play its first match on U.S. soil on June 17 at Inter & Co Stadium in Orlando. Matías Lacava is the son of Rafael Lacava, current governor of Carabobo state in north-central Venezuela and a prominent figure in Maduro's regime. The official was sanctioned on Feb. 25, 2019, by the U.S. government along with three other Venezuelan governors for corruption and obstructing humanitarian aid. In the letter, VEPPEX argues that allowing the entry of immediate relatives of sanctioned officials such as Matías Lacava represents a clear contradiction to the principles of justice, accountability and respect for human rights that the United States has historically upheld. 'Allowing the son of a top Maduro regime official to enter the U.S. for an international sporting event is a direct affront to the Venezuelan exile community, many of whom have fled precisely the oppression that family represents,' the letter stated. The organization formally requested that the State Department revoke any valid visa or entry permit held by Matías Lacava and deny him entry into the country until a thorough review of his case is conducted, 'taking into account possible implications for human rights and national security.' In its decision to sanction Rafael Lacava in 2019, the Treasury Department argued that the four governors were involved in endemic corruption practices and that he helped obstruct the delivery of critical humanitarian aid, thereby worsening the ongoing humanitarian crisis 'caused by Maduro's illegitimate regime.' In Rafael Lacava's specific case, the department noted that he 'has long been a friend and key intermediary' of Maduro and continues to act on his behalf. 'In early 2018, he was accused of hiding funds in Switzerland and Andorra.' Rafael Lacava was re-elected in the controversial regional elections held on May 25, which were widely denounced for lack of transparency, voter repression and the exclusion of opposition candidates, according to VEPPEX. For the Venezuelan exile community, the case of Matías Lacava 'carries deep symbolic weight' because, according to VEPPEX, the United States has been a bastion of hope and refuge for thousands of politically persecuted individuals, and decisions like this send a contradictory message about its stance toward authoritarian regimes. 'We trust that you will take swift and decisive action on this matter,' the letter to the leadership of the State Department concludes.

What to know about Guantánamo Bay as Trump prepares more migrant transfers
What to know about Guantánamo Bay as Trump prepares more migrant transfers

Washington Post

time10 hours ago

  • Washington Post

What to know about Guantánamo Bay as Trump prepares more migrant transfers

As President Donald Trump pledges the largest mass deportation of undocumented migrants in U.S. history, his administration is planning to transfer potentially thousands to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, including hundreds from friendly European nations, starting as early as this week. U.S. officials shared the plans — which are subject to change — with The Washington Post, including some documents, on the condition of anonymity because the matter is considered highly sensitive. The White House declined to comment, but press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted on social media that the plans are 'Fake News. Not happening.' If Trump's plans come to pass, it would be a marked escalation of his use of Guantánamo. Here's what to know about the facility. Guantánamo Bay is a military base that has been operated for decades by the U.S. Navy. It is the oldest overseas U.S. military installation and the only one in a communist country. It's located on the southeastern coast of Cuba, about 400 air miles from Miami. Guantánamo Bay was seized in 1898 by U.S. forces and their Cuban allies during their efforts to wrest the island from Spanish control. The United States formally established a naval base on the bay in 1903, after leasing 45 square miles of land and water from the newly independent Cuban government, according to the U.S. Navy. Since the 1960s, Guantánamo Bay has had its own power and water sources. The base has enabled both Navy and Coast Guard ships to operate in the Caribbean region. It has been used for a variety of purposes including fleet training, ship repair, disaster assistance, and search and rescue support. The prison that holds terrorism suspects at the base was established by President George W. Bush in 2002. It became most notorious for holding suspected terrorists and others captured on battlefields in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the start of the U.S. war in Afghanistan. Since then, the base has been mired in controversy over allegations that the U.S. military tortured terrorism suspects, and it has faced scrutiny over the detention of hundreds of prisoners without formal charges. Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden said they wanted to close Guantánamo. In late January, Trump signed an executive order instructing the Pentagon and the Department of Homeland Security to prepare a 30,000-person migrant facility at the Guantánamo Bay Naval Base. 'We have 30,000 beds in Guantánamo to detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people,' Trump said that month. At the time, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said migrants would not be held with terrorism suspects and that the detention camp would be a place for detainees to stay temporarily while officials made travel arrangements for them to third countries if their home nations wouldn't accept them. The Post reported Tuesday that the foreign nationals under consideration for transfer to Guantánamo include citizens of Britain, Italy, France, Germany, Ireland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Lithuania, Poland, Turkey and Ukraine, and other parts of the world, including many from Haiti. The operation to move migrants has struggled to scale up amid legal, logistical and financial hurdles. In all, about 300 migrants total have been detained there, The Post reported in March. The U.S. government has deployed military planes to transport migrants, an effort that cost at least $21 million for the period between January and April, but only held 32 migrants as of mid-May, NBC reported that month, noting that many of them were likely flown back to the United States. DHS recently requested the expansion of a medium-security detention facility at the base from 140 to 300 detainees, The Post reported. While authorities could detain thousands more migrants there if tents put up by troops were equipped with utilities like air conditioning, Defense Department officials said in March that they held off on taking steps to fix them up for further use without the migrants to fill them. A document recently reviewed by The Post said that 'GTMO,' the government acronym for the base, 'is not at capacity.' Trump administration officials say the plan to send migrants to Guantánamo is necessary to free up capacity at domestic detention facilities, which have become overcrowded. Overall, ICE has detention capacity for about 40,000 people. Human rights groups — which say U.S. government agencies and private contractors have detained asylum seekers and refugees at Guantánamo facilities for several decades — have condemned Trump's plans to move migrants there. 'Migrants and asylum seekers are being cast as the new terrorist threat, deserving to be discarded in an island prison, removed from legal and social services and supports,' the Center for Constitutional Rights said in January, after Trump's announcement. In 1994, for instance, President Bill Clinton resumed the previous administration's use of the Guantánamo base for processing Haitian refugees and later ordered Cuban asylum seekers caught at sea to be held there. Later that year, the migrant population at the base's camps totaled 45,000, according to a government report. In 2024, the International Refugee Assistance Project released a report accusing the U.S.-run Migrant Operations Center at Guantánamo Bay, or GMOC, of detaining migrants fleeing Haiti, Cuba and other Caribbean countries throughout its history. Many of those refugees are intercepted by the U.S. Coast Guard at sea and then 'detained indefinitely in prison-like conditions without access to the outside world,' often 'with little to no transparency or accountability,' the report said. 'These refugees are forced to endure this treatment until a third country agrees to accept them for resettlement, even if they have family in the United States,' it said, adding that the process can take years. John Hudson, Alex Horton and Silvia Foster-Frau contributed to this report.

From student advocate to Capitol Hill, South Florida man credits The Children's Trust for helping him find purpose
From student advocate to Capitol Hill, South Florida man credits The Children's Trust for helping him find purpose

CBS News

time2 days ago

  • CBS News

From student advocate to Capitol Hill, South Florida man credits The Children's Trust for helping him find purpose

While attending John A. Ferguson Senior High School, a friend invited Eleazar Padilla to join The Children's Trust Youth Advisory Committee. "We find that when we give our young people the opportunity to serve their communities, to advocate for their communities, it is incredible the transformation within a community," Danielle Barreras, associate director of community engagement for The Children's Trust, said. The Youth Advisory Committee focuses on service, advocacy, and hands-on community engagement to help families throughout South Florida. Padilla said he was quickly hooked. "I saw a lot of people starting to worry about making sure that they can push for some form of citizenship. They're worried about their family members who were trying to immigrate over. My thought was, 'how do I make sure that people aren't scared?'," he said. Youth Advisory Committee experience changed his life Padilla quickly became vice president of the West Kendall branch, tackling tough topics centering around local elections and homelessness. But it was a prison tour, where he saw a teenager locked up in an adult prison, that led him to double major in sociology and political science. "It blew my mind that there was a minor in a facility with adults, and that person was being isolated because they couldn't be held in the same areas that others were. That drew me to working in juvenile justice," he said. Now a college graduate, Padilla has taken his activism to Capitol Hill. He's working with U. S. House members to push for education reform and labor rights. "Every day I go to work and I see the Washington Monument as I go in, and I see the United States Capitol, and I'm inside and I'm doing my work, and I know, wow, I'm at the center of it all," he said. Padilla said his early work with the Youth Advisory Committee helped him carve out a clear purpose. "The future is just making sure that I can keep fighting, keep giving back to my community as much as I can," he said. Send us your story at MiamiProud@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store