Hundreds greet Kneecap rapper as he arrives at court on terror charge
Demonstrations in support of the rapper were organised outside Westminster Magistrates' Court in London where he arrived on Wednesday, as well as in Dublin.
The Metropolitan Police has imposed conditions limiting where the demonstration outside the court can take place, saying they are needed to 'prevent serious disruption'.
O hAnnaidh, who arrived at court alongside fellow bandmates Naoise O Caireallain and JJ O Dochartaigh, was swamped by photographers outside, with security officers taking more than a minute to usher him into the court building.
Mr O Caireallain and Mr O Dochartaigh sat at the back of the courtroom with three others as O hAnnaidh confirmed his name, date of birth and address to the court at the start of the hearing.
Hundreds of supporters greeted the Kneecap rapper with cheers as he made his way from a silver people-carrier to the building.
Fans held signs which read 'Free Mo Chara' while others waved Palestine and Irish flags before the rapper's arrival at court.
Chants of 'free, free, Mo Chara' could also be heard over a megaphone, which was repeated by the crowd.
In response to the Met imposing conditions on the protest, Kneecap described this move as a 'calculated political decision' that was 'designed to try and portray support for Kneecap as somehow troublesome', and 'asked supporters to go out of your way to be compliant with all instructions issued, irrespective of how pitiful'.
O hAnnaidh received a rockstar welcome when he appeared at the same court in June, supported by Mr O Caireallain and Mr O Dochartaigh.
He was greeted by a festival-like atmosphere for his first court appearance, with dozens of fans waving flags, playing drums and one supporter setting off a smoke canister.
The court previously heard the 27-year-old defendant is 'well within his rights' to voice his opinions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, but the alleged incident at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London, was a 'wholly different thing'.
O hAnnaidh is yet to enter a plea to the charge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Police watchdog closes investigations over decision to charge Caroline Flack
The police watchdog has closed its investigations into the circumstances leading up to the decision to charge TV presenter Caroline Flack with assaulting her boyfriend. Flack died in February 2020, with a coroner ruling that she took her own life after discovering she was definitely going to face a trial. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) initially recommended a caution after the alleged assault in December 2019 - but London's Metropolitan Police appealed and the Love Island host was charged with assault by beating. Various reviews into the way the case was handled have been carried out by the CPS, the Met, and the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) since Flack's death. In April 2024, the star's mother told Sky News she believes her daughter's celebrity status likely contributed towards the decision to charge her. It has now emerged that the IOPC closed its latest investigation, relating to the actions of officers in appealing to the CPS, in January 2025 - finding the outcome was "reasonable and proportionate". An IOPC spokesperson said it received a complaint referral from the Met, which contained "a number of allegations about the force's investigation" into the alleged assault, in March 2024. The majority of the allegations had already been investigated by the force and reviewed by the IOPC, the watchdog said, so it found no further action was required. However, the Met was directed to investigate one aspect of the complaint "on the basis there may be new witness evidence available". This related to the actions of officers in appealing the initial CPS decision, and five allegations were returned to the force's Directorate of Professional Standards (DPS) to "resolve in a proportionate manner", the IOPC spokesperson told Sky News. In June 2024, the Met found there was "no new evidence that would alter any previous outcomes", the spokesperson added, and the complainant asked the IOPC to review once again. "Following that review, in January 2025 we found that outcome to be reasonable and proportionate." A Met Police spokesperson said DPS officers made further enquiries and examined the evidence last year. "It did not change the original outcome that the service provided by officers was acceptable," the spokesperson said. "The family were advised of the outcome in June [2024] and then appealed that outcome to the IOPC. The IOPC carried out a review and, in January 2025, found no new evidence that would alter any of the previous outcomes." Both the Met and the IOPC have closed their investigations. The IOPC said another review could be considered in light of any new evidence. At the end of Flack's inquest, coroner Mary Hassell said the alleged assault had "played out in the national press" following her arrest and had a serious impact on her mental health. In April 2024, her mother Christine Flack told Sky News: "This wasn't domestic violence. This was an accident. But she was portrayed in the court and in the newspapers as a domestic abuser, and that's what hurts. That's what I want got rid of - because she wasn't." She said she believed her daughter was treated differently due to her celebrity status. "And that's not on. She shouldn't be treated better, but she shouldn't be treated worse." This was not the first investigation into the handling of Flack's case, with the Met initially referring itself to the watchdog just a few days after her death. The DPS found there was no misconduct, prompting another complaint from Flack's family to the IOPC. In 2023, the IOPC ordered the force to apologise for not recording its reason for appealing against the caution, but said it had not identified any misconduct. In the days after the TV presenter's death, the CPS also reviewed its handling of the case. Flack's boyfriend, Lewis Burton, had said he did not support the prosecution, and following her death her management released a statement criticising the decision. At the time, a CPS spokesperson said it was normal practice for prosecutors to hold a debriefing after complex or sensitive cases have ended. "This has taken place and found that the case was handled appropriately and in line with our published legal guidance," they said. Flack, 40, presented shows including spin-offs I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! NOW! and The Xtra Factor, as well as one season of the main X Factor show with former contestant Olly Murs, before becoming best known as the host of Love Island. She also won Strictly Come Dancing in 2014. Sky News has contacted Flack's family for comment.
The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Paul Weller SUES accountancy firm who stopped working with him ‘after he claimed Israel was committing genocide in Gaza'
PAUL Weller is suing his accountants who quit after he accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. The singer has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter who had worked for him for 30 years. Lawyers for the ex-frontman of The Jam say he was told the accountants and tax advisers were withdrawing their services. A WhatsApp message from a partner was said to have informed him: 'As a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners we are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller, 67, claim the move discriminated against his 'protected philosophical beliefs'. The musician said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship — it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' He will donate any damages to relief efforts in Gaza. 1 Paul Weller makes cameo appearance in Sherlock finale as a Viking
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Met Police's use of facial recognition tech ‘breaches human rights'
Scotland Yard's plan to increase the use of live facial recognition technology is incompatible with human rights law, the equality watchdog has said. The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said the Metropolitan Police's policies for deploying the technology 'fall short' and could have a 'chilling effect' on individuals' rights when used at protests. Privacy concerns about live facial recognition (LFR) intensified this week as the Met finalised plans to use it on the approaches to, but not within the boundaries of, the Notting Hill Carnival over the bank holiday weekend. LFR links cameras to a watch list of photos of wanted suspects. Biometric data from a person's face is extracted and compared against the list, and a positive match alerts officers who can seek and stop them.
