Fire breaks out at Leicester Royal Infirmary
Multiple fire crews were called to Leicester Royal Infirmary after a fire broke out on the ground floor of the hospital.Leicestershire Fire and Rescue first received reports of a smell of smoke in the restaurant area of the infirmary at 22:55 BST on Saturday. It initially sent six crews to the scene, though 10 appliances were fighting the fire at the height of the incident. Leicestershire Police and East Midlands Ambulance Service were also at the scene. Crews began damping down by 01:39 and finally left the hospital at 06:30 on Sunday. An investigation into the cause of the fire is due to be carried out.
No details have yet been released on the extent of the damage to the hospital.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Doctor tells baby murder trial injuries from 'violent shaking'
A doctor has told a jury she believes injuries inflicted upon a five-week-old baby who was allegedly murdered by her father were caused by "violent shaking".Thomas Holford, 24, is accused of murdering Everleigh Stroud, who was rushed to Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother (QEQM) Hospital in Margate, Kent, on 21 April was having seizures, had a bleed on the brain and a number of other injuries. She died in hospital, aged 14 months, on 27 May the following year, Canterbury Crown Court was of Ramsgate, pleaded guilty to manslaughter in November last year but denies murder and causing actual bodily harm. On Thursday, a statement from the consultant paediatrician who was on duty when Everleigh was admitted to the QEQM hospital was read to the Bushra Malik said she was called to the A&E resuscitation department where "several members of staff were around the bed of a baby girl brought in by ambulance".She was told it was a suspected Non-Accidental Injury (NAI) because of bruising on her face and the seizures she was giving Everleigh a CT scan due to signs of a bleed on her brain, Dr Malik went to talk to the baby's mother to ask about the baby's history."I can recall that Casey Stroud appeared more interested in her phone than she did Everleigh," Dr Malik said in her scan showed a "massive" bleed on the baby's brain, the court heard. "In my professional opinion, due to the age and multiple bruising… the injuries to Everleigh were caused non-accidentally," Dr Malik was transferred to Kings College Hospital in London by air ambulance later that well as brain injuries, she had injuries to her eyes "consistent with an acceleration/deceleration type injury", the court was transferred to a high-dependency unit and it was initially thought should would survive, despite the brain being transferred back to the hospital in Margate for ongoing care, she survived for more than a year before her condition 27 May 2022 at Eveline Children's Hospital in London, the decision was made to withdraw her life support. Arrest footage The jury also heard a statement from Dr Sreena Das, a general paediatrician at Kings College said the fractures to Everleigh's legs and ribs, damage to her eyes and multiple external bruising were typical "when a child is violently held and shaken".She said: "In my opinion the only explanation for the combination of head injuries and different fractures is non-accidental, in particular, violent shaking."The jury was shown footage of the moment Holford was arrested on suspicion of child neglect and GBH on 21 May the footage, it was explained to Holford that police had received an update from the hospital that the bruising on Everleigh's face appeared to have been "done by a person".The arresting officer, PC Lianne Groves, told Holford: "Obviously the only person that was in there with her..."She was interrupted by Holford, who pointed at himself and said: "Was me".The trial continues.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Reaseheath College fined after Crewe student's fingers severed
A college has been fined after a student severed three fingers on his left hand while he was using a saw at the Maguire, from Crewe, Cheshire, was a 17-year-old horticulture student at Reaseheath College, in Nantwich, when he was hurt while cutting a piece of wood with a mitre saw on 20 September were able to reattach his thumb and index finger but his middle finger could not be a case brought by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the college admitted a breach under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and was fined £40,000 at Chester Magistrates' Court. Reaseheath College apologised for what happened to the student and said it had taken "immediate robust action" to address the HSE's Maguire said everyday tasks have become more difficult for him despite his left hand not being his "dominant hand"."I cannot grip things properly and it makes it difficult to do the hobbies I did," he added. The now 19-year-old said he was a keen hockey player and still tried to play but was "nowhere near" the level he was at before the Maguire is due to have an operation on his hand in September which he said would affect his studies at to the HSE, Mr Maguire was seen by a tutor not using the saw correctly but was still allowed to use it later without supervision, before his the sentencing on 4 June, HSE inspector Summer Foster said the injuries would not have happened if there had been proper training, an assessment of competence and appropriate supervision."A young man has been left with life-changing injuries as a result," she added. A spokesperson for Reaseheath College said the safety of its students and staff was its "top priority" and apologised for the added the college recognised the lasting impact it had had on Mr Maguire and commended his "determination in moving forward with his ambitions"."Following this isolated incident, we took immediate and robust action to review where any processes needed to be strengthened and ensured any lessons to be learned were implemented rapidly," they added. Read more Cheshire stories from the BBC and follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Frazer Irvine inquest hears ‘basic care' may have saved his life
A man probably would have survived if ambulance workers had provided "basic clinical care", a medical expert has told an Irvine, 39, died after he called 999 and had a heart attack on 18 March Thursday, Prof Charles Deakin said it was likely Mr Irvine would have survived if the ambulance crew had taken efforts to manage his breathing instead of leaving him face down in his own John Sutherland and ambulance technician Tom Le Sauteur were previously found guilty of failing to take reasonable care of Mr Irvine the night he died. That verdict was upheld at an appeal hearing. Coroner Bridget Dolan KC read extracts from the post-mortem report of Mr Irvine that said he died of a heart attack, with a background of mixed alcohol and drug use, and aspiration - meaning food or vomit in his lungs.A toxicology report found Mr Irvine had a high blood alcohol level, two-and-a-half times the maximum limit to drive, and much lower levels of three different prescription drugs in his Deakin told the inquest in Jersey he did not believe the mix of drugs and alcohol would have caused a cardiac arrest if the ambulance workers had taken measures to manage Mr Irvine's airway. Airway blocked He said the ambulance staff left Mr Irvine lying at the top of the staircase outside his flat in a position that was not the recovery position but was "essentially face down" with his head in his vomit and his hand partly covering his added that it would have "inevitably" blocked Mr Irvine's airway, reducing the amount of oxygen he could take said Sutherland and Le Sauteur could have prevented this by a "number of means" such as repositioning Mr Irvine's airway to open it, suctioning vomit from his mouth and giving him extra said: 'It is basic clinical care to remove vomit from someone's airway, irrespective of what position they are in.' On Wednesday, Sutherland said he and his colleague may have been able to move Mr Irvine down the staircase and get him to hospital if there had not been "huge delays" in the time it took for police to respond to calls for added that the police who did attend were 'outstanding' when they Deakin said he did not believe any potential delay in the police responding to calls for assistance caused Mr Irvine's said when the police did arrive there was a 12-minute window where the ambulance staff could have provided appropriate care that would have given Mr Irvine "a good chance of survival". Shortcomings to be addressed Ms Dolan said it was still a "factual issue" regarding whether the ambulance crew made one or two calls for police she questioned a senior police officer, DCI Mark Hafey, on why the call the police did respond to was categorised as a Grade 2 response, requiring a 60-minute response time, as opposed to Grade 1, requiring blue lights and a 10-minute Hafey said, on the information emergency call handlers had, it would always have been a Grade 2 he did admit that the call handlers should have asked more questions of the ambulance staff regarding the urgency of the situation, which would have changed the call to Grade questioned about the lack of a relevant policy on how 999 call handlers collect information when paramedics call for police assistance, he said police management would review current procedures and address inquest, expected to conclude on Friday, continues.
