
Scientists Say These Daily Routines Can Slow Cognitive Decline
But most of that understanding comes from observational studies, which correlate people's behaviors with outcomes while trying to account for other factors that may interfere with the results. While useful, these do not yield the type of solid scientific evidence that doctors like to act on and strongly recommend to their patients.
A new study published in JAMA and presented at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference, however, may finally provide the stronger evidence that doctors pass on to their patients.
The study included more than 2,100 older adults—ages 60 to 79—who did not have symptoms of cognitive decline or dementia but who were at higher risk for them. Their risk factors included being sedentary, eating an unhealthy diet, having a family history of memory problems or a genetic predisposition for them, having heart disease risk factors, or belonging to certain ethnic groups that have a higher risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer's disease.
The two groups were randomly assigned to one of two lifestyle programs that ran for two years. One was more structured and involved 38 group sessions in which clinicians and participants set goals for meeting certain health benchmarks. It also included weekly online brain- training sessions, appointments to review lab test results with a clinician, and a $10 monthly rebate, provided by the U.S. Highbush Blueberry Council, for people to purchase blueberries. (Studies have linked the antioxidants in blueberries to slower cognitive decline.) The other less-structured group was provided general information about making brain-healthy changes, met in teams about three times a year, and was provided a $75 gift card at each meeting to spend as they wished on healthy behavior changes.
Read More: How to Maximize the Health Benefits of Walking
Phyllis Jones, from Aurora, Ill., had a personal reason for joining the study. 'I watched my mom with dementia for 8.5 years,' she says. 'It was very difficult to watch. But what made it harder for me was that I had seen my mother caring for her mother. So I saw two generations ahead of me go through that.' Joining the study, she says, 'gave me a way to try to break the cycle from happening again.'
At the end of the study, everyone improved on their cognitive function score, but the group following the more structured program showed significantly greater improvement. On average, those in the structured change group appeared to slow their cognitive decline by one to two years.
'Because of the rigor of the trial, the size of the trial, and the care we took in rolling out the interventions, we now finally have scientific evidence that healthy behavior does matter,' says Laura Baker, professor of gerontology and geriatrics at Wake Forest University School of Medicine. 'That's new information. We all think we know it, but until now, we didn't have the science.'
Jones, who was part of the structured group, says that prior to the study, she was stressed out at work and not taking care of her health. 'I was not exercising or eating the right things,' she says. The turning point for her, she says, occurred when her son said, ''Mom, I didn't expect to be a caregiver for you at this stage in your life, not yet.' I knew I had to find a way out of this dark hole.'
While the structured program required more commitment and accountability from the participants, Jones says she didn't feel discouraged or frustrated with making the changes, since the study ramped them up gradually, and she had the support of other people in her group. 'We had team meetings, and instead of starting out with the prescribed 30 to 35 minutes of exercise a day, four times a week, we started with 10 minutes a day and moved up from there,' she says. 'If you are living a sedentary lifestyle, 10 minutes a day is a good start. And then if you can get through the 10 minutes, you can push to 20 minutes and then get to 30 minutes.'
One of the women in Jones' group was Patty Kelly, and the two inspired and motivated each other. Kelly, 81, says she struggled with weight most of her life, and weighed 130 pounds in the third grade. Like Jones, her mother was diagnosed with dementia at 77, and Kelly cared for her for seven years, watching as her mother gradually failed to recognize her family. 'I wanted to make sure my sons did not have to go through that with me,' she says.
Both Jones and Kelly say they are different from when they began the study in many ways. Kelly says her driving has improved, which she attributes to the regular brain-training exercises she did on the computer as part of the study. 'At this point, I'm living my life with my arms wide open,' says Jones, who is now working at a job she loves. 'I'm just having a ball.'
The improvement occurred in people with the APOE4 genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, as well as those without the mutation—an encouraging indication of the power of lifestyle changes.
Read More: 9 Things You Should Do for Your Brain Health Every Day, According to Neurologists
Everyone experiences cognitive decline with age, Baker says. But the results provide reassuring evidence that not all cognitive decline that occurs with age is inevitable. The trial was a continuation of a similar study published in 2015 from Finland demonstrating similar cognitive benefits in people at risk of developing Alzheimer's and other dementias who made behavior changes. The current trial was intended to involve a more diverse population at risk of not just Alzheimer's, but the broader condition of dementia. 'It doesn't reverse the clock but it's very clear that it can slow, and pull back the clock by one to two years,' she says.
Baker and her colleagues determined this by relying on a global score to measure people's cognitive state—the result of a compilation of different cognitive tests that neuropsychologists typically use to assess brain function. The suite of tests is designed to pick up even the smallest changes in cognitive function, something that cognitive tests to detect Alzheimer's can't do.
Baker says she plans to follow the people in the study for another four years to record what impact the behavior changes might have on the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer's. About 30% of the people in the trial showed signs of amyloid, the hallmark of Alzheimer's, in their brain scans, although they did not have any symptoms of memory loss or other cognitive deficits yet. Another third carried the APOE4 gene that increases the risk of Alzheimer's, so Baker says following them will provide better insight into 'how to improve cognition as a means of increasing resilience to decline.'
Maria Carrillo, chief scientific officer at the Alzheimer's Association (which supported and contributed to the design of the study), says that the follow-up will also include looking at the relationship between behavior changes and Alzheimer's medications for people who have the disease to better understand how making such lifestyle changes early might impact the disease's severity. The researchers are also eager to study how the popular GLP-1 weight loss drugs affect cognitive decline, since some early studies hint that the drugs may help to lower inflammation associated with Alzheimer's disease.
The rigor of the study means that doctors can, and should, start talking to their patients about making behavior changes to maintain their brain health, Carrillo says. 'This could be something that if we are able to roll it out—which is our intent—through health systems, clinics and public health organizations, we could create something in which more and more individuals out there understand the impact that their everyday activities have in improving their health,' she says. 'Nobody really thinks about cognitive function, and rarely do primary care doctors ask about it. This will change that.'
The good news is that even those who made changes on their own experienced some slowing in cognitive decline. That also suggests that even if people adopt part of the behavior changes—starting with their diet, for example, if they aren't able to exercise—they might still improve their brain health. 'Anything is better than nothing,' says Baker.
Jones views her new lifestyle as a positive example for her seven-year-old granddaughter, who knows that it's not a good lunch unless it includes a salad. 'She got that from grandma,' she says. She now volunteers as a community educator for the Alzheimer's Association, helping people who are living through the same challenges she faced before joining the study.
It's all about taking the first step, and now there's strong evidence that the effort is worthwhile. 'For people who are already doing these things, it gives them hope that they are saving their brain health, and that's great,' says Carrillo. 'For those who are halfway there, this encourages them to take it to the next level and exercise a little more or eat a little healthier. And for those on the other end of the spectrum—who aren't following the program at all—it gives them hope that if they do certain things, they can indeed change their cognitive trajectory. It's good news for everybody.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
2 days ago
- Politico
Senate appropriators defend the NIH
WASHINGTON WATCH Senate appropriators came out hard in support of the National Institutes of Health on Thursday, giving the agency a $400 million funding boost for the 2026 fiscal year. How so: The Senate Appropriations Committee upped the agency's budget to $48.7 billion in the 2026 funding bill that cleared the panel with a 26-3 vote Thursday. If the bill becomes law, it would increase cancer research by $150 million; Alzheimer's research by $100 million and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS, research by $25 million. The NIH's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Office of Research on Women's Health would each get a $30 million boost. Research on maternal mortality, diabetes and rare diseases would also see an increase, among others. Why it matters: The funding boost is a rebuke from both Republicans and Democrats to the Trump administration's demand to decrease the NIH funding in the next fiscal year by as much as 40 percent, or $18 billion. Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins (R-Maine) said the legislation 'prioritizes funding to help make Americans healthier and supports life-saving medical research.' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), the top Democrat on the panel, said the budget increase was a message to 'the scientists wondering if there will even be an NIH by the end of this administration. This committee's resounding message is: 'Yes, Congress has your back.'' Murray urged scientists to continue their research in the U.S. despite the efforts of other countries to lure them away. The appropriators also adopted an amendment Thursday that would limit the Trump administration's control over NIH research funding. An amendment in the bill's manager's package limits the administration's plan to shift funding for most NIH grants from a multiyear schedule to an upfront single-year payment. The amendment states that no funds appropriated in the fiscal 2026 spending bill can be used to increase the proportion of grants fully funded in the first year of the award, compared with fiscal 2024. The NIH can only increase that proportion of forward-funded grants if the agency ensures it isn't cutting grants to do so. What's next: The bill is cleared for floor action. But congressional leaders haven't started bipartisan negotiations toward overall government funding totals, increasing the odds that lawmakers will again resort to a stopgap funding patch before the next fiscal year starts on Oct. 1. WELCOME TO FUTURE PULSE This is where we explore the ideas and innovators shaping health care. Peacock feathers have reflective structures that can amplify light into a laser beam, Science reports. Share any thoughts, news, tips and feedback with Carmen Paun at cpaun@ Ruth Reader at rreader@ or Erin Schumaker at eschumaker@ Want to share a tip securely? Message us on Signal: CarmenP.82, RuthReader.02 or ErinSchumaker.01. MORNING MONEY: CAPITAL RISK — POLITICO's flagship financial newsletter has a new Friday edition built for the economic era we're living in: one shaped by political volatility, disruption and a wave of policy decisions with sector-wide consequences. Each week, Morning Money: Capital Risk brings sharp reporting and analysis on how political risk is moving markets and how investors are adapting. Want to know how health care regulation, tariffs, or court rulings could ripple through the economy? Start here. WORLD VIEW A draft United Nations plan to make the world healthier no longer includes several targets cracking down on sugary drinks, trans fats and tobacco to prevent and control noncommunicable diseases globally. Struck down: A target of 80 percent of countries taxing sugary drinks at levels recommended by the World Health Organization by 2030, POLITICO's Rory O'Neill reports. That goal was a pillar of the initial draft, which will take the form of a nonbinding political declaration world leaders are expected to endorse at a Sept. 25 meeting in New York, on the margins of the U.N. General Assembly. The latest version has also dropped commitments to eliminate trans fats and aims instead to reduce them to the 'lowest level possible.' It also requires front-of-pack labels with nutritional information. A requirement for health warnings on tobacco packaging to be graphic and accompanied by elements that make it unattractive to consumers is also gone. The new draft has softer language on tobacco advertising, requiring countries to restrict it instead of eliminate it. 'Make no mistake, the Declaration in its current form is a backslide,' said Alison Cox, director of policy and advocacy at the NCD Alliance, in a statement. The alliance is a Switzerland-based civil society group working to promote chronic disease prevention. Why it matters: World leaders aim to reduce premature mortality from noncommunicable diseases such as heart disease, cancer and diabetes by 2030 through prevention and treatment and to improve mental health and well-being globally. Noncommunicable diseases killed 18 million people under age 70 in 2021, according to the WHO. Most deaths were in low- and middle-income countries. The aims align with the U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again agenda, but it's unclear how much the U.S. is involved in drafting the final text. HHS did not respond to a request for comment. What's next: Negotiators are meeting this week in New York to discuss the text.


Business Wire
2 days ago
- Business Wire
Forsyth County Sheriff, Attorney General Urged to Investigate Wake Forest for "Planned Animal Cruelty" Involving Monkeys
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--A national physicians group is asking the Forsyth County Sheriff and North Carolina Attorney General to stop Wake Forest University from committing animal cruelty in a course scheduled for next week involving small monkeys. In a formal animal cruelty complaint filed today, the nonprofit Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine explained that the procedures are likely to cause pain, suffering, injury, and potentially death. The physicians write that they have 'never heard of a single medical center using monkeys' for this type of training. Share The Physicians Committee explained in its complaint that a whistleblower informed it that the course, scheduled for Aug. 4-7, will allow pediatricians in training and others to perform invasive procedures on young vervet monkeys weighing about 2-4 pounds. Among the most invasive procedures to be performed on the monkeys is intubation, in which trainees force a plastic tube through the animals' nasal passages or mouths and into their windpipes. The Physicians Committee points out that intubation can cause bleeding, scarring, injury to the vocal cords, and even fatal complications. Other procedures include inserting thin tubes into the animals' urethras—which can cause painful bladder infections and injuries to the urethra—and using a needle to insert a tube into the artery, which can cause bleeding, infection, and the forming of blood clots. In a related letter sent July 24 to NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, the group called the practice 'unjustifiable and possibly illegal,' pointing out that the animals to be used are part of a colony of vervets that received more than $1 million in funding from the agency earlier this year. It requested that the NIH instruct Wake Forest to cancel the course and halt funding for the colony. The letter to the NIH, signed by a Harvard-trained pediatrician and other physicians, points out that no other pediatrics programs in the United States or Canada use animals. The physicians write that they have 'never heard of a single medical center using monkeys' for this type of training. In a corresponding letter to Wake Forest University School of Medicine Dean L. Ebony Boulware, MD, MPH, they urge her to cancel the upcoming course. The letters to the NIH and Dean Boulware emphasize that most trainees to whom the course is offered never take part and that more than 200 pediatrics programs in the U.S. and Canada teach procedures with lifelike newborn simulators, which Wake Forest owns, and shadowing of senior physicians. "I never harmed animals to become a pediatrician,' said Margaret Peppercorn, MD, FAAP, of Portsmouth, R.I., who signed the letter. 'The NIH should stop this course before it happens and cancel funding for this monkey colony that is failing to benefit patients.' In the letter, Dr. Peppercorn and others point out the NIH's recent effort to prioritize human-based research methods and reduce the use of animals mean Wake Forest's vervet colony 'appears misaligned with the agency's evolving priorities.' The physicians point to experiments conducted using the colony related to Alzheimer's, aging, obesity, and metabolic diseases that failed to benefit patients and that could have been done in humans or with human-relevant methods. One experiment forced 30 female vervets through a maze—including a pregnant monkey who carried her infant during the test—only to conclude that older animals walked slower. A paper published about the experiment acknowledged that numerous human clinical studies have been conducted on the issue but dismissed those studies as 'difficult and expensive.' To see the letter to NIH or speak with Dr. Peppercorn or Physicians Committee Director of Academic Affairs John Pippin, MD, FACC, please contact Reina Pohl at 202-527-7326 or rpohl@ Founded in 1985, the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine is a nonprofit organization that promotes preventive medicine, conducts clinical research, and encourages higher standards for ethics and effectiveness in research.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Three factors will stall dementia and the aging process, according to new U.S. study
By 2050, over 1.7 million Canadians are projected to be living with dementia. This represents an increase of 187 per cent compared to 2020, when approximately 597,300 Canadians were living with dementia, according to the Alzheimer's Society of Canada. Dementia describes the decline of mental ability, while Alzheimer's Disease is the medical term for the brain disease that commonly causes dementia. Researchers are now saying certain lifestyle changes can stave off mental decline. A new U.S. study sets out what Alzheimer's researchers are calling the strongest evidence yet regarding what is involved in slowing the aging process and improving cognition. It comes down to three key factors: a diet heavy on leafy greens, berries and grains, regular moderate exercise and ongoing social interaction. Regular cardiovascular monitoring is also a factor. Jessica Langbaum, senior director of research strategy at the Banner Alzheimer's Institute in Phoenix was not involved directly in the research but she presented the findings at an annual conference of experts in Toronto on Wednesday. The Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) is the largest international meeting dedicated to advancing dementia science and clinical practice. This year's gathering brought together 8,000 scientists and clinicians from all over the world, with the goal of improving diagnosis, risk reduction and treatment. The study pulled together diet, exercise and socialization in one substantial, structured study of 2,100 people in their 60s and 70s at risk of developing dementia, showing that bad habits 'can really slow down memory and thinking' in adults at risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, Langbaum told the PBS New Hour in an interview on Wednesday evening. The subjects who participated in the study changed their habits, shifting from a sedentary lifestyle to an active one and improving their diet over a two-year period, resulting in cognitive function scores on par with people one or two years younger. That might not sound like much, but Langbaum says the results are significant evidence that change can occur without medication. 'And so, it's showing that we can change the trajectory of aging,' she said. There were two groups in the study. In one, lifestyle changes were structurally prescribed. In the other, the changes were self-directed. The results for the prescribed group were much better, but Langbaum says both groups showed improvement. The biggest challenge that study participants faced was sustaining a new exercise regime. Langbaum recommends people find something that they enjoy doing. 'If (you're) frustrated by it, (you're) just going to give up. But do something that you enjoy. Better yet, do it with somebody else or others around you because socialization is key, and lastly, something that you can adhere to, if you can schedule it. It's something that you can stay committed to.' Regarding nutrition she notes: 'We say what's good for the heart is good for the brain, so a nice balanced … nutritious diet with … those leafy greens, low in saturated fats, all of those things.' The American Alzheimer's Association spent close to US$50 million on the study. The National Institutes of Health spent even more to ensure many of the participants underwent brain scans, blood tests and sleep studies aimed at provide additional information down the road. Meanwhile, Langbaum expresses concern that structured intervention may not be sustainable in most communities. 'I think that's really the next stage of the research is, how do we make this scalable in communities so that people can implement these things into their daily lives?' The American Alzheimer's Association is planning to spend another US$40 million on implementing the lessons of the study. Langbaum says that will come with a change in the mindsets of doctors. They 'should be treating lifestyle interventions as they would a drug,' she told NPR. That would mean prescribing improved exercise and eating regimens and getting insurers to cover those prescriptions, she added. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here.