Preliminary report on Air India plane crash likely to be released this week, AAIB officials tell parliamentary panel
Parliament's Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture met here on Wednesday with members making queries and seeking clarifications on the issue of safety and aircraft maintenance.
The members, sources said, talked about the vast expansion of air sector in India, the projected growth and the need to expand the maintenance facilities.
Several members mentioned the aircraft crash in Ahmedabad on June 12 last month in which over 250 people were killed.
The Air India Flight AI-171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, bound for London, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport.
Sources stated that AAIB officials informed the meeting that the preliminary report would be made public within 30 days of the tragic accident.
AAIB officials are also learnt to have told the panel that the black box was intact and its data is being analysed.
The agenda of parliamentary panel was to hear the Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation, on 'Overall review of safety in Civil Aviation Sector'.
The meeting, which began at 11 am lasted till almost 6 pm, with senior officials of DGCA, AAI giving presentations. The panel is chaired by Janata Dal-United MP Sanjay Jha.
Senior officials of Air India, Indigo, Akasa Air were among those present.
On Tuesday, Members of Parliament's Public Accounts Committee (PAC) raised serious concerns over aviation safety following the Air India Flight AI-171 crash in Ahmedabad and the sudden surge in flight fares from Srinagar to other cities after the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, according to sources.
The investigation is being led by the AAIB Director General and includes experts from the Indian Air Force, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL), and the US-based National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is the designated investigation body from the country of the aircraft's design. Aviation medicine and air traffic control experts are also part of the team.
According to officials, this is the first time India is decoding black box data domestically.
On June 25, the memory module was successfully accessed and its data was downloaded at the AAIB Lab, the official said. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
6 minutes ago
- India Today
Despite war and warnings, US traded more with Russia than ally Ukraine
United States President Donald Trump on August 6 announced an additional tariff of 25 per cent on India, taking the total to 50 per cent, making tariffs on India one of the highest in the tariffs, as per Trump, are a sanction against India for importing fuel from Russia. Trump alleges that India, by doing this, has been financing the Russian invasion of data by the US Census Bureau presents a different picture.A deep dive into the monthly trade data of the US with Russia and Ukraine reveals that the US has been doing more trade with Russia than it is with since the war began in February 2022, the US-Russia total trade has stood at USD 25.233 billion, while the trade with Ukraine stands at a mere USD 9.69 we merely look at import data for the two nations, as Trump's major concern is India financing Russia through imports, we see a trend that exposes US hypocrisy. In 2022, US imports from Russia stood at USD 14.43 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at $1.503 billion In 2023, US imports from Russia stood at USD 4.57 billion, while imports from Ukraine fell to USD 1.39 billion In 2024, US imports from Russia stood at USD 3 billion, while imports from Ukraine stood at USD 1.17 billion In 2025, till June, US imports from Russia stood at USD 2billion while imports from Ukraine stood at merely USD 769 trend is clear, in terms of imports. Even though substantially reduced, the US continues to buy from Russia more than it does from all, the US has imported goods worth over USD 22 billion from Russia, ever since Ukraine was attacked, while has only imported goods worth USD 4 billion in the same time period from we take a look at the percentage increase in Indian trade cooperation with Ukraine, when it comes to Ukrainian imports to India, since the the war began during FY 2021-22, India imported USD 3.38 billion worth of goods from Ukraine, as per data published by the Indian Embassy in Kyiv, while in 2024-25 this data stood at USD 1.2 billion, which stands more than what the US buys from the war-torn the data is clear: While the US has accused India of arming and financing the Russian war, it is the US which is financing Russia more than it is financing Ukraine through trade, while India is balancing its partnership without taking a side and without financing any one side.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Economic Times
34 minutes ago
- Economic Times
No direct impact on JSW biz, but sentiment in India will be hit: Parth Jindal on Trump's tariff
There would be no impact on the USD 23 billion-JSW Group's business due to the 50 per cent tariff imposed by the Trump administration, but sentiments in India may be hit, Jindal Cements MD Parth Jindal said on the imposition of additional tariffs of 25 per cent by the Trump administration on Wednesday, Jindal said it was "very unfortunate", and the industry should stand with "whatever route the government of India wants to take" in the national interest."We have to worry about 1.4 billion people here; we don't have to worry about what's happening in other parts of the world," said Jindal on the sidelines of an event statement came a day after Trump ratcheted up tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent, even as the two nations discuss a bilateral trade deal. The trade deal has been stuck over the US demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy market. When asked about the development, Jindal said: "No, there is no direct impact on either the steel industry or the cement industry or the power industry or the paint industry, there is no impact" due to the tariff. However, the managing director, who also heads the paints business of the group, said the "sentiment will take a hit for sure".The export from India to the US is around USD 86 billion, of which around USD 10 billion is pharma, which has an exemption."So, you are looking at about USD 76 billion getting impacted, which is mainly gems and jewellery, textile and a bit of the toy industry and some of the auto component guys," he added. When being asked if the high tariff persists, what would be the industry's demand from the government, Parth said: "I think the government, in their wisdom, is already taking steps to boost the gems and jewellery industry, to boost the textile industry. They are acutely aware of what's going to happen if the tariffs stay and the government machinery is "working double time" on finding a solution."I am sure, Ficci, CII, and Assocham are also working with the government very diligently, and I am sure steps will be taken, but we have to stand by whatever route the government of India wants to take. They are taking the route which is in the interest of 1.4 billion Indians," he the India-US relationship, Parth said It's been three decades of hard work by India and the US to get the relationship back to where it needs to be. "India has spent a lot of time and effort as well on improving the relationship, which started improving under President Clinton and improved with every successive president," Parth who had attended the Howdy-Modi event in 2019 in Houston, said: "I saw the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump. So, I really don't know what's changed". The oldest democracy in the world and the largest democracy in the world are natural allies, and this is just an aberration.
Economic Times
34 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Would you opt something that has 99.9% failure rate? Sanjeev Sanyal compares UPSC preparation as 'opium'
Synopsis Economist Sanjeev Sanyal has criticised the intense focus on India's civil services exam, highlighting its low success rate and the role of coaching centres. He argues that talented individuals are trapped in a cycle of preparation, leading to a misallocation of resources. Sanyal questions the value of pursuing a career path with such high failure rates when other opportunities exist. ANI Economist and PM-EAC member Sanjeev Sanyal (File photo) Economist and PM-EAC member Sanjeev Sanyal has strongly criticised the culture surrounding preparation for India's civil services examination, calling it a massive misallocation of talent driven by what he described as a 'coaching class mafia'. In a recent podcast with CA Kushal Lodha, Sanyal questioned the wisdom of pursuing an exam with a 99.9% failure rate as a primary life goal.'Now tell me how many things are there with a 99.9% failure rate that you would recommend somebody to do unless it has a very large payoff?' Sanyal said, adding, 'If you're going to take such a large risk—why become a bureaucrat?' While clarifying that he was not opposed to those who genuinely want to become civil servants, he criticised the prolonged cycles of preparation many aspirants are drawn into. 'There are people who have now become professional UPSC aspirants... they spend years and years doing it. I think it's a complete waste of human resources.'This is not the first time Sanyal has spoken on this issue. In March 2024, Sanyal was among the first prominent voices to publicly warn about the growing obsession with the UPSC exam. He said, 'Way too many young kids who have so much energy are wasting their time trying to crack UPSC.'Sanyal argued that the most talented students, not average ones, are being pulled into what he called a 'trap.' He said, 'It's the supposedly talented guy in the class because this is the only guy the family will borrow, beg, and send them to live in Mukherji Nagar in Delhi. So we are taking the best people in our system and instead of putting them to some productive use, we are putting them where there is a 99.9% failure rate.' He blamed the coaching industry for sustaining the system, describing it as one that 'sells opium' to aspirants. 'Imagine the product they're selling—it's a product that is going to fail you 99.9% of the time. And it's worse than that, because even the 0.1% who get through are not all going to do exciting things in life,' he noted that only a small number of those who succeed in the exam go on to hold top positions such as Cabinet Secretary. 'The bulk of them will do mostly mundane things,' he said, questioning why similar energy is not directed toward other career paths such as sports, entrepreneurship, writing or the arts. He added, 'The success rates of entrepreneurs are much, much higher than 0.1%.'When asked whether MBA entrance exams like CAT, which also involve high competition, fall in the same category, Sanyal disagreed. 'Many of them get through to something else. I don't think there is a large number of people who take CAT every year for five, six, and seven years.'On the Chartered Accountancy track, Sanyal said it does not fit the same pattern, as most students pursuing CA have a genuine interest in the subject. 'Two to three years is perfectly fine. That's even true for UPSC if that's what you want to do in life. First of all, be clear you want to do that.'Sanyal said the UPSC craze has turned into a culture. 'My experience is that UPSC giving is actually a culture now. Most of those people don't actually want to be civil servants. If they actually showed them the life of a civil servant, they would not want to be there.'He added that even successful candidates often reattempt the exam to join what they perceive as higher-ranking services. 'So that tells me one thing—even the successful people are not happy. So they are now on the opium.'
