
Trump administration releases new JFK assassination records
The Trump administration on Tuesday released thousands of records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy that it said had previously been classified.
Many of the files related to the JFK assassination have already been disclosed, including a tranche of 13,000 documents released during the Biden administration. Many of the documents released Tuesday had been previously redacted, however.
Trump said on Monday that 'people have been waiting for decades' to see the 80,000 pages of records related to Kennedy's assassination. Soon after taking office, he signed an executive order directing the public release of thousands of files related to the assassinations of Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.
The documents were posted to the website of the National Archives Tuesday evening. It may take some time before researchers who have studied the JFK assassination can go through the newly posted 1,123 documents, which were identified only by record numbers and no descriptions.
But there's no indication the files will contain any bombshells, according to one man who's seen many of the records already.
Tom Samulok was a deputy director of Assassination Records Review Board, a government panel formed in the 1990s to study records related to the assassination. He and a team of dozens re-examined troves of documents for public release between 1994 and 1998.
From what he reviewed, there isn't anything to change the current conclusion of Kennedy's assassination: that a lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, was responsible for his death.
'The collection of records that we reviewed, the vast majority of which were released — some were kept classified in whole or in part — if that's what we're talking about, then there is no smoking gun,' he told CNN in a phone interview.
'If there had been anything that cut to the core of the assassination, the Review Board would have released it in the mid-'90s. So there is a sense of what the records are,' he went on.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in a statement that the records contain 'approximately 80,000 pages of previously classified records that will be published with no redactions.'
There are additional documents, she said, that are 'withheld under court seal or for grand jury secrecy, and records subject to section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, must be unsealed before release.'
The National Archives is working with the Justice Department to expedite the unsealing of those records, she added.
Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia who wrote 'The Kennedy Half-Century: The Presidency, Assassination, and Lasting Legacy of John F. Kennedy,' warned that the public could be disappointed in the lack of revelations.
'I'm just telling you that we will learn things,' Sabato said. 'But it may not be about the Kennedy assassination and people who are expecting, you know, to crack the case after 61 years, are going to be bitterly disappointed.'
Kennedy's assassination has long fueled conspiracy theories, some of which Trump has given voice to himself. That is part of why the Review Board that Samulok helped lead was created — to assess whether records related to the assassination could be made public.
Samulok acknowledged he hasn't seen all of the records that could potentially be released.
For example, last month the FBI said it had discovered about 2,400 new records related to the JFK assassination from a new records search following Trump's executive order.
There could also be other records at additional agencies that also haven't been released, Samulok said, that would make up a new bucket of documents previously unseen by his commission.
And he said there could still be points of interest in the remaining records that would help fill in gaps of existing knowledge, including information from the CIA related to Oswald's movements ahead of the November 22, 1963, assassination.
In 2023, the National Archives concluded its review of the classified documents related to the assassination, with 99% of the records having been made publicly available, CNN has previously reported.
President Joe Biden then released a memo certifying that the archivist had completed the review and affirmed the remaining documents authorized to be declassified had been released to the public — meeting a previously set deadline.
Despite past pledges from presidents, including Trump, to release those records, the CIA, Pentagon and State Department still have documents they've refused to release. The justification for those documents remaining classified largely stems from efforts to protect the identities of confidential sources who are still alive, or might be alive, and protecting methods.
During Trump's first term, he agreed not to release the full tranche of records related to Kennedy's assassination at the request of national security agencies. But Trump on the 2024 campaign trail said he would release the remaining documents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
It's Opening Night for the MAGA Makeover of the Kennedy Center
When the curtain rises in the John F. Kennedy Center Opera House for a performance of 'Les Misérables' this week, President Trump is scheduled to be surrounded by supporters who have paid up to $2 million to watch the musical with him. A coup de théâtre earlier this year put the president and his deputies in charge of programming, fundraising and staff at the famous cultural center. Now, a president who skipped Kennedy Center performances during his first term will stride into an institution he has bent to his will.


Politico
25 minutes ago
- Politico
Newsom blasts deployment of National Guard to LA as ‘purposefully inflammatory'
LOS ANGELES — California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday denounced President Donald Trump's plan to deploy thousands of National Guard troops to quell pro-immigrant demonstrators in the Los Angeles area, calling the action 'purposefully inflammatory.' The Democrat's remarks came after Tom Homan, Trump's border czar, told Fox News that the administration planned to send National Guard troops to the area. In a statement, Newsom said Trump was moving to take over the California National Guard and deploy 2,000 soldiers, which the governor said would 'only escalate tensions' after protestors confronted immigration agents making raids on local businesses. Trump's move came without Newsom's signature, presumably by invoking Title 10, the legal basis for activating and mobilizing the Guard. In a social media post, Trump said, 'If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!' The standoff in Paramount, a small city in southeast Los Angeles County, marks the second consecutive day of clashes in the region over high-profile immigration raids. At least 44 people were arrested on Friday on suspicion of immigration violations. Among those arrested was the president of the labor union SEIU California, David Huerta, whose injuries during his detainment required brief hospitalization and set off a wave of condemnation from California Democratic officials, including Newsom. A video of Huerta's arrest showed officers knocking the labor union leader to the ground. In Paramount, federal agents in riot gears squared off against protestors, using tear gas and flash-bang grenades to disperse the crowds. Homan told Fox News that while people had a First Amendment right to protest, there would be consequences for 'crossing the line' and impeding ICE's operations. 'We're already ahead of the game. We're already mobilizing. We're going to bring in the National Guard tonight,' he said. 'We're going to continue doing our job. We're going to push back on these people and we're going to enforce the law.' Newsom, in his statement, said such federal intervention was unnecessary. 'LA authorities are able to access law enforcement assistance at a moment's notice. We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need,' Newsom said. 'The Guard has been admirably serving LA throughout recovery. This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Watch: CNN Stars Troll MAGA Panelist Amid Trump-Musk Feud
A CNN panel teased one of their contributors mercilessly on Saturday morning over Donald Trump and Elon Musk's meteorically messy divorce this week. 'Oh, this is just so horrible. And you know, when this news broke, all I could think of was my dear friend Scott Jennings,' the network's data guru Harry Enten said of his pro-Trump fellow panelist. 'Scott, how have you dealt with this, are you doing okay?' Enten went on, his voice laden with faux concern. 'My heart goes out to you.' A MAGA loyalist and frequent CNN contributor, Jennings has spoken often and enthusiastically in support of both Trump and Musk in the past. His appearance on Saturday, however, came amid the spectacular and rapidly widening rift between the president and his former-top-campaign-donor-turned-government-efficiency czar. Following his departure as head of Trump's cost-cutting DOGE initiative, Musk this week launched a series of vicious and highly personal attacks against the president, taking shots at the White House's budget proposals while accusing Trump of being less than candid about his relationship with late pedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'Yeah, mom and dad are not doing so well right now,' CNN host Abby Phillips put it on Saturday. 'On Friday, (Trump) spent a big chunk of the day, the morning it seemed, calling around to network reporters, including our very own Dana Bash here at CNN and spinning a narrative because, I guess, maybe he was unsatisfied with how this was playing out without him.' Jennings, for his part, seemed content to take his fellow panelists' mockery on the chin. 'I'm perfectly fine,' he responded to Enten, adding: 'I do appreciate you offering to let me stay at your place for a while.'