logo
Plastic Pollution Treaty Talks Collapse Without An Agreement

Plastic Pollution Treaty Talks Collapse Without An Agreement

NDTVa day ago
Switzerland:
Talks aimed at striking a landmark global treaty on plastic pollution fell apart Friday without agreement, as countries failed to find consensus on how the world should tackle the ever-growing scourge.
Negotiators from 185 nations worked beyond Thursday's deadline and through the night in an ultimately futile search for common ground between nations wanting bold action such as curbing plastic production, and oil-producing states preferring to focus more narrowly on waste management.
Several countries voiced bitter disappointment as the talks unravelled, but said they were prepared for future negotiations -- despite six rounds of talks over three years now having failed to find agreement.
"We have missed a historic opportunity but we have to keep going and act urgently. The planet and present and future generations need this treaty," said Cuba.
Colombia added: "The negotiations were consistently blocked by a small number of states who simply don't want an agreement."
Tuvalu, speaking for 14 Pacific small island developing states, said they were once again leaving empty-handed.
"For our islands this means that without global cooperation and state action, millions of tonnes of plastic waste will continue to be dumped in our oceans, affecting our ecosystem, food security, livelihood and culture," the Polynesian archipelago said.
Pollution fight 'cannot end here'
The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the European Union, Britain and Canada, and many African and Latin American countries, wanted to see language on reducing plastic production and the phasing out of toxic chemicals used in plastics.
A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group -- including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Iran, and Malaysia -- want the treaty to have a much narrower remit.
"Our views were not reflected... without an agreed scope, this process cannot remain on the right track and risks sliding down a slippery slope," said Kuwait.
Bahrain said it wanted a treaty that "does not penalise developing countries for exploiting their own resources".
France's Ecological Transition Minister Agnes Pannier-Runacher said: "I am disappointed, and I am angry," saying a handful of countries, "guided by short-term financial interests", had blocked the adoption of an ambitious treaty.
"Oil-producing countries and their allies have chosen to look the other way."
The future of the negotiations was not immediately clear.
Some countries called for a seventh round of talks in future, with the EU saying the latest draft was a "good basis for a resumed session", and South Africa insisting: "It cannot end here."
The talks in Geneva -- called after the collapse of the fifth and supposedly final round of talks in South Korea late last year -- opened on August 5.
Last-ditch scramble
With countries far apart, talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso produced a draft text Wednesday based on the limited areas of convergence.
But it was immediately shredded by all sides, plunging the talks into disarray, with the high ambition group finding it shorn of all impact, and the Like-Minded Group saying it crossed their red lines and lacked scope.
Vayas spend Thursday in a frantic round of negotiations with regional groups, and produced a new version after midnight.
Lead negotiators then held a meeting behind closed doors to thrash out whether there was enough in the text to keep talking. But shortly before sunrise, the game was up.
Dumped, burned and discarded
More than 400 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is for single-use items.
While 15 percent of plastic waste is collected for recycling, only nine percent is actually recycled.
Nearly half, or 46 percent, ends up in landfills, while 17 percent is incinerated and 22 percent is mismanaged and becomes litter.
The plastic pollution problem is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
On current trends, annual production of fossil-fuel-based plastics will nearly triple by 2060 to 1.2 billion tonnes, while waste will exceed one billion tonnes, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In France, Sweltering Is a Climate Virtue
In France, Sweltering Is a Climate Virtue

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

In France, Sweltering Is a Climate Virtue

Most of France has been sweltering under a heat wave this week, so naturally air conditioning has become the latest flash point in climate politics. The climate scolds want to prod the public into adopting what they call 'energy sobriety,' and the French are discovering that in practice this means less AC. This summer the French government suggested air conditioning should be used mainly by those 'who are very sensitive to heat (elderly people, etc.),' or who can't open the window at night because it's too loud outside. The advisory urges the rest of the public to opt for a fan instead, draw the blinds, and limit heat emissions from ovens, computers and game consoles. The government added that if you must use AC, don't set it below 78 degrees Fahrenheit, and air condition only one room. While it may be 'tempting to set your air conditioning to a very cool temperature to cool down quickly,' the French state said that's a green faux pas that 'results in excess electricity consumption.' That suggestion may become a mandate. The European Union has issued a goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, and this year France issued one of its periodic plans for getting there. The report envisions 'intelligent building control systems' that ensure nobody's setting the temperature lower than authorities want. Meanwhile, the French Education Ministry has promoted a 'passive thermal comfort' guide for schools that includes encouraging children to 'wet their skin' to cope with the heat, among other palliatives. The real cold splash of water is the public's realization that climate obsessions come at a cost, and they'll be the saps sweating under its burden. Marine Le Pen of the insurgent-right National Rally said this summer that she'd support an air-conditioning equipment initiative for the French. She's right to see a hot political opportunity.

No Ukraine Cease-Fire From Putin
No Ukraine Cease-Fire From Putin

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

No Ukraine Cease-Fire From Putin

President Trump tried to put the best spin he could Friday on his summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and the mutual pleasantries were effusive. But the substantive news from the meeting seems to be that Mr. Putin refuses to end his war in Ukraine, and he won't even agree to a temporary cease-fire. The killing that Mr. Trump rightly abhors will apparently continue. Mr. Trump was full of praise for Mr. Putin and said the two 'made some great progress today,' though 'we didn't get there' to an agreement. He offered no details about the 'progress' and announced no end to hostilities. He said they agreed on many things but not on the biggest areas, which presumably means a cease-fire and any compromises on Mr. Putin's war aims. There will be some cautionary relief in Europe that Mr. Trump didn't announce a deal with Mr. Putin that he would present to them as a fait accompli. Instead Mr. Trump said he would call European allies and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky to brief them on what happened in Alaska. There's no deal, he said, until there's a final deal, which suggests he is at least listening to what Ukraine needs to feel secure if an armistice is reached. Mr. Putin for his part gave nothing away on Ukraine. He offered his familiar line that the 'root causes' of the war must be addressed before it can end. By this he means blaming Ukraine for wanting to determine its own future as part of the European Union with security help from NATO countries. It was notable that Mr. Putin spent most of his soliloquy in front of the press flattering Mr. Trump, endorsing the U.S. President's view that the war would never have happened if Mr. Trump had been in office in 2022, and extolling the possibilities for U.S.-Russia business ties. With his economy struggling, Mr. Putin wants financial relief. In that sense the Russian achieved one of his major goals from the summit, which is the start of his rehabilitation as a world leader. The summit ended his isolation from the West, and he gave up nothing for it. He also appears to have gained more time to continue bombing Ukrainian cities and slowly taking more territory. It isn't clear what Mr. Trump gained. He had told the press that he would be angry if no cease-fire emerged from the parley, but Mr. Trump showed no pique afterward. Perhaps there was some quiet concession Mr. Trump will take back to Ukraine, and if so we will know that soon enough. If there was nothing but niceties and a Putin stonewall, then Mr. Trump will have to decide if he will follow through on the red lines he has drawn. On Wednesday he had promised 'very severe consequences' if Mr. Putin didn't agree to end the war. Will he now move to impose sanctions on such buyers of Russian oil as China and Turkey as he has India? Or will he agree to a second summit, as Mr. Putin seems to want, in hope that next time will be different? Mr. Trump's desire to be a peacemaker is laudable, but in Vladimir Putin he is dealing with a hard man who has his eyes fixed on conquering Ukraine sooner or later. Mr. Putin will only bend from that goal if he sees a unified West determined to deny him that victory and willing to impose severe costs if he continues his march of death in Ukraine.

Danish PM says Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has become a ‘problem'
Danish PM says Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has become a ‘problem'

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Danish PM says Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has become a ‘problem'

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said on Saturday (August 16, 2025) that Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu has become a 'problem', adding she would try to put pressure on Israel over the Gaza war as her country currently holds the European Union (EU) presidency. 'Netanyahu is now a problem in himself,' Ms. Frederiksen said in an interview with the Jyllands-Posten daily, adding that the Israeli government was going 'too far.' The centre-right leader slammed the 'absolutely appalling and catastrophic' humanitarian situation in Gaza and the new settlement project in the occupied West Bank. 'We are one of the countries that wants to increase pressure on Israel, but we have not yet obtained the support of EU members,' she said. Ms. Frederiksen added that she wanted to consider 'political pressure, sanctions, whether against settlers, Ministers, or even Israel as a whole', referring to trade or research sanctions. Also read: 146 countries now recognise a Palestinian state 'We are not ruling anything out in advance. Just as with Russia, we are designing the sanctions to target where we believe they will have the greatest effect,' added Ms. Frederiksen, whose country is not among those who have said they will recognise the Palestine. The October 7, 2023 attack on Israel by Gaza's Hamas rulers resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally of official figures. Israel's retaliatory offensive has killed more than 61,430 Palestinians, mainly civilians, according to figures from Gaza's Hamas-run Health Ministry, which the United Nations considers reliable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store