TFG share price falls 7% even though sales have perked up since June
Image: Karen Sandison/African News Agency
The Foschini Group's (TFG) share price plunged over 7% on Thursday morning after the clothing and accessories retailer reported that June sales in its TFG Africa segment had flattened, following a first eight weeks of strong sales for the 2026 financial year.
The share price was trading at R110.96 on Thursday morning, which was also 15.3% lower than the price a year ago.
In the first eight weeks of the quarter to end-June 2025, the group reported a strong 9.9% increase in sales due to the timing shift of the Easter holidays into April and favourable winter conditions against a prior-year base impacted by pre-election consumer caution in 2024.
However, June 2025 sales slowed and were flat, while total market retail sales reported by the Retail Liaison Committee (RLC) fell by 4%.
'The impact was intensified by the shift of school holidays from the last two weeks of June into July, leading to higher promotional activity across the market,' TFG's directors said.
Nevertheless, for the three weeks to July 19, 2025, TFG Africa's sales had increased by 9.2%. One hundred new stores were expected to be opened in the 2026 financial year.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
First quarter store sales rose by 3.2%, complemented by a strong online sales performance. The store network expanded by a net 3 stores, bringing TFG Africa's total store count to 3 617.
At the end of the three-month period, TFG Africa's sales were up 5.2%, TFG London sales were up 57.7%, and TFG Australia sales fell by 2.8%. Excluding last year's acquisition of White Stuff, comparable group sales grew 2.5%, and TFG London sales declined by 2.6%.
This brought overall group sales 11.5% higher to R14.4 billion in the quarter. Group online sales grew by 45.5% and now contributes 14.5% to total retail sales, aided by the acquisition of White Stuff. TFG Africa online sales grew by 40.2%, driven by the Bash platform.
Market share gains in South Africa of 50 basis points were reported in the TFG Africa segment, outperforming total market retail sales growth, according to RLC data.
In TFG Africa, clothing sales increased by 4.2% over the same quarter a year ago, homeware sales increased by 8.5%, beauty product sales were up by 24.5%, jewelry sales increased by 0.3%, and cellular sales were up 2.8%.
Credit sales increased by 9.3% and now contribute 28.2% of TFG Africa sales, with the debtors' book growing by 9% to R9.1bn. Acceptance rates for new accounts increased by 0.5% to 20.3%.
In the clothing segment, sales increased by 4.2% while comparable sales grew 0.3%. The segment experienced a strong 7.4% growth in April and May.
The beauty segment maintained strong growth, with sales rising 24.5%, achieving further market share gains in line with strategy.
TFG London was impacted by the continued weak UK economy, but the addition of White Stuff saw sales increase by 57.7%—excluding White Stuff, sales declined by 2.6%. Online sales were up by 55.9%, contributing 43.1% of total TFG London sales.
TFG Australia continued to face sustained high inflation and interest rates impacting the consumer. Sales were 2.8% lower in Australian dollars, with a mixed performance in a highly promotional market.
In the UK, sales growth was 68.8% for the three weeks to July 19. Excluding White Stuff, sales growth was 6.3%.
In Australia, sales contracted by 4.1% in the three weeks ended July 19. However, the economy appeared to be stabilising, with two quarter-percent interest rate reductions in recent months.
BUSINESS REPORT

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Nedbank sells 21% stake in Ecobank for R1. 8 billion
Nedbank has announced that it has "reached an agreement to sell its 21.2% shareholding in Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI) to Bosquet Investments Limited Image: Karen Sandison / Independent Newspapers Nedbank has announced that it has "reached an agreement to sell its 21.2% shareholding in Ecobank Transnational Incorporated (ETI) to Bosquet Investments Limited (Bosquet Investments) for a purchase consideration of US$100 million (R1.8 billion)" . Enko Capital is an African-focused asset management group established in 2008. The group manages alternative and traditional investment funds across Africa and has assets under management of Bosquet Investments is the private investment vehicle of Alain Nkontchou, the Managing Partner and co-founder of Enko Capital Management LLP ('Enko Capital'). The bank confirmed the news in a statement to the media on Friday morning, saying the decision "follows the bank's strategic review of the group's financial investment ETI, which as from 30 June 2025, was classified as a non-current asset held for sale in terms of IFRS 5". Nedbank Group Chief Executive Jason Quinn said, "the bank was pleased to have reached this milestone following the board's approval to dispose of the asset". 'Nedbank's decision to sell its ETI investment follows a detailed evaluation of the strategic alignment, financial performance, and long-term value proposition of the investment and is consistent with Nedbank's ongoing efforts to optimise its capital allocation and focus on core growth areas. "This marks the conclusion of a significant chapter in Nedbank's journey with ETI spanning many years" Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Quinn added that Nedbank remains committed to its African growth strategy but will now concentrate its efforts in regions where it has operational control. The proposed disposal is subject only to the receipt of the requisite regulatory approvals in the relevant jurisdictions, with no other conditions precedent. The transaction is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2025. 'The sale represents a reset of Nedbank's strategy on the rest of the African continent with a clear focus on the SADC and East Africa regions in businesses Nedbank Group owns and controls, and areas where we can play to our strengths.' IOL Business Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel

IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
Pula Group disputes Motsepe's move to South African courts in R3. 4bn graphite dispute
Motsepe and his companies - who have now sought to have the dispute heard in the South African High Court - are accused by Pula of reneging on the Tanzanian graphite mining deal by allegedly investing in a similar project by an Australian rival of Pula. Image: Karen Sandison/Independent Newspapers Tawanda Karombo A bid by billionaire Patrice Motsepe's investment company, African Rainbow Capital (ARC), to have South African courts hear a dispute over a graphite mining deal turned sour has been rebutted by Pula Group, which argues that the case should continue to be heard before the Tanzanian High Court. Pula Group is a US company with interests in Tanzania. It is suing Motsepe owned companies including ARC and African Rainbow Minerals for R3.4 billion for breaching agreements related to a graphite mining deal in Tanzania. Motsepe and his companies - who have now sought to have the dispute heard in the South African High Court - are accused by Pula of reneging on the Tanzanian graphite mining deal by allegedly investing in a similar project by an Australian rival of Pula. Apparently, the two projects are located in the same area in Tanzania. Pula Group now argues that ARC and Motsepe have 'approached the South African High Court in an attempt to shield from the consequences of a R3.4bn lawsuit filed' in Tanzania by Pula Group LLC and its Tanzanian subsidiary, Pula Graphite Partners. The suit, filed on the basis of a breach of non-compete agreement and underway in Tanzania over the past two years, had already been set for a pre-trial conference on August 22. 'ARC's appeal to the South African courts appears to be a strategic attempt to sidestep accountability. What's troubling is the inconsistency in their legal arguments,' stated Pula president Mary Stith. 'In Tanzania, they assert that the parties named in the suit are unrelated yet in South Africa, they claim that a potential judgment against Motsepe, ARM, and ARCH would impact ARC directly.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ This 'contradiction raises serious questions about the credibility' of the South African billionaire and his companies' position, said Stith, adding: 'legal integrity demands consistency, and ARC's approach undermines that principle.' ARC argued in court papers filed in South Africa that 'notwithstanding the fact that Pula Graphite, ARC, Dr Motsepe and ARCH are not parties to the confidentiality agreement, Pula Group and Pula Graphite are seeking to hold them jointly and severally' liable together with ARM. It further argues that the Tanzanian High Court has to apply the law of the Republic of SA in its determination of the case as the confidentiality provisions of the agreement under dispute are based on South African statutes. 'It is our case that a finding on SA law will be dispositive of all the relief sought, first and foremost against ARC, but by necessary implication against Dr Motsepe and ARCH too,' argued ARC. The Motsepe group of companies is being represented by IMMA, Bowmans, and FNB while Pula and Pula Graphite Partners are being represented by Advocate Michael Ngalo and Beatus Malima. Pula chairman and former US Ambassador to Tanzania, Charles Stith, said ARC's move to apply to the South African High Court 'is part of a troubling' pattern. 'ARC seeks refuge in South African courts to avoid facing the consequences of its own actions. Their argument that Tanzanian courts lack jurisdiction is not only legally tenuous - it contradicts their own logic… South African courts should not be drawn into it,' he said. Pula said it has four graphite licenses in Tanzania's rich Graphite Belt, which is among the world's richest in quality and quantity, with its priority project is in the Ruangwa District in the Lindi Region where a second drilling exercise completed in the third quarter of 2023 indicates that there is nearly 145 million tons of measured, indicated, and inferred resource of the mineral. BUSINESS REPORT

IOL News
4 days ago
- IOL News
The struggle for land reform in South Africa: why black farmers are still waiting
The Black Farmers' Association of South Africa says that land redistribution must be transparent, timely, and supportive of farmers' growth from subsistence to full commercial scale. Image: Karen Sandison / Independent Newspapers Black farmers who need to expand their production have pleaded with authorities for assistance after being unsuccessful in securing farm leases from the Department of Land Reform and Rural Development. They say that the delays in accessing land are limiting their productivity and contribution to the country's food safety due to its failure to give them land. One farmer said: 'I have been farming on about 100ha with stud and commercial herds, and have applied for farm to lease more than five times, to no avail.' He added that the only thing that will help farmers like him is a commercial bank, but livestock is not collateral. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Another farmer said: 'I would like to know what criteria the Land Reform Department uses to award land. I have been applying for such a long time to no avail. I am a poultry and bee farmer, and I'm also a vegetable farmer. I have grown from five village chickens to thousands of broiler chickens. The challenge is that I am only using 2,700Sqm of land for residence and farming. 'I farm what I can with limited resources, but grow from there. I would really like a bigger piece of land. The main purpose is to grow at least 40,000 broilers per cycle and bring in goats for milk, and be able to grow the required feed myself.' Dr Lennox Mtshagi, president of the Black Farmers' Association of South Africa (BFASA), said they are fully aware of the frustration expressed by their members regarding the slow and often opaque process of accessing agricultural land. 'The slow pace of land release stalls agricultural expansion, limits food security contributions, and keeps many black farmers in subsistence mode rather than commercial production. Lack of transparency in allocation fosters mistrust, discourages investment, and perpetuates inequality. Farmers cannot plan long-term without knowing if, when, or where they will receive land,' Mtshagi said. He added that since 2019, BFASA has formally engaged the department through written submissions, ministerial meetings, and parliamentary portfolio committee briefings. 'We have specifically called for the immediate release of the 2.5 million hectares currently under the State Land Lease and Disposal Policy, a transparent, published database of land available for allocation and inclusion of farmer organisations like BFASA in the vetting process to ensure fairness and speed,' Mtshagi said. While leasehold can be a starting point, it severely limits a farmer's ability to access bank financing, secure long-term contracts with buyers, and make infrastructure investments such as irrigation systems and packhouses. BFASA has been clear that secure tenure, preferably through full title, is essential for building generational wealth and sustainable agribusiness, he said. He added that the recurring challenges faced by black farmers applying for land include lengthy application timelines with no clear status updates, complex paperwork that is not farmer-friendly, inconsistent provincial implementation of national policy, lack of published criteria for successful allocation, and political gatekeeping, where deserving applicants are bypassed in favour of politically connected individuals. 'We are lobbying for policy change to prioritise ownership models, establishing partnership frameworks with private landowners willing to lease or sell directly to black farmers, using legal channels to challenge unfair allocation practices, and launching a national land reform tracker to monitor DLRRD performance. 'BFASA believes that land reform success depends on partnerships. We propose a multi-stakeholder Land Reform Council with the government, private sector, and farmer organisations. Blended finance models where banks, government grants, and private equity co-fund land acquisition and development, and public-private training hubs to ensure land recipients have the skills to farm commercially,' Mtshagi said. He added that BFASA remains committed to ensuring that land reform is not a political slogan, but a lived reality for black farmers. 'Access to land is the foundation of food security, rural development, and economic transformation. Our position is clear: redistribution must be transparent, timely, and supportive of farmers' growth from subsistence to full commercial scale,' Mtshagi said. Linda Page, spokesperson for the Department of Land Reform and Rural Development, said there is a transparent process for applications for land, which begins with an advert published on the department's website and other platforms, including newspapers. She referred to the Beneficiary Selection and Land Allocation Policy, which lists key aspects, as prioritising specific previously disadvantaged groups, ensuring a fair and transparent process, the policy providing a standardised national land application system. The policy also seeks to ensure that selected beneficiaries have the necessary skills and capacity to maintain and utilise the allocated land productively, among others. On the land that is in the hands of the government, Page said: 'The 2.5 million hectares are already leased out to black farmers and individuals, in line with the policy mentioned above. Therefore, the land in question is already in the hands of black farmers and other black individuals, and it is being used. The department acquired this land through the Pro-active Land Acquisition Strategy, and as indicated, it is leased out for different land use purposes.' She added that this land is not merely acquired and held by the department; it is in use through leaseholds. In 1994, total farm land with title deeds, thus outside what the apartheid government set aside for black people, covered 77.58 million hectares of South Africa's total surface area of 122 million hectares. During his 2024 State of the Nation Address, President Cyril Ramaphosa said: 'Through redistribution, around 25% of farmland in our country is now owned by black South Africans, bringing us closer to achieving our target of 30% by 2030.' This gives a total of 19.3 million hectares or 24.9% of the total of all freehold farmland in South Africa, previously owned by white landowners, that has been restored, redistributed to black South Africans, or moved away to state ownership, according to agricultural experts from Stellenbosch University. Professor Johann Kirsten, the director of the Bureau for Economic Research at Stellenbosch University, said the issue of concern is that the state is now a major owner of agricultural land with more than 2.5 million hectares, which had been acquired by June 2023. This is through the Agricultural Land Holding Account Trading Entity, which acquires land and property under the Proactive Land Acquisition Scheme, implemented in 2006 to allow state ownership for programme lessees. 'Most of the roughly 2,500 beneficiaries have a 30-year lease agreement with the state. There are several farms where no agreement has been signed. The arrangement makes reference to the leasing of land. But there's no mention of the transfer or sale of land to beneficiaries,' he said. In a piece co-authored by Kirsten and Wandile Sihlobo, a senior fellow at the Department of Agricultural Economics at Stellenbosch University, and published by The Conversation, they highlight that calls for the state to redistribute the 2.5 million hectares of land to black farmers have fallen on deaf ears, and black farmers continue to despair. 'The government has been slow to distribute the land it has acquired. This shows that the problem of South Africa's land reform is not only about acquisition but also the distribution of land with title deeds to beneficiaries,' Kirsten and Sihlobo said.