logo
This is the week Scotland was forced to confront its role in slavery, and say: ‘Yes, that was us'

This is the week Scotland was forced to confront its role in slavery, and say: ‘Yes, that was us'

The Guardian12 hours ago
As a child growing up in Edinburgh, I was taught this was a city built on the genius of the Scottish Enlightenment. That story was sunk deep into our bones and passed between us as our treasured inheritance. It formed our sense of ourselves and our belief in Scotland's good and worthy contribution to the world.
We walked past statues of David Hume and Adam Smith. We celebrated their intellect and claimed it as our own. Yet no one spoke of what lay beneath that brilliance – of whose labour built their wealth, whose bodies were stolen, dispossessed and abused as a consequence of their 'thinking'. Edinburgh was framed not as a city of complicity but of genius. That silence shaped us.
Now, the University of Edinburgh's review of its legacies of enslavement and colonialism joins a wider reckoning that has been building across Scotland. It confronts the stories we were told – that we continue to tell. That we love to tell.
Scotland has long positioned itself as a nation on the margins of empire. We speak of being oppressed, victimised – or as a benign participant in the British imperial project. But many of us, through our family histories, have always known that's not the whole truth. It's a lie of omission. One that has excluded us, exiled us from a national story in which we also have histories to contribute, and in which we have a claim.
Edinburgh University's recent inquiry into its history is sobering. It focuses on the institution's financial gains from plantation slavery, its intellectual support of racial pseudoscience and its memorialisation of colonial figures. It names how Enlightenment thinking in Scotland justified racial hierarchies. These aren't revelations for many Black and Brown Scots, or for those involved with Scotland's anti-racism movements – they're confirmations of truths long lived and denied.
And still, we are met with denial, minimisation and the defensive recoil of a nation uncomfortable with the truth of itself. There's a reflex to preserve pride at all costs within our society – even when the cost is exclusion and erasure of fellow Scots; of their histories and their story of Scotland.
The work of uncovering Scotland's pivotal role in enslavement and colonialism has been led by individuals such as the academics Geoff Palmer and Stephen Mullen, Zandra Yeaman at the Hunterian Museum, Lisa Williams, founder of the Edinburgh Black History Walk, and the poet Shasta Hanif Ali, who explores the stories of the Indian ayahs who lived and worked in Edinburgh. Their work has helped us understand long-denied histories and given many of us a stronger sense of belonging as a result. The University of Edinburgh's report adds further weight to their labour. But what comes next?
Race is a social construct. But we must now confront the fact that it was constructed, in part, here, by so-called 'great men' – our great men – whose legacy continues to shape our country and institutions. And their legacy still causes us harm.
This harm is not abstract. In 2024 alone, Police Scotland recorded 4,794 hate crimes under the new Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act. Black and minority ethnic people are 60% more likely to live in the most deprived parts of Scotland than their white counterparts. Black and minority ethnic workers have poorer outcomes than white workers when applying for jobs in our public sector organisations.
These are reverberations of a legacy born in Enlightenment philosophies that theorised racial hierarchies – ideas presented as science, later used to justify enslavement and colonialism. These narratives of white supremacy negatively affect us all, and they continue to endanger and blight the lives of Black and Brown people.
What happens next must therefore go beyond apology and symbolism. It must be structural, sustained and fiercely imaginative. Education is key. Not just to correct the record, but to transform how we imagine and create a better nation. Within our schools, reform is under way – initiatives such as Education Scotland's Building Racial Literacy programme and collectives such as The Anti-Racist Educator provide vital resources and training.
Such efforts must be scaled, funded and politically backed if they're to meaningfully reshape how we understand ourselves, how we embed anti-racism within our institutions and how we teach Scotland's history.
Edinburgh council's Slavery and Colonialism Legacy Review, endorsed by councillors in 2022, included a public apology and the creation of an implementation group, chaired by Irene Mosota, to guide reparative action. This included initiatives such as the Disrupting the Narrative project, which has formed the main body of my work as Edinburgh makar (the city's poet laureate). The meetings of the Scottish BPOC Writers Network's writers group at the University of Edinburgh, and the important work of mentorship and support from We Are Here Scotland are also living examples of this reparative work. This work is not symbolic – it is foundational. It allow us to rebuild from the margins, and write ourselves back into the story of Scotland, and into the story we tell.
This is a live, unfinished conversation – one that must embrace intersectionality, mobilise solidarity and resist the far right's weaponisation of pseudoscience and historical denial. Opposition to anti-racism is often framed as resistance to 'political correctness', and calls for decolonisation are frequently mocked or deliberately misunderstood. Silence, however, is complicity.
History is not settled. Our story is not finished. We are capable of confronting ourselves honestly and critically. We can take pride in our history of social justice movements – but this pride must also own and acknowledge the truth of what and who built this nation. That means interrogating our past and the reasons for our collective amnesia. It means listening to voices long silenced. The time has come, Scotland. The time has finally come.
Hannah Lavery is a Scottish poet and playwright. She will be appearing in Disrupting the Narrative – a Performance, at the Edinburgh international book festival
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exhibition showcases vision behind design of Scottish Parliament building
Exhibition showcases vision behind design of Scottish Parliament building

STV News

time14 minutes ago

  • STV News

Exhibition showcases vision behind design of Scottish Parliament building

A new exhibition exploring how Enric Miralles brought to life his vision of a Scottish Parliament 'growing out of the land' is now open to the public at Holyrood. Enric Miralles: Creating the Scottish Parliament and other stories by Benedetta Tagliabue and EMBT opened at the Scottish Parliament on Thursday and will run until October 30. Construction began on the Scottish Parliament in June 1999 on the site of an old brewery. But the hangover from the devolution project lingered for years as costs spiralled and an inquiry found flaws in the management of the whole project. iStock Scottish Parliament. iStock Now a new exhibition inside Holyrood showcases Miralles vision for the building, featuring more than 50 models and some of his early drawings. These include hand-drawn concept images, sketches, collages, site studies, and competition boards from the Fundació Enric Miralles archives. Barcelona-based architecture studio EMBT, founded by Miralles and his partner Benedetta Tagliabue, won the international competition to design the Scottish Parliament in 1998. They collaborated with Edinburgh-based firm RMJM to deliver a building that would reflect Scotland's identity. Their design aimed to create 'a new Parliament that embodied the values of Scotland, a space rooted in its landscape, traditions and people.' The work on display captures the essence of that vision, much of it developed under the leadership of Tagliabue following Miralles' untimely death in 2000. STV News Miralles exhibition. STV News His work was carried on by his wife, who helped curate the free exhibition. Benedetta Tagliabue told STV News: 'Through the archives, opening drawers, looking at the notebooks, reading things, was very emotional. 'But I tried to control the emotion and at the same time I love having all this material now on display to everybody.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims
Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims

Telegraph

time15 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after small boat terror claims

The Home Office tried to silence Robert Jenrick after he said terror suspects had arrived in Britain on small boats. In an article for The Telegraph last year, Mr Jenrick, the former immigration minister, claimed that individuals linked to Islamic State had 'waltzed right in' to Britain across the Channel. It can now be revealed that a fortnight later, the Home Office's most senior civil servant reprimanded him over the disclosure. Sir Matthew Rycroft, the department's then permanent secretary, wrote to Mr Jenrick to tell him the information 'should not have been made public' and warned him against 'any further disclosure' of sensitive information from his time in government. On Saturday, critics said the move showed that the Government was trying to 'suppress' concerns about the security implications of mass migration. During his spell as immigration minister between October 2022 and December 2023, Mr Jenrick would have had access to sensitive information and security briefings, including about migrants crossing the Channel. The Home Office has neither confirmed nor denied the veracity of Mr Jenrick's claims and is understood to have had concerns that they could undermine national security. In his letter, Sir Matthew argued that the former immigration minister was bound by rules that prohibit the disclosure of sensitive information, including the ministerial code and the Official Secrets Act. Sir Matthew is also understood to have confirmed that Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, was personally aware that he was issuing the reprimand. The revelation comes amid wider concerns about the Government's attitude towards free speech, especially on contentious topics such as migration. This week it emerged that a secretive Whitehall 'spy' unit has been used to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two-tier policing'. That prompted the White House to say it was monitoring the situation surrounding freedom of expression in the UK 'closely and with great concern'. Allies of Mr Jenrick expressed concern that the Home Office was trying to deter him from speaking out on security concerns around migration. Bradley Thomas, the Tory MP for Bromsgrove, said: 'Any attempt by the Home Office to suppress news of such significant national security importance is a disgrace. 'Robert Jenrick resigned from the Home Office on a point of principle and he has been clear that mass migration has not been good for our country. 'Robert's principled stance has seen him consistently challenge the failings of the immigration system to keep our country secure and prosperous.' He said that Ms Cooper's 'implicit awareness' that the reprimand was being issued was 'a dereliction of her duty to the British people'. Lewis Cocking, the Tory MP for Broxbourne, said that the warning to Mr Jenrick represented 'political overreach from the Civil Service'. 'They shouldn't be telling an elected Member of Parliament what they should or shouldn't be saying about illegal immigration,' he said. 'It's just another example of why we need a total overhaul of the Civil Service, to get them back working in the interests of ordinary British people. 'Labour Ministers have failed to give me clear answers on how many small boat arrivals fail criminality checks, and this suggests they are working with civil servants to keep the reality of the situation hidden from the public.' Ministerial code Former ministers continue to be bound by the ministerial code, which sets out the standards for their conduct, after they have left office. Mr Jenrick is also on the Privy Council, which advises the sovereign on matters of state, and whose members are subject to extra confidentiality obligations. It is understood that it is not unusual for officials to remind both current and former ministers of their responsibilities under those rules. Mr Jenrick declined to comment. The news comes as Labour is under growing pressure over its handling of the small boats crisis, with the number of crossings this year having already topped 25,000. Officials were forced to send migrants to a controversial overflow hotel in Canary Wharf on Saturday after almost 900 arrived on Wednesday.

Yvette Cooper's fast-track asylum plan revealed as protests erupt again
Yvette Cooper's fast-track asylum plan revealed as protests erupt again

Times

time27 minutes ago

  • Times

Yvette Cooper's fast-track asylum plan revealed as protests erupt again

The home secretary is set to introduce a new fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog so that decisions can be made in weeks rather than years. As the pressure to cut the number of people waiting in hotels for asylum decisions grows, Yvette Cooper is expected to introduce a new law this autumn to overhaul the appeal system. It comes as the first 60 migrants were moved into the four-star Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf, east London, on Friday night under cover of darkness. There was a small anti-migrant protest outside the Britannia on Saturday afternoon, while much bigger groups of both anti-migrant and anti-fascist protesters congregated outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in central London, which also houses asylum seekers, and in the centre of Manchester where hundreds of people marched as part of a protest organised by Britain First, a far-right group. Anti-immigrant protesters in Manchester JAMES SPEAKMAN FOR THE SUNDAY TIMES Home Office figures show that more than 25,000 migrants have attempted to cross the Channel to the UK in small boats this year — the earliest the figure has been reached. Cooper will also tighten the rules surrounding the interpretation of 'exceptional circumstances' in immigration cases and the use of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to family and private life. In an interview with The Sunday Times, Cooper said: 'We need a major overhaul of the appeal [process] and that's what we are going to do in the autumn … if we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers in the asylum system, because that is the best way to actually restore order and control.' A source familiar with the plans said the aim would be to compress the process so that decisions and returns could be 'made within weeks'. It is understood the system would look similar to a scheme Labour operated while last in government, which was abandoned after judges ruled it was 'structurally unfair' after about 99 per cent of claims were refused. Asylum seekers who are refused sanctuary in Britain are seeing their appeals take an average of 54 weeks to be heard. There were 50,976 outstanding appeals as of March, which is almost double the number compared with 2024 and seven times higher than in 2023, figures show. It is the highest the backlog has ever been and comes on top of the almost 79,000 asylum claims awaiting an initial decision. Residents at the Thistle City Barbican hotel in central London watch from their windows… LUCY NORTH/PA … as anti-immigration protesters gather outside. PA While they wait, many asylum seekers receive state support in the form of accommodation such as hotels — with a bill of £2.1 billion for the taxpayer in the year to March — and a weekly allowance of between £8.86 and £49.18 per person depending on other support. Those who register appeals are entitled to legal aid, at about £820 a case. Of those who received an initial asylum decision in the year to March, just under half (49 per cent) were granted asylum. In the year to March 2024, it was 61 per cent. The proposed changes will cap a series of announcements this summer aimed at restoring order and control in the system. This weekend, Cooper has announced plans to outlaw social media adverts promoting journeys on small boats to asylum seekers or jobs in the black market aimed at luring migrants to the UK. Offenders could receive up to five years in prison and a hefty fine. Home Office analysis shows that approximately 80 per cent of migrants arriving via small boats told officials that they used social media during their illegal journey to the UK, including to locate or communicate with an agent or facilitator associated with an organised crime group. Under an amendment to the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill going through parliament, a new UK-wide offence will be introduced to criminalise the creation of material for publication online which promotes or offers services facilitating a breach of UK immigration law. This could include small boat crossings, the creation of fake travel documents like passports or visas or explicitly promising illegal working opportunities in the UK. Cooper said: 'Selling the false promise of a safe journey to the UK and a life in this country — whether on or offline — simply to make money, is nothing short of immoral. 'These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. We are determined to do everything we can to stop them — wherever they operate. 'We have to stay one step ahead of the ever-evolving tactics of people-smuggling gangs and this move, part of our Plan for Change to boost border security, will empower law enforcement to disable these tactics faster and more effectively, ensuring people face proper penalties.' The government's 'one in one out' deal with France is also expected to begin in the coming weeks, with people arriving in the UK via small boats being returned to France in exchange for the UK accepting an asylum seeker from France who can demonstrate a genuine family connection to Britain. According to The Times, the pilot scheme is expected to see only up to 50 asylum seekers a week being returned to France, with the same number coming in exchange to the UK. However, Cooper disputed the figure and said: 'We are not fixing numbers. We're very clear we want to operate this as extensively as possible.' • 'One in, one out' migrant deal: what are the key plans? Introducing a fast-track scheme to process asylum decisions is expected to require an injection of cash from the Ministry of Justice to increase the number of judges and court sitting days. Spelling out her ambition to the home affairs select committee in June, Cooper said: 'One of the things I have always been keen to do is to have a system for fast-track decisions and appeals. 'If people arrive from predominantly safe countries, they should not be sitting in the asylum system for a long time. We should be able to take those decisions really quickly, and make sure that those people go through the appeals system really quickly and are returned really quickly as well. That would mean a fast-track system alongside the main asylum system, and it would be really important in making sure that the system is fair. It will require legislation in order to be able to do that, as well as new system design … I think there should be faster tracks for those cases so that we can get them through the system really quickly.' Last week, as he arrived for a visit to Scotland, President Trump said the 'invasion' of migrants is 'killing' Europe and told politicians to 'get their act together'. Responding to his claims, Cooper blamed the previous Conservative government. 'We inherited a broken immigration system and a broken asylum system,' she said. 'And what we're doing is putting in place the foundations to restore order and control to both systems.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store