Olympic Games thrown into chaos as bombshell NCAA rule change sparks huge cuts across the board
As predicted by several groups of NCAA coaches, major universities are already cutting Olympic sports programs after a recent federal court decision allowing schools to pay student athletes.
Last week, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved a $2.8 billion settlement nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA to lift restrictions on revenue sharing. Wilken's approval permits schools to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year, while also allowing $2.7 billion to be paid to former players previously barred from receiving such payments.
Although one of House's attorneys described the ruling as 'a fantastic win for hundreds of thousands of college athletes,' there remain concerns about the future of non-revenue sports, such as track and field or wrestling.
Those fears appeared to come to fruition on Tuesday as Washington State drastically consolidated its track-and-field program and the University of Louisiana Monroe cut its women's tennis team entirely.
In total, 32 Division I Olympic sports programs have been slashed since May, when the House settlement was first announced. And that doesn't include St. Francis, a Pennsylvania college that recently announced its decision to move from Division I to Division III in anticipation of the new financial landscape in college sports.
Critics predicted last week the ruling would lead to such programs being cut by schools.
'We are concerned that the new financial obligations placed on schools will force administrators to divert their attention and resources away from non-football and non-basketball sports – the programs where the majority of NCAA student-athletes participate,' the coaching associations for volleyball, wrestling, track and field, and swimming and diving wrote in last week's statement.
'This is no hypothetical. Budget cuts and program eliminations have already taken place in anticipation of today's outcome, and more are likely to follow.'
The next programs to face the chopping block could be track-and-field or swimming-and-diving teams, as US Track and Field and Cross Country Coaches Association representative Nick Lieggi told Front Office Sports.
'Schools can drop their jumping and throwing program or their diving program, getting rid of the relevant coaches and athletes, without having to worry about their sport sponsorship numbers,' Lieggi said.
The exact impact of the court ruling on NCAA sports is difficult to quantify. Neither Washington State nor Louisiana Monroe blamed it for their respective cost-cutting moves, although both are impacted by the ruling.
Coaching associations in the Olympic sports, such as tennis or track, are continuing to fight this trend. According to FOS, several have hired lobbying firm FGS Global to work on their behalf.
'Congress must intervene to address these pressing issues and ensure a balanced, equitable path forward for all student-athletes, including the protection of existing requirements of schools to maintain robust sport sponsorship and meaningful allocation of resources for non-football and non-basketball programs,' read an FGS Global statement following last week's ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fan climbs netting at Wrigley Field to retrieve Sal Frelick's bat
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
US joining Israeli strikes would cause hell, Iranian minister tells BBC
The US joining Israeli strikes would cause "hell for the whole region", Iran's deputy foreign minister has told the Khatibzadeh said this is "not America's war" and if US President Donald Trump does get involved, he will always be remembered as "a president who entered a war he doesn't belong in".He said US involvement would turn the conflict into a "quagmire", continue aggression and delay an end to the "brutal atrocities". His comments came after the Soroka hospital in southern Israel was hit during an Iranian missile attack. Iranian state media reported that the strike targeted a military site next to the hospital, and not the facility itself. Israel's Ministry of Health said 71 people were injured during the attack on the Soroka Medical Centre. Meanwhile, Israel's military said it had targeted Iran's nuclear sites including the "inactive" Arak heavy water reactor and Natanz has not given an update on casualties in Iran from Israeli latest attacks come at a critical time. On Thursday, the White House said Trump would decide whether or not the US gets directly involved in the conflict within the next two to the BBC, Khatibzadeh insisted that "of course, diplomacy is the first option", but said but while bombardment continues "we cannot start any negotiation".He repeatedly called Iran's attacks on Israel "self defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter" and said "we were in the middle of diplomacy" when in a major escalation of the conflict on 13 June, Israel launched attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, killing several top generals and nuclear deputy foreign minister called the conflict "unprovoked" and "unnecessary". Responding to Trump's repeated comments that the conflict could have been avoided if Iran had accepted a nuclear deal, Khatibzadeh said they were negotiating until Israel "sabotaged" discussions by launching attacks Iran. "We were planning to have the sixth round of nuclear talks in Muscat, and we were actually on the verge of reaching an agreement," he said. "President Trump knows better than anybody else that we were on the verge of reaching an agreement." He also criticised Trump's "confusing and contradictory" social media posts and interviews, which he said indicated "that Americans have been aware and have participated" in the conflict. US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have reportedly spoken on the phone several times since Friday, in a bid to find a diplomatic end to the crisis, Reuters reported. According to three diplomats who spoke to the news agency and asked not to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter, Araqchi said Tehran would not return to negotiations unless Israel stopped the attacks. Israel has alleged Iran has recently "taken steps to weaponise" its enriched uranium stockpile, which can be used for power plants or nuclear bombs. Iran has always claimed that its nuclear programme is entirely Friday, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - the UN's nuclear watchdog - said Iran had amassed enough uranium enriched up to 60% purity - a short technical step away from weapons grade, or 90% - to potentially make nuclear bombs."This is nonsense," Khatibzadeh said in response. "You cannot start a war based on speculation or intention."If we wanted to have a nuclear bomb, we would have had it way before."Iran has never developed any programme for nuclear weaponisation of peaceful nuclear activities. Bottom line." IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked, regardless of the context or circumstances, as it could harm both people and the environment". Khatibzadeh also discussed potential diplomatic channels after a G7 summit in Canada. He said: "What we are hearing from Europeans is that they would like to get back to diplomacy at a ministerial level"."They are going to have a meeting in Geneva and we are very much happy that finally they have to come and talk at the table about the issues at hand."
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
CNN data analyst says Americans agree with Trump on keeping Iran nuke free: A lot more popular than ‘would think'
The majority of Americans agree with Donald Trump that Iran should not be able to produce nuclear weapons, analysis by CNN has shown. Just under 80 percent of U.S. adults surveyed by the broadcaster in April – some two months before the latest escalations in the Middle East – agreed with the president, with clear majorities among both Democrats and Republicans. 'I think it's a complicated picture overall, but on this particular question and overall, I feel like there's more support for Donald Trump 's positions than is commonly acknowledged,' CNN data analyst Harry Enten said, in a segment on Thursday. Some 79 percent of adults said that Iran 'cannot get nuclear weapons,' Enten said, adding that, when split down party lines, 83 percent of Republicans and 79 percent of Democrats agreed. 'When you get 79 percent of Democrats and 83 percent of Republicans agreeing on anything, you know that that position is the very clear majority in this country,' Enten said. 'And so the American public is with Donald Trump. They definitely oppose Iran getting nuclear weapons.' Back in February, Trump signed a national security presidential memorandum restoring 'maximum pressure' on Tehran aimed at 'denying Iran all paths to a nuclear weapon, and countering Iran's malign influence abroad'. ' AMERICA FIRST means many GREAT things, including the fact that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' the president wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. However, despite this unwavering stance, he has yet to decide on whether the U.S. should intervene in the escalation conflict between Israel and Iran. On Thursday the president said he would decide on whether to order U.S. warplanes to strike Iranian nuclear facilities within the next two weeks depending on whether or not Tehran engages in talks over ending their nuclear weapons program. Back on CNN, Enten discussed the opinion of the American people on entering the conflict to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear capability, noting again that polling had been done in April – prior to the recent escalations with Israel. 'If you buy Donald Trump's theory of the case… Iran's trying to make a nuclear weapon… overall, you get the slight plurality. I mean, it's within the margin of error, but the slight plurality of Americans actually favor U.S. airstrikes (48 percent) compared to 47 percent opposing it,' Enten said. However, he noted: 'If Iran is trying to make nuclear weapons… 69 percent of Republicans, the clear vast majority of Republicans favor U.S. airstrikes on Iran, on their nuclear facilities.'
