Minister hails ‘remarkable turnaround' of renationalised train operator
Lord Hendy described TransPennine Express (TPE) as 'the blueprint for Great British Railways (GBR)'.
The Labour Government began renationalising all remaining franchised train operators in Britain on Sunday, by bringing South Western Railway under public control.
The process is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2027.
Rail minister Lord Hendy (right) said 'these impressive results demonstrate what happens when we put passengers and communities first' (Andrew Matthews/PA)
TPE, which runs trains across northern England and into Scotland, was renationalised under the Conservative government in May 2023 because of poor performance.
Its reliability was badly affected by drivers no longer volunteering to work paid overtime shifts.
Britain's train services were privatised in the mid-1990s.
Services now under public control are owned by DFTO (Department for Transport Operator) until GBR is established.
DFTO said TPE has reduced cancellations by 75% and recorded a 42% growth in passenger journeys over the past two years.
It added that the operator generated £1.4 billion in 'economic value' during the 2023/24 financial year.
TPE launched an improvement plan in October 2023 which prioritised stabilising operations.
Lord Hendy said: 'TransPennine Express's remarkable turnaround shows exactly why we're bringing our railways back into public ownership as part of our plan for change.
'These impressive results demonstrate what happens when we put passengers and communities first rather than private profit.
'This is the blueprint for Great British Railways: a reliable, accessible and value for money railway that serves the public and drives economic growth not only across the North but the whole country.'
TPE managing director Chris Jackson said: 'Public ownership gave us the space and stability to reset.
'Our focus has been on people, our passengers, our colleagues and the communities we serve.
'Two years on, we're proud to be delivering a better, more reliable railway for the North.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
40 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Fact check: Reform UK migrants claim and minister's inflation mix-up
These figures can't tell us exactly how many have arrived under Labour, as they cover roughly six months of the last Conservative government and the first six months of Labour. The next set of figures, which will cover the year ending June 2025 and are expected to be published in the autumn, will more reliably tell us about the change under Labour.
ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
SNP group on D&G Council say they have officially called for a vote of no confidence
The SNP group on Dumfries and Galloway Council say they have officially called for a vote of no confidence in the leadership. It comes after seven Conservative councillors left the party, making the SNP the biggest group. Councillor Gail MacGregor has been the leader of the Conservative administration since 2023, when an SNP-led rainbow coalition collapsed. SNP group business manager Councillor Katie Hagmann told ITV Border her party had submitted a no confidence motion that has received cross party support. The vote is expected to take place at a special full council meeting in the coming days. In February, councillors voted through the opposition SNP budget. Councillor Katie Hagmann said the administration was in 'disarray.' She added: 'We have submitted a motion of no confidence in the current administration. There is likely to be an announcement of a full council meeting and we are calling for the removal of the convener and the deputy convener, which is also the leader of Dumfries and Galloway council. "It is not acceptable the way that the administration is acting and the SNP group are the biggest group within the whole of the council and this is an snp budget that's been passed. "We've got business to do, we've got to deliver for the people of Dumfries and Galloway and we're determined to do that." The Conservative rebels have formed two separate groups. Councillors Andrew Giusti, Chrissie Hill, David Inglis and Richard Marsh have formed a new group called Novantae. The three other councillors Ian Carruthers, Karen Carruthers and Andrew Wood, have formed a separate independent group. A spokesperson for the Scottish Conservatives said: 'We wish them well.' The rebellion means that the Conservative group shrinks from 16 to nine and raises questions over the viability of the current administration. The political make-up of the council is now: 11 SNP members; nine Scottish Conservatives; eight Scottish Labour; one Scottish Liberal Democrat; 14 independent / other. A spokesperson for Dumfries and Galloway Council said: 'Dumfries and Galloway Council can confirm that seven councillors have resigned from the Conservative group. The council's website has been updated. 'Four of the councillors have formed a new political group called Novantae – councillors Richard Marsh, Chrissie Hill, Andrew Giusti and David Inglis. 'Three of the councillors have informed council officers that they have set up a separate group and they intend to call it The Dumfries and Galloway Independent Group. These are councillors Ian Carruthers, Karen Carruthers and Andrew Wood. 'The council will not be commenting further at this time.'
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Public ownership ‘not the answer' says Reed after Thames Water deal collapse
Steve Reed said nationalisation was 'not the answer' to a failed bid to rescue the debt-laden utility, after private equity giant KKR pulled out of a deal which would have seen around £4 billion of new equity invested into the firm. At the despatch box, Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins accused ministers of having 'talked themselves out of' a rescue plan. Thames Water faces around £19 billion of debt and the company's chairman Sir Adrian Montague previously warned the Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee that there were 'hair-raising' moments in the last year when the firm had five weeks' worth of cash left before going bust. At the despatch box, Mr Reed told MPs: 'The Government stands ready for any eventuality and will take action as required. 'We are not looking at nationalisation because it would cost over £100 billion of public money that would have had to be taken away from other public services like the National Health Service to be given to the owners of the water companies. 'It will take years to unpick the current model of ownership, during which time pollution would get worse and we know that nationalisation is not the answer – you only have to look at the situation in Scotland to see that.' In his question, Labour MP for Norwich South Clive Lewis had earlier told the Commons: 'The collapse of KKR's rescue deal isn't a blip, it's a reckoning – a moment that exposes the complete bankruptcy of the privatised water model. 'This morning's interim (Sir Jon) Cunliffe review into the water sector confirms the scale of the crisis. He describes our water system, a regulated statutory monopoly, as now too risky for investors. 'Too risky – but it didn't seem too risky when shareholders were siphoning off billions in dividends while letting the pipes rot, rivers choke and the debt pile up.' Mr Lewis urged the Government to 'stop fiddling, put Thames Water into special administration, strip out the debt, and begin the job of returning our water system – not just Thames – back into public ownership'. Sir Jon recommended that 'to attract such long-term investors' into water companies, risks 'need to be lower than they are presently', ahead of a final report later in summer. Mr Reed earlier said that 'the Government will respond in full to the (Independent Water) Commission's final report in due course and outline further steps to benefit customers, attract investment and clean up our waterways'. Ms Atkins said Thames Water's 16 million water supply and sewage customers throughout London and southern England 'will be concerned at the news this morning that private equity firm KKR have pulled out of their rescue deal with Thames Water'. She continued: 'According to a source close to KKR, one of the reasons they pulled out was because they were concerned about negative rhetoric directed at Thames Water and the rest of the industry in recent weeks by the Secretary of State and other ministers; in other words, the Secretary of State and his ministers have talked themselves out of this rescue deal.' Ms Atkins asked whether the Government's options 'include a plan for temporary renationalisation', which she warned could dent Mr Reed's environment, food and rural affairs budget by up to £4 billion. Mr Reed replied that it was not 'particularly clever to stand at the despatch box opposite and make up figures to attack', and continued: 'This Government stands ready for all eventualities but I will make no apology for tackling the poor behaviour of water companies and water company executives that took place under the previous government and that we are correcting. 'I mean, we even had stories that have been confirmed by water companies of previous Conservative secretaries of state shouting and screaming at water company bosses but not actually changing the law to do anything about the bonuses that they were able to pay themselves.' The minister said the Government was working with customers, companies and investors to 'ensure that we have a successful water sector that works for the environment and for customers and for investors'. Liberal Democrat environment spokesman Tim Farron said the company should go into special administration and emerge 'as a public interest company'. He added: 'Thames Water's customers have been left in the lurch, and the Conservatives seem to think it's all because we've all been a bit too mean about Thames Water. The price must not be paid by the customers. 'Will he ensure that those who are responsible for making dreadful decisions rightly bear the cost instead?' Mr Reed replied: 'There is a procedure to be followed for special administration. 'We stand ready should that be required in this case, or in any other case with regulated industries.' Elsewhere in the debate, Labour MP for Eltham and Chislehurst Clive Efford suggested the Government should 'put this company out of its misery'. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice proposed a plan to 'buy it for a pound – it's a good deal for the taxpayer – then it won't have to pay huge, egregious rates of interest, and the taxpayer and the customers will be the beneficiaries'.
