logo
From courthouse ambushes to citizen deportations, Trump is weaponizing immigration fear

From courthouse ambushes to citizen deportations, Trump is weaponizing immigration fear

Yahoo22-05-2025
Activists protest the agenda of President Donald Trump during a rally near the water tower on the Magnificent Mile on Jan. 25, 2025, in Chicago, Illinois. (Photo by)
A day doesn't pass now that someone in America, almost invariably someone who is not white, is getting snatched off the street, jerked off a worksite or out of their home, or sometimes arrested after appearing at what they thought would be a routine immigration hearing.
In Phoenix recently, after learning their court cases were cancelled, multiple immigrants were taken into custody by federal agents lying in wait in the courthouse's hallways and parking lot. The Arizona Mirror reported agents were also detaining people that day after hearings at other immigration courts across the country.
An attorney for one of those arrested this week in Phoenix told a local reporter, 'The majority of them are going to be waking up tomorrow in their own countries.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
President Donald Trump's mass deportation plan is barreling forward with little regard for due process or long established civil and human rights norms.
The result has been that the lives of thousands of immigrant families are being needlessly disrupted — or outright destroyed — with potentially millions more in danger of falling prey to the president's white nationalist, anti-immigrant crusade.
The truth is that the overwhelming majority of migrants to the U.S. mean us no harm, even if many of them have violated civil laws by entering the country illegally or overstaying their visas.
Do some immigrants commit serious crimes? Yes. But decades of research has shown that immigrants in the U.S., including undocumented immigrants, commit fewer crimes on average than people who were born here.
Most arrive in this country filled with hopes, dreams and a longing to share in the aspirational mission — as flawed as it has been — of the world's richest and oldest democracy. But Trump and his Republican abettors would have us believe that immigration authorities are just trying to protect us from what the president falsely describes as a relentless assault by foreign-born rapists, murderers and child molesters who come here determined to destroy our way of life.
It's Trump's latest Big Lie — the first being his groundless assertion that he won the 2020 election — and the sort of grotesque propaganda the president uses to dredge up popular support for his agenda.
No, Mr. Trump, you lost that election and migrants are not trying to kill us. Rather, it's the opposite: they're largely trying to emulate us. Like most of us, they want to live in a safe, prosperous, law-abiding democratic society, as opposed to the often violent or economically distressed nations they left behind.
What's so dangerous about Trump's endless torrent of lies about immigrants is that it has already had dangerous — and even deadly — consequences.
The lies he told in 2017 in his first term as president about a 'Hispanic invasion' and 'open borders' were amplified in the manifesto of a man who drove from his Dallas suburb to gun down 23 people in El Paso, most of them were U.S.-born Latinos or Mexicans.
The lies he told in 2018 about wealthy Jews financing immigrant caravans from Honduras, which the president also claimed were infiltrated by Middle East terrorists, inspired a racist gunman to slaughter 11 people in a Pittsburgh synagogue.
The lies he told last year in his run for reelection about Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, most of whom came here to flee violence in their homeland, eating dogs and cats forced that community to cower in fear.
Fast forward to today and Trump's foot soldiers in the Department of Homeland Security are jailing immigrants who've dared to exercise their constitutionally protected right to free speech. They've deported Venezuelans and others without due process and they've begun to defy federal courts to end these abuses.
They've even deported U.S. citizens to countries they've never been to.
Most disturbingly, they're rounding up droves of otherwise law-abiding men, women and children across the country, people who truly help make this nation stronger every day, despite this administration's early pronouncements that it was going to focus its immigration enforcement efforts on expelling 'the worst of the worst.'
There is a maliciousness about the way Trump is executing his immigration policy. The goal isn't just to hunt down and deport as many undocumented immigrants as possible, but to instill deep-seated terror in the communities they are targeting.
Why else would you deport a Honduran mother and her U.S.-born, four-year-old child suffering from cancer? Why else would unidentified masked agents scoop an international college student off the streets and toss her in prison for the 'crime' of writing an op-ed criticizing our country's foreign policy, an act that is explicitly protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution?
The very act that I am engaged in now.
Before our Civil War, escaped slaves were tracked and recaptured by their owners and opportunistic bounty hunters. Decades of Jim Crow saw African Americans stalked and lynched by the thousands. And between 1910 and 1920, scholars say the Texas Rangers pursued and summarily executed, often without having ever been charged with a crime, thousands of Mexican Americans and Mexicans to drive them off property their families had inherited under Spanish land grants before the U.S. invasion of Mexico in the mid-1800s.
You see, Brown people — my people — have been hunted before, but our communities have survived to tell the story.
We're being hunted again, and we'll survive to tell this story as well.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This MAGA "Biggest Loser" Star Had A Huge Meltdown Defending White People During A Talk About Slavery On CNN
This MAGA "Biggest Loser" Star Had A Huge Meltdown Defending White People During A Talk About Slavery On CNN

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

This MAGA "Biggest Loser" Star Had A Huge Meltdown Defending White People During A Talk About Slavery On CNN

Biggest Loser coach and Donald Trump supporter Jillian Michaels had a stunning meltdown Wednesday night while defending white people during a fiery debate about the president's efforts to rewrite US history. Michaels appeared on a CNN NewsNight panel with conservative commentator Scott Jennings, Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.), Democratic strategist Julie Roginsky, and legal analyst Elie Honig to discuss Trump's pick for Kennedy Center honoree. The conversation took a sharp turn when Roginsky, discussing changes Trump has spearheaded at the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian Institution, accused the president of 'trying to change culture' and revise history so it does not offend his MAGA base. Related: 'Can you address some of those things in there? Because have you looked at some of the things in there?' Michaels asked, referring to historical displays at the Smithsonian Institution. 'Yeah. Yes, slavery was a bad thing we should talk about,' Roginsky said before Michaels interrupted. 'He's not whitewashing slavery,' the fitness guru argued. 'And you cannot tie imperialism and racism and slavery to just one race, which is pretty much what every single exhibit does.' @Acyn/ CNN / Via Related: The CNN panel erupted in cross-talk, and Michaels turned to Torres and asked, 'Do you realize that only less than 2% of white Americans owned slaves?' citing a contested figure. 'But it was a system of white supremacy,' Torres responded. As people continued to talk over each other, Michaels added that slavery is thousands of years old, but was interrupted by a stunned Phillip, who said she was 'surprised' that her guest was 'trying to litigate who was the beneficiary of slavery.' 'In the context of American history, what are you saying is incorrect by saying it was white people oppressing Black people?' Phillip asked. 'Every single thing is like, oh, no, no, no, this is all because 'white people bad,' and that's just not the truth,' Michaels said. Related: Michaels then characterized a Smithsonian exhibit as claiming that people 'migrated from Cuba because 'white people bad,'' before accusing Roginsky of not knowing what's in the museum. But the exhibit Michaels called out didn't actually appear to make that argument. Later that night, she posted a photo of an exhibit that names US foreign policy as a contributor to political instability in Cuba and the Dominican Republic. The pictured exhibit did not expressly mention white people at all, except to note that some of the first Cubans to immigrate to the US were 'wealthy White Cubans.' @jillianmichaels / Via During her appearance on CNN, the fitness influencer also griped about other elements of the Smithsonian.'Do you know that when you walk in the front door, the first thing you see is the gay flag?' asked Michaels, who is married to a woman. She then started to criticize an exhibit that touches on gender testing in sports before Phillip interjected, 'We don't have time to litigate all of this.' Related: 'Of course we don't, because then you're going to lose the argument, and if everything is racialized, just like you're trying to do to me now,' Michaels told Phillip. 'Excuse me? Jillian, you brought up race,' Phillip said. 'This was a conversation about the arts, and you brought up race.' @Acyn/ CNN / Via This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:

Little Sisters of the Poor are still fighting ObamaCare— as states force nuns to violate their faith
Little Sisters of the Poor are still fighting ObamaCare— as states force nuns to violate their faith

New York Post

time16 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Little Sisters of the Poor are still fighting ObamaCare— as states force nuns to violate their faith

It's enraging. More than a decade after the Obama administration first tried to force the Little Sisters of the Poor to buy contraception including abortifacient drugs for employees, states are still hounding the nuns in court. At its heart, ObamaCare was a massive welfare program meant to redistribute health-care costs to the middle class. But it was also a social engineering project aimed at coercing religious organizations and businesses to adopt progressive values. The Affordable Care Act mandated employers, including nonprofits such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, to pay for contraceptives in their worker-provided health insurance as an 'essential health benefit' under the euphemistic category of 'preventative and wellness services.' There was no 'religious exemption.' It's worth taking a step back and thinking about that term: The very idea that an American citizen should be impelled to ask the state for an 'exemption' to practice their faith is an assault on the fundamental idea of liberty. Imagine having to ask the state for an exemption to exercise your free speech? What makes the case even more unsettling, of course, is that the state is demanding citizens engage in activity that is explicitly against their faith. Now, there may well be numerous theological disputes within the Catholic Church. The use of contraception and abortion aren't among them. There is absolutely no question that nuns hold genuine, long-standing religious convictions. And there is no question that liberals want to smash them. Nevertheless, the Little Sisters spent years in court, working their way up to the Supreme Court and winning protections against the federal government (twice). In 2017, the Trump administration exempted religious groups like the Little Sisters from the ObamaCare mandate entirely. The government, however, bolstered with unlimited taxpayer funds, can hunt its prey in perpetuity. So states such as New Jersey and Pennsylvania began their own lawsuits against the Little Sisters. This week, in a nationwide ruling, Judge Wendy Beetlestone, chief judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, found that the Trump administration's expansion of religious exemptions from the contraception mandate was 'arbitrary and capricious.' Religious nonprofit groups and businesses will again have to ask for special accommodations from the Department of Health and Human Services to avoid buying abortifacients. Even if the Trump administration grants every one of them, one day there will be authoritarians in charge who won't — and nonprofit employees will still be guaranteed contraception through health plans paid for by employers. Beetlestone, incidentally, was the same judge who issued a nationwide injunction against the contraception exemption back in 2017, arguing it was 'difficult' to think of any rule that 'intrudes more into the lives of women.' The Supreme Court overturned it in 2020 by a 7-2 majority. Because no one has a right to free condoms. Indeed, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act holds that the state must have a 'compelling interest' and use the least restrictive means when burdening religious practice. Free birth control isn't a compelling interest. And fining religious organizations millions of dollars to pressure them into abandoning their beliefs is perhaps the most restrictive means of action, short of throwing nuns in prison. You'd think attacking a group of nuns who offer end-of-life care for the elderly would be a public relations nightmare for Democrats. Yet they've never really shied away from it. Because the point is to intimidate others. In many ways, the Little Sisters' struggle is reminiscent of the travails of Jack Phillips, the Colorado baker who refuses to create unique message cakes for gay weddings. Phillips is now embroiled in his umpteenth court case over his crimes. The message: Dissent from those who practice their faith will be punished. Take the Catholic Charities adoption agencies, which shuttered in numerous states due to laws and policies compelling them to place children with same-sex couples. The attacks will continue until the Supreme Court upholds the clear language and intent of the First Amendment and religious liberty. It's already punted once: In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, a 7-2 Supreme Court decision in favor of Jack Phillips, the court barred the state's attacks only if state officials openly demeaned their target's faith — a ruling so narrow as to be largely useless. But it shouldn't matter why the state is steamrolling the religious liberty of nuns, or anyone else for that matter. The problem is that the ObamaCare mandate is authoritarian and unconstitutional. And the only way to fix that problem is to overturn it. David Harsanyi is a senior writer at the Washington Examiner. Twitter @davidharsanyi

California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House
California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House

Chicago Tribune

time16 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House

LOS ANGELES — California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday his state will hold a Nov. 4 special election to seek approval of redrawn districts intended to give Democrats five more U.S. House seats in the fight for control of Congress. The move is a direct response to a similar Republican-led effort in Texas, pushed by President Donald Trump as his party seeks to maintain its slim House majority in the midterm elections. The nation's two most populous states have emerged as the center of a partisan turf war in the House that could spiral into other states — as well as the courts — in what amounts to a proxy war ahead of the 2026 elections. Texas lawmakers are considering a new map that could help them send five more Republicans to Washington. Democrats who so far have halted a vote by leaving the state announced Thursday that they will return home if Texas Republicans end their current special session and California releases its own recast map proposal. Both were expected to happen Friday. However, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to call another special session to push through new maps. Texas House Democrats planning their departure from Illinois and back to AustinIn Los Angeles, Newsom staged what amounted to a campaign kickoff rally for the as-yet unreleased new maps with the state's Democratic leadership in a downtown auditorium packed with union members, legislators and abortion rights supporters. Newsom and other speakers veered from discussing the technical grist of reshaping districts — known as redistricting — and instead depicted the looming battle as a conflict with all things Trump, tying it explicitly to the fate of American democracy. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said. 'We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future.' An overarching theme was the willingness to stand up to Trump, a cheer-inducing line for Democrats as the party looks to regroup from its 2024 losses. 'Donald Trump, you have poked the bear and we will punch back,' said Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential contender. Thursday's announcement marks the first time any state beyond Texas has officially waded into the mid-decade redistricting fight. The Texas plan was stalled when minority Democrats fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts on Aug. 3 to stop the Legislature from passing any bills. Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write new maps. In Missouri, a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. In California, lawmakers must officially declare the special election, which they plan to do next week after voting on the new maps. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — and Newsom said he's not worried about winning the required support from two-thirds of lawmakers to advance the maps. Newsom encouraged other Democratic-led states to get involved. 'We need to stand up — not just California. Other blue states need to stand up,' Newsom said. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among states that rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The California map would take effect only if a Republican state moves forward, and it would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Some people already have said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy — running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. Outside Newsom's news conference Thursday, U.S. Border Patrol agents conducted patrols, drawing condemnation from the governor and others. 'We're here making Los Angeles a safer place since we don't have politicians that will do that,' Gregory Bovino, chief of the patrol's El Centro, California, sector, told a reporter with KTTV in Los Angeles. He said he didn't know Newsom was inside nearby.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store