Who gets to lift over 8,500 kg of glass? Kochi startup, trade union face off in 4-day deadlock
The deadlock began last Tuesday after the trade union workers insisted on unloading toughened glass panels - over 100 panels, each weighing 85 kg - themselves despite being told that the fragile material required skilled handling using proper safety equipment.
The incident gained traction after coverage by Malayalam media and after one of the interior firm's founders took to LinkedIn to highlight what he called the "hard truth about starting a business in Kerala".
Speaking to HT.com, Louis Issac, co-founder of Idea House Coworking, confirmed that the standoff with CITU workers has now been resolved and that they were charged ₹30,000 by the union for unloading and moving the material.
"They only placed it in the 10-metre limit. From there we had to move it," Issac said.
The issue sparked a discussion online, with many agreeing with the entrepreneurs' call for a more business-friendly environment in the state. The episode also brought back to light the issue of the banned "Nokku Kooli", a fee charged by trade union workers for the work either done by machine or others as their right. Nokku Kooli was banned in 2018 by the Left government but it is still prevalent in many parts of Kerala.
"The government must either disband the union or provide them with proper technical and safety training. Otherwise, we will not cooperate," Issac told HT.com, adding that a group of startup founders in Kerala has sought a meeting with Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan to put forth their demands.
"If unresolved, we're planning a statewide entrepreneurs' rally," he said.
Before the standoff was resolved, the police intervened and called both the workers and the entrepreneurs - Issac and his partner Anto Raffy - to the station for mediation.
In June, a car dealership worker at Kochi died after being crushed by a Range Rover while the luxury car was being unloaded from a trailer reportedly by a trade union worker.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
JLR CEO Adrian Mardell retires amid backlash over Jaguar rebranding
Jaguar Land Rover Chief Executive Officer Adrian Mardell is leaving the maker of luxury sport utility vehicles, as it grapples with higher US tariffs and a controversial makeover of the Jaguar brand. 'Adrian Mardell has expressed his desire to retire from JLR after three years as CEO and 35 years with the company,' a spokesperson said in a statement. 'His successor will be announced in due course.' Mardell's departure marks the latest CEO change at a major automaker after new leaders for Renault SA, Stellantis NV and Volvo Car AB. The industry has been battered by a drop in sales in China, weak demand for electric vehicles in Europe, and more recently US President Donald Trump's trade onslaught. JLR, owned by India's Tata Motors Ltd., was among a number of carmakers to withhold profit guidance at the height of the US tariff uncertainty. JLR, which makes the Range Rover and Land Rover SUVs, does not have any US factories. A video last year teasing Jaguar's revamp as an electric-only brand received intense criticism. Jaguar isn't making any cars until the new lineup is ready. During Mardell's tenure, JLR pushed ahead with a strategy of developing fully electric options for all its models by the end of the decade. It's gearing up for the first: the electric Range Rover.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
JLR CEO Adrian Mardell to retire after transformative three-year tenure
Adrian Mardell, Chief Executive Officer of Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), will step down from his role after nearly three years at the helm and a 35-year career at the company. His successor will be announced in due course, Autocar reports. Mardell took charge in 2023 following the abrupt departure of Thierry Bolloré and has since led the British luxury carmaker through one of its most pivotal transformations. His tenure was marked by a significant financial turnaround, a renewed retail strategy, and the early stages of JLR's shift to an all-electric portfolio. Under his leadership, JLR returned to profitability, driven by strong global demand for its high-margin models, notably the Defender and the Range Rover. These successes helped put the company on track to achieve its targeted 10 per cent operating margin by FY26. Key achievements under his leadership He also oversaw the rollout of JLR's 'House of Brands' strategy, positioning Defender, Discovery, Range Rover, and Jaguar as distinct entities, each with its own brand identity and customer base. But perhaps the most ambitious of Mardell's initiatives has been Jaguar's repositioning as a premium all-electric brand, aimed at rivalling the likes of Bentley rather than BMW or Mercedes-Benz. This new direction was crystallised in the unveiling of the Jaguar Type 00 concept – a dramatic four-door GT EV that Mardell himself described as 'the most fun I've had' during his time at the company. The production version of the car is currently in the final testing phase and is expected to be unveiled by the end of 2025, with a market launch planned for mid-2026. A tough road for JLR Mardell departs at a time when JLR is on firmer ground but still faces headwinds. Chief among them are trade-related hurdles, including newly imposed US tariffs on foreign-built vehicles. While the UK recently negotiated a tariff cap with the US — lowering duties on the first 100,000 vehicles to 10 per cent — units above that limit, including some models built in Slovakia, will attract the full 25 per cent rate. Moreover, the global premium EV market remains volatile, prompting delays such as the Range Rover EV, which was initially slated for a 2025 launch. The company has yet to announce a revised timeline for the model or clarify the production schedule for the new Jaguar EVs.
Hindustan Times
a day ago
- Hindustan Times
The remarkable rise of 'greenhushing'
Read the headlines and the easy conclusion is that big business has abandoned the fight against climate change. In the past two weeks BP, an oil giant, sold its American onshore-wind business; Jaguar Land Rover, a carmaker, has reportedly delayed the launch of its new electric Range Rover; and HSBC, a bank, left the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (nzba), a group committed to lending in a greener way. But these bits of news are only part of the picture. Taken as a whole, companies are quietly making progress on their climate goals. Consider a report published in March by PWC, an auditor. It found that of the 4,000-odd firms that reported climate commitments last year to the CDP, a non-profit, only 16% dialled back their goals, while 47% stood by them and 37% became more ambitious. The analysis also found that 67% of companies with targets were on track to meet them, a proportion which had inched up by three percentage points compared with 2023. Once firms were accused of 'greenwashing': making nonsense promises, and doing nothing to achieve them. Now they seem to be 'greenhushing'—getting on with the job of decarbonisation, without making a fuss. Firms are also improving the rigour of their targets. Some are moving away from using ineffective carbon offsets to claim carbon neutrality, says Thomas Day of the NewClimate Institute, a think-tank. That includes Microsoft, Google and easyJet. Our analysis of data from the Science Based Targets initiative (sbti), a non-profit that verifies climate goals, shows that the share of firms that target 'scope three' emissions (a category which includes pollution created in their supply chain and from the use of their products) in their goals rose from 28% in 2022 to 67% in 2024. This is welcome news because when businesses set green goals, decarbonisation tends to follow. MSCI, a provider of stockmarket indices, looked at the 2,400 or so large and medium-sized companies in their global index. In the past three years those with a climate target saw a 8% drop in their emissions intensity (defined as emissions from a firm's operations and from purchased energy per dollar of revenue). That figure declined by only 3% for those without a target. Even if this is promising, plenty of problems remain. One is that the sectors where there is backsliding are particularly crucial to slowing climate change. That includes the oil-and-gas industry, which is struggling to find a way to decarbonise profitably. Murray Auchincloss, bp's boss, announced a shift away from renewable energy and back to fossil fuels in a 'fundamental reset' earlier this year. On July 22nd news broke that Shell, Enbridge and Aker bp, three oil companies, quit the sbti's advisory group set up to define what 'net zero' means for oil companies. They reportedly left because they were told achieving it would mean not developing new oil and gas fields. Financial institutions are also backsliding. Along with hsbc, big American banks including Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have dropped out of the nzba, as have some from Japan and Canada. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, a think-tank, estimates that the leavers account for two-fifths of the group's total assets. The same problems are afflicting similar organisations, such as the Net Zero Asset Managers initiative. Last year Wells Fargo, another bank, scrapped its green-lending plans and in March Switzerland's ubs pushed back its climate targets after acquiring Credit Suisse. Part of the problem for financial institutions is politics, which was shifting even before Donald Trump returned to the White House. In America Republican senators have suggested that joining a green alliance could breach antitrust rules. Since Mr Trump's re-election the pressure has been cranked up. In January ten attorneys-general wrote to America's biggest financial firms, including BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, threatening legal action if the companies did not change their climate and diversity policies. As a consequence, even companies that have continued to take action to decarbonise have grown more reluctant to parade their efforts. The number of times climate change is mentioned on earnings calls of companies in the s&p 500 or stoxx Europe 600 indices has dropped from 427 in the first quarter of 2022 to 246 in the first three months of this year. If they can no longer boast about their targets, then some firms might start to question whether setting them is worthwhile. Already companies that hoped their green credentials would give them a share-price boost as money flooded into sustainable-investment funds have been disappointed. Yet the fact that many are quietly persevering with decarbonisation points to a more comforting conclusion: that they realise that taking action is beneficial to their bottom lines, no matter what politicians say or do. If the worst accusation that environmentalists can level at a company is its tendency to greenhush, then that is surely a sign of progress. To stay on top of the biggest stories in business and technology, sign up to the Bottom Line, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
