Lammy hit with legal threat over Israel links to Foreign Office jobs scheme
In a pre-action letter to the Foreign Secretary, environmental charity The Corner House raised 'serious concerns' about potential conflicts of interest. It urged officials to explain whether BAE employees would be involved in shaping policy.
In particular, the charity demanded answers from the Government as to whether BAE staff would be involved in matters relating to ' potential or actual genocide in Palestine' and the 'licensing of arms exports'.
The legal threat emerged after Mr Lammy invited staff from BAE and Shell to swap jobs with diplomats in Whitehall to help 'champion their interests overseas'.
The Corner House, which has instructed lawyers at Leigh Day, called on the Foreign Office to 'confirm whether embedded BAE Systems staff will be involved directly or indirectly in advising, commenting, deciding on law and/or policy relating to trade and/or foreign affairs (including humanitarian affairs)'.
Without an adequate response, the charity said it was prepared to launch legal proceedings about the scheme's lawfulness.
Nicholas Hildyard, who founded The Corner House, said: 'This scheme cries out for judicial scrutiny.
'Seconding employees from powerful corporations to the Foreign Office or other ministries (and vice versa) is a recipe for potential serious conflicts of interest.'
BAE Systems is currently one of the biggest exporters of British arms to Israel through a US-run scheme that enables the sale of F-35 jet parts to the Israel Defence Forces.
A BAE spokesman said: 'We do not have operations or employees based in Israel or Gaza and we do not currently sell military equipment directly to the Government of Israel.'
The legal letter comes after the Foreign Office last September suspended 30 licences that had allowed British companies to sell arms to be used in Gaza.
This decision was made amid concerns the weapons could be used to 'commit or facilitate serious violations of International Humanitarian Law'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The handshake that shook the world: Why Putin left grinning and Trump insisted he'd stood firm after three-hour meeting to change history
In the end, the 'Don and Vlad' show ended without a big finale. After nearly three hours behind closed doors in Alaska, Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin emerged like heavyweight prize fighters who had fought each other to a standstill. They proceeded to talk briefly to the millions watching with bated breath on TV but revealed no specifics of what they had discussed. The only conclusion for those in Kyiv, and in European capitals, was that the encounter had ended in stalemate, and there would be no immediate ceasefire in the Ukraine war. Putin spoke first, and seemed the happier, jauntily inviting Trump to Moscow for another meeting. He and Trump had reached an 'understanding,' Putin said, as he ominously warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' Trump called the summit 'very productive' but said there were a 'couple of quite big' issues not agreed. He later seemed more optimistic and rated it '10/10.' For Trump, it was undoubtedly a historic achievement to get Putin to the negotiating table at all, and a starting point for what may be a long road to peace, and a Nobel Prize. But for Kremlin watchers it looked like Putin had achieved his two main goals - a return to the world stage, and buying more time to make military gains in Ukraine. By agreeing to the meeting Putin avoided further impending U.S. sanctions, and by then not agreeing to a ceasefire he kicked the diplomatic can down the road. Putin's troops are currently advancing in Ukraine, so it was always going to be to his advantage to delay Trump's demands for a ceasefire, and seek a better deal later. Indeed, on the eve of the summit Putin bombed Ukraine yet again with a ballistic missile, and his troops advanced six miles towards the eastern town of Dobropillia. The starting points for the summit had never been entirely promising. Putin wanted Ukrainian territory but the extent of his demands had been shrouded in uncertainty, due in part to apparent previous misunderstandings with Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff. Trump was prepared for 'land swaps' but had agreed not to make any commitments without the approval of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited. Zelensky wanted a ceasefire before any discussion on territory. Meanwhile, European leaders wanted post-war security guarantees for Ukraine. And Putin wanted Ukraine membership of NATO ruled out, which was a diplomatic non-starter. However, for Ukraine, and its European allies, there was some relief that no harm was done in Alaska. They had feared a repetition of Yalta, the 1945 conference where Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin decided the fate of European counties without them being represented at the negotiating table. Russia occupies about one fifth of Ukraine, including large parts of Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, areas rich in coal and gas, and other minerals like lithium. With Zelensky not in Alaska, he and European allies were concerned about a 'Yalta 2,' with Trump handing over parts of Ukraine's territory to Putin. Trump's detractors had also cast him the role of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.'" Chamberlain gave the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia to Hitler and then infamously claimed that he had achieved 'peace for our time.' The following year, the world was at war. Trump showed in Alaska that he is no Chamberlain. Instead, he is a man with a strong dislike for people trying to pull the wool over his eyes. Last month, he lamented: 'We get a lot of bulls*** thrown at us by Putin, if you want to know the truth. He's very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' There was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. In Alaska, there was also no repeat of the 2018 meeting in Helsinki when Trump was widely criticized for siding with Putin over his own intelligence agencies, denying that Russia had interfered in the 2016 election. Unlike Helsinki, Trump took the decision not to meet Putin alone this time. Instead, he brought into the room a diplomatic 'good cop' and 'bad cop'. The 'good cop' was Witkoff, who has built up a rapport with Putin over several long meetings. The 'bad cop' was Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has in the past savaged Putin as a 'thug and gangster.' In one sense, just being in Alaska was a victory for Putin, a man responsible for launching the largest land war in Europe since 1945. He is, officially, an internationally wanted war crimes suspect after a warrant for his arrest was issued by the International Criminal Court in March 2023. The summit allowed him to become the first Russian leader to set foot in Alaska since Tsar Alexander II sold it to the U.S. in 1867. Trump effectively brought him in from his three-and-a-half year exile as a global pariah. Despite the challenges the summit had begun in a hopeful atmosphere. On the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Trump's Air Force One sat next to Putin's so-called 'Flying Kremlin,' an Ilyushin Il-96-300PU aircraft. Trump disembarked first and played the perfect host, standing at the end of an ultra-long red carpet as Putin descended the steps and walked briskly toward him. The American leader applauded Putin on his walk and then deployed what body language experts call a 'clasp and yank' handshake - gripping Putin's hand and pulling the Russian toward him. Putin resisted the power play and stood his ground as they locked hands for 20 seconds, with Putin telling Trump he had come to 'help.' As they walked up another stretch of red carpet, past two parked U.S. jets, there were pats on the back and a few pleasantries. Putin paused and gazed up as there was a flyby of a B2 bomber and four F-35 fighter jets. He looked impressed. The two men then stood on a stage over the words 'Alaska 2025.' Trump's carefully choreographed welcome was upended when an American reporter yelled at Putin: 'Will you stop killing civilians? Putin shrugged pointed to his ear as if couldn't hear. They then headed toward Trumps armored limousine, 'The Beast.' Putin appeared to chuckle as he got in the back with Trump for what was likely to be their only one-on-one encounter. After they arrived at the venue for the meeting they sat with advisers for photographs. Putin again appeared rattled as a reporter yelled: 'Mr Putin, will you commit to a ceasefire? Will you commit to not killing any more civilians?' He cupped his hands to his face and appeared to mouth 'I can't hear you.' Ahead of the meeting, Putin sought to smooth Trump's ego, praising his 'energetic and sincere efforts to end the conflict.' On top of that, he offered a carrot, that a deal could lead to talks on 'strategic offensive arms control,' a clear reference to a potential nuclear arms deal. Russia and the United States have by far the biggest arsenals of nuclear weapons in the world. The last remaining pillar of nuclear arms control between the two countries is the New Strategic Arms Reduction (New START) treaty, which expires in February. But, as Trump found out, pushing Putin into a ceasefire will be an uphill struggle. Not all wars end at the negotiating table. According to research by the Hague Center for Strategic Studies between 1946 and 2005 only 30 percent of wars between countries ended in a ceasefire, and only 16 percent in a peace agreement. It found 21 percent ended in a decisive victory, and 33 percent in some other form like a stalemate or ongoing low-level conflict. When there was a negotiated settlement in 50 percent of hose cases the counties were at war again within five years.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Melania Trump sends letter to Putin about abducted children
ANCHORAGE, Alaska, Aug 15 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's wife, Melania Trump, raised the plight of children in Ukraine and Russia in a personal letter to Russian President Vladimir Putin, two White House officials said on Friday. President Trump hand-delivered the letter to Putin during their summit talks in Alaska, the officials told Reuters. Slovenian-born Melania Trump was not on the trip to Alaska. The officials would not divulge the contents of the letter other than to say it mentioned the abductions of children resulting from the war in Ukraine. The existence of the letter was not previously reported. Russia's seizure of Ukrainian children has been a deeply sensitive one for Ukraine. Ukraine has called the abductions of tens of thousands of its children taken to Russia or Russian-occupied territory without the consent of family or guardians a war crime that meets the U.N. treaty definition of genocide. Previously Moscow has said it has been protecting vulnerable children from a war zone. The United Nations Human Rights Office has said Russia has inflicted suffering on millions of Ukrainian children and violated their rights since its full scale invasion of Ukraine begun in 2022. Trump and Putin met for nearly three hours at a U.S. military base in Anchorage without reaching a ceasefire deal in the war in Ukraine.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
AntiSocial Asylum hotels
Anger has flared outside hotels used to house asylum seekers. Protestors say they are worried about illegal migration, cost to the taxpayer and a lack of consultation, but one issue seems to spark even more concern - the safety of women and children. Opponents have accused protestors of racism and whipping up hate. Is there any evidence that asylum seekers are more likely to commit sexual offences? We trace the clamour for more data to answer that question. Police have been given new guidance on disclosing the ethnicity and nationality of suspects in criminal cases - especially high profile ones. What might be the effect? And why are so many asylum seekers currently housed in hotels anyway? We hear how the system is supposed to work and how it's evolved. Presenter: Adam Fleming Producers: Simon Tulett, Natasha Fernandes, Emma Close and Tom Gillett Editor: Penny Murphy Production coordinator: Janet Staples Studio engineer: Annie Gardiner
